Service-user narratives in social work education; Co-production or co-option?

References

• Adichie, C. N. (2009). The danger of a single story. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story
   Google Scholar
• Anghel, R., & Ramon, S. (2009). Service users and carers’ involvement in social work education: Lessons from an English case study. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askheim, O., Beresford, P., & Heule, C. (2017). Mend the gap – Strategies for user involvement in social work education. Social Work Education, 36(2), 128–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2008). Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 461–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basset, T. (1999). Involving service users in training. Care, 7(2), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy & Society, 1(2), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2011). Radical social work and service users: A crucial connection. In M. Lavalette (Ed.), Radical social work today. Social work at the crossroads (pp. 95–114). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Boxall, K. (2012). Service users, social work education and knowledge for social work practice. Social Work Education, 312, 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, L. (2013). Service-user involvement in Irish mental health services: A sociological analysis of inherent tensions for service-users, service-providers and social movement actors. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, P., Gadsby, J., & Williams, S. (2018). Critical mental health nursing: Observations from the inside. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cabiati, E., & Raineri, M. L. (2016). Learning from service users’ involvement: A research about changing stigmatizing attitudes in social work students. Social Work Education, 35(8), 982–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, J. (1978). On our own: Patient controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. (1995). Forbidden narratives: Critical autobiography as social science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. (1996). Beyond ‘bad manners’: The power relations of ‘consumer participation’ in Ontario’s community mental health system. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 15(2), 27–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church, K. (2013). Making madness matter in academic practice. In B. A. LeFrancois, R. Menzies, & G. Reaume (Eds.), Mad Matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies (pp. 181–194). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• CORU. (2019a). Social workers registration board code of professional conduct and ethics. Social Workers Registration Board. Retrieved from https://coru.ie/files-codes-of-conduct/swrb-code-of-professional-conduct-and-ethics-for-social-workers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CORU. (2019b). Social workers registration board criteria for education and training programmes. Social Workers Registration Board. Retrieved from https://coru.ie/files-education/scwrb-criteria-for-education-and-training-programmes-guidelines-for-programme-providers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L., Voronka, J., Landry, D., Reid, J., McFarlane, B., Reville, D., & Church, K. (2012). Recovering our stories: A small act of resistance. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. (2005). Psychiatric ‘survivors’ and testimonies of self-harm. Social Science & Medicine, 61(8), 1668–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2006). Contesting psychiatry: Social movements in mental health. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denshire, S. (2013). Autoethnography. Sociopedia.isa. doi:10.1177/205684601351
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Children (2006). A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2008). Looking out from the middle: User involvement in health and social care in Northern Ireland. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., McKeever, B., McLaughlin, H., & Sadd, J. (2017). Service user and carer involvement in social work education—where are we now?—part 2. Social Work Education, 36(2), 125–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2010). Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled America and the world. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. J. (2016). Ethical and political implications of the turn to stories in suicide prevention. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(3), 265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2016). Being a service user and a social work academic: Balancing expert identities. Social Work Education, 35(8), 960–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Friedli, L., & Stearn, R. (2015). Positive affect as coercive strategy: Conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare programmes. Medical Humanities, 41, 40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard, S., Simons, L., Turner, K., Lucock, M., & Edwards, C. (2012). Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qualitative Health Research, 22(8), 1126–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (2002). Involving users of services in clinical psychology training. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D., & Speed, E. (2012). Uncovering recovery: The resistible rise of recovery and resilience. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, K. (2017). A critical examination of the knowledge contribution service user and carer involvement brings to social work education. Social Work Education, 36(2), 154–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Service Executive. (2017). A national framework for recovery in mental health services. Dublin. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/4/mental-health-services/advancingrecoveryireland/national-framework-for-recovery-in-mental-health/recovery-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Health Service Executive. (2018). Co-production in practice guidance document. Dublin. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/4/mental-health-services/advancingrecoveryireland/national-framework-for-recovery-in-mental-health/co-production-in-practice-guidance-document-2018-to-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, A., Maguire, G., Watts, M., Creaner, M., McCann, E., Rani, S., & Alexander, J. (2011). Service user involvement in mental health practitioner education in Ireland. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18, 519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchin, S. (2016). Role-played interviews with service users in preparation for social work practice: Exploring students’ and service users’ experience of co-produced workshops. Social Work Education, 35(8), 970–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (2017). What difference does it make? Findings of an impact study of service user and carer involvement on social work students’ subsequent practice. Social Work Education, 36(2), 203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. (2006). Poetic resistance: Juxtaposing personal and professional discursive constructions in a practice setting. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 4(1), 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lakeman, R., Walsh, J., & McGowan, P. (2007). Service users, authority, power and protest: A call for renewed activism. Mental Health Practice, 11(4), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, H., & Broderick. (2017). From service-user to social work examiner: Not a bridge too far. Social Work Education, 36(2), 188–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman, P. (2004). The domestication of anger. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(2), 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Matka, E., River, D., Littlechild, R., & Powell, T. (2010). Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: Cross-disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Birmingham. British Journal of Social Work, 407, 2137–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, J. (2001). Building on common ground: A report into mental health awareness training. Edinburgh: Scottish Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, L. J. (2005). Talking back to psychiatry: The psychiatric consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, M. (2013). Recovery: progressive paradigm or neoliberal smokescreen. In B. A. LeFrancois, R. Menzies, & G. Reaume (Eds.), Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian Mad Studies (pp. 323–333)). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. (Research Briefing 31). London: Social Cers Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Newnes, C., Holmes, G., & Dunn, C. (eds). (1999). This is madness: A critical look at psychiatry and the future of mental health services. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’ Donnell, A., Sapouna, L., & Brosnan, L. (2019). Storytelling: An act of resistance or a commodity? Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, Special Issue, Disordering Social Inclusion, Ethics, Critiques, Collaborations, Futurities, 1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pascal, J., & Sagan, O. (2016). Cocreation or collusion: The dark side of consumer narrative in qualitative health research. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D., & Prescott, L. (2016). The co-optation of survivor knowledge: The danger of substituted values and voice. In J. Russo & A. Sweeney (Eds.), Searching for a rose garden: Challenging psychiatry fostering mad studies (pp. 35–45). Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. (2005). Protest and co-option: The recent fate of the psychiatric patient’s Voice. In A. Bell & P. Lindley (Eds.), Beyond the water towers: The unfinished revolution in mental health services 1985–2005 (pp. 17–26). London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Poursanidou, D. (2016). Critical reflections on paradoxes and unsettling relations in the politics of “co-production” in university-based mental health research. In S. Carr & P. Ryan. (Eds.), Insider, outsider, impostor? Perspectives of mental health service user and survivor researchers and teachers on co-production in academia. London: Conference Report, Middlesex University. Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/20902/
   Google Scholar
• Recovery in the Bin. n.d. RITB – 20 Key Principles. Retrieved from https://recoveryinthebin.org/recovery-in-the-bin-19-principless.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, J., Unwin, P., & Osborne, N. (2016). Gaining by giving? Peer research into service user and carer perceptions of inclusivity in Higher Education. Social Work Education, 35(8), 945–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (2016). Experience, madness theory, and politics. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(3), 207–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadd, J. (2011). ‘We are more than our story’: service user and carer participation in social work education. SCIE Report 42. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Sapouna, L. (2016). Education for critical practice in mental health: Opportunities and challenges. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4(1), 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapouna, L. (2019). Social work education as a critical space. In H. Gijbels, L. Sapouna, & G. Sidley (Eds.), Inside out, outside in: Transforming mental health practices (pp. 17–39). Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, R., McClelland, N., & Jowett, B. (2016). Belonging to the library: Humanising the space for social work education. Social Work Education, 35(8), 892–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J., Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2011). Implementing recovery: An analysis of the key technologies in Scotland. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 5, 11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandler, H. (2009). Spaces of psychiatric contention: A case study of a therapeutic community. Health & Place, 15, 672–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed, E. (2002). Irish mental health social movements: A consideration of movement habitus. Irish Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Littlechild, R., Duffy, J., & Hayes, D. (2015). ‘Making it real’: Evaluating the impact of service user and carer involvement in social work education. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(2), 467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tew, J., Holley, T., & Caplen, P. (2012). Dialogue and challenge: Involving service users and carers in small group learning with social work and nursing students. Social Work Education, 31(3), 316–330.
   Google Scholar
• Videmšek, P. (2017). Expert by experience research as grounding for social work education. Social Work Education, 36(2), 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronka, J. (2016). Researching the politics of inclusion. Retrieved from https://radssite.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/researching-the-politics-of-inclusion
   Google Scholar
• Voronka, J. (2016a). Disciplines, difference, and representational authority: Making moves through inclusionary practices. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(3/4), 211–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, L., & Boxall, K. (2009). Service users in and out of the academy: Collusion in exclusion. Social Work Education, 283, 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A., Hart, A., & Spandler, H. (2019). The recovery narrative: Politics and possibilities of a genre. Cult Med Psychiatry, 1–27. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11013-019-09623-y
   Google Scholar