Pre–service teachers’ generic and subject-specific lesson-planning skills: On learning adaptive teaching during initial teacher education

References

• Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl, eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom´s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, M. Neubrand, and Y. Tsai. 2010. “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. 2004. “Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24 (3): 200–212. doi:10.1177/0270467604265535.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, and W. Schmidt, eds. 2014. International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Opportunities to Learn. Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., J.-E. Gustafsson, and R. Shavelson. 2015. “Beyond Dichotomies: Competence Viewed as a Continuum.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., S. A. Roberts, and R. Shavelson. 2008. “Teachers’ Decision Making: From Alan J. Bishop to Today.” In Critical Issues in Mathematics Education, edited by P. Clarkson and N. Presmeg, 37–67. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., and C. Livingston. 1989. “Cognition and Improvisation: Differences in Mathematics Instruction by Expert and Novice Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 26 (4): 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., G. J. Mellenbergh, and J. V. Heerden. 2004. “The Concept of Validity.” Psychological Review 111 (4): 1061–1071. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. 1981. Das Denken von Lehrern bei Der Unterrichtsvorbereitung: Eine empirische Untersuchung zu kognitiven Prozessen von Mathematiklehrern [Teachers’ Thoughts for Planning: An Empirical Study on Cognitive Processes of Mathematics Teachers]. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher Expertise. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15459–15465). Amsterdam: Smelser and Baltes.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholtz, C., and J. König. 2015. “Erfassung von Planungskompetenz im Praxissemester.” [ Capturing Planning Competence in Long-term Practicum.] Journal für LehrerInnenbildung 15 (1): 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chizhik, E. W., and A. W. Chizhik. 2018. “Using Activity Theory to Examine How Teachers’ Lesson Plans Meet Students’ Learning Needs.” The Teacher Educator 53 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1080/08878730.2017.1296913.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. M., and P. L. Peterson. 1986. “Teachers’ Thought Processes.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by M. Wittrock, 255–296. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and A. M. Villegas. 2016. “Research on Teacher Preparation: Charting the Landscape of a Sprawling Field.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by D. H. Gitomer and C. A. Bells, 439–547. 5th ed. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, M. L., E. J. Trudeau, S. A. Stein, F. A. Richards, and S. R. Krause. 1998. “Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages.” Developmental Review 18 (3): 237–278. doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, N. J. 1992. “Modeling Human Expertise in Expert Systems.” In The Psychology of Expertise, edited by R. Hoffman, 29–60. New York, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L. Y. N. 2008. “On Teaching Adaptively.” Educational Psychologist 43 (3): 161–173. doi:10.1080/00461520802178466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dack, H. 2018. “Structuring Teacher Candidate Learning about Differentiated Instruction through Coursework.” Teaching and Teacher Education 69: 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., S. P. Newton, and R. C. Wei. 2013. “Developing and Assessing Beginning Teacher Effectiveness: The Potential of Performance Assessments.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25 (3): 179–204. doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9163-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., L. Verschaffel, and G. Kelchtermans. 2013. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Systematic Review of the Way in Which the Concept Has Pervaded Mathematics Educational Research.” Teaching and Teacher Education 34: 12–25. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enow, L., and A. Goodwyn. 2018. “The Invisible Plan: How English Teachers Develop Their Expertise and the Special Place of Adapting the Skills of Lesson Planning.” English in Education 52 (2): 120–134. doi:10.1080/04250494.2018.1438119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. 1996. “The Acquisition of Expert Performance: An Introduction to Some of the Issues.” In The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Science, Sports, and Games, edited by K. A. Ericsson, 1–50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Brussels: European Commission Education and Training UE.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. 2016. “Teacher Education Curriculum.” In International Handbook of Teacher Education, edited by J. Loughran and M. L. Hamilton, 187–230. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., and C. Day. 2006. “Contexts Which Shape and Reshape New Teachers’ Identities: A Multi-perspective Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2): 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner, L. D., and D. C. Griffey. 1985. “Teacher Cognition: Differences in Planning and Interactive Decision-making between Experienced and In-experienced Teachers.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 56 (1): 45–53. doi:10.1080/02701367.1985.10608430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, F. J., P. J. Lin, and T. Y. Wang. 2012. “Mathematics-related Teaching Competence of Taiwanese Primary Future Teachers: Evidence from TEDS-M.” ZDM 44 (3): 277–292. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0377-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., and M. Strong. 2011. “The Impact of Induction and Mentoring Programs for Beginning Teachers: A Critical Review of the Research.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, P. D. 2006. “Lesson Planning and the Student Teacher: Re‐thinking the Dominant Model.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (4): 483–498. doi:10.1080/00220270500363620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. 2003. Designing Language Tasks. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, T. D., and M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler. 1996. “Types and Qualities of Knowledge.” Educational Psychologist 3 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. 1992. “Professional Growth among Preservice and Beginning Teachers.” Review of Educational Research 62 (2): 129–169. doi:10.3102/00346543062002129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, G., and J. König. 2019. “Competence Measurement in (mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy.” Higher Education Policy 32: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. 2017. “Preservice Teachers’ Learning to Plan Intellectually Challenging Tasks.” Journal of Teacher Education 68 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1177/0022487116676313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P. 1995. “The Deutsche Didaktik.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 27 (4): 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärner, T., C. Bonnes, and C. Schölzel. 2019. “Bewertungstransparenz Im Referendariat.” [Assessment Transparency in Teacher Training.] Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 65 (3): 378–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMK [Standing Conference of the (State) Ministers for Education and Culture]. 2004. Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz Vom 16.12.2004 [Standards for Teacher Education: Education Sciences. Resolution of the Standing Conference of 16.12.2004]. Berlin, Germany: KMK.
   Google Scholar
• KMK [Standing Conference of the (State) Ministers for Education and Culture]. 2008. Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung [Content Requirements for Subject Areas and Subject Didactics in Teacher Education across Countries: Resolution of the Standing Conference of 16.10.2008 as Amended on 16.09.2010]. Berlin, Germany: KMK.
   Google Scholar
• König, J., and S. Blömeke. 2010. “Sozio-ökonomischer, bildungspolitischer und schulischer Kontext der Primarstufenlehrerausbildung im internationalen Vergleich.” [International Comparison of Socio-economic, Educational Political, and School Context of Primary Teacher Education.] In TEDS-M 2008 - Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Primarstufenlehrkräfte im internationalen Vergleich, edited by S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, and R. H. Lehmann, 39–53. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• König, J., and S. Blömeke. 2013. “Preparing Teachers of Mathematics in Germany.” In TEDS-M Encyclopaedia. A Guide to Teacher Education Context, Structure and Quality Assurance in 17 Countries. Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), edited by J. Schwille, L. Ingvarson, and R. Holdgreve–Resendez, 100–115. Amsterdam: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• König, J., A. Bremerich-Vos, C. Buchholtz, S. Lammerding, S. Strauß, I. Fladung, and C. Schleiffer. 2017b. “Die Bedeutung des Professionswissens von Referendarinnen und Referendaren mit Fach Deutsch für ihre Planungskompetenz (PlanvoLL-D).” [The Significance of Professional Knowledge of Teacher Candidates of German for Their Planning Competence (PlanvoLL-D).] In Unterrichtsplanung [Lesson Planning], edited by S. Wernke and K. Zierer, 121–133. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• König, J., A. Bremerich-Vos, C. Buchholtz, S. Lammerding, S. Strauß, I. Fladung, and C. Schleiffer. 2017a. “Modelling and Validating the Learning Opportunities of Preservice Language Teachers: On the Key Components of the Curriculum for Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 394–412. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., C. Buchholtz, and D. Dohmen. 2015. “Analyse von schriftlichen Unterrichtsplanungen: Empirische Befunde zur Didaktischen Adaptivität als Aspekt der Planungskompetenz angehender Lehrkräfte.” [An Analysis of Written Lesson Plans to Examine Pedagogical Adaptivity in the Planning Competences of Trainee Teachers.] Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 18 (2): 375–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., J. Doll, N. Buchholtz, S. Förster, K. Kaspar, A.-M. Rühl, S. Strauß, A. Bremerich-Vos, I. Fladung, and G. Kaiser. 2018. “Pädagogisches Wissen versus Fachdidaktisches Wissen? Struktur des Professionellen Wissens bei angehenden Deutsch-, Englisch- und Mathematiklehrkräften im Studium.” [General Pedagogical Knowledge versus Pedagogical Content Knowledge? the Structure of Professional Knowledge in Pre-service Teachers of German, English, and Mathematics at University.] Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 21 (3): 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., and J. Greeno. 1986. “The Cognitive Skill of Teaching.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (2): 75–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. 2016. “Partial Credit Model.” In Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One: Models, edited by W. van der Linden, ch. 7, pp. 137–154. Chapman: Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Mutton, T., H. Hagger, and K. Burn. 2011. “Learning to Plan, Planning to Learn: The Developing Expertise of Beginning Teachers.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (4): 399–416. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.580516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubrand, M., A. Jordan, S. Krauss, W. Blum, and K. Löwen. 2013. “Task Analysis in COACTIV: Examining the Potential for Cognitive Activation in German Mathematics Classrooms.” In Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, edited by M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, and M. Neubrand, 125–144. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., M. Vaughn, R. Q. Scales, M. A. Gallagher, A. W. Parsons, S. G. Davis, M. Pierczynski, and M. Allen. 2018. “Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 88 (2): 205–242. doi:10.3102/0034654317743198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R., and R. Chung 2007. Technical report of the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT): Summary of validity and reliability studies for the 2003–04 pilot year. Stanford: Stanford University. .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T. 1987. “Structuring and Adjusting Content for Students: A Study of Live and Simulated Tutoring of Addition.” American Educational Research Journal 24 (1): 13–48. doi:10.3102/00028312024001013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusznyak, L., and E. Walton. 2011. “Lesson Planning Guidelines for Student Teachers: A Scaffold for the Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Education as Change 15 (2): 271–285. doi:10.1080/16823206.2011.619141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1998. “Toward a Theory of Teaching-in-context.” Issues in Education 4 (1): 1–94. doi:10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, D. 2018. Metatheorie Der Allgemeinen Didaktik: Ein Systemtheoretisch Begründeter Vorschlag [Metatheory of General Didactics: A Systemtheoretically Founded Approach]. Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., and H. Borko. 1979. “Research on Teachers’ Decisions in Planning Instruction.” Educational Horizons 57 (4): 183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., and P. Stern. 1981. “Research on Teachers’ Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior.” Review of Educational Research 51 (4): 455–498. doi:10.3102/00346543051004455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., and D. Strahan. 2001. “Toward A Prototype of Expertise in Teaching. A Descritptive Case Study.” Journal of Teacher Education 55 (4): 357–371. doi:10.1177/0022487104267587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., and K. F. Miller. 2018. “Expertise and Expert Performance in Teaching.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. 2nd ed, edited by A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, and A. M. Williams, Ch. 24, pp. 431–452. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strietholt, R., and E. Terhart. 2009. “Referendare Beurteilen. Eine Explorative Analyse Von Beurteilungsinstrumenten in Der Zweiten Phase Der Lehrerbildung.” [Assessing Pre-service Teachers. An Explorative Analysis of Assessment Instruments during the Second Phase of Teacher Education.] Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 55 (4): 622–645.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzare, Z. O. 2007. “The Transition Process: The Early Years of Being a Teacher.” In Handbook of Teacher Education, edited by T. Townsend and R. Bates, 343–364. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E. 1994. “„Lernen Lernen und das eigene Verstehen lernen.“ [Learning to Learn and Learning about One’s Own Comprehension.].” In Verstehen. Psychologischer Prozess und Didaktische Aufgabe [Comprehension. Psychological Process and Didactic Task], edited by K. Reusser and M. Reusser-Weyeneth, 183–205. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, D. A. 1991. “Expert and Novice Teacher Decision Making.” Journal of Teacher Education 42 (4): 292–305. doi:10.1177/002248719104200407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M. L., R. J. Adams, and M. R. Wilson. 1997. ConQuest: Multi-Aspect Test Software [Computer Program]. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. J. 1977. “A study of teacher planning: Description and theory development using ethnographic and information processing methods.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Michigan State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zahorik, J. A. 1975. “Teachers’ Planning Models.” Educational Leadership 33 (2): 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar