Changing pre-service mathematics teachers’ beliefs about using computers for teaching and learning mathematics: the effect of three different models

References

• Ambrose, R. 2004. “Initiating Change in Prospective Elementary School Teachers’ Orientations to Mathematics Teaching by Building on Beliefs.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7 (2): 91–119.10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021879.74957.63
   Google Scholar
• Baki, A. 2002. Bilgisayar destekli matematik [Computer-Supported Mathematics]. Istanbul: Ceren.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L. 1989. Breaking with Experience in Learning to Teach Mathematics: The Role of the Preservice Methods Course. (Issue Paper 89–10). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J., and J. Ravitz. 1999. “The Influence of Computer and Internet Use on Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices and Perceptions.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 4: 356–384.
   Google Scholar
• Beyerbach, B. A., C. Walsh, and R. A. Vannatta. 2001. “From Teaching Technology to Using Technology to Enhance Student Learning: Preservice Teachers’ Changing Perceptions of Technology Infusion.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 9: 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., and K. Hazelip. 1995. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Belief Systems.” In International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, edited by L. W. Anderson, 25–28. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, O. 2002. “Belief Structures and Inservice High School Mathematics Teacher Growth.” In Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education, edited by G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, and G. Törner. 177–194. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., and S. McMillen. 1996. “Rethinking Concrete Manipulatives.” Teaching Children Mathematics 2 (5): 270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Collopy, R. 2003. “Curriculum Materials as a Professional Development Tool: How a Mathematics Textbook Affected Two Teachers’ Learning.” Elementary School Journal 103 (3): 287–311.10.1086/esj.2003.103.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., H. Kilpatrick, and C. Peck. 2001. “Paradox High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 813–834.10.3102/00028312038004813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1986. “Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems Theory and Results.” PhD diss., MIT.
   Google Scholar
• De Ponte, J. P., H. Oliveira, and J. M. Varandas. 2002. “Development of Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Identity in Working with Information and Communication Technology.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 5 (2): 93–115.10.1023/A:1015892804607
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, S. L., and R. E. Anderson. 1999. “Teacher’s Views of Computersas Catalysts for Changes in Their Teaching Practices.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 31 (3): 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• DFE (Department for Education). 2011. Review of the National Curriculum in England: What Can We Learn from the English, Mathematics and Science Curricula of High Performing Jurisdictions? London: DFE.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, D. K. 1993. “Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ View of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, Their Planning and Classroom Instruction, and Student Beliefs and Achievement.” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364412.)
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. 1991. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Hampshire: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. 2005. “Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest Technology Integration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (4): 25–39.10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., P. Addison, M. Lane, E. Ross, and D. Woods. 1999. “Examining Teachers’ Beliefs about the Role of Technology in the Elementary Classroom.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32 (1–2): 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J. 2012. “Globalisation, Neoliberalism, and the Reform of Teacher Education in England.” The Educational Forum 77: 28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. 2011. “School Curriculum Gets back to Facts and Figures.” The Independent, January 20. http://www.independent.co.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. 2005. “A Sociocultural Analysis of the Development of Preservice and Beginning Teachers’ Pedagogical Identities as Users of Technology.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8 (1): 35–59.10.1007/s10857-005-0457-0
   Google Scholar
• Guha, S., and J. Leonard. 2002. “Leonard Motivation in Elementary Mathematics: How Students and Teachers Benefit from Computers.” TechTrend 46 (1): 40–43.10.1007/BF02772036
   Google Scholar
• Guven, B., U. Cakiroglu, and Y. Akkan. 2009. “The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Integrating Computers into Mathematics Classrooms.” Asia Pacific Education Review 10 (4): 505–515.10.1007/s12564-009-9047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., and T. Brush. 2007. “Integrating Technology into K-12 Teaching and Learning: Current Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research.” Educational Technology and Research Development 55 (3): 223–252.10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Reynolds, D. 1992. “Personal History-Based Beliefs as Relevant Prior Knowledge in Course Work.” American Educational Research Journal 29 (2): 325–349.10.3102/00028312029002325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. 1992. “Implications of Research on Teacher Belief.” Educational Psychologist 27: 65–90.10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, R., S. Sandretto, and C. Heath. 2002. “Telling Half the Story: A Critical Review of Research on the Teaching Beliefs of University Academics.” Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 177–228.10.3102/00346543072002177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H. 2006. “Evaluating Strategies Used to Incorporate Technology into Preservice Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 (4): 383–408.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T., and E. Chambers. 2001. “Assessing Teachers’ Context Beliefs about Technology Use.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34 (1): 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R. 1993. “Computers and Teachers: Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26: 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid, G. W. l990. Liberal Arts: Will More Result in Better Subject Matter Understanding? Theory into Practice 29 (1): 21–29.10.1080/00405849009543426
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. 2000. “Strangers in a Strange Land: Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching and Learning French as a Second or Foreign Language in Online Learning Environments.” PhD diss.,Universite Laval.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM (National Council for Teachers of Mathematics). 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Newhouse, P. 1998. “The Impact of Portable Computers on Classroom Learning Environments.” The Australian Journal of Educational Computing 13 (1): 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S., and T. Cooper. 2001. “Factors Influencing Computer Use in Mathematics Teaching in Secondary Schools.” In Numeracy and Beyond (Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), edited by J. Bobis, B. Perry and M. Mitchelmore, 386–393. Sydney: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S. J., C. McRobbie, and T. J. Cooper. 2000. “Exploring Secondary Mathematics Teachers Reasons for Not Using Computers in Their Teaching: Five Case Studies.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33 (1): 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. E. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332.10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S., and M. Liu. 2003. “Teachers’ Beliefs about Issues in the Implementation of a Student-centered Learning Environment.” Educational Technology Research and Development 51 (2): 57–76.10.1007/BF02504526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posamentier, A. S. 2002. Advanced Euclidian Geometry. Florida: Key College.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T., and M. B. Bryans. 2004. “Teachers’ Orientations toward Mathematics Curriculum Materials: Implications for Teacher Education.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35 (5): 352–388.10.2307/30034820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slough, S. W., and G. E. Chamblee. 2000. “Implementing Technology in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms: A Perspective on Change.” Proceeding of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, San Diego 1–3: 1021–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, L. J., and G. M. Lloyd. 2004. “The Impact of Enacted Mathematics Curriculum Models on Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Course Perceptions and Beliefs.” School Science and Mathematics 104 (1): 32–42.10.1111/ssm.2004.104.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. C., and E. Stern. 2002. “The Nature of Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Beliefs Matters for students’ Achievement Gains: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Elementary Mathematics.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2): 344–355.10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezci, E. 2011. “Factors That Influence Pre-service Teachers’ ICT Usage in Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (4): 483–499.10.1080/02619768.2011.587116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. 1984. “The Relatianship of Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching to Instructional Practice.” Educational Studies in Mathematies 15 (2): 105–l27.10.1007/BF00305892
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. A. Grouws, 127–146. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trollip, S. R., and S. M. Alessi. 2001. Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Walen, S. B., S. R. Williams, and B. E. Garner. 2003. “Pre-Service Teachers Learning Mathematics Using Calculators: A Failure to Connect Current and Future Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (4): 445–462.10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., P. A. Ertmer, and T. J. Newby. 2004. “Increasing Pre-service Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs for Technology Integration.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 (2): 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., P. Schram, G. Lappan, and P. Lanier. 1991. “The Role of a Learning Community in Changing Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs about Mathematics Education.” For the Learning of Mathematics 11 (3): 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., and K. Sahl. 2002. “Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs.” American Educational Research Journal 39 (1): 165–205.10.3102/00028312039001165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. 2012. “The Math Wars: Tensions in the Development of School Mathematics Curricula.” For the Learning of Mathematics Journal 32 (2): 7–13.
   Google Scholar