Transparency of assessment in practice education: the TAPE model

References

• Baird, S. L. (2016). Conceptualizing anxiety among social work students: Implications for social work education. Social Work Education, 35(6), 719–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BASW. (2016). Professional capabilities framework. British Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.basw.co.uk/pcf/:
   Google Scholar
• Beverley, A., & Worsley, A. (2007). Learning and teaching in social work practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University: What the student does (3rd Ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Gioberman, J. (2002). Evaluating A measure of student field performance in direct service: testing reliability and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(3), 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleak, H., Hawkins, L., Williams, J., & Laughton, J. (2015). Creating a standardised teaching and learning framework for social work field placements. Australian Social Work, 68(1), 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C., Elliott, G., & Gibbs, P. (2010). Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, K. (2006). The essence of essences–The search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(1), 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Doel, M. (2010). Social work placements. A traveller’s Guide. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, P., Littler, L., & Jasper, C. (2014). Practice education in social work: Achieving professional standards. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2009). Can’t Fail, Won’t Fail - Why practice assessors find it difficult to fail social work students. A qualitative study of practice assessors’ experiences of assessing marginal or failing social work students. Professional Doctorate in Social Work Thesis. University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2017). Supporting struggling students on placement. A practical guide. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Editorial special issue ‘Failing students’. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J., & Taylor, I. (2012). Failure to Fail? Practice educators’ emotional experiences of assessing failing social work students. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 32(2), 244–258.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, S., & Gilligan, P. (2004). Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. Social Work Education, 23(4), 465–479.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2008). Phenomenology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• HCPC. (2012). Standards of proficiency. In Social work in England. London: Health and Care Professions Council.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. (2017). Conflicting and competing roles and expectations: The Conundrum of failing social work students on placements. Czech & Slovak Social Work, 17(1), 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. (1993). Research methods – Researching peers and familiar settings. Research Papers in Education, 8(2), 199.
   Google Scholar
• Kanno, H., & Koeske, G. F. (2010). MSW students’ Satisfaction with their field placement: The role of preparedness and supervision quality. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketner, M., VanCleave, D., & Cooper-Bolinskey, D. (2017). The meaning and value of supervision in social work field education. Field Educator, 7.2(Fall 2017), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevre, M. (2005). Facilitating practice learning and assessment: The influence of relationship. Social Work Education, 24(5), 565–583.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Retrieved 2017, March 6, fromhttps://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/F50603E0-41AF-4B15-9C84-BA7E4DE8CB4F/0/Seaweedphenomenologyresearch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, S., & Caffrey, B. (2014). Developing a practice learning curriculum. A guide for practice educators. Staffs: Kirwin Maclean Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, I., Simpson, D., & Crawford, K. (2014). Your social work practice placement. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Koerin, B. B. (2001). Gatekeeping in the practicum: What field instructors need to know. Clinical Supervisor, 20(2), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, W. S., & Kerr, J. (2015). Practice educating social work students. Supporting Qualifying students on their placements. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O.E.D. (2015). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/:
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2004). Effective practice learning in social work. Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2010a). Effective practice learning in social work (2nd ed.). Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2010b). When things go wrong! Placement disruption and termination: Power and student perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 983–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, J., Drummond, J., McLafferty, E., & Hendry, C. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: A discussion and critique. Nurse Researcher, 18(3), 20–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11(2), 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2014a). Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2014b). An exploration of how Practice Educators use competency frameworks to assess social work students in practice learning settings Doctoral Thesis. University of Central Lancashire.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2015). Developing method to meet the needs of the research. Journal of International Doctoral Research, 4(1), 10–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2016). The role of practice educators in initial and post qualifying social worker education. Social Work Education, 35(6), 706–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SWRB. (2010a). Building a safe and confident future: One year on. Detailed proposals from the Social Work Reform Board. Crown Copyright. www.education.gov/swrb:
   Google Scholar
• SWRB. (2010b). Practice educator professional standards for social work. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/swrb/education.shtml:
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2017). Social work and digitalisation: Bridging the knowledge gaps. Social Work Education, 36(8), 869–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCSW. (2012a). Assessing practice using the professional capabilities framework. Retrieved from http://www.tcsw.org.uk/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/Resources/Assessing%20practice%20using%20the%20PCF%20guidance%20Oct12(3).pdf
   Google Scholar
• TCSW. (2012b). Practice educator professional standards and guidance. Retrieved from http://search.collegeofsocialwork.org/search/search.cgi?collection=scie-cosw&query=PRACTICE%20EDUCATORS:
   Google Scholar
• TCSW. (2013). Practice learning guidance. Placement criteria (edref9). Retrieved from http://www.collegeofsocialwork.org/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/_CollegeLibrary/Reform_resources/PlacementCriteria(edref9).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2006). Promoting workplace learning. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandermause, R. K., & Fleming, S. E. (2011). Philosophical hermeneutic interviewing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., & Rutter, L. (2010). The practice educator’s handbook. Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Zeira, A., & Schiff, M. (2014). Field education: A comparison of Students’ and Novice social workers’ perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1950–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar