Social work teaching partnerships: a discussion paper

References

• All-Party Parliamentary Group for Social Work. (2013). Inquiry into the state of social work. Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., & Manthorpe, J. (2014). The Views of Step Up to Social Work Trainees: Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: Research report, London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., & Manthorpe, J. (2015). Trainees’ views of the step up to social work programme. Social Work Education, 34(1), 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry-Lound, D., Tate, S., & Greatbatch, D. (2016). Social work teaching partnership programme pilots: evaluation Final research report. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/563261/Social_Work_Teaching_Partnership_Programme_An_Evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Workforce Intelligence. (2012). Workforce planning for social workers: A supply and demand model. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. (2018). Social Work Education and the Marketisation of UK Universities. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J., Schraer, R., & McNicholl, A. (2016). Social work fast-track schemes: What we do and don’t know. Community Care, 3(February), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Re-visioning social work education: An independent review. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017). Social work: National assessment and accreditation system; government response to consultation. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2018). Section 31 grant determination letter. London: Author. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/685888/3236_-_SOCIAL_WORK_TEACHING_PARTNERSHIPS_2017-18_-__S31__-_DFE_-_Grant_Determination.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Department for Health. (2017). Social work teaching partnerships from April 2018. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Department of Health. (2016). Social work teaching partnerships from April 2016. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Domakin, A., & Curry, L. (2018). Partners in practice: Developing integrated learning opportunities on the Frontline child and family social work qualifying programme. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, A., & Guez, G. (2018). Intentions to leave supervision among social work supervisors: Contributing factors. Social Work Education, 37, 458–471. advance access
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghate, D. (2016). From programs to systems: Deploying implementation science and practice for sustained real world effectiveness in services for children and families. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(6), 812–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Office for the West Midlands (2010). Review of social worker retention project. (Confidential report) Birmingham: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). (2016). Social work education in England. London: HCPC.
   Google Scholar
• Hek, R. (2012). Is it possible to develop and sustain non-traditional placements? An evaluation of the development of practice learning opportunities in partnership with the police and probation services in the West Midlands. Social Work Education, 31(4), 512–529.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. (2014). the struggle for the soul of social work in England. Social Work Education, 31(1), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., Goodyear, A., & Whittaker, A. (2015). Can a Munro-inspired approach transform the lives of looked after children in England? Social Work Education, 34(3), 328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2000). International Federation of Social Workers and International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H., Scholar, H. F., McCaughan, S., & Coleman, A. (2015). Are non-traditional social work placements second best learning opportunities for qualifying social work students? The British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1469–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The munro review of child protection: Final Report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Narey, M. (2014). Making the Education of Social Workers Consistently Effective. Report of Sir Martin Narey’s Independent Review of the Education of Children’s Social Workers. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2018). Adult Social Care at a Glance. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/report/adult-social-care-at-a-glance/
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rixon, A., & Ward, R. (2012). What difference does it make? Social work practice and post-qualifying awards. Practice: Social Work in Action, 24(3), 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (seventh edition). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scholar, H., McLaughlin, H., McLaughlin, S., & Coleman, W. (2014). Learning to be a social worker in a non-traditional placement: Critical reflections on social work, professional identity and social work education in England. Social Work Education, 33(8), 998–1016.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, R., & Patent, P. (2010). West London social work project: lessons learnt report. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Skills for Care. (2016). Social work education in England. Leeds: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Stepanova, E., Venn, L., Carpenter, J., & Patsios, D. (2018). Evaluation of step up to social work, Cohorts 1 and 2: 3-years and 5 years on. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/707085/Step_Up_to_Social_Work_evaluation-3_and_5_years_on.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Reform Board. (2010). Building a safe, confident future: One year on. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Reform Board (2012). Building a safe and confident future: Maintaining Momentum Progress report from the Social Work Reform Board. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Task Force (2009). Building a safe, confident future - The final report of the Social Work Task Force. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Spicker, P. (2013). Personalisation Falls Short. British Journal of Social Work, 43(7), 1259–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thorley, C. (2014). How to fix the problem of work placements for social work students, The Guardian Online. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2014/jan/09/problem-work-placements-social-work-students.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M., Hardy, M., Cauvain, S., Kääriäinen, A., Satka, M., Yliruka, L., & Shaw, I. (2014). W(h)ither the academy? An exploration of the role of university social work in shaping the future of social work in Europe. European Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 627–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Mostyn, A., & Fyson, R. (2009). Nursing and social work students’ perceptions of lecturing by non-university practitioners. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(1), 98–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar