Who is the ‘I’? An exploration of social work professional written discourse and implications for social work education

References

• Almeida, R., Werkmeister Rozas, L. M., Cross-Denny, B., Kyeunghae Lee, K., & Yamada, A. (2019). Coloniality and intersectionality in social work education and practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 30(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2019.1574195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amas, D., & Fox, J. (2023). Telling stories of practice in the neo-liberal context of English social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(6), 3289–3304. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2023 online access). A year to remember? Introducing the BE21 corpus and exploring recent part of speech tag change in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22007.bak
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination ( C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays ( V. W. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balkow, M. & Lillis, T.(2019). Social Work Writing and bureaucracy a tale in two voices. A discussion paper from the centre for welfare reform, www.citizen-network.org
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2020). Ethics and values in social work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2021). #LancsBox V. 6.X. Software.
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission. (2017). The state of adult social care services 2014-2017. Findings from CQC initial programme of comprehemsive inspections in adult social care. https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/major-report/state-adult-social-care-services-2014-2017
   Google Scholar
• Community Care. (2018a). Retrieved June 6, 2023, from https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2018/05/10/divisivedemeaning-devoid-feeling-social-work-jargon-causes-problems-families/
   Google Scholar
• Community Care. (2018b). Retrieved June 6, 2023, from https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2018/06/28/social-workersshouldnt-use-attachment-records-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. (2013). Becoming a social worker: Global narratives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2011) . The Munro review of child protection. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2017). Feminist social work theory and practice. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnley, B. (2022). Becoming a reflexive and reflective practice educator: Considering theoretical constructs of Bronfenbrenner and Bourdieu for social work student field placements. Social Work Education, 41(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1796954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forenza, B., & Eckert, C. (2018). Social worker identity: A profession in context. Social Work, 63(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. (2018). The voice of the social worker: A narrative literature review. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(5), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., & Dunworth, M. (2017). The fall and rise of “use of self? An exploration of the positioning of use of self in social work education. Social Work Education, 36(5), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1267722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Slembrouck, S., & Sarangi, S. (2006). Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R. (2019). Work-based learning in social work education: The challenges and opportunities for the identities of work-based learners on university-based programs. Social Work Education, 38(6), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1557631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HCPC Health and Care Professions Council. (2018). Fitness to practice annual report 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2023, from https://www.hcpc-uk.org/resources/reports/2018/fitness-to-practise-annual-report
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K., & Drayton, J. (2022). Mind the gap: Incorporating writing skills into practice simulations. Social Work Education, 41(8), 1802–1820. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.1962270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, L. M., & Link, R. J. (Eds). (2011). Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, B., & Lu, M. (Eds.). (1999). Representing the “other”: Basic writers and the teaching of basic writing. National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2015). Selective clients’ trajectories in case files: Filtering out information in the recording process in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedham, M., Lillis, T. & Twiner, A. (2020). Exploring the core preoccupation of social work writing: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 2(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. EUP.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2017). Imagined, prescribed and actual text trajectories: The ‘problem’ with case notes in contemporary social work. Text & Talk, 37(4), 485–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2023). Professional written voice “in flux”: The case of social work. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(3), 615–641. https://libezproxy.open.ac.uk/101515/applirev-2021-0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., Leedham, M. & Twiner, A. (2017). If it’s not written down it didn’t happen’: Contemporary social work as a writing-intensive profession. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 14(1), 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. & Rai, L. (2012). Quelle relation entre l’écrit académique et l’écrit professionnel? Une étude de cas dans le domaine du travail social. Pratiques, 153/154, 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. Rai, L. & Garcia-Maza, G.(2012) Action research project on case notes recording. Internal report for a local authority in partnership with the Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., Twiner, A., Balkow, M., Lucas, G., Smith, M. & Leedham, M. (2023). Reflections on the procedural and practical ethics in researching professional social work writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 17,2. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20014
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M. (2012). Social work and personalisation. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D., Boddy, J., O’Callaghan, K. & Chester, P. (2015). Ethical professional writing in social work and human services. Ethics and Social Welfare, 9(4), 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead, B., Bell, K., Jones-Mutton, H., & Bailey, R. (2019). Preparation for practice: Embedding the development of professional identity within social work curriculum. Social Work Education, 38(8), 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1595570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E., & Hardie, J. (2019). Why we should stop talking about objectivity and subjectivity in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2019). Retrieved June 4, 2023, from https://socialcareinspection.blog.gov.uk/2019/07/24/what-makes-an-effective-case-record/
   Google Scholar
• Paquette, J. (2016). Cultural policy, work and identity. The creation, renewal and negotiation of professional subjectivities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A., & Cathrine Le Maistre, C. (2006). Active learning in the workplace: Transforming individuals and institutions. Journal of Education & Work, 19(4), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080600867141
   Google Scholar
• Rai, L. & Lillis, T. (2013). “Getting it write” in social work: Exploring the value of writing in academia to writing for professional practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesch-Marsh, A. (2016). Professional relationships and decision making in social work: Lessons from a Scottish case study of secure accommodation decision making. Qualitative Social Work, 17(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016680285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., De Wilde, L., & Vanobbergen, B. (2017). Framing the ‘child at risk’ in social work reports: Truth-telling or storytelling? Journal of Social Work, 17(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316644864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCIE. (2016). Practice issues from serious case reviews 13. Euphemistic language in reports and written records. Retrieved June 7, 2023, from https://www.scie.org.uk/children/safeguarding/case-reviews/learningfrom-case-reviews/13.asp
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., (2022) WordSmith tools version 8 ( 64 bit version) Lexical Analysis Software.
   Google Scholar
• Sissay, L. (2020). My name is why. Canongate.
   Google Scholar
• TACT. (2019). https://www.tactcare.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/11/Language-That-Cares
   Google Scholar
• Thesen, L., & van Pletzen, E. (Eds.). (2006). Academic literacy and the languages of change. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, J. (2018). Academics engaging with student writing: Working at the higher education textface. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (Ed). (2017). Professional identity and social work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2016). Professional identity and social work. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge companion to the professions and professionalism (pp. 355–370). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K., & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The “tragic tale” of the integrated children’s system. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310367675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, F. [email protected]. (2013). Not easily put into a box’: Constructing professional identity. Social Work Education, 32(7), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.705273
   Google Scholar
• WRAM (Write right about me). (2023) https://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/Aberdeen-Protects/improving-childrens-futures/write-right-about-me
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, V. (2011). La escritura académica y la agencia de los sujetos. Cuadernos Comillas, 1, 52–66.
   Google Scholar