Social work undergraduates and service users as co-learners and researchers

References

• Barnes, M., Taylor, D., & Ward, L. (2013). Being well enough in old age. Critical Social Policy, 33, 473–493.10.1177/0261018312471163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M., Koppel, I., & Reeves, S. (2000). Evaluations of interprofessional education: A United Kingdom review for health and social care. London: CAIPE/British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• BASW. (2014). The code of ethics for social workers: Statement of principles. Retrieved from http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_95243-9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell, L., & Clancy, C. (2013). Postgraduate students learning about research: Exploring the attitudes of social work and mental health students in an English university setting. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 16, 37–50.10.1921/2803160204
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society, 1, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2008). Democratising social work – A key element of innovation: From “client” as object, to service user as producer. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 13, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Biskin, S., Barcroft, V., Livingston, W., & Snape, S. (2013). Reflections on student, service user and carer involvement in social work research. Social Work Education, 32, 301–316.10.1080/02615479.2012.656267
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, T., & Howard, A. (2015). Engaging undergraduate social work students in research through experience-based learning. Social Work Education, 34, 861–880.10.1080/02615479.2015.1065809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delman, J., & Lincoln, A. (2009). Service users as paid research workers: Principles for active involvement and good practice guidance. In J. Wallcraft, B. Schrank, & M. Amering (Eds.), Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research (pp. 139–151). Oxford: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743157.ch10
   Google Scholar
• French, S., & Swain, J. (2001). The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), The handbook of disability studies (pp. 735–738). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, S., Turner, K., & Neffgen, M. (2015). How does who we are shape the knowledge we produce?: Doing collaborative research about personality disorders. In P. Staddon (Ed.), Mental health service users in research: Critical sociological perspectives (pp. 53–68). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, C., Hantman, S., Criden, W., Ben-Oz, M., Anghel, R., & Ramon, S. (2014). Involving service users in social work education:  Developing a bi-national participatory action research framework. Educational Gerontology, 40, 186–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, C., Kraiem, Y., Criden, W., & Yalon-Chamovitz, S. (2012). Deconstructing hierarchies: A pedagogical model with service user co-teachers. Social Work Education, 31, 202–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, K. (2013). Community-based participatory action research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, A., Maguire, G., Watts, M., Rani, S., & Alexander, J. (2011). Service user involvement in mental health practitioner education in Ireland. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18, 519–525.10.1111/jpm.2011.18.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetter, C., Williamson Sullenberger, S., & Wood, L. (2013). The key to learning: Engaging undergraduate students in authentic social work research. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 18 (Special issue), 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A., & Lovell, A. (2012). Participatory action research: Moving beyond the mental health ‘service user’ identity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20, 641–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, G., & French, R. (2011). A new pedagogical approach for integrating social work students and service users. Social Work Education, 30, 948–963.10.1080/02615479.2010.516357
   Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M., & Barak, A. (2006). Service users’ perspectives on the benefits system in Israel: A participatory action research. Social Policy & Administration, 40, 774–790.10.1111/spol.2006.40.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysik, J., & Finn, J. (2013). Research for effective social work practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, C. L., Lietz, C. A., & Furman, R. (2007). A model for teaching qualitative research methods to undergraduate social work students. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 12, 70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maglajlic, R. A. (2010). “Big organisations” supporting “small involvement”: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina on enabling community-based participation of children through PAR. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 204–214.10.1007/s10464-010-9322-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2006). Involving young service users as co-researchers: Possibilities, benefits and costs. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 1395–1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicoll, P. (1999). Issues in teaching participatory action research. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux, J., & Irvine, J. (2004). Service user and carer involvement in social work training: A long and winding road? Social Work Education, 23, 293–308.10.1080/0261547042000224047
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., & Jones, D. (2009). Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students’ knowledge and practice: A literature review. Medical Teacher, 31, 82–95.10.1080/01421590802526946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenshtern, M., Freymond, N., Agyapong, S., & Greeson, C. (2011). Graduate social work students’ attitudes toward research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 552–568.10.1080/08841233.2011.615287
   Google Scholar
• Munn-Giddings, C., McVicar, A., Boyce, M., & O’Brien, N. (2009). Older people as researchers – Why not? An overview of a partnership project to train older people to be researchers. Working with Older People, 13, 16–19.10.1108/13663666200900065
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2014). Doing research inclusively: Bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 102–109.10.1111/bld.2014.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, E. (2013). The poverty challenge of administrative law. Tel Aviv: Resling (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Ramon, S. (Ed.). (2003). Users researching health and social care: An empowering agenda? Birmingham, AL: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, M. 2007. Redressing the balance? The participation of older people in research. In M. Bernard and Scharf, T. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on ageing societies (pp. 73–87). Bristol: The Polity Press.10.1332/policypress/9781861348906.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2013). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in social work education: A literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 925–944.10.1093/bjsw/bcs025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schahar, E., & Shemer, O. (2012). We’ll learn with the community: A narrative approach and learning in partnership through dialogue in community work, Society and Welfare, 4, 553–577 ( in hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Scheyett, A., & Diehl, M. J. (2004). Walking our talk in social work education: Partnering with consumers of mental health services. Social Work Education, 23, 435–450.10.1080/0261547042000245035
   Google Scholar
• Secret, M., Ford, J., & Lewis Rompf, E. (2003). Undergraduate research courses. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R., & Sykes, I. (2002). Introducing structured dialogue with people with mental illness into the training of social work students. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26, 63–69.10.2975/26.2002.63.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1212–1237.10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unrau, Y., & Coleman, H. (1997). Qualitative data analysis. In M. Grinnell (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (pp. 512–514). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, J., & Morris, K. (2005). Training in “social” work: Exploring issues of involving users in teaching on social work degree programmes. Social Work Education, 24, 653–675.10.1080/02615470500185093
   Google Scholar