Navigating the gendered academy: women in social work academia

References

• Acker, S., & Piper, D. W. (Eds) (1984). Is Higher Education Fair to Women? Guildford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Advance HE. (2018). Equality + higher education staff statistical report 2018. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018_HE-stats-report-staff.pdfrington
   Google Scholar
• Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe. Outsiders in the sacred grove. Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P., & Williams, J. (Eds). (2001). Identity and difference in higher education: ‘outsiders within’. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, L., & Vicars, M. (2016). Feminine men and masculine women: In/exclusion in the academy. Education + Training, 58(3), 252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. (2017). Reflecting on a journey: Positionality, marginality and the outside-within. In D. Gabriel & S. A. Tate (Eds), Inside the Ivory Tower. Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia (pp. 80–90). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being “native”. The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeze, M., & Taylor, Y. (2018). Feminist collaborations in higher education: Stretched across career stages. Gender and Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7(1). doi:10.1353/tae.2003.0020
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, V., & Sheehan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: The insider/outsider debate. Midwifery Journal, 28(2012), 52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, P. J. (1993). Lifting a ton of feathers. A woman’s guide to surviving in the academic world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. (1997). Surviving on the inside. Reflections on being a woman and a feminist in a male academic institution. Social Work Education, 16(3), 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. (2019). “States of change”? One hundred years of the JUC. Social Work Education, The International Journal, 38(8), 1054–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• David, M. (2015). Women and gender equality in higher education? Education Sciences 5(1), 10–25. doi:10.3390/educsci5010010
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2010). Governmentality and academic work: Shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26(3), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., Lubelska, C., & Quinn, J. (Eds). (1994). Changing the Subject: Women in higher education. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, D., & Tate, S. A. (Eds). (2017). Inside the Ivory Tower. Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2010). Examining the ‘conservative revolution’: Neoliberalism and social work education. Social Work Education, 29, 340–355.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, M. V., & Norton, S. M. (2009, Fall). Improving the status of women in the academy. The NEA Higher Education Journal, 163–169. Special Focus.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, N. (2007). Investigating women nurse academics’ experiences in universities: The importance of hope, optimism and career resilience for workplace satisfaction. In M. Oermann & K. T. Heinrich (Eds), Annual review of nursing education (Vol. 5: Challenges and new directions in nursing education, pp. 111–136). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gutgold, N. D., & Linse, A. R. (2016). Women in the academy. Washington DC: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. (2018). Gender pay gap reporting 13th report of session 2017–19 HC928. London: House of Commons. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmbeis/928/928.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (1986). The segregation of women and their work in the personal social services. Critical Social Policy, 15, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. (2001). Sexism, support and survival in academia. Academic women and hidden discrimination in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1976). Men in a woman’s profession. Social Work, 21, 440–447.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howson, C., Coate, K., & de St Croix, T. (2018). Mid-career academic women and the prestige economy. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M.-L. (2001). Women, power and the academy. From rhetoric to reality. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knochel, K. A., Saltzburg, S., Rassi, S., & Natale, A. P. (2017). Transgender in the American academy: A review of social work. Innovation in Education, 4(1). doi:10.1504/IJIIE.2017.086411
   Google Scholar
• Kwali, J. (2017). The accidental academic. In D. Gabriel & S. A. Tate (Eds.), Inside the Ivory Tower. Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia (pp. 5–24). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963947.n419
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C., Hadfield, M., & Hitchings, M. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 160940691878636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., & Weiner, G. (1994). Gender politics and conceptions of the modern teacher: Women, identity and professionalism. Educational Review, 46(2), 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., Phillimore, P., & Richardson, D. (Eds). (2011). Contesting recognition culture, identity and citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (1994). Glass ceiling or iron cage? Women in UK academia. Gender, Work and Organisation, 1(4), 194–204.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2012). Cycles of domination of top roles by men must be broken. Times Higher Education, 6(December), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Murgia, A., & Poggio, B. (2018). Gender and precarious research careers: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. D. M. (2017). Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship an ethnography of academia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reissman, C. K., & Quinney, L. (2005). Narrative in social work. A critical review. Qualitative Social Work, 4(4), 391–412.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., & Monro, S. (2013). Public duty and private prejudice: Sexualities equalities and local government. Sociological Review, 61, 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, I., Anastas, J. W., McPhail, B. A., & Colarossi, L. G. (2008). Status of women in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(1), 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siltanen, J., Willis, A., & Scobie, W. (2008). Separately together: Working reflexively as a team. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromberg, A. H. (1988). Women in female-dominated professions. In A. H. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.), Women working (pp. 206–224). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Y., & Lahad, K. (2018). Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. M. (2004). Advancing women’s leadership in academe: New directions for research and HRD practice. Equal Opportunities International, 27(7/8), 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V., & Morey, L. (2005). Breaking boundaries: Women in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. G. (1975). Women in social work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. S., & Holley, L. C. (2005). Combining caregiving and career: Experiences of social work faculty. Affilia, 20(2), 136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Z. (2018). Women’s work. How mothers manage flexible working in carers and family life. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar