1,188
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How can a few streamflow measurements help to predict daily hydrographs at almost ungauged sites?

Comment tirer parti de quelques débits ponctuels disponibles en un site non jaugé pour prédire un hydrogramme journalier ?

&
Pages 2126-2142 | Received 08 Jul 2013, Accepted 07 Nov 2013, Published online: 20 Oct 2014

REFERENCES

  • Andréassian, V., et al., 2012. Neighbours: nature’s own hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.007.
  • Archfield, S.A. and Vogel, R.M., 2010. Map correlation method: selection of a reference streamgage to estimate daily streamflow at ungaged catchments. Water Resources Research, 46, W10513. doi:10.1029/2009WR008481.
  • Blöschl, G.. 2005. Rainfall–runoff modelling of ungauged catchments. Article 133. In: M.G. Anderson, Managing ed. Encyclopaedia of hydrological sciences. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons, 2061–2080.
  • Burt, T.P., et al., 2010. Long-term monitoring of river water nitrate: how much data do we need? Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 12, 71–79. doi:10.1039/b913003a.
  • Byrd, R.H., et al., 1995. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 16, 1190–1208. doi:10.1137/0916069.
  • Chopart, S. and Sauquet, É., 2008. Usage des jaugeages volants en régionalisation des débits d’étiage (Using spot gauging data to interpolate low flow characteristics. Revue des Sciences de l’Eau/Journal of Water Science, 21 (3), 267–281. doi:10.7202/018775ar.
  • Clausen, B., Pearson, C.P., and Downes, M.T., 1999. Relating potential denitrification rates to streamflow variability [online]. In: L. Heathwaite, ed. Impact of land-use change on nutrient loads from diffuse sources. Proceedings of IUGG 99 symposium HS3, Birmingham. Wallingford: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. 257, 127–134. Available from: http://iahs.info/uploads/dms/iahs_257_0127.pdf [Accessed 30 Aug 2014].
  • Decloux, J.P. and Sary, M., 1991. Campagnes d‘étiage. Objectifs, traitement et valorisation des données (Low flows field campaigns. Objectives, data treatment and valorisation). Mosella, XXIII, 121–134.
  • Drogue, G., et al., 2002. The applicability of a parsimonious model for local and regional prediction of runoff. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47 (6), 905–920. doi:10.1080/02626660209492999.
  • François, D. and Sary, M., 1990. Etude méthodologique des basses eaux. Estimation minimale des points de mesure (Methodological study of low flows. Estimation of minimal measurement points). Metz: CEGUM, Université de Metz.
  • Guillaud, J.F. and Bourriel, L., 2007. Relationships between nitrate concentration and river flow, and temporal trends of nitrate in 25 rivers of Brittany (France). Revue des sciences de l‘eau/Journal of Water Science, 20 (2), 213–226.
  • He, Y., Bárdossy, A., and Zehe, E., 2011. A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 3539–3553. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3539-2011.
  • Hrachowitz, M., et al., 2013. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (6), 1198–1255. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183.
  • Kay, A.L., et al., 2006. A comparison of three approaches to spatial generalization of rainfall–runoff models. Hydrological Processes, 20, 3953–3973. doi:10.1002/hyp.6550.
  • Klemeš, V., 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31 (1), 13–24. doi:10.1080/02626668609491024.
  • Lang, C. and Gille, E. 2006. Une méthode d’analyse du tarissement des cours d’eau pour la prévision des débits d’étiage (A recession analysis method for low flow forecasting). Norois, 201 2006/4 [online]. Available from: http://norois.revues.org/1743; doi:10.4000/norois.1743 [Accessed 30 Aug 2014].
  • Mathevet, T., et al., 2006. A bounded version of the Nash-Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins [online]. In: V. Andréassian, ed. Large sample basin experiments for hydrological model parameterisation: results of the Model Parameter Experiment—MOPEX. Wallingford, CT: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. 307, 211–219. Available from: http://iahs.info/uploads/dms/13614.21–211-219-41-MATHEVET.pdf [Accessed 19 Sep 2014].
  • McIntyre, N., et al., 2005. Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Water Resources Research, 41, W12434. doi:10.1029/2005WR004289.
  • Montanari, A. and Toth, E., 2007. Calibration of hydrological models in the spectral domain: an opportunity for scarcely gauged basins? Water Resources Research, 43, doi:10.1029/2006WR005184.
  • Oudin, L., et al., 2006. Dynamic averaging of rainfall–runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations. Water Resources Research, 42 (7), W07410. doi:10.1029/2005WR004636.
  • Oudin, L., et al., 2008. Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: a comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resources Research, 44, W03413. doi:10.1029/2007WR006240.
  • Pannatier, Y., 1996. VARIOWIN: software for spatial data analysis in 2D. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Parajka, J., et al., 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins—Part 1: runoff hydrograph studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10, 375–409. doi:10.5194/hessd-10-375-2013.
  • Perrin, C., et al., 2007. Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall—runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (1), 131–151. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.1.131.
  • Perrin, C., et al., 2008. Discrete parameterization of hydrological models: evaluating the use of parameter sets libraries over 900 catchments. Water Resources Research, 44, W08447. doi:10.1029/2007WR006579.
  • Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V., 2003. Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279, 275–289. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7.
  • Plasse, J., et al., 2014. Apport des jaugeages ponctuels à la reconstitution des chroniques de débits moyens journaliers par simulation pluie-débit: l’exemple du bassin Rhin-Meuse. (Using point flow measurements for guided reconstruction of daily streamflow time series through continuous flow simulation: a regional case study on the Rhine-Meuse district). La Houille Blanche-Revue Internationale de l’Eau, 1, 45–52. doi:10.1051/lhb/2014007.
  • Quintana-Seguí, P., et al., 2008. Analysis of near surface atmospheric variables: validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47, 92–107. doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1636.1.
  • Rojas-Serna, C., et al., (submitted). How should a rainfall–runoff model be parameterized in an almost ungauged catchment? A methodology tested on 705 catchments. Water Resources Research.
  • Rojas-Serna, C., et al., 2006. Ungauged catchments: how to make the most of a few streamflow measurements? [online]. In: V. Andréassian, ed. Large sample basin experiments for hydrological model parameterisation: results of the Model Parameter Experiment—MOPEX. Wallingford, CT: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. 307, 230–236. Available from: http://iahs.info/uploads/dms/13616.23-230-236-43-ROJAS-SERNA.pdf [Accessed 30 August 2014].
  • Seibert, J. and Beven, K., 2009. Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 883–892. doi:10.5194/hess-13-883-2009.
  • Woods, R. and Sivapalan, M., 1999. A synthesis of space-time variability in storm response: rainfall, runoff generation, and routing. Water Resources Research, 35 (8), 2469–2485. doi:10.1029/1999WR900014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.