References
- A. Katrin, A., H. W. Marsh, R. Pekrun, S. Lichtenfeld, K. Murayama, and R. Vom Hofe. 2017. “Math Self-Concept, Grades, and Achievement Test Scores: Long-Term Reciprocal Effects across Five Waves and Three Achievement Tracks.” Journal of Educational Psychology 109 (5): 621‒634. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000163.
- Abdullah, A. H. 2017. “Mathematics Teachers’ Level of Knowledge and Practice on the Implementation of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS).” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13: 3‒17. doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a.
- Ahsan, T., and U. Sharma. 2018. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion of Students with High Support Needs in Regular Classrooms in Bangladesh.” British Journal of Special Education 45 (1): 81‒97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12211.
- Akay, H., and N. Boz. 2010. “The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes toward Mathematics and Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teachers.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 35 (1): 59–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.6.
- Alegre, F., L. Moliner, A. Maroto, and G. Lorenzo-Valentin. 2018. “Peer Tutoring in Mathematics in Primary Education: A Systematic Review.” Educational Review 71 (6): 767‒791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1474176.
- Alegre, F., L. Moliner, A. Maroto, and G. Lorenzo-Valentin. 2019a. “Peer Tutoring and Mathematics in Secondary Education: Literature Review, Effect Sizes, Moderators, and Implications for Practice.” Heliyon 5 (9): e02491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02491.
- Alegre, F., L. Moliner, A. Maroto, and G. Lorenzo-Valentin. 2019b. “Peer Tutoring in Algebra: A Study in Middle School.” The Journal of Educational Research 112 (6): 693‒699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1693947.
- Alegre, F., L. Moliner, A. Maroto, and G. Lorenzo-Valentin. 2020. “Academic Achievement and Peer Tutoring in Mathematics: A Comparison between Primary and Secondary Education.” SAGE Open 10 (2): 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929295.
- Alegre-Ansuategui, F., L. M. Jose, G. Lorenzo, and A. Maroto. 2018. “Peer Tutoring and Academic Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (1): 337‒354. doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79805.
- Alegre-Ansuategui, F. J., and L. Moliner-Miravet. 2017. “Emotional and Cognitive Effects of Peer Tutoring among Secondary School Mathematics Students.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 48 (8): 1185‒1205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1342284.
- Aljaberi, N., and E. Gheith. 2018. “In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching, Learning and Nature of Mathematics and Their Mathematics Teaching Practices.” Journal of Education and Learning 7 (5): 156. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p156.
- APA, AERA, and NCME. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. New York: American Educational Research Association.
- Ayre, C., and A. J. Scally. 2014. “Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 47 (1): 79‒86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.
- Baloche, L., and C. M. Brody. 2017. “Cooperative Learning: Exploring Challenges, Crafting Innovations.” Journal of Education for Teaching 43 (3): 274‒283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513.
- Beswick, K. 2019. “The Role of Knowledge and Beliefs in Helping Learners to Progress Their Mathematical Understanding.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 22 (2): 125‒128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09432-5.
- Bieda, K., A. Visnawathan, R. McCrory, and P. Sikorskii. 2019. “The UTE Model: Enhancing Learning in Developmental Mathematics and Preparing Mathematics Teachers of the Future.” PRIMUS 30 (7): 750‒761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1626958.
- Boyle, C., K. Topping, and D. Jindal-Snape. 2013. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion in High Schools.” Teachers and Teaching 19 (5): 527‒542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.827361.
- Boynton, P. M., and T. Greenhalgh. 2004. “Selecting, Designing, and Developing Your Questionnaire.” BMJ 328 (7451): 1312‒1315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.
- Buchs, C., D. Filippou, C. Pulfrey, and V. Yann. 2017. “Challenges for Cooperative Learning Implementation: Reports from Elementary School Teachers.” Journal of Education for Teaching 43 (3): 296‒306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673.
- Bucur, A., C. V. Kifor, and S. C. Mărginean. 2018. “Evaluation of the Quality and Quantity of Research Results in Higher Education.” Quality & Quantity 52 (1): 101‒118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0452-9.
- Cattell, R. B. 1965. “A Biometrics Invited Paper. Factor Analysis: An Introduction to Essentials I. The Purpose and Underlying Models.” Biometrics 21 (1): 190. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2528364.
- Chapman, D., and J. Carter. 1979. “Translation Procedures for the Cross Cultural Use of Measurement Instruments.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1 (3): 71‒76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737001003071.
- Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. “Evaluating Goodness-Of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 9 (2): 233‒255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5.
- Chiu, M. 2017. “Self-Concept, Self-Efficacy, and Mathematics Achievement: Students in 65 Regions Including the US and Asia.” What Matters? Research Trends in International Comparative Studies in Mathematics Education 267‒288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51187-0_15.
- Clayton, M. J. 1997. “Delphi: A Technique to Harness Expert Opinion for Critical Decision‐Making Tasks in Education.” Educational Psychology 17 (4): 373‒386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401.
- Copur-Gencturk, Y., D. Plowman, and H. Bai. 2019. “Mathematics Teachers’ Learning: Identifying Key Learning Opportunities Linked to Teachers’ Knowledge Growth.” American Educational Research Journal 56 (5): 1590‒1628. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218820033.
- Cronbach, L. J., and P. E. Meehl. 1955. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.” Psychological Bulletin 52 (4): 281‒302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.
- Dignath, C., and B. Gerhard. 2018. “Teachers’ Direct and Indirect Promotion of Self-Regulated Learning in Primary and Secondary School Mathematics Classes–Insights from Video-Based Classroom Observations and Teacher Interviews.” Metacognition and Learning 13 (2): 127‒157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x.
- Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.
- Ding, M., L. Xiaobao, D. Piccolo, and G. Kulm. 2007. “Teacher Interventions in Cooperative-Learning Mathematics Classes.” The Journal of Educational Research 100 (3): 162‒175. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.3.162-175.
- Duran, D., and C. Monereo. 2005. “Styles and Sequences of Cooperative Interaction in Fixed and Reciprocal Peer Tutoring.” Learning and Instruction 15 (3): 179‒199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.002.
- Dziuban, C. D., and E. C. Shirkey. 1974. “When Is a Correlation Matrix Appropriate for Factor Analysis? Some Decision Rules.” Psychological Bulletin 81 (6): 358‒361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036316.
- Efron, B. 1969. “Student’s t-Test under Symmetry Conditions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 64 (328): 1278‒1302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10501056.
- Eickelmann, B., and M. Vennemann. 2017. “Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs regarding ICT in Teaching and Learning in European Countries.” European Educational Research Journal 16 (6): 733‒761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899.
- Einhorn, H. J. 1974. “Expert Judgment: Some Necessary Conditions and an Example.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (5): 562‒571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037164.
- Ekmekci, A., A. Papakonstantinou, R. Parr, and M. Shah. 2019. “Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, and Perceptions about Mathematics Teaching.” Handbook of Research on TPACK in the Digital Age 1‒23. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.ch001.
- Ekstam, U., J. Korhonen, K. Linnanmäki, and P. Aunio. 2017. “Special Education Pre-Service Teachers’ Interest, Subject Knowledge, and Teacher Efficacy Beliefs in Mathematics.” Teaching and Teacher Education 63: 338‒345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.009.
- Ernest, P. 1989. “The Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of the Mathematics Teacher: A Model.” Journal of Education for Teaching 15 (1): 13‒33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102.
- Fantuzzo, J. W., J. A. King, and L. R. Heller. 1992. “Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Mathematics and School Adjustment: A Component Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (3): 331‒339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331.
- Fink, A. 2015. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage Publications.
- Fisher, M. H., and D. Royster. 2016. “Mathematics Teachers’ Support and Retention: Using Maslow’s Hierarchy to Understand Teachers’ Needs.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 47 (7): 993‒1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1162333.
- Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, N. B. P. Johnell Bentz, and C. L. Hamlett. 1997. “The Nature of Student Interactions during Peer Tutoring with and without Prior Training and Experience.” American Educational Research Journal 31 (1): 75‒103. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031001075.
- Gillham, B. 2008. Developing a Questionnaire. London: A&C Black.
- Green, R. A. 2014. “The Delphi Technique in Educational Research.” SAGE Open 4 (2): 215824401452977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014529773.
- Harmsen, R., M. Helms-Lorenz, R. Maulana, and K. van Veen. 2018. “The Relationship between Beginning Teachers’ Stress Causes, Stress Responses, Teaching Behaviour and Attrition.” Teachers and Teaching 24 (6): 626‒643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1465404.
- Hewitt, K. K., B. J. Irby, J. Boswell, and J. Lynch. 2016. “Axes of Difference and Areas of Inquiry in Mentoring and Tutoring.” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning 24 (3): 179‒185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1232677.
- Horgan, K., and G.-H. Fíodhna. 2019. “Irish Student Teachers’ Beliefs about Self, Learning and Teaching: A Longitudinal Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42 (2): 151‒174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576625.
- Horzum, T., and E. Ertekin. 2018. “Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of the Base Concept.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 49 (2): 176‒199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1352042.
- Hox, J. J., M. Moerbeek, and R. Van de Schoot. 2017. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852279.
- Irby, B. J. 2018. “Editor’s Overview: Differences and Similarities with Mentoring, Tutoring, and Coaching.” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 26 (2): 115‒121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1489237.
- Jacobson, E., and J. Kilpatrick. 2015. “Understanding Teacher Affect, Knowledge, and Instruction over Time: An Agenda for Research on Productive Disposition for Teaching Mathematics.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 18 (5): 401‒406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9316-9.
- Kaiser, H. F. 1958. “The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 23 (3): 187‒200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289233.
- Karlberg, M., and C. Bezzina. 2020. “The Professional Development Needs of Beginning and Experienced Teachers in Four Municipalities in Sweden.” Professional Development in Education 1‒18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1712451.
- Keselman, H. J., C. J. Huberty, L. M. Lix, S. Olejnik, R. A.Cribbie, B. Donahue, R. K. Kowalchuk, et al. 1998. “Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of Their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 350‒386. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003350.
- Kiviniemi, U., P. Tynjälä, H. L. T. Heikkinen, and A. Martin. 2020. “Running a Hybrid: Mingling In-service and Pre-service Teachers in Peer-mentoring Groups.” European Journal of Teacher Education 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1766442.
- Kiwanuka, H. N., J. Van Damme, W. Van Den Noortgate, D. N. Anumendem, G. Vanlaar, C. Reynolds, and S. Namusisi. 2017. “How Do Student and Classroom Characteristics Affect Attitude toward Mathematics? A Multivariate Multilevel Analysis.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28 (1): 1‒21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123.
- Knezic, D., P. Meijer, A. Toom, Ä. Leijen, J. Mena, and J. Husu. 2019. “Student Teachers’ Self-dialogues, Peer Dialogues, and Supervisory Dialogues in Placement Learning.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42 (5): 539–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1652901.
- Kuder, G. F., and M. W. Richardson. 1937. “The Theory of the Estimation of Test Reliability.” Psychometrika 2 (3): 151‒160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288391.
- Lane, C., and R. Maire. 2019. “Out-of-Field Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: An Examination of Change and Tensions Using Zone Theory.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (2): 337‒355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09964-5.
- Lawshe, C. H. 1975. “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity.” Personnel Psychology 28 (4): 563‒575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
- Laxman, K. 2010. “A Conceptual Framework Mapping the Application of Information Search Strategies to Well and Ill-Structured Problem Solving.” Computers & Education 55 (2): 513‒526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.014.
- Limpo, T. 2018. “Development of a Short Measure of Writing Apprehension: Validity Evidence and Association with Writing Frequency, Process, and Performance.” Learning and Instruction 58: 115‒125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.001.
- Lin, K.-Y., and P. John Williams. 2016. “Taiwanese Preservice Teachers’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Teaching Intention.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (6): 1021‒1036. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2.
- Li‐tze, H., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1‒55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
- Lloyd, G. M. 2018. “Understanding Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education through the Characteristics and Activities of Preservice Teachers, Elementary Mathematics Specialists, and Mathematics Teacher Educators.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 21 (2): 95‒98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9404-8.
- Lui, A. M., and S. M. Bonner. 2016. “Preservice and Inservice Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, and Instructional Planning in Primary School Mathematics.” Teaching and Teacher Education 56: 1‒13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.015.
- Lutovac, S., and R. Kaasila. 2018. “Future Directions in Research on Mathematics-Related Teacher Identity.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (4): 759‒776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9796-4.
- Maaranen, K., H. Kynäslahti, R. Byman, R. Jyrhämä, and S. Sintonen. 2019. “Teacher Education Matters: Finnish Teacher Educators’ Concerns, Beliefs, and Values.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42 (2): 211‒227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1566317.
- Maasz, J., and S. Wolfgang. 2009. Beliefs and Attitudes in Mathematics Education. Boston: Brill. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907235.
- Martínez-Sierra, G., Y. Arellano-García, A. Hernández-Moreno, and N.-G. Cristian. 2018. “Daily Emotional Experiences of A High School Mathematics Teacher in the Classroom: A Qualitative Experience-Sampling Method.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17 (3): 591‒611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9879-x.
- Mertler, C. A. 2018. Introduction to Educational Research. New York: Sage Publications.
- Messick, S. 1989. “Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment.” Educational Researcher 18 (2): 5‒11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018002005.
- Moliner, L., and F. Alegre. 2020a. “Effects of Peer Tutoring on Middle School Students’ Mathematics Self-Concepts.” Plos One 15 (4): e0231410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231410.
- Moliner, L., and F. Alegre. 2020b. “Peer Tutoring Effects on Students’ Mathematics Anxiety: A Middle School Experience.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: e1610. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01610.
- Mu, Y., X. Liu, and L. Wang. 2018b. “A Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient Based Decision Tree and Its Parallel Implementation.” Information Sciences 435: 40‒58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.059.
- Mulvihill, T. M., and L. E. Martin. 2020. “Voices in Education: Mathematics and Teacher Education.” The Teacher Educator 55 (1): 1‒5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2020.1687184.
- Novick, M. R., and C. Lewis. 1966. “Coefficient Alpha and the Reliability of Composite Measurements.” Psychometrika 32 (1): 1‒13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289400.
- Panadero, E., and M. Alqassab. 2019. “An Empirical Review of Anonymity Effects in Peer Assessment, Peer Feedback, Peer Review, Peer Evaluation and Peer Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1253‒1278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.
- Pare, G., A.-F. Cameron, P. Poba-Nzaou, and M. Templier. 2013. “A Systematic Assessment of Rigor in Information Systems Ranking-Type Delphi Studies.” Information & Management 50 (5): 207‒217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003.
- Putnick, D. L., C.-S. Hahn, J. T. Charlene Hendricks, D. Suwalsky, and M. H. Bornstein. 2019. “Child, Mother, Father, and Teacher Beliefs about Child Academic Competence: Predicting Math and Reading Performance in European American Adolescents.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 30 (2): 298‒314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12477.
- Qian, H., and P. Youngs. 2016. “The Effect of Teacher Education Programs on Future Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge: A Five-Country Analysis Using TEDS-M Data.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 19 (4): 371‒396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9297-0.
- Ren, L., and W. M. Smith. 2018. “Teacher Characteristics and Contextual Factors: Links to Early Primary Teachers’ Mathematical Beliefs and Attitudes.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 21 (4): 321‒350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9365-3.
- Rosenblad, A. 2015. “A Step-By-Step Approach to Using SAS® for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling, Second Edition.” International Statistical Review 83 (2): 325‒326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12111_2.
- Russo, J., J. Bobis, P. Sullivan, A. Downton, S. Livy, M. McCormick, and S. Hughes. 2020. “Exploring the Relationship between Teacher Enjoyment of Mathematics, Their Attitudes Towards Student Struggle and Instructional Time Amongst Early Years Primary Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 88: 102983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102983.
- Sansone, D. 2017. “Why Does Teacher Gender Matter?” Economics of Education Review 61 (1): 9‒18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.004.
- Schmidt, W. H., L. Cogan, and R. Houang. 2011. “The Role of Opportunity to Learn in Teacher Preparation: An International Context.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (2): 138‒153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110391987.
- Schmidt, W. H., N. A. Burroughs, R. T. Houang, and L. S. Cogan. 2018. “The Role of Content Knowledge in Mathematics Teacher Preparation: A Study of Traditional and Alternative Teacher Preparation in Texas.” Journal of Teacher Education 71 (2): 233‒246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118805989.
- Schoen, R. C., and L. Mark. 2019. “Teacher Beliefs about Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Identifying and Clarifying Three Constructs.” Cogent Education 6 (1): 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1599488.
- Shin, M., M. W. Ok, E. Y. Kang, and D. P. Bryant. 2018. “Korean Elementary School Teachers’ Implementation of Mathematics Instruction for Students Struggling to Learn Mathematics in Inclusive Settings.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 19 (2): 145‒157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12437.
- Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Fleiss. 1979. “Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (2): 420‒428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
- Singh, R., and S. Sarkar. 2015. “Does Teaching Quality Matter? Students Learning Outcome Related to Teaching Quality in Public and Private Primary Schools in India.” International Journal of Educational Development 41: 153‒163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.02.009.
- Sogillo, R., W. D. Guimba, and J. C. Alico. 2016. “Assessment of Mathematics Teachers in a Public and a Private School: Implications to the Quality of Teaching Secondary Mathematics.” Advances in Sciences and Humanities 2 (2): 7‒16. doi:https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160202.1.
- Som, R. K. 1995. Practical Sampling Techniques. New York: CRC Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482273465.
- Spencer, V. G. 2006. “Peer Tutoring and Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: A Review of the Literature.” Behavioral Disorders 31 (2): 204‒222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100206.
- Srivastava, M., A. A. de Boer, and S. J. Pijl. 2017. “Preparing for the Inclusive Classroom: Changing Teachers’ Attitudes and Knowledge.” Teacher Development 21 (4): 561‒579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1279681.
- Stoline, M. R. 1981. “The Status of Multiple Comparisons: Simultaneous Estimation of All Pairwise Comparisons in One-Way ANOVA Designs.” The American Statistician 35 (3): 134‒141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1981.10479331.
- Stylianides, A. J., and S. Delaney. 2018. “Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs.” ICME-13 Monographs 219‒228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68342-3_15.
- Talbott, E., A. Trzaska, and J. L. Zurheide. 2017. “A Systematic Review of Peer Tutoring Interventions for Students with Disabilities.” The Wiley Handbook of Diversity in Special Education 321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118768778.ch16.
- Tinsley, H. E., and D. J. Weiss. 1975. “Interrater Reliability and Agreement of Subjective Judgments.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 22 (4): 358‒376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076640.
- Topping, K. 1996. “The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Typology and Review of the Literature.” Higher Education 32 (3): 321‒345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138870.
- Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249‒276. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.
- Topping, K., J. Campbell, W. Douglas, and A. Smith. 2003. “Cross-Age Peer Tutoring in Mathematics with Seven- and 11-Year-Olds: Influence on Mathematical Vocabulary, Strategic Dialogue and Self-Concept.” Educational Research 45 (3): 287‒308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000137274.
- Van der Beek, J. P. J., S. H. G. Van der Ven, E. H. Kroesbergen, and P. P. M. Leseman. 2017. “Self-Concept Mediates the Relation between Achievement and Emotions in Mathematics.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (3): 478‒495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12160.
- Verloop, N., J. Van Driel, and P. Meijer. 2001. “Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 35 (5): 441‒461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(02)00003-4.
- Voet, M., and B. De Wever. 2019. “Teachers’ Adoption of Inquiry-Based Learning Activities: The Importance of Beliefs about Education, the Self, and the Context.” Journal of Teacher Education 70 (5): 423–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751399.
- Wallin, A., P. Nokelainen, and S. Mikkonen. 2019. “How Experienced Professionals Develop Their Expertise in Work-Based Higher Education: A Literature Review.” Higher Education 77 (2): 359‒378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0279-5.
- Webb, N. M., M. L. Franke, M. Ing, A. C. Turrou, N. C. Johnson, and J. Zimmerman. 2017. “Teacher Practices that Promote Productive Dialogue and Learning in Mathematics Classrooms.” International Journal of Educational Research 97 (1): 176‒186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009.
- Welty, G. 1972. “Communications. Problems of Selecting Experts from Delphi Exercises.” Academy of Management Journal 15 (1): 121‒124. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/254805.
- Wilkins, J. L. M. 2008. “The Relationship among Elementary Teachers’ Content Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11 (2): 139‒164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9068-2.
- Yerdelen, S., T. Durksen, and R. M. Klassen. 2018. “An International Validation of the Engaged Teacher Scale.” Teachers and Teaching 24 (6): 673‒689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1457024.
- Yin, H., and X. Zheng. 2018. “Facilitating Professional Learning Communities in China: Do Leadership Practices and Faculty Trust Matter?” Teaching and Teacher Education 76: 140‒150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.002.
- Yow, J. A., J. A. Eli, M. Beisiegel, A. McCloskey, and R. M. Welder. 2016. “Challenging Transitions and Crossing Borders: Preparing Novice Mathematics Teacher Educators to Support Novice K-12 Mathematics Teachers.” Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 18 (1): 52‒69.
- Yun, G. W., and C. W. Trumbo. 2006. “Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-Mail, & Web Form.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00112.x.
- Zhu, M., Q. Liu, F. Yao, T. Yang, X. Zhang, and J. Shi. 2018. “The Relationship between Teacher Self-Concept, Teacher Efficacy and Burnout.” Teachers and Teaching 24 (7): 788‒801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1483913.
- Zumbo, B. D., and E. K. H. Chan. 2014. “Reflections on Validation Practices in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences.” Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences 54 (1): 321‒327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_19.