References
- Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bassman, M. F., & Harris, K. (2007). Narrating the journey: Immersion learning in the migrant Latino community. Partnerships Perspectives, 4, 62–69.
- Bellinger, A. (2010). Talking about (re)generation: Practice learning as a site of renewal for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2450–2466.
- Bore, A., & Wright, N. (2009). The wicked and complex in education: Developing a transdisciplinary perspective for policy formulation, implementation and professional practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35, 241–256.
- Branom, C. (2012). Community-based participatory research as a social work research and intervention approach. Journal of Community Practice, 20, 260–273.
- Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Brown-Sica, M. (2012). Library spaces for urban, diverse commuter students: A participatory action research project. College & Research Libraries, 73, 217–231.
- Butler, T., Feller, J., Pope, A., Emerson, B., & Murphy, C. (2008). Designing a core IT artefact for knowledge management systems using participatory action research in a government and a non-government organisation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 249–267.
- Chatterjee, S. (2013). Beyond megacities: Next generation urban development in India. In S.Sing (Ed.), Social work and social development: Perspectives from India and the United States (pp. 114–133). Chicago: Lyceum.
- Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers, and students. Chichester: Wiley.
- D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 73–90.
- Deshpande, R. S. (2013). Agrarian transition and farmers' suicides. In S.Sing (Ed.), Social work and social development: Perspectives from India and the United States (pp. 78–99). Chicago: Lyceum.
- Dulmus, C., & Cristalli, M. (2012). A university-community partnership to advance research in practice settings: The HUB research model. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 195–202.
- Dybicz, P. (2004). An inquiry into practice wisdom. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85, 197–203.
- Etowa, J. B., Bernard, W. T., Oyinsan, B., & Clow, B. (2007). Participatory action research (PAR): An approach for improving Black women's health in rural and remote communities. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 18, 349–357.
- Fern, E. (2012). Developing social work practice through engaging practitioners in action research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 156–173.
- Freeman, E. R., Brugge, D., Bennett-Bradley, W. M., Levy, J. I., & Carrasco, E. R. (2006). Challenges of conducting community-based participatory research in Boston's neighborhoods to reduce disparities in Asthma. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 1013–1021.
- Gehlert, S., & Coleman, R. (2010). Using community-based participatory research to ameliorate cancer disparities. Health & Social Work, 35, 302–309.
- Lykes, M., Hershberg, R., & Brabeck, K. (2011). Methodological challenges in participatory action research with undocumented Central American migrants. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 3, 22–35.
- Mezirow, J., & Taylor, E. (2009). Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Ozer, E. J., & Wright, D. (2012). Beyond school spirit: The effects of youth-led participatory action research in two urban high schools. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 267–283.
- Panwar, M (2005, September 23–29). Self help groups in Haryana: Some experiences. Mainstream.
- Panwar, M. (2010). Role of SHGs in strengthening grassroots democracy—experiences of Haryana. Kurukshetra Journal of Rural Development, 58, 52–54.
- Percy, S. L., Zimpher, N. L., & Brukardt, J. M. (2004). Creating a new kind of university: Institutionalizing community-university engagement. In S. L.Percy, N. L.Zimpher, & M.Brukardt (Eds.), Creating a new kind of university: Institutionalizing community-university engagement (pp. 3–22). Bolton, MA: Anker.
- Planning Commission. (2009). Haryana development report. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Sarason, S. (1983). Creation of settings and the future societies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Scharmer, C. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. Cambridge, MA: SoL.
- Senge, P., & Scharmer, O. (2006). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants, and researchers. In P.Reason & H.Bradbury-Huang (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 195–206). London: Sage.
- Sheppard, M. (1995). Social work, social science, and practice wisdom. British Journal of Social Work, 25, 265–293.
- Shulman, L. (2005). Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91, 18–25.
- Smith, L. (2005). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.
- Tsang, N. M. (2008). Kairos and practice wisdom in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 11, 131–143.
- Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 327–339.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaningful, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Wergin, J. (2004). Elements of effective community engagement. In S.Percy, N.Zimpher, & M.Brukardt (Eds.), Creating a new kind of university: Institutionalizing community-university engagement (pp. 23–42). Bolton, MA: Anker.
- Wilson, G., Walsh, T., & Kirby, M. (2008). Developing practice learning: Student perspectives. Social Work Education, 27, 35–50.