10,702
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 548-571 | Received 30 Dec 2020, Accepted 23 May 2021, Published online: 11 Jun 2021

References

  • Akkerman, S., and T. Bruining. 2016. “Multilevel Boundary Crossing in a Professional Development School Partnership.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (2): 240–284. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448.
  • Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–69. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435
  • Alderman, M. K. 2018. Motivation for Achievement: Possibilities for Teaching and Learning. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Arhar, J., . T., J. Niesz, S. Brossmann, K. Koebley, D. L. O’Brien, F. Black, F, and F. Black. 2013. “Creating a ‘Third Space’ in the Context of a University–school Partnership: Supporting Teacher Action Research and the Research Preparation of Doctoral Students.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 218–236. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.789719.
  • Avey, J. B., B. J. Avolio, C. D. Crossley, and F. Luthans. 2009. “Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 30 (2): 173–191. doi:10.1002/job.583.
  • Coburn, C. E., and W. R. Penuel. 2016. “Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions.” Educational Researcher 45 (1): 48–54. doi:10.3102/0013189X16631750.
  • Doering, A., S. Koseoglu, C. Scharber, J. Henrickson, and D. Lanegran. 2014. “Technology Integration in K–12 Geography Education Using TPACK as a Conceptual Model.” Journal of Geography 113 (6): 223–237. doi:10.1080/00221341.2014.896393.
  • Durall Gazulla, E., M. Bauters, I. Hietala, T. Leinonen, and E. Kapros. 2020. “Co-creation and Co-design in Technology-enhanced Learning: Innovating Science Learning outside the Classroom.” IxD&A Interaction Design & Architecture(s) 42: 202–226.
  • Eguchi, A. 2014. “Educational Robotics Theories and Practice: Tips for How to Do It Right.” In Robotics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 3, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 193–223. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4607-0.ch011.
  • Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747.
  • Fridin, M., and M. Belokopytov. 2014. “Acceptance of Socially Assistive Humanoid Robot by Preschool and Elementary School Teachers.” Computers in Human Behavior 33 (April): 23–31. doi:10.1016/J.CHB.2013.12.016.
  • Hakkarainen, K. 2009. “A Knowledge-practice Perspective on Technology-mediated Learning.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4 (2): 213–231. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x.
  • Hall, A. B., and J. Trespalacios. 2019. “Personalized Professional Learning and Teacher Self-Efficacy for Integrating Technology in K–12 Classrooms.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 35 (4): 221–235. doi:10.1080/21532974.2019.1647579.
  • Harris, J. B., P. Mishra, and M. Koehler. 2009. “Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41 (4): 393–416. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536.
  • Hu, S., K. Laxman, and K. Lee. 2020. “Exploring Factors Affecting Academics’ Adoption of Emerging Mobile Technologies-an Extended UTAUT Perspective.” Education and Information Technologies 25 (5): 4615–4635. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x.
  • Koo, T. K., and M. Y. Li. 2016. “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15 (2): 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
  • Lawshe, C. H. 1975. “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity.” Personnel Psychology 28 (4): 563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
  • Leoste, J., and M. Heidmets. 2018. “The Impact of Educational Robots as Learning Tools on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Basic Education.” In Digital Turn in Schools—Research, Policy, Practice, edited by T. Väljataga and M. Laanpere, 203–217, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Leoste, J., K. Tammets, and T. Ley. 2019. “Co-Creating Learning Designs in Professional Teacher Education: Knowledge Appropriation in the Teacher’s Innovation Laboratory.”Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal42: 131–63. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/42_7.pdf
  • Ley, T., R. Maier, S. Thalmann, L. Waizenegger, K. Pata, and A. Ruiz-Calleja. 2020. “A Knowledge Appropriation Model to Connect Scaffolded Learning and Knowledge Maturation in Workplace Learning Settings.” Vocations and Learning 13 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1007/s12186-019-09231-2.
  • Pepin, B., G. Gueudet, M. Yerushalmy, L. Trouche, and D. Chazan. 2015. “E-textbooks In/for Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Disruptive and Potentially Transformative Educational Technology.” In Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, edited by L. English and D. Kirshner, 636–661. Third ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Qvortrup, L. 2016. “Capacity Building: Data- and Research-informed Development of Schools and Teaching Practices in Denmark and Norway.” European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (5): 564–576. doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1253675.
  • Radovan, M., and N. Kristl. 2017. “Acceptance of Technology and Its Impact on Teacher’s Activities in Virtual Classroom: Integrating UTAUT and CoI into a Combined Model.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16 (3): 11–22.
  • Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., L. P. Prieto, T. Ley, T. De Jong, and D. Gillet. 2020. “Social Practices in Teacher Knowledge Creation and Innovation Adoption: A Large-scale Study in an Online Instructional Design Community for Inquiry Learning.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 15 (4): 445–67. doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09331-5.
  • Sheffield, C. C. 2011. “Navigating Access and Maintaining Established Practice: Social Studies Teachers’ Technology Integration at Three Florida Middle Schools.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 11: 3.
  • Smith, G. T. 2005. “On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement.” Psychological Assessment 17 (4): 396–408. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396.
  • Snoek, M., J. Bekebrede, F. Hanna, T. Creton, and H. Edzes. 2017. “The Contribution of Graduation Research to School Development: Graduation Research as a Boundary Practice.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 361–378. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315400.
  • Spiteri, M., and S. N. Chang Rundgren. 2017. “Maltese Primary Teachers’ Digital Competence: Implications for Continuing Professional Development.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (4): 521–534. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242.
  • Statistics, L. 2017. “One-way ANOVA Using SPSS Statistics. Statistical Tutorials and Software Guides.” Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/
  • Šumak, B., and A. Šorgo. 2016. “The Acceptance and Use of Interactive Whiteboards among Teachers: Differences in UTAUT Determinants between Pre- and Post-Adopters.” Computers in Human Behavior 64 (November): 602–620. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037.
  • Swennen, A. 2020. “Experiential Learning as the ‘New Normal’ in Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 43 (5): 657–659. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1836599.
  • Teo, T. 2011. “Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test.” Computers & Education 57 (4): 2432–2440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
  • Twining, P., J. Raffaghelli, P. Albion, and D. Knezek. 2013. “Moving Education into the Digital Age: The Contribution of Teachers‘ Professional Development.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29 (5): 426–437. doi:10.1111/jcal.12031.
  • Van Der Spoel, I., O. Noroozi, E. Schuurink, and S. Van Ginkel. 2020. “Teachers’ Online Teaching Expectations and Experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Teacher Education 43 (4): 623–638. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 27 (3): 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
  • Voogt, J., T. Laferrière, A. Breuleux, R. C. Itow, D. T. Hickey, and S. McKenney. 2015. “Collaborative Design as a Form of Professional Development.” Instructional Science 43 (2): 259–282. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7.
  • Wang, W. T., and C. C. Wang. 2009. “An Empirical Study of Instructor Adoption of Web-based Learning Systems.” Computers & Education 53 (3): 761–774. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021.
  • Webb, M., and M. Cox. 2004. “A Review of Pedagogy Related to Information and Communications Technology.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13 (3): 235–286. doi:10.1080/14759390400200183.
  • Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhao, Y. 2007. “Social Studies Teachers’ Perspectives of Technology Integration.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 (3): 311–333.