Improving teacher education in the Netherlands: data team as learning team?

References

• Achinstein, B. 2002. “Conflict amid Community: The Micro-Politics of Teacher Collaboration.” Teachers College Record 104: 421–455. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmal, T., and D. Miller. 2003. “Overcoming Resistance to Change: A Case Study of Revision and Renewal in a US Secondary Education Teacher Preparation Programme.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (4): 409–420. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00025-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliger, G. M., and E. A. Janak. 1989. “Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Training Criteria: Thirty Years Later.” Personnel Psychology 42 (2): 331–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00661.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliger, G. M., S. I. Tannenbaum, W. Bennett Jr, H. Traver, and A. Shotland. 1997. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relations among Training Criteria.” Personnel Psychology 50: 341–358. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R. 2004. “A Critical Analysis of Evaluation Practice: The Kirkpatrick Model and the Principle of Beneficence.” Evaluation and Program Planning 27 (3): 341–347. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, V. L. 2004. “Continuous Improvement: It Takes More than Test Scores.” ACSA Leadership 2004, November–December: 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and B. Levin. 2009. “Using Data to Support Educational Improvement: Educational Assessment.” Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrell, C., and H. K. Hughes. 2008. “Teacher Efficacy and Content Literacy Implementation: An Exploration of the Effects of Extended Professional Development with Coaching.” Journal of Literacy Research 40 (1): 95–127. doi:10.1080/10862960802070442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., G. Borman, and M. Robinson. 2011. “A Multistate District-Level Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of Data-Driven Reform on Reading and Mathematics Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33 (3): 378–398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. A., K. J. Nelson., and I. D. Stoodley. 2013. “The Place of Higher Education Institutions in Assessing Student Engagement, Success and Retention: A Maturity Model to Guide Practice.” In Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 1–4 July, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., and E. O. Turner. 2012. “The Practice of Data Use: An Introduction.” American Journal of Education 118: 99–111. doi:10.1086/663272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. M., L. I. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. Evaluating teacher effectiveness. How teachers performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., V. Park, and B. Kennedy-Lewis. 2013. “Affordances and Constraints in the Context of Teacher Collaboration for the Purpose of Data Use.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 341–362. doi:10.1108/09578231311311500.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teacher’s Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., and S. Katz. 2006. Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World. Harnessing Data for School Improvement.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, A. N. N. W., and P. A. Hemmer. 2012. “Program Evaluation Models and Related Theories: AMEE Guide No. 67.” Medical Teacher 34: e288–e299. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., E. Care, M. Francis, and C. Scoular. 2014. “The Role of Assessment in Improving Learning in a Context of High Accountability.” In Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. vol. 1, edited by C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, and P. Colbert, 73–87. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, V., S. Thompson, and L. Hryniewicz. 2014. “Landmarks in the Professional and Academic Development of mid-Career Teacher Educators.” European Journal of Teacher Education 37 (1): 74–90. doi:10.1080/02619768.2013.825241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, S. F. 2012. “Instructional Conversations. a Qualitative Exploration of Differences in Elementary Teachers’ Team Discussions.” PhD diss., Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, E. F. 1996. “The Flawed Four-Level Evaluation Model.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 7 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920070103.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, L., J. Pedulla, S. Enterline, M. Cochran-Smith, F. Loftus, Y. Salomon-Fernandez, and E. Mitescu. 2008. “From Students to Teachers: Using Surveys to build a Culture of Evidence and Inquiry.” European Journal of Teacher Education 31 (4): 319–337. doi:10.1080/02619760802420842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., and J. A. Marsh. 2007. “Cutting through the ‘Data-Driven’ Mantra: Different Conceptions of Data-Driven Decision Making.” Chap. 5. In Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by P. A. Moss, 105–131. 106 vols. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00099.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., K. S. Louis, and R. Schroeder. 2004. “Accountability Policies and Teacher Decision Making: Barriers to the Use of Data to Improve Practice.” Teachers College Record 106 (6): 1258–1287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00379.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italiano, F., and G. Hine. 2014. “Finding Ways to Effectively Use Year 12 Achievement Data to Inform Practice in Secondary Schools.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39 (5): 99–116. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n5.8.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, N. A. 2012. “Mapping the Topography of the Evidence Use Terrain in Assessment of the U.S. Higher Education: A Multiple Case Study Approach.” PhD diss., University of Illionois.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S., L. Earl, and S. Ben Jaafar. 2009. Building and Connecting Learning Communities: The Power of Networks for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer, R., J., van der Linden, J. Vos-Bos, and L. Verbeek-Pleune. 2012. “Teachers in Primary Education Learn to Work with Data.” [Leraren basisonderwijs leren opbrengst gericht werken] Tijdschrift Voor Lerarenopleiders 31 (2): 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. 1960. “Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs: Results.” American Society for Training and Development Journal 14: 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, M. A., and S. Smith. 2005. “Practices That Support Data Use in Urban High Schools.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 10 (3): 333–349. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M. K., and K. Schildkamp. 2012. “Data-Based Decision Making: An Overview.” In Data-Based Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai and L. Earl, 1–16. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lewins, A., and C. Silver. 2007. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857025012
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 2012. “Understanding Data Use Practice among Teachers: The Contribution of Micro-Process Studies.” American Journal of Education 118 (2): 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, K. 2014. “Teacher Educators: Hidden Professionals?” European Journal of Education 49: 218–232. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, N., K. E. Stiles, S. Mundry, and K. DiRanna. 2008. The Data Coach’s Guide to Improve Learning for All Students. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., and M. van der Wende. 2007. “To Rank or to Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (3–4): 306–329. doi:10.1177/1028315307303544.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A. 2012. “Interventions Promoting Educators’ Use of Data: Research Insights and Gaps.” Teachers College Record 114 (11): 1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., J. Sloan McCombs, and F. Martorell. 2010. “How Instructional Coaches Support Data-Driven Decision Making: Policy Implementation and Effects in Florida Middle Schools.” Educational Policy 24 (6): 872–907. doi:10.1177/0895904809341467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., M. K. Lai, and S. Hsiao. 2012. “Testing the Effectiveness of an Intervention Model Based on Data Use: A Replication Series across Clusters of Schools.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (2): 203–228. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.652126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil, P., and J. Johnston. 2005. “An Approach to Analysing Professional Discourse in a School Self-Evaluation Project.” Research in Education 73 (1): 73–86. doi:10.7227/RIE.73.6.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., and L. Cunningham. 2009. “The Impact of Professional Development and Coaching on Early Language and Literacy Instructional Practices.” American Educational Research Journal 46 (2): 532–566. doi:10.3102/0002831208328088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plecki, M. L., A. M. Elfers, and Y. Nakamura. 2012. “Using Evidence for Teacher Education Program Improvement and Accountability: An Illustrative Case of the Role of Value-Added Measures.” Journal of Teacher Education 63 (5): 318–334. doi:10.1177/0022487112447110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortman, C. L., and K. Schildkamp. 2011. “Alternative Quality Standards in Qualitative Research.” Qula Quant 2012 (46): 1727–1751. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffner, K. B. 2008. “Translating Data into Action: A Data Team Model as the Seed of Comprehensive District Change.” PhD diss., National Louis University.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., and C. H. Major. 2013. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K. C. Poortman, and A. Handelzalts. 2015. “Data Teams for School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., and W. M. Kuiper. 2010. “Data-Informed Curriculum Reform: Which Data, What Purposes, and Promoting and Hindering Factors.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 482–496. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., and C. Poortman. 2015. “Factors Influencing the Functioning of Data Teams.” Teachers College Record 117 (4): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoer, E., and J. Meierink. 2015. Understanding the Complexity of Teacher Interaction in a Teacher Professional Learning Community. European Journal of Teacher Education. Published online on 16 February 2015. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.994058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, L. 2001. “Lessons from an Inquiring School: Forms of Inquiry and Conditions for Teacher Learning.” In Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development That Matters, edited by A. Lieberman, and L. Miller, 141–158. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., R. Bolam, A. McMahon, M. Wallace, and S. Thomas. 2006. “Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Educational Change 7: 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., and J. B. Christman. 2003. Developing Communities of Instructional Practice: Lessons for Cincinnati and Philadelphia. C.P.R.E. Policy Briefs. RB-39. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swennen, A., K. Jones, and M. Volman. 2010. “Teacher Educators: Their Identities, Sub‐Identities and Implications for Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 36 (1–2): 131–148. doi:10.1080/19415250903457893.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., and L. Earl. 2012. Learning and Change Networks a Background Paper on Designing Networks to Make a Difference, (August), 1–63. Auckland, New Zealand: Ministry of Education, New Zealand and The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. 1965. “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups.” Psychological Bulletin 63 (6): 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization. 2013. Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education-Uses and Misuses. United Nations Educational, Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hurk, H. T. G., A. A. M. Houtveen, W. J. C. M. Van de Grift, and D. W. P. Cras. 2014. “Data-Feedback in Teacher Training. Using Observational Data to Improve Student Teachers’ Reading Instruction.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., R. Zwart, J. Meirink, and N. Verloop. 2010. Professional Development of Teachers: A Review Study of the Characteristics of Effective Interventions of Professional Development of Teachers. [Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren.] Leiden: ICLON/Expertisecentrum leren van docenten.
   Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, G., J. Vanhoof, M. Valcke, and P. van Petegem. 2011. “The Effects of Supporting the Use of School Feedback.” [De effecten van ondersteuning bij schoolfeedbackgebruik.] Pedagogische Studiën 88 (2): 90–106. doi:10.1080/03055698.2013.830245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., D. Ross, and A. Adams. 2008. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (1): 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., H. Westbroek, A. Handelzalts, A. Walraven, S. McKenney, J. Pieters, and B. de Vries. 2011. “Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 1235–1244. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. 1998. “Have We Learned Anything New about the Use of Evaluation?” American Journal of Evaluation 19: 21–33. doi:10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80178-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar