The development of an instrument to measure teachers’ inquiry habit of mind

References

• Abrami, P. C., R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, M. A. Surkes, R. Tamim, and D. Zhang. 2008. “Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 78 (4): 1102–1134. doi:10.3102/0034654308326084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzan, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. 2nd ed. Milton Keynes, England: University Press/Mc Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, L. 2000. “A Useable, Trans-Disciplinary Conception of Scholarship.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2): 137–153. doi:10.1080/072943600445619.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. 1995. EQS Structural Equations Programmanual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1989. “Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 24: 445–455. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009a. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009b. “Teacher Research as Stance.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. E. Noffke and B. Somekh, 39–49. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Comrey, L. A., and H. B. Lee. 1992. A First Course in Factor Analyses. 2nd ed. Hillside, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P. 2003. “Research and Evidence-Based Practice: Focusing on Practice and Practitioners.” In Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Educational Leadership and Management, edited by L. Anderson and N. Bennett, 104–114. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cornet, M., F. Huizinga, B. Minne, and D. Webbink. 2006. Kansrijkkennisbeleid [Promising Knowledge Policy]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Crommelinck, M., and F. Anseel. 2013. “Understanding and Encouraging Feedback-Seeking Behaviour: A Literature Review.” Medical Education 47 (3): 232–241. doi:10.1111/medu.12075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., and V. Venkatesh. 1996. “A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (1): 19–45. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., and S. Katz. 2002. “Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World.” In Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, edited by K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, G. C. Furman, K. Riley, J. MacBeath, P. Gronn, and B. Mulford, 1003–1022. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., and S. Katz. 2006. Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World: Harnessing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., and H. Timperley. 2008. Professional Learning Conversations: Challenges in Using Evidence for Improvement. New York: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Gauld, C. F. 2005. “Habits of Mind, Scholarship and Decision Making in Science and Religion.” Science & Education 14 (3–5): 291–308. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-1997-x.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., and E. T. Loiacono. 2002 January. “Randomizing Survey Question Order Vs. Grouping Questions by Construct: An Empirical Test of the Impact on Apparent Reliabilities and Links to Related Constructs.” In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, Big Island, HI, 3456–3465. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E., D. Leat, K. Wall, S. Higgins, and G. Edwards. 2006. “Learning to Learn: Teacher Research in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Teacher Development 10 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1080/13664530600773119.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., and H. Hodkinson. 2004. “The Significance of Individuals’ Dispositions in Workplace Learning: A Case Study of Two Teachers.” Journal of Education and Work 17 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1080/13639080410001677383.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. 1995. Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. 2010. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: From Idea to Integration.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 123: 63–72. doi:10.1002/tl.410.
   Google Scholar
• Imants, J., K. van Veen, B. Pelzer, M. Nijveldt, and J. van der Steen. 2010. “Onderzoeksgerelateerde activiteiten in het dagelijkse werk van leraren [Research related activities in daily work of teachers].” Pedadogische Studiën 87 (4): 272–287.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. K., and J. L. Johnson. 2002. “Capturing Complexity: A Typology of Reflective Practice for Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (1): 73–85. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., and L. Earl. 2010. “Learning about Networked Learning Communities.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 27–51. doi:10.1080/09243450903569718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., S. Sutherland, and L. Earl. 2005. “Toward an Evaluation Habit of Mind: Mapping the Journey.” Teachers College Record 107 (10): 2326–2350. doi:10.1111/tcre.2005.107.issue-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., M. Vermeulen, P. A. Kirschner, H. van Buuren, and F. Van Acker. 2013. “Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to Explain Teachers’ Willingness to Use ICT: A Perspective for Research on Teachers’ ICT Usage in Pedagogical Practices.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 22 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.754371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, L. R. 2005. “Making Inquiry a Habit of Mind: Learning to Use Inquiry to Understand and Improve Practice.” Studying Teacher Education 1 (2): 179–193. doi:10.1080/17425960500288366.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, M. L. 2010. De Invloed Van Schoolleiderschap Op Het Onderzoeksmatig Handelen Van Leraren in Veranderingsprocessen [The Influence of Schoolleadership on Resaerch Performance of Teachers during Processes of Change]. Eindrapport Kenniskring Leren En Innoveren. Amsterdam: Kenniscentrum Onderwijs en Opvoeding, Hogeschool van Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Leeman, Y., and W. Wardekker. 2010. “Verbetert onderzoek het onderwijs? [Does Research improve Education].” Tijdschrift Voor Lerarenopleiders (VELON/VELOV) 31 (1): 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, K., and M. A. Flores (2017). Trends in teacher education: a review of papers published in the European journal of teacher education over 40 years.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., J. R. Balla, and K. T. Hau. 1996. “An Evaluation of Incremental Fit Indices: A Clarification of Mathematical and Empirical Properties.” In Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, edited by G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumacker, 315–353. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, P. C., J. A. Meirink, D. Lockhorst, and H. W. Oolbekkink-Marchand. 2010. “(Leren) Onderzoeken Door Docenten in Het Voortgezet Onderwijs [(Learning to) research by Teachers in Secondary Education].” Pedadogische Studiën 87 (4): 232–252.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, P. C., H. W. Oolbekkink, J. A. Meirink, and D. Lockhorst. 2013. “Teacher Research in Secondary Education: Effects on Teachers’ Professional and School Development, and Issues of Quality.” International Journal of Educational Research 57: 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., L. Kyriakides, G. van der Werf, B. Creemers, H. Timperley, and L. Earl. 2014. “State of the art—Teacher Effectiveness and Professional Learning.” School Effectiveness And School Improvement 25 (2): 231–256. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munthe, E., and M. Rogne. 2015. “Research Based Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 46: 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998–2012. Mplus User’s Guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. J. 2015. “Intelligent Dispositions: Dewy, Habits and Inquiry in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 66: 86–97. doi:10.1177/0022487114535267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, R. D. 2008. “On the Reasons We Want Teachers of Good Disposition and Moral Character.” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (4): 288–299. doi:10.1177/0022487108321377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2004. Towards a Culture of Inquiry in DECS. South Australia: Department of Education and Children’s Services.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, F., and E. Meyers. 2006. “The Bright Side: Teacher Research in the Context of Educational Reform and Policy-Making.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (1): 69–86. doi:10.1080/13450600500365452.
   Google Scholar
• Snoek, M., and E. Moens. 2011. “The Impact of Teacher Research on Teacher Learning in Academic Training Schools in the Netherlands.” Professional Development in Education 37 (5): 817–835. doi:10.1080/19415257.2011.587525.
   Google Scholar
• So, K. 2013. “Knowledge Construction among Teachers within a Community Based on Inquiry as Stance.” Teaching and Teacher Education 29: 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tack, H., and R. Vanderlinde. 2014. “Teacher Educators’ Professional Development: Towards a Typology of Teacher Educators’ Researcherly Disposition.” British Journal of Educational Studies 62 (3): 297–315. doi:10.1080/00071005.2014.957639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert-Johnson, C. 2006. “Preparing Highly Qualified Teacher Candidates for Urban Schools: The Importance of Dispositions.” Educational and Urban Society 39 (1): 147–160. doi:10.1177/0013124506293321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, H. 2006. “Dispositions in Action : Do Dispositions Make a Difference in Practice?” Teacher Education Quarterly 33: 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. 2010. “Using Evidence in the Classroom for Professional Learning.” Paper presented at the Ontario Education Research Symposium, Ottawa, Canada..
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., and C. Lewis. 1973. “A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 28: 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Donk, C., and B. van Lanen. 2010. Praktijkonderzoek in de school. Bussum, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Rijst, R. M. 2009. The Research-Teaching Nexus in the Sciences: Scientific Research Dispositions and Teaching Practice. Leiden, The Netherlands: ICLON.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. 2003. “Teacher Research as Professional Development for P-12 Educators in the USA.” Educational Action Research 11 (2): 301–325. doi:10.1080/09650790300200211.
   Google Scholar
• Zuidema, L. A. 2012. “Making Space for Informal Inquiry Inquiry as Stance in an Online Induction Network.” Journal of Teacher Education 63 (2): 132–146. doi:10.1177/0022487111428326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar