REFERENCES

• Agirre, U., et al., 2005. Application of a unit hydrograph based on sub watershed division and comparison with Nash’s instantaneous unit hydrograph. Catena, 64, 321–332. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam, M.N., 1990. Geomorphologic rainfall‐runoff model: incorporating Philip’s infiltration expression. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 116 (2), 262–281. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1990)116:2(262).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam, M.N. and Balkhair, K.S., 1987. Case study evaluation of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resources Management, 1, 267–291. doi:10.1007/BF00421880.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Wagdany, A.S. and Rao, A.R., 1997. Estimation of velocity parameter of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resources Management, 11, 1–16. doi:10.1023/A:1007923906214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, G. and White, E.L., 1982. Fitting a gamma distribution over a synthetic unit hydrograph. Water Resources Bulletin, 18 (1), 95–98. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb04533.x.
   Google Scholar
• Band, L.E., 1986. Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 22 (1), 15–24. doi:10.1029/WR022i001p00015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Band, L.E., 1989. A terrain-based watershed information system. Hydrological Processes, 3, 151–162. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360030205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedient, P.B. and Huber, W.C., 2002. Hydrology and floodplain analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., 1935. An approach to determinate stream flow. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 100, 347–362.
   Google Scholar
• Bérod, D.D., et al., 1995. A Geomorphologic Non-linear Cascade (GNC) model for estimation of floods from small alpine watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 166, 147–170. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)02591-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., Wood, E.F., and Sivapalan, M., 1988. On hydrological heterogeneity—catchment morphology and catchment response. Journal of Hydrology, 100, 353–375. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90192-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadra, A., et al., 2008. Development of a geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph model for scantily gauged watersheds. Environmental Modelling and Software, 23, 1013–1025. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, N.R., Parida, B.P., and Nayak, A.K., 1997. Flood estimation for ungauged catchments using the GIUH. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 123 (4), 228–238. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:4(228).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., et al., 2005. Hybrid model for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10 (6), 458–467. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:6(458).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., et al., 2007. Suitability of gamma, chi-square, Weibull and beta distributions as synthetic unit hydrographs. Journal of Hydrology, 334, 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., et al., 2008. Comparison between Weibull and gamma distributions to derive synthetic unit hydrograph using Horton ratios. Water Resources Research, 44, W0442. doi:10.1029/2007WR006031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., et al., 2010. A Simple conceptual model of sediment yield. Water Resources Management, 24 (8), 1697–1716. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9520-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., Mishra, S.K., and Berndtsson, R., 2003. Simplified two parameter gamma distribution for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8 (4), 226–230. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:4(226).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., Singh, P.K., and Mishra, S.K., 2009. Fréchet and chi-square parametric expressions combined with Horton ratios to derive a synthetic unit hydrograph. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (2), 274–286. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.2.274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botter, G. and Rinaldo, A., 2003. Scale effect on geomorphologic and kinematic dispersion. Water Resources Research, 39 (10), 1286. doi:10.1029/2003WR002154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boufadel, M.C., 1998. Unit hydrographs derived from the Nash model. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 167–177. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05969.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouraoui, F. and Dillaha, T.A., 1996. ANSWERS-2000: runoff and sediment transport model. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122 (6), 493–502. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:6(493).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M.J., 1979. A storage-routing model relating drainage basin hydrology and geomorphology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24, 43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M.J., Pilgrim, D.H., and Cordery, I., 1979. A storage routing model based on catchment geomorphology. Journal of Hydrology, 42 (3–4), 209–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bras, R.L. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1989. A review of the search for a quantitative link between hydrologic response and fluvial geomorphology. In: M.L. Kavvas, ed. New directions for surface water modelling. IAHS Publications 181. Wallingford: IAHS Press, 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Chorowicz, J., et al., 1992. A combined algorithm for automated drainage network extraction. Water Resources Research, 28 (5), 1293–1302. doi:10.1029/91WR03098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1964. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
   Google Scholar
• Chutha, P. and Dooge, J.C.I., 1990. The shape parameters of the geomorphologic unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology, 117 (1–4), 81–97. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(90)90087-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C.O., 1945. Storage and unit hydrograph. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 110, 1419–1446.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W.T., 1939. Runoff distribution graphs from precipitation occurring in more than one time unit. Civil Engineering, 9 (9), 559–561.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Cabral, M.C. and Burges, S.J., 1994. Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON): a model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas. Water Resources Research, 30, 1681–1692. doi:10.1029/93WR03512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croley II., T.E., 1980. Gamma synthetic hydrographs. Journal of Hydrology, 47, 41–52. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(80)90046-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudennec, C., et al., 2004. A geomorphological explanation of the unit hydrograph concept. Hydrological Processes, 18, 603–621. doi:10.1002/hyp.1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Odorico, P. and Rigon, R., 2003. Hillslope and channel contributions to the hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 39 (5), 1113. doi:10.1029/2002WR001708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, G., 2009. Hydrology and soil conservation engineering. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• DeVantier, B.A. and Feldman, A.D., 1993. Review of GIS Applications in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119 (2), 246–261. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:2(246).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diskin, M.H., 1964. A basic study of the linearity of the rainfall–runoff process in watersheds. Thesis (PhD). University of Illinois, Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Diskin, M.H., Ince, M., and Kwabena, O.N., 1978. Parallel cascades model for urban watersheds. Journal of Hydraulics Division, Proceedings ASCE, 104 (2), 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooge, J.C.I., 1959. A general theory of the unit hydrograph. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64 (2), 241–256. doi:10.1029/JZ064i002p00241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooge, J.C.I., 1973. The linear theory of hydrologic systems. Technical Bulletin, US Dept. Agric., no. 1468. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Duchesne, J., Cudennec, C., and Corbierre, V., 1997. Relevance of the hu model to predict the discharge of a catchment. Water Science & Technology, 36 (5), 169–175. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00471-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleson, P.S., Mejia, R., and March, F., 1966. Computation of optimum realizable unit hydrographs. Water Resources Research, 2, 755–764. doi:10.1029/WR002i004p00755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairfield, J. and Leymarie, P., 1991. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 30 (6), 1681–1692.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurant, C., Kartiwa, B., and Roland, B., 2006. Analytical model for a geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph. Hydrological Processes, 20, 3879–3895. doi:10.1002/hyp.6162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchini, M. and O’Connell, P.E., 1996. An analysis of the dynamic component of the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology, 175 (1–4), 407–428. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80018-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T.G., 1991. Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid. Computers and Geosciences, 17 (3), 413–422. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(91)90048-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolfi, C. and Bischetti, G.B., 1997. Influence of the drainage network identification method on geomorphological properties and hydrological response. Hydrological Processes, 11, 353–375. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19970330)11:4<353::AID-HYP436>3.0.CO;2-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelius, H., 1914. Flusshunde. [Compendium of hydrology, vol. 1: Rivers.]. Berlin: Göschen. (German).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D.M., 1961. Synthetic unit hydrographs for small drainage areas. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 87 (4), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2010. Flow time estimation with spatially variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources, 33 (10), 1216–1223. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Nardi, F., 2012. A parsimonious geomorphological unit hydrograph for rainfall–runoff modelling in small ungauged basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (1), 73–83. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.636045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V. and Waymire, E., 1983. On the formulation of an analytical approach to hydrologic response and similarity at the basin scale. Journal of Hydrology, 65, 95–123. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90212-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V.J., Waymire, E., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1986. On scales, gravity and network structure in basin runoff. In: V.K. Gupta, I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, and E.F. Wood, eds. Scale problems in hydrology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, V.K. and Mesa, O., 1988. Runoff generation and hydrologic response via channel network geomorphology—recent progress and open problems. Journal of Hydrology, 102, 3–28. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90089-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V.K., Waymire, E., and Wang, C.T., 1980. A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology. Water Resources Research, 16 (5), 855–862. doi:10.1029/WR016i005p00855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., Willgoose, G.R., and De Troch, F.D., 1995. Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 9, 363–382. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, C.T. and Barfield, B.J., 1978. Hydrology and sedimentology of surface mined lands. Kentucky: University of Kentucky, Office of Continuing Education and Extension, College of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Haan, C.T., Barfield, B.J., and Hayes, J.C., 1994. Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Haktanir, T. and Sezen, N., 1990. Suitability of two-parameter gamma and three-parameter beta distributions as synthetic unit hydrographs in Anatolia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 35 (2), 167–184. doi:10.1080/02626669009492416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M.J., Zaki, A.F., and Shahin, M.M.A., 2001. Regional analysis using the geomorphoclimatic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (1), 93–102. doi:10.5194/hess-5-93-2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, B.M., 1967. Linear routing in uniform open channels. Master Thesis. National University of Ireland, Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E.R., 1970. Mean annual runoff as related to channel geometry of selected streams on California. Arlington, VA: USGS-WSP. 1999-E, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmeister, G. and Weisman, R.N., 1977. Accuracy of synthetic hydrographs derived from representative basins [La précision des hydrogrammes synthétiques dérivés des bassins représentatifs]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 22 (2), 297–312. doi:10.1080/02626667709491719.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.E., 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361. doi:10.1029/TR013i001p00350.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 56, 275–370. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S.K., Singh, R.D., and Seth, S.M., 2000. Design flood estimation using GIS supported GIUH approach. Water Resources Management, 14, 369–376. doi:10.1023/A:1011147623014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, V. and Sinha, R., 2003. Derivation of unit hydrograph from GIUH: analysis for a Himalayan river. Water Resources Management, 17, 355–376. doi:10.1023/A:1025884903120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, R.I. and Coon, G.C., 2003. True form of instantaneous unit hydrograph of linear reservoirs. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 129 (1), 11–17. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, R.L., 2006. NRCS (SCS) synthetic curvilinear dimensionless unit hydrograph. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 132 (6), 627–631. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(627).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, S.K., 1985. Automated derivation of hydrologic basin characteristics from digital elevation model data. In: Proceedings of the digital representations of spatial knowledge (Auto-Carto 7), 11–14 March, Washington, DC. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O., 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54 (11), 1593–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, C.-X., 1992. A deterministic gamma type geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph based on path types. Water Resources Research, 28 (2), 479–486. doi:10.1029/91WR02577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner, J., Feng, X., and Neal, C., 2001. Catchment-scale advection and dispersion as a mechanism for fractal scaling in stream tracer concentrations. Journal of Hydrology, 254, 82–101. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00487-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, M.J., 1976. Tests of the random network model, and its application to basin hydrology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1, 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshen, D. and Bras, R., 1983. The linear channel and its effect on the geomorphologic IUH. Journal of Hydrology, 65, 175–208. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90216-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D. and Xanthopoulos, T., 1989. On the parametric approach to unit hydrograph identification. Water Resources Management, 3, 107–128. doi:10.1007/BF00872467.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, D.W. and Feldman, A.D., 1998. Evolution of Clark’s unit graph method to spatially distributed runoff. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 3 (1), 9–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:1(9).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., et al., 2007. Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) models. Hydrological Processes, 21, 1829–1840. doi:10.1002/hyp.6318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. and Rastogi, R.A., 1987. A conceptual catchment model for estimating suspended sediment flow. Journal of Hydrology, 95, 155–163. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(87)90122-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.T., 1998. Generating design hydrographs by DEM assisted geomorphic runoff simulation: a case study. Water Resources Association, 34 (2), 375–384. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb04142.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.T. and Chang, C.H., 2005. Incorporating subsurface-flow mechanism into geomorphology-based IUH modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 311 (1–4), 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, J.J., et al., 2005. Analysis of a unit hydrograph model based on watershed geomorphology represented as a cascade of reservoirs. Agricultural Water Management, 77, 128–143. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D., 2002. ArcHydro—GIS for water resources. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 220.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., et al., 1996. Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrological Processes, 10, 831–844. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6<831::AID-HYP374>3.0.CO;2-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., 1984. Automated detection of drainage networks from digital elevation models. Cartographica, 21 (2–3), 168–178.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, L.W. and Taur, C.K., 1982. Unit hydrographs via non-linear programing. Water Resources Research, 18 (4), 744–752. doi:10.1029/WR018i004p00744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 1989. Hydrologic analysis and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, O. and Mifflin, E., 1986. On the relative role of hillslope and network geometry in hydrologie response. In: V.K. Gupta, I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, and E.F. Wood, eds. Scaling problems in hydrology, Chapter 1. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V.C., 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Project NR 389042, Tech. Rept. 3, Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Molnár, D.K. and Julien, P.Y., 2000. Grid-size effects on surface runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5, 8–16. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:1(8).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D., 1996. Hydrologic modeling and GIS. In: F.M. Goodchild, et al., eds. GIS and environment modelling. Collins: GIS World, 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D., Grayson, R.B., and Landson, A.R., 1991. Digital terrain modelling in hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 5, 1–42. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D.G. and Heerdegen, R.G., 1988. Automatically drained catchment boundaries and channel networks and their hydrological applications. Geomophology, 1, 131–141. doi:10.1016/0169-555X(88)90011-6.
   Google Scholar
• Murphey, J.B., Wallace, D.E., and Lane, L.J., 1977. Geomorphic parameters predict hydrograph characteristics in the southwest. Water Resources Bulletin, 13 (1), 25–37. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1977.tb01987.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., 2007. Probability models for unit hydrograph derivation. Journal of Hydrology, 344, 185–189. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naden, P., 1992. Spatial variability in flood estimation for large catchments: the exploitation of channel network structure. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 37 (1), 53–71. doi:10.1080/02626669209492561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, F., et al., 2008. Hydrogeomorphic properties of simulated drainage patterns using digital elevation models: the flat area issue [Propriétés hydro-géomorphologiques de réseaux de drainage simulés à partir de modèles numériques de terrain: la question des zones planes]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (6), 1176–1193. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.6.1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, F., Vivoni, E.R., and Grimaldi, S., 2006. Investigating a floodplain scaling relation using a hydrogeomorphic delineation method. Water Resources Research, 42, W09409. doi:10.1029/2005WR004155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E., 1957. The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 3, 114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E., 1959. Synthetic determination of unit hydrograph parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64 (1), 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Nasri, S., et al., 2004. Use of a geomorphological transfer function to model design floods in small hillside catchments in semiarid Tunisia. Journal of Hydrology, 287 (1–4), 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Singh, V.P., and Delafrouz, H., 2009. Three geomorphological rainfall–runoff models based on the linear reservoir concept. Catena, 76 (3), 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, J.F. and Mark, D.M., 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image processing, 28, 323–344. doi:10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0.
   Google Scholar
• Olivera, F. and Maidment, D.R., 1999. GIS tools for HMS modeling support. Proceedings of the 19th ESRI users conference, July 26–30, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Orlandini, S., et al., 2003. Path-based methods for the determination of nondispersive drainage directions in grid-based digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 39 (6), 1144. doi:10.1029/2002WR001639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, A., Ayuso, J.L., and Giráldez, J.V., 1999. Incorporating topologic properties into the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 24 (1–2), 55–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroselli, A., 2012. LIDAR data and hydrological applications at the basin scale. GIS Science and Remote Sensing, 49 (1), 139–162. doi:10.2747/1548-1603.49.1.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peucker, T.K. and Douglas, D.H., 1975. Detection of surface-specific points by local parallel processing of discrete terrain elevation data. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 4, 375–387. doi:10.1016/0146-664X(75)90005-2.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D.H., 1977. Isochrones of travel time and distribution of flood storage from a tracer study on a small watershed. Water Resources Research, 13, 587–595. doi:10.1029/WR013i003p00587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pristachova, G., 1990. Quantitative geomorphology, stream networks and instantaneous unit hydrograph. In: L. Molnar ed. Hydrology of mountainous areas. IAHS Publication. 190. Wallingford: IAHS Press, 369–375.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, P., et al., 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes, 5, 59–79. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A., Marani, A., and Rigon, R., 1991. Geomorphological dispersion. Water Resources Research, 27 (4), 513–525. doi:10.1029/90WR02501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1996. Geomorphological theory of the hydrological response. Hydrological Processes, 10, 803–829. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6<803::AID-HYP373>3.0.CO;2-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A., et al., 1995. Can one gauge the shape of a basin? Water Resources Research, 31 (4), 1119–1127. doi:10.1029/94WR03290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., Devoto, G., and Valdés, J.B., 1979. Discharge response analysis and hydrologic similarity: the interrelation between the geomorphologic IUH and the storm characteristics. Water Resources Research, 15 (6), 1435–1444. doi:10.1029/WR015i006p01435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., González-Sanabria, M., and Bras, R.L., 1982a. A geomorphoclimatic theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 18 (4), 877–886. doi:10.1029/WR018i004p00877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., GonzBlez-Sanabira, M., and Caamaño, G., 1982b. On the climatic dependence of the IUH: a rainfall-runoff analysis of the Nash model and the geomorpho-climatic theory. Water Resources Research, 18 (4), 887–903. doi:10.1029/WR018i004p00887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Rinaldo, A., 1997. Fractal river basins; chance and self-organization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdés, J., 1979. The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 15 (6), 1409–1420. doi:10.1029/WR015i006p01409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso, R., 1984. Nash model relation to Horton order ratios. Water Resources Research, 20, 914–920. doi:10.1029/WR020i007p00914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, B., et al., 2006. Flood estimation by GIUH based Clark and Nash models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11 (6), 515–525. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(515).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. and Rai, R.K., 2011. Flood inundation modeling using Nakagami-m distribution based GIUH for a partially gauged catchment. Water Resources Management, 25 (14), 3805–3835. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9890-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., Goel, N., and Mathur, B., 2010. Performance investigation of Nakagami-m distribution to derive flood hydrograph by genetic algorithm optimization approach. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (8), 658–666. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., 1956. The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597–646. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1957. Use of storm and watershed characteristics in synthetic hydrograph analysis and application. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Shamseldin, A.Y. and Nash, J.E., 1998. The geomorphological unit hydrograph—a critical review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2 (1), 1–8. doi:10.5194/hess-2-1-1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K.D., Dhir, R.P., and Murthy, J.S.R., 1992. Modelling suspended sediment flow in arid upland basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 37 (5), 481–490. doi:10.1080/02626669209492613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K.D. and Murthy, J.S.R., 1996. A conceptual sediment transport model for arid regions. Journal of Arid Environments, 33, 281–290. doi:10.1006/jare.1996.0065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.K., 1932. Stream flow from rainfall by the unit hydrograph method. Engineering News Record, 108, 501–505.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K.P., 1964. Non-linear instantaneous unit-hydrograph theory. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 90 (HY2), 313–347.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2007. An extended hybrid model for synthetic unit hydrograph derivation. Journal of Hydrology, 336, 347–360. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2008. A sediment graph model based on SCS-CN method. Journal of Hydrology, 349, 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S.K., 2000. Transmuting synthetic unit hydrographs into gamma distribution. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (4), 380–385. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(380).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., 1988. Hydrologic systems: rainfall–runoff modeling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P. and Chowdhury, P., 1985. On fitting gamma distribution to synthetic runoff hydrographs. Nordic Hydrology, 16, 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., Corradini, C., and Melone, F., 1985. A comparison of some methods of deriving the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Nordic Hydrology, 16, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., 1987. On application of the Weibull distribution in hydrology. Water Resources Management, 1, 33–43. doi:10.1007/BF00421796.
   Google Scholar
• Sivapalan, M., et al., 2003. IAHS decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48 (6), 857–880.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J.D. and Sivapalan, M., 1994. On geomorphological dispersion in natural catchments and the geomorphological unit hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 30 (7), 2311–2323. doi:10.1029/94WR00537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, F.F., 1938. Synthetic unit-graphs. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 19, 447–454. doi:10.1029/TR019i001p00447.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W.M., 1955. Hydrograph analysis by the method of least squares. Proceedings American Society of Civil Engineers, 81, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sorman, A.U., 1995. Estimation of peak discharge using GIUH model in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, 121 (4), 287–293. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:4(287).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 38 (6), 913–920. doi:10.1029/TR038i006p00913.
   Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., 1997. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 33, 309–319. doi:10.1029/96WR03137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G. and Ames, D.P., 2001. Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data. World water and environmental resources congress, Orlando, FL, 20–24, ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes, 5, 81–100. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A.B. and Schwarz, H.E., 1952. Unit hydrograph lag and peak flow related to basin characteristics. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 33, 235–246. doi:10.1029/TR033i002p00235.
   Google Scholar
• Todini, E., 1988. Rainfall–runoff modeling-past, present and future. Journal of Hydrology, 100, 341–352. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90191-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribe, A., 1991. Automated recognition of valley heads from digital elevation models. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16, 33–49. doi:10.1002/esp.3290160105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribe, A., 1992. Automated recognition of valley lines and drainage networks from grid digital elevation models: a review and a new method. Journal of Hydrology, 139, 263–293. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(92)90206-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troutman, B.M. and Karlinger, M.R., 1985. Unit hydrograph approximations assuming linear flow through topologically random channel networks. Water Resources Research, 21, 743–754. doi:10.1029/WR021i005p00743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsihrintzis, V.A., Hamid, R., and Fuentes, H.R., 1996. Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in water resources: a review. Water Resources Management, 10 (4), 251–277. doi:10.1007/BF00508896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1940. Engineering construction–flood control. Fort Belvoir, VA: Engineering School, USACE.
   Google Scholar
• Usul, N. and Tezcan, B., 1995. Determining synthetic unit hydrographs and parameters for four Turkish basins. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50 (2), 170–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés, J.B., Fiallo, Y., and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., 1979. A rainfall-runoff analysis of the geomorphologic IUH. Water Resources Research, 15 (6), 1421–1434. doi:10.1029/WR015i006p01421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Tak, L. and Bras, R., 1990. Incorporating hillslope effects into the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 26, 2393–2400. doi:10.1029/WR026i010p02393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J.P. and Willgoose, G.R., 1999. On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology. Water Resources Research, 35 (7), 2259–2268. doi:10.1029/1999WR900034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P., Lam, C.S., and Deng, Y., 2007. Comparison of the performance of flow routing algorithms used in GIS-based hydrologic analysis. Hydrological Processes, 21, 1026–1044. doi:10.1002/hyp.6277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C., 2000. Digital terrain analysis. In: J.P. Wilson and J.C. Gallant, eds. Terrain analysis: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P., Repetto, R.L., and Snyder, R.D., 2000. Effect of data source, grid resolution, and flow-routing method on computed topographic attributes. In: J.P. Wilson and J.C. Gallant, eds. Terrain analysis: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 133–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wolock, D.M. and McCabe, G.J., 1995. Comparison of single and multiple flow direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters in TOPMODEL. Water Resources Research, 31, 1315–1324. doi:10.1029/95WR00471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. and Han, D., 2006. Derivation of unit hydrograph using a transfer function approach. Water Resources Research, 42, W01501. doi:10.1029/2005WR004227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, B.C. and Lee, K.T., 1997. Unit hydrograph derivation for ungauged watersheds by stream order laws. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:1(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. and Govindaraju, R.S., 2003. Geomorphology-based artificial neural networks (GANNs) for estimation of direct runoff over watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 273, 18–34. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00313-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar