Effective assessment: a key knowledge and skill for a sustainable profession

References

• Bertotti, T. (2016). Decidere nel servizio sociale. Metodo e riflessioni etiche [Decisions in social work: Method and ethical reflections]. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2016). (Eds.). Child welfare removals by th state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. Oxford: Oxfor University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L. L. (2017). Making sense of the initial home visit: The role of intuition I child and family social workers’ assessments of risk. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(4), 431–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health (DH) (2007). Independence, choice and risk: A guide to best practice in supported decision making. London: author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Department for Education and Employment (DH and DfEE) (2000). Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K. (2003). Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychological Science, 14, 175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doel, M., & Marsh, P. (1992). Task-centred social work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dowie, J. (1999). Communication for better decisions: Not about ‘risk’. Health, Risk and Society, 1(1), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Taylor, B. J., & McCall, S. (2006). Human rights and decision making in child protection through explicit argumentation. Child Care in Practice, 12(2), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, G. (2010). The skilled helper: A problem management and opportunity development approach to helping. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Enosh, G., & Bayer-Topilsky, T. (2015). Reasoning and bias: Heuristics in safety assessment and placement decisions for children at risk. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 1771–1787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fengler, J. (2016, July). The ALOHA-intervention-model: A methodical approach to support clients in social work. Poster session presented at Decisions, Assessment, Risk and Evidence in Social Work. 4th Biennal Symposium, Templeton Hotel, Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, J. (2017a). Pädagogisches Handeln in der Sozialen Arbeit [Pedagogical Practice in Social Work]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, J. (2017b, June). How to overcome “Either-or-Polarities“ in intervention: Core competences for professionals in supporting clients in social work. Poster session presented at Conference of European Association of Schools of Social Work, University René Descartes, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, J., & Fengler, J. (2012). Förderung der Ressource Bildung in der Sozialen Arbeit. [Fostering the Resource “Education” in Social Work]. In A. Knecht & F. Ch. Schubert (Eds.), Ressourcen im Sozialstaat und in der Sozialen Arbeit. Aktivierung, Förderung, Zuteilung. Ein Handbuch (pp. 238-251). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, J., & Schäfer, P. (2014). Children of offenders: Guilt by association? Dangers of “psychological clan custody” and approaches of psychological support. In P. Schäfer & E. Weitekamp (Eds.), Establishing victimology – A pioneer’s involvement in creating the science of victimology – A Festschrift on the occasion of the 30th anniversary Dubrovnik course “victimology, victim assistance and criminal justice“ (pp. 397–413). Mönchengladbach: Schriftenreihe FB Sozialwesen HS Niederrhein.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, J., & Winkel, F.-W. (2014). The development of an (ODARA-based) actuarial screening version of the Danger Assessment Inventory (DAI): A traumatic diversity-approach and some follow up evidence. In P. Schäfer & E. Weitekamp (Eds.), Establishing victimology – A pioneer’s involvement in creating the science of victimology – A Festschrift on the occasion of the 30th anniversary Dubrovnik course „victimology, victim assistance and criminal justice (pp. 151–169). Mönchengladbach: Schriftenreihe FB Sozialwesen HS Niederrhein.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Decision making: Non-rational theories. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences: Vol. 5 (2nd ed.) (pp. 911–916). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015). Predictive risk modelling to prevent child maltreatment and other adverse outcomes for service users: Inside the ‘black box’ of machine learning. British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 1044–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., & Dunworth, M. (2017). The fall and rise of ‘use of self’? An exploration of the positioning of use of self in social work education. Social Work Education, 36(5), 591–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. (2017). In defence of actuarialism: Interrogating the logic of risk in social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(4), 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzler, S., & Messmer, H. (2010). Group decision-making in child welfare and the pursuit of participation. Qualitative Social Work, 9(2), 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, J. (2007). Child neglect: Identification and assessment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• IASSW & IFSW (2001). International definition of the social work profession (Supplement to international social work). Rheinfelden: International Association of Schools of Social Work and International Federation of Social Workers [ISSN 0020-8728].
   Google Scholar
• IFSW (2012). Statement of ethical principles. International Federation of Social Workers. Retervied from https://www.ifsw.org/statement-of-ethical-principles/?hub=main.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R. A., Degenholtz, H., & Kane, R. L. (1999). Adding values: An experiment in systematic attention to values and preferences of community long-term care clients. Journal of Gerontology, 54B(2), 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. (2018). Risk in child protection: Assessment challenges and frameworks for practice. Social Work Education, 37(2), 277–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liel, C. (2017). Diagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Validierung eines Risikoscreenings für Partnergewalt zum Einsatz in Täterprogrammen. [Diagnostics in social work: Validation of a risk screening for violence in partnerships for application in programs for offenders]. Rechtspsychologie, 3(1), 68–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, R., Davies, N., Manthorpe, J., & Iliffe, S. (2016). Making decisions at the end of life when caring for a person with dementia: A literature review to explore the potential use of heuristics in difficult decision-making. British Medical Journal, 6(7), e010416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, P., Campbell, A., & Taylor, B. J. (2015). Resilience and burnout in child protection social work: Individual and organizational themes from a systematic literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1546–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. (2005). Counselling skills for social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., & Soydan, H. (2012). Translation and implementation of evidence- based practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, H.-R., & Bohm, G. (2008). The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 5–17. Retervied from http://journal.sjdm.org/bb1.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. J., & Epstein, L. (1972). Task-Centred casework. Columbia, NJ: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (2009). The skills of helping individuals, families, groups and communities (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sicora, A. (2017). Reflective practice and mistakes in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(4), 491–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub-Bernasconi, S., (2009). Social work as a discipline and profession. In V. Leskošek (Ed.), Theories and methods of social work – Exploring different perspectives (pp. 9–30). Slovenia: Faculty of Social Work / University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., & Taylor, B. J. (2017). Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 1940–1958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (Ed.). (2011). Working with aggression and resistance in social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Developing an integrated assessment tool for the health and social care of older people. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1293–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017a). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017b). Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1043–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., & Devine, T. (1993). Assessing needs and planning care in social work. Farnham, Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., & Donnelly, M. (2006). Professional perspectives on decision making about the long-term care of older people. British Journal of Social Work, 36(5), 807–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., & Campbell, B. (2011). Quality, risk and governance: Social workers’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services [NOW the International Journal of Public Leadership], 7(4), 256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., & McKeown, C. (2013). Assessing and managing risk with people with physical disabilities: Development of a safety checklist. Health, Risk and Society, 15(2), 162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., Killick, C., O’Brien, M., Begley, E., & Carter-Anand, J. (2014). Older people’s conceptualisation of elder abuse and neglect. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 26(3), 223–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., Killick, C., & McGlade, A. (2015). Understanding and using research in social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., Killick, C., Bertotti, T., Enosh, G., Gautschi, J., Hietamäki, J., & Whittaker, A. (2017). European social work research association SIG to study decisions, assessment and risk. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(1), 82–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., Stevenson, M., & McDowell, M. (2018). Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals. Health and Social Care in the Community. 26, e291–e303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2000). Social work skills. A practice handbook. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Murphy, T. (2017). Signs of safety: Comprehensive briefing paper (4th ed.). East Perth, Australia: Resolutions Consultancy.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2006). Risk. Social Work and Society International Online Journal, 4(2). Retervied from urn:nbn:de:0009-11-7838.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2018). How do child protection practitioners make decisions in real life situations? Lessons from the psychology of decision making. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar