Publication Cover
Social Work Education
The International Journal
Volume 42, 2023 - Issue 8
261
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Envisioning the future of (techno) social work education: perspectives of Japanese and Lithuanian social work educators

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1227-1247 | Received 29 Mar 2021, Accepted 20 Dec 2021, Published online: 06 Jan 2022

References

  • Ahmedani, B. K., Harold, R. D., Fitton, V. A., & Shifflet Gibson, E. D. (2011). What adolescents can tell us: Technology and the future of social work education. Social Work Education, 30(7), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.504767
  • Allenby, B. (2015). Emerging technologies and the future of humanity. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(6), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215611087
  • Bartneck, C., Van Der Hoek, M., Mubin, O., & Al Mahmud, A. (2007). “Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do!” switching off a robot. In 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 217–222). Arlington, VA, USA: IEEE.
  • Berzin, S. C., Singer, J., & Chan, C. (2015). Practice innovation through technology in the digital age: A grand challenge for social work. Grand Challenges for Social Work Initiative ( Working Paper No. 12). Cleveland, OH: American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare.
  • Blakemore, T., & Agllias, K. (2020). Social media, empathy and interpersonal skills: Social work students’ reflections in the digital era. Social Work Education, 39(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1619683
  • Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2009). The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts. Research methods series (pp. 43–80). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cabinet Office Japan. (2019). Annual report on the ageing society, JPN (Report No. FY 2019).
  • Campbell, M., Detres, M., & Lucio, R. (2019). Can a digital whiteboard foster student engagement? Social Work Education, 38(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1556631
  • Chan, C., & Holosko, M. (2018). Technology for social work interventions. Oxford University Press.
  • Čiapaitė, L., & Vaitkevičienė, A. (2020). Kaip negalia turintys asmenys vertina socialiniu paslaugu kokybe. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 21(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2020.22
  • Cooner, T. S., Knowles, A., & Stout, B. (2016). Creating a mobile app to teach ethical social media practices. Social Work Education, 35(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1042361
  • Dafoe, A. (2015). On technological determinism: A typology, scope conditions, and a mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6), 1047–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283
  • Dagienė, V., & Kurilovas, E. (2009). Informaciniu ir komunikaciniu technologiju diegimo švietime patirties lietuvoje ir užsienio šalyse lyginamoji analizė. Pedagogika 95(1) , 112–118. https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/23321
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • de Lucas y Murillo de la Cueva, F., & D’Antonio Maceiras, S. (2020). Ict, young people and social work: Distances and opportunities. Social Work Education, 39(6), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1691163
  • Deepak, A. C., Wisner, B. L., & Benton, A. D. (2016). Intersections between technology, engaged learning, and social capital in social work education. Social Work Education, 35(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1154661
  • DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. (2015). Disability as disjuncture: A theory to guide social work practice. Social Work Chronicle, 4(1–2), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.21863/swc/2015.4.1and2.001
  • Devlieghere, J., & Roose, R. (2018). Electronic information systems: In search of responsive social work. Journal of Social Work, 18(6), 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757296
  • Diaconu, M., Racovita, L. D., Carbonero Muñoz, D., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Social work educators’ perceived barriers to teaching with technology: The impact on preparing students to work with younger clients. Social Work Education, 39(6), 785–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1683155
  • Engström, M., Lindqvist, R., Ljunggren, B., & Carlsson, M. (2009). Staff members’ perceptions of a ict support package in dementia care during the process of implementation. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(7), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00985.x
  • European Commission . (2013) Long-Term care in ageing societies–challenges and policy options. Retrieved 2021 July 2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0041&from=EN
  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115608387
  • Garrett, P. M. (2005). Social work’s ‘electronic turn’: Notes on the deployment of information and communication technologies in social work with children and families. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305057044
  • Genienė, R. (2020). Decovidacija= deinstitucionalizacija. savarankiškas gyvenimas ir itrauktis i bendruomene. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 21(21), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2020.21
  • Groff, L. (2015). Future human evolution and views of the future human: Technological perspectives and challenges. World Futures Review, 7(2–3), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756715608956
  • Hsu, E. L., Elliott, A., Ishii, Y., Sawai, A., & Katagiri, M. (2020). The development of aged care robots in Japan as a varied process. Technology in Society, 63, [101366]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101366
  • Huang, Y., & Sharif, N. (2017). From ‘labour dividend’to ‘robot dividend’: Technological change and workers’ power in south China. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 6(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976017721284
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (2002). Wissenskulturen: Ein vergleich naturwissenschaftlicher wissensformen. Suhrkamp.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.
  • Latour, B. (2020). What protective measures can you think of so we don’t go back to the precrisis production model? AOC Media. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/853.html
  • Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1 suppl), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x
  • Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press.
  • Levin, S., Fulginiti, A., & Moore, B. (2018). The perceived effectiveness of online social work education: Insights from a national survey of social work educators. Social Work Education, 37(6), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1482864
  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. SSOAR.
  • McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT press.
  • Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In A. Bogner, B. Littig., W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts. Research methods series (pp. 17–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_2
  • Miwa, H., Watanabe, K., Määttä, H., Ylikauppila, M., & Niemelä, M. (2017). Comparison of japanese and finnish attitude regarding technology use in nursing-care service. In 5th international conference on serviceology, ICServ 2017. Vienna, Austria: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Columbia University Press.
  • Nauha, L., Keränen, N. S., Kangas, M., Jämsä, T., & Reponen, J. (2018). Assistive technologies at home for people with a memory disorder. Dementia, 17(7), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216674816
  • Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.18060/241
  • Phillips, C. R. (2019). The computer social worker: Regulatory practices, regulated bodies and science. Qualitative Social Work, 18(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017723700
  • Pozo-Rubio, D., Jiménez-Rubio, D. (2020). The challenge of sustaining long-term care in aging societies: Lessons from Japan and Spain; Comment on “Financing long-term care: Lessons from Japan”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9(12), 520–523. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.143
  • Pybus, L., & Gillan, D. J. (2015). Implicit theories of technology: Identification and implications for performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59 ( 1), 1555–1557. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
  • Rice, T. (2010). ‘The hallmark of a doctor’: The stethoscope and the making of medical identity. Journal of Material Culture, 15(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510373985
  • Sage, M., Hitchcock, L. I., Bakk, L., Young, J., Michaeli, D., Jones, A. S., & Smyth, N. J. (2021). Professional collaboration networks as a social work research practice innovation: Preparing dsw students for knowledge dissemination roles in a digital society. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520961163
  • Saker, M., & Evans, L. (2016). Locative media and identity: Accumulative technologies of the self. Sage Open, 6(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016662692
  • Scholar, H. (2017). The neglected paraphernalia of practice? Objects and artefacts in social work identity, practice and research. Qualitative Social Work, 16(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016637911
  • Singer, J. B., & Sage, M. (2015). Technology and Social Work Practice: Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Applications. In Social Workers’ Desk Reference (3rd ed., pp. 179–188). Retrieved from Loyola eCommons Social Work: School of Social Work Faculty Publications and Other Works. New York City: Oxford University Press.
  • Sugihara, T., Fujinami, T., Phaal, R., & Ikawa, Y. (2015). A technology roadmap of assistive technologies for dementia care in Japan. Dementia, 14(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301213493798
  • TNS Opinion & Social. (2012). Public attitudes towards robots (Report No. Wave EB77.1). European Commission.
  • Turner, D., Landmann, M., & Kirkland, D. (2020). Making ideas “app”-en: The creation and evolution of a digital mobile resource to teach social work interviewing skills. Social Work Education, 39(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1611758
  • van de Luitgaarden, G., & van der Tier, M. (2018). Establishing working relationships in online social work. Journal of Social Work, 18(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316654347
  • van Oeffelt, T., Ruijters, M. C., van Hees, A. A., & Simons, R. J. P. (2017). Professional identity, a neglected core concept of professional development. In M. Lee, K. Black, R. Warhurst, & S. Corlett (Eds.), Identity as a foundation for human resource development (1st ed., pp. 237–252). New York: Routledge.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540
  • Vilkoitytė, V., & Skučienė, D. (2020). Vyresnio amžiaus asmenų nuostatos dėl darbinės karjeros tęstinumo. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 20(1), 22–39. doi:10.15388/STEPP.2020.16
  • Waissbluth, M., & De Gortari, A. (1990). A methodology for science and technology planning based upon economic scenarios and delphi techniques: The case of Mexican agroindustry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 37(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(90)90047-Y
  • Westwood, J., Dill, K., Campbell, A., & Shaw, A. (2017). Making it ‘app’en: Service user feedback: Developing and implementing a service user app: Reflections from northern Ireland, england and scotland. Social Work Education, 36(8), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1360857
  • Žalimienė, L., Blažienė, I., Miežienė, R., & Junevičienė, J. (2017). Pagyvenusiu žmoniu globos sektoriaus transformacijos: Paslaugu, darbo jėgos poreikis ir užimtumo kokybė (Report No. GER-012/2015). Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.