Discovery or Construction? Theorising the Roots of Adult Protection Policy and Practice

References

• ARC, NAPSAC (1996). It could never happen here! The prevention and treatment of sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilities in residential settings. Chesterfield and Nottingham: ARC/NAPSAC.
   Google Scholar
• Arnd-Caddigan, M., & Pozzuto, R. (2006). Truth in our time. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, A. (2013). A cognitive mask? Camouflaging dilemmas in street-level policy implementation to safeguard older people from abuse. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 99–115.10.1093/bjsw/bcr161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., & Prior, D. (Eds.). (2009). Subversive citizens: Power, agency and resistance in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2000). Service users’ knowledges and social work theory: Conflict or collaboration? British Journal of Social Work, 30, 489–503.10.1093/bjsw/30.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. (1995). Typification and social problems construction. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2003). But seriously folks: The limitations of a strict constructionist interpretation of social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 51–69). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behaviour and social processes: An interactionist approach (pp. 145–154). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, W. (2013). Experiments in adapting to need: Pragmatism as orienting perspective in clinical social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 27, 259–271.10.1080/02650533.2013.818942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H., & Stein, J. (1998). Implementing adult protection policies in Kent and East Sussex. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 371–396.10.1017/S0047279498005339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2011). ‘Vulnerability’: Handle with care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 313–321.10.1080/17496535.2011.597165
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, H. (2003). Child protection work: Beyond the rhetoric. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2001). Social problems: Sociological perspectives. In M. May, R. Page, & E. Brunsdon (Eds.), Understanding social problems: Issues in social policy (pp. 3–15). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1998). Psychology’s subject: A commentary on the relativism/realism debate. In I. Parker (Ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism (pp. 133–147). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446217412
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, H. (2004). Constructing meanings and identities in child protection practice. Croydon: Tertiary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1993). No longer afraid: The safeguard of older people in domestic settings. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2000). No secrets: Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Doron, I., Alon, S., & Offir, N. (2005). Time for policy: Legislative response to elder abuse and neglect in Israel. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 16, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. (2005). Elder abuse in Africa: What policy and legal provisions are there to address the violence? Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 16, 17–32.10.1300/J084v16n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793358.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, F. (2004). Disability, care and controlling services. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers–Enabling environments (pp. 226–232). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, J., Johnson, F., Daniel, B., & Ferguson, A. (2009). Interagency collaboration in adult support and protection in scotland: Processes and barriers. Volume 1: Main report. Dundee, White Top Research Unit: University of Dundee. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/924/0095150.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Miller, G. (2003). Social constructionism and social problems work. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 70–91). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (1995). The implications of the term ‘elder abuse’ for problem definition and response in health and social welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 24, 493–507.10.1017/S004727940002540X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. (2012a). Problems with the term and concept of `abuse’: Critical reflections on the Scottish Adult Support and Protection study. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 833–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. (2012b). What is an `adult protection’ issue? Victims, perpetrators and the professional construction of adult protection issues. Critical Social Policy, 32, 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelstam, M. (2009). Safeguarding vulnerable adults and the law. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. J., & Dennis, A. (2010). Introduction: The opposition of structure and agency. In P. J. Martin & A. Dennis (Eds.), Human agents and social structures (pp. 3–16) Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCreadie, C., Mathew, D., Filinson, R., & Askham, J. (2008). Ambiguity and cooperation in the implementation of adult protection policy. Social Policy and Administration, 42, 248–266.10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Means, R., Smith, R., & Richards, S. (2008). Community care: Policy and practice (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. J. (2003). Claims-making from the underside: Marginalization and social problems analysis. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 92–119). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Northway, R., Davies, R., Mansell, I., & Jenkins, R. (2007). ‘Policies don’t protect people, it’s how they are implemented’: Policy and practice in protecting people with learning disabilities from abuse. Social Policy and Administration, 41, 86–104.10.1111/spol.2007.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I. (Ed.). (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1991). Governing the family: Child care, child protection and the state. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-21441-9
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ethics of care. British Journal of Social Work, 33(1), 1–16.10.1093/bjsw/33.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2012). Thinking and acting constructively in child protection. In S. L. Witkin (Ed.), Social construction and social work practice (pp. 127–153). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & O’Byrne, P. (2000). Constructive social work: Towards a new practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., & Smith, N. (2009). Adult protection and the law in Scotland. Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Perth & Kinross Council. (2015). Adult support and protection training course. Retrieved from http://localapps.pkc.gov.uk/Training/AdultSupportandProtection/story.html
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Care. (2009). Tell someone: Implementing the adult support and protection (Scotland) Act 2007. ASP Guidance Booklet Scottish Care. Available from http://scottishcare.org/docs/037_280__asp_act_guidance_text_1383758723.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2003). The framework for social work education in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2009). The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007: ‘What it means to me’. Report of a user and carers conference. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2012a). Adult protection training framework. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Support-Social-Care/Adult-Support-Protection/Training-Material/frameworkdiagram
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2012b). Adult support and protection: National training materials: Level 1. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Health/Support-Social-Care/Adult-Support-Protection/Training-Material
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2012c). Adult support and protection: National training materials: Level 2. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Health/Support-Social-Care/Adult-Support-Protection/Training-Material
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2012d). Adult support and protection: National training materials: Level 3. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Health/Support-Social-Care/Adult-Support-Protection/Training-Material
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013). Act against harm. Retrieved from http://www.actagainstharm.org/
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2014). The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007: Code of practice. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scragg, T., & Mantell, A. (2011). Introduction. In T. Scragg & A. Mantell (Eds.), Safeguarding adults in social work (2nd ed), (pp. 1–5). Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood-Johnson, F. (2013). Constructions of vulnerability in comparative perspective: Scottish protection policies and the trouble with `adults at risk’. Disability and Society, 28, 908–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood-Johnson, F. (2014). A different kind of practice? Meanings attached by practitioners to the idea of `adult protection’. Journal of Social Work, 14, 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, P. (1999). Elder abuse as harm to older adults: The relevance of age. In P. Slater & M. Eastman (Eds.), Elder abuse: Critical issues in policy and practice (pp. 38–54). London: Age Concern England.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. (2012). Supporting vulnerable adults: Citizenship, capacity, choice. Edinburgh: Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & White, S. (2006). Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 937–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., & Dodd, K. (2003). Knowledge and attitudes of staff towards adult protection. Journal of Adult Protection, 5, 26–32.10.1108/14668203200300031
   Google Scholar