Challenges in values education in social work: the case of the Visegrad four countries

References

• Adams, K., Hean, S., Sturgis, P., & Clark, J. M. (2006). Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. A. (1994). Constructivist paradigm. Values and ethics. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 8(1–2), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v08n01_03
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (APA). 2016. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved December 3, 2020, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
   Google Scholar
• Azarian, R. (2011). Potentials and Limitations of Comparative Method in Social Science. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., & Gallagher, A. (2009). Ethics in professional life: Character, conduct and caring. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2014). Ethics. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, J.-M. 2020. Le Retour dez ‘Valeurs’: UnEmpechementde Penser ? [The return of ‘values’: an impediment to thinking]. Innovation pédagogique. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.innovation-pedagogique.fr/article8209.html
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1994). Alone again: Ethics after certainty. Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality .Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education. Holt and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In C. H. C. Ragin, and B. Rihoux (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage Publishing, pp. 1–18 . https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569.n1
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2004). Changing welfare, changing states: New directions in social policy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1968 [1916]). Democracy and education. The MacMillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (1996). Deprofessionalizing social work: Anti-oppressive practice, competencies and postmodernism. British Journal of Social Work, 26(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of comparative communication research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feber, J., & Petrucijová, J. (2015). Limits of the ethical training of social workers. altruism issue in the moral space of professional ethics. The New Educational Review, 42(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.42.4.16
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2001). Dits et écrits [Words and writings]. Galimard.
   Google Scholar
• Giurgiu, L. R., & Mircea, A. M. (2013). Professional values in social work students and mid-career practitioners: A comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.130
   Google Scholar
• Glumbíková, K., Petrucijová, J., & Mikulec, M. (2020). Formation of practice wisdom in social work with vulnerable children and their families in the Czech Republic. Social Work Education, 40(7), 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1745173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, K. M. (1989). Professional versus academic values: Cultural ambivalence in university professional school in Australia. Higher Education, 18, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing qualitative research differently: A psychosocial approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2003). Professional values and ethics in social work: Reconsidering postmodernism? British Journal of Social Work, 33(8), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.8.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2005). Exploring the paradox of teaching ethics for social work practice. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 24(5), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500132772
   Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I. (2016). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFSW. 2018. Global social work statement of ethical principles. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. (2017). Developing pre-professional identity in undergraduates through work-integrated learning. Higher Education, 74(5), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0080-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantowicz, E. (2006). Dilemmas in comparative research of education for social work in Europe. The European Journal of Social Work, 8(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500210798
   Google Scholar
• Kantowicz, E. (2013). Pedagogika (w)pracy socjalnej [Pedagogy in social work]. Wydawnictwo UWM.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, C. H., & Scragg, T. (2016). Reflective practice in social work. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M. E. F. (2003). Negotiating the contradictions between competence and creativity in social work education. Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017303003001007
   Google Scholar
• Marynowicz-Hetka, E. (2006). Predagogika społeczna. Podrecznik akademicki [Social pedagogy. Academic textbook]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Marynowicz-Hetka, E. (2020). Social pedagogy. Comprehending activity in the field of practice. Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, A., & Sheafor, B. (1980). Social work: A profession of many faces . Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mortari, L. (2015). Reflectivity in research practice: An overview of different perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 14(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915618045
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, T. (2011). Decision making in social work. MacMillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Qyen, E. (1990). Comparative methodology. Theory and practice in international social research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2001). Ethics education in social work. Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1986). Ethical dilemmas in social work practice. Routledge; P. Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, S. (2013). Critical social work with children and families. Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rożniatowska, K., Kaszyński, H., & Maciejewska, O. (2019). Kształcenie do pracysocjalnej w świetleewaluacji Spaceru aksjologicznego w Kobierzynie [Education for social work in the light of evaluation of the axiological walk in Kobierzyn]. Praca Socjalna, 34(3), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5702
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T., & Craft, C. (2001). BSW students’ perceptions of key competencies, values, and practitioner skills. Implications for social work education. Aust. Soc. Work, 54(4), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070108414345
   Google Scholar
• Tynjäla, P., Välimaa, J., & Sarja, A. (2003). Pedagogical perspectives on the relationships between higher education and working life. Higher Education, 46(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024761820500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G., & Kelly, B. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of social work education: Preparing students for practice learning. British Journal of Social Work, 40(8), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar