6,882
Views
83
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 513-531 | Received 03 Sep 2019, Accepted 27 Aug 2020, Published online: 08 Oct 2020

References

  • Ananiadou, K., and M. Claro 2009. 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Eduation Working Papers, No. 41. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Bangemann, M. 1994. Europe and the Global Informationsociety. Recommendations of the European Council. Brussels: European Union publications.
  • Björk, G., and O. Hatlevik. 2018. “Newly Qualified Teachers’ Professional Digital Competence: Implications for Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 41 (2): 214–231. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.
  • Bond, M., O. Zawacki-Richter, and M. Nichols. 2019. “Revisiting Five Decades of Educational Technology Research: A Content and Authorship Analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (1): 12–63. doi:10.1111/bjet.12730.
  • Bustos-López, H. G., and M. G. Gómez-Zermeño. 2018. “Digital Competence in High School Teachers as a Means for Educational Innovation.” CPU-e., Revista De Investigación Educativa 26: 66–86.
  • Cochrane Style Guide Working Group. 2016. “Cochrane Style Guide Basics.” Accessed 30 July 2018. http://www.cochrane.org/style/csgbasics.html
  • Coll, C., and J. L. Rodríguez Illera. 2008. “Literacy, New Literacies and Digital Literacy: ICT in the School Curriculum.” In Psicología de la educación virtual. Enseñar y aprender con las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación, edited by C. Coll and C. Monereo, 325–347. Madrid: Morata.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. 2020. “Accountability in Teacher Education.” Action in Teacher Education 42 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/01626620.2019.1704464.
  • Ely, E., P. C. Pullen, M. J. Kennedy, and M. C. Williams. 2015. “A Multimedia Tool to Deliver Professional Development of Vocabulary Instruction.” Journal of Special Education Technology 30 (1): 59–72. doi:10.1177/016264341503000105.
  • Erstad, O. 2013. Digital Learning Lives: Trajectories, Literacies, and Schooling. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Escudero, J. M., B. Martínez-Domínguez, and J. M. Nieto. 2018. “ICT in Continuing Teacher Training in the Spanish Context.” Revista De Educación 382: 56–78. doi:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2018-382-392.
  • Esteve, F. 2015. “La competencia digital del futuro docente: análisis de su autopercepción y evaluación de su desempeño por medio de un entorno 3D.” (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
  • European Commision. 2010. “Europa 2020. Una Estrategia para un crecimiento inteligente, sostenible e integrador.” Brussels 3 (3): 2010.
  • European Commision. 2012a. “La Comisión presenta la nueva estrategia Replantear la Educación.” Brussels 20 (11): 2012.
  • European Commision. 2012b. “Un nuevo concepto de educación: Invertir en las competencias para lograr mejores resultados socioeconómicos.” Brussels 20 (11): 2012.
  • Ferrari, A. 2012. Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Seville: JRC IPTS. doi:10.2791/82116.
  • Fraser, J., L. Atkins, and R. Hall. 2013. DigiLit Leicester. Supporting Teachers, Promoting Digital Literacy, Transforming Learning. Leicester: Leicester City Council.
  • From, J. 2017. “Pedagogical Digital Competence—between Values, Knowledge and Skills.” Higher Education Studies 7 (2): 43–50. doi:10.5539/hes.v7n2p43.
  • Gallagher, M. S. 2018. “KakaoTalk Meets the Ministry of Education: Mobile Learning in South Korean Higher Education.” In Mobile Learning and Higher Education, edited by H. Crompton and J. Traxler, 136–147. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • García-Martínez, I., J. M. Fernández-Batanero, D. Cobos Sanchiz, and A. Luque de La Rosa. 2019. “Using Mobile Devices for Improving Learning Outcomes and Teachers’ Professionalization.” Sustainability 11 (24): 6917. doi:10.3390/su11246917.
  • George, A., and M. Sanders. 2017. “Evaluating the Potential of Teacher-designed Technology-based Tasks for Meaningful Learning: Identifying Needs for Professional Development.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (6): 2871–2895. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9609-y.
  • Gisbert-Cervera, M., and J. L. Lázaro-Cantabrana. 2015. “Professional Development in Teacher Digital Competence and Improving School Quality from the Teachers’ Perspective: A Case Study.” New Approaches in Educational Research 4 (2): 115–122. doi:10.7821/naer.2015.7.123.
  • Gurevich, I., H. Stein, and D. Gorev. 2017. “Tracking Professional Development of Novice Teachers When Integrating Technology in Teaching Mathematics.” Computers in the Schools 34 (4): 267–2893. doi:10.1080/07380569.2017.1387470.
  • Hall, R., L. Atkins, and J. Fraser. 2014. “Defining a Self-evaluation Digital Literacy Framework for Secondary Educators: The DigiLit Leicester Project.” Research in Learning Technology 22. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.21440.
  • Hargreaves, A., and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Hennessy, S., T. Dragovic, and P. Warwick. 2018. “A Research-informed, School-based Professional Development Workshop Programme to Promote Dialogic Teaching with Interactive Technologies.” Professional Development in Education 44 (2): 145–168. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1258653.
  • Hernández-Martín, A., and J. Martín de Arriba. 2017. “Concepts of Non-university Teachers on Collaborative Learning with ICT.” Educación XX1 20 (1): 185–208. doi:10.5944/educXX1.17508.
  • Howell, J. 2012. Teaching with ICT: Digital Pedagogies for Collaboration and Creativity. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Hutchison, A. 2012. “Literacy Teachers’ Perception of Professional Development that Increases Integration of Technology into Literacy Instruction.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 21 (1): 37–56. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.659894.
  • Hutton, B., F. Catalá-López, and D. Moher. 2016. “La Extensión De La Declaración PRISMA Para Revisiones Sistemáticas Que Incorporan Metaanálisis En Red: PRISMA-NMA.” MedClin (Barc) 147 (6). doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025.
  • Ilomäki, L., S. Paavola, M. Lakkala, and A. Kantosalo. 2016. “Digital Competence – An Emergent Boundary Concept for Policy and Educational Research.” Education and Information Technologies 21 (3): 655–679. doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4.
  • Instefjord, E., and E. Munthe. 2017. “Educating Digitally Competent Teachers: A Study of Integration of Professional Digital Competence in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.
  • Kennedy, M. J., W. J. Rodgers, J. E. Romig, J. W. Lloyd, and M. T. Brownell. 2017. “Effects of Multimedia Professional Development Package on Inclusive Science Teachers’ Vocabulary Instruction.” Journal of Teacher Education 68 (2): 213–230. doi:10.1177/0022487116687554.
  • Kirschner, P., T. Wubbels, and M. Brekelmans. 2009. “Puntos de referencia para los programas de formación docente en el uso pedagógico de las TIC.” In Manual internacional de tecnología de la información en educación primaria y secundaria, edited by J. Voogt and G. Knezek, 435–447. New York: Springer.
  • Kivunja, C. 2013. “Embedding Digital Pedagogy in Pre-Service Higher Education to Better Prepare Teachers for the Digital Generation.” International Journal of Higher Education 2 (4): 131–142.
  • Knoke, D., and S. Yang. 2008. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Social Network Analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Krumsvik, R. J. 2009. “Situated Learning in the Network Society and the Digitized School.” European Journal of Teacher Education 32 (2): 167–185. doi:10.1080/02619760802457224.
  • Krumsvik, R. J. 2012. “Teacher Educators’ Digital Competence.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58 (3): 269–280. doi:10.1080/00313831.2012.726273.
  • Krumsvik, R. J., L. Ø. Jones, M. Øfstegaard, and O. J. Eikeland. 2016. “Upper Secondary School Teachers’ Digital Competence: Analysed by Demographic, Personal and Professional Characteristics.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 11 (3): 143–164. doi:10.18261/.1891-943x-2016-03-02.
  • Markauskaite, L. 2007. “Exploración de la estructura de la alfabetización en TIC de los docentes en formación: Los componentes principales y las relaciones entre las capacidades cognitivas y técnicas generales.” Investigación y Desarrollo de Tecnología Educativa 55: 547–572.
  • Michos, K., and D. Hernández-Leo. 2020. “CIDA: A Collective Inquiry Framework to Study and Support Teachers as Designers in Technological Environments.” Computers & Education 143. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679.
  • Mishra, P., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
  • Mishra, P., M. J. Koehler, and D. Henriksen. 2011. “The Seven Trans-Disciplinary Habits of Mind: Extending the TPACK Framework Towards 21st Century Learning.” Educational Technology 51 (2): 22–28.
  • Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman and The PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  • Mongeon, P., and A. Paul-Hus. 2016. “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Análisis.” Scientometrics 106 (1): 213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
  • Nabi-Ranjbari, M., H. Heidari-Tabrizi, and A. Afghari. 2020. “Evaluation of the Latest Pre-Service Teacher Education Curriculum in EFL Context: A Testimony of Teachers, Teachers Educators and Student Teachers’ Perspectives.” Applied Research on English Language 9 (1): 1–24.
  • Nawaz, A., and G. M. Kundi. 2010. “Digital Literacy: An Analysis of the Contemporary Paradigms.” Journal of Science and Technology Education Research 1 (2): 19–29.
  • Nganji, J. T. 2018. “Towards Learner-constructed E-learning Environments for Effective Personal Learning Experiences.” Behaviour & Information Technology 37 (7): 647–657. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1470673.
  • Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
  • Pegalajar-Palomino, M. C. 2018. “Information and Communication Technologies and Inclusive Teaching: Perceptions and Attitudes of Future Early Childhood and Primary Education Teachers.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76 (3): 380–392.
  • Pettersson, F. 2017. “On the Issues of Digital Competence in Educational Contexts – A Review of Literature.” Education and Information Technologies 23 (3): 1005–1021. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3.
  • Pinya, C., and M. R. Rosselló. 2016. “Using Blogs to Be Aware of the Development and Adoption of Professional Skills.” Education and Information Technologies 21: 1055–1070. doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9367-z.
  • Pozos-Pérez, K. V., and J. Tejada-Fernández. 2018. “Digital Competences in Higher Education Faculty: Levels of Mastery and Training Needs.” Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria 12 (2): 59–87. doi:10.19083/ridu.2018.712.
  • Prtljaga, P., and Z. Savić. 2017. “The Use of the Internet Sources in the Professional Development of Preschool Teachers.” Croatian Journal of Education 19 (2): 479–510. doi:10.15516/cje.v19i2.2336.
  • Redecker, C., and Y. Punie. 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: JointResearch Centre (JRC).
  • Revelo-Rosero, J. E., F. I. Revuelta-Domínguez, and A. González-Pérez. 2018. “Modelo de integración de la competencia digital del docente universitario para su desarrollo profesional en la enseñanza de la matemática. Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial de Ecuador.” EDMETIC, Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC 7 (1): 196–224. doi:10.21071/edmetic.v7i1.6910.
  • Rodríguez Moreno, J., M. Agreda Montoro, and A. M. Ortiz Colón. 2019. “Changes in Teacher Training Withinthe TPACK Model Framework: A Systematic Review.” Sustainability 11 (7): 1–10. doi:10.3390/su11071870.
  • Rossi-Cordero, A. S., and M. Barajas-Frutos. 2018. “Digital Competence and Educational Innovation: Challenges and Opportunities.” Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado 22 (3): 317–339.
  • Sánchez-García, A. B., and P. Galindo-Villardón. 2018. “Uso e integración de las tic en el aula y dificultades del profesorado en activo de cara a su integración.” Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado 22 (3): 341–358. doi:10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.8005.
  • Spante, M., S. S. Hashemi, M. Lundin, and A. Algers. 2018. “Digital Competence and Digital Literacy in Higher Education Research: Systematic Review of Concept Use.” Cogent Education 5 (1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143.
  • Spiteri, M., and S. N. Rundgren. 2017. “Maltese Primary Teachers’ Digital Competence: Implications for Continuing Professional Development.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (4): 521–534. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242.
  • Thannimalai, R., and A. Raman. 2018. “The Influence of Principals’ Technology Leadership and Profesional Development on Teachers’ Technology Integration in Secondary Schools.” Malasyan Journal of Learning and Instruction 15 (1): 203–228.
  • Tondeur, J., J. Van Braak, P. A. Ertmer, and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2017. “Understanding the Relationship between Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology Use in Education: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65: 555–575. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
  • UNESCO. 2008. ICT Competency Standards for Teachers. Policy Framework (156210). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • UNESCO. 2018. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • Urbina, S., and J. Salinas. 2014. “Campus Virtuales: Una Perspectiva Evolutiva Y Tendencias.” Revista De Educación a Distancia (RED), no. 42. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/236601.
  • Uslu, Ö. 2017. “Evaluating the Professional Development Programaimed Technology Integration at the Era of Curriculum Change.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 17 (6): 2031–2065. doi:10.12738/estp.2017.6.0116.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.