REFERENCES

• Afifi, A.A. and Clark, V., 1996. Computer-aided multivariate analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Arthington, A.H., et al., 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16 (4), 1311–1318. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisel, J.-N., et al., 1998. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia, 389, 73–88. doi:10.1023/A:1003519429979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brierley, G., et al., 2002. Application of the River Styles framework as a basis for river management in New South Wales, Australia. Applied Geography, 22, 91–122. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00016-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, A.J., et al., 2005. Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles. Freshwater Biology, 50, 331–344. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, G.W., 2001. HEC-RAS river analysis system: hydraulic reference manual. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Chessman, B.C., Fryirs, K.A., and Brierley, G.J., 2006. Linking geomorphic character, behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity: implications for river management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 267–288. doi:10.1002/aqc.724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, N.J., et al., 2006. Physical habitat, eco-hydraulics and river design: a review and re-evaluation of some popular concepts and methods. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 389–408. doi:10.1002/aqc.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham, P., et al., 2001. Report of the Broken River scientific panel on the environmental condition and flows of the Broken River and Broken Creek. Canberra, ACT: CRC for Freshwater Ecology, University of Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Cottingham, P., et al., 2003. Flow-related environmental issues related to the Goulburn River below Lake Eildon. A report to the Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria and the Murray Darling Basin Commission. Canberra, ACT: CRC for Catchment Hydrology and CRC for Freshwater Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, F. and Thoms, M.C., 2006. Managing river flows for hydraulic diversity: an example of an upland regulated gravel-bed river. River Research and Applications, 22, 257–267. doi:10.1002/rra.909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthtech, 2003. Thomson River environmental water requirements and options to manage flow stress: Part B—Draft Final Recommendations. Unpublished Report to the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority by the Thomson River Environmental Flows Technical Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Earthtech, 2007. Assessment of environmental flow requirements for the Latrobe River. Amended Final Recommendations Report. Unpublished report by Earthtec for the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority, March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• French, R., 1994. Development of uniform flow concepts, open channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, O.T. and Karr, J.R., 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology, 59 (3), 507–515. doi:10.2307/1936581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, M.P., Petts, G.E., and Maddock, I.P., 2010. Mesohabitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio). Hydrobiologia, 652, 299–310. doi:10.1007/s10750-010-0363-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer, C., et al., 2011. Variability of mesohabitat characteristics in riffle-pool reaches: testing an integrative evaluation concept (FGC) for mem-application. River Research and Applications, 27, 403–430. doi:10.1002/rra.1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, P., Serafini, L.G., and King, A.J., 2002. River regulation and fish larvae: variation through space and time. Freshwater Biology, 47, 1307–1331. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00871.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, P., et al., 2006. Creating a disturbance: manipulating slackwaters in a lowland river. River Research and Applications, 22 (5), 525–542. doi:10.1002/rra.920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, I.G., 1993. A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27, 241–248. doi:10.1080/00288330.1993.9516563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, J.L., Harper, D.M., and Crosa, G.A., 2000. The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers. Ecological Engineering, 16, 17–29. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00073-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, J., O’Connor, N.A., and Jackson, P.D., 1994. Seasonal and size-related variation in microhabitat use by a southern Victorian stream fish assemblage. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45, 1353–1366. doi:10.1071/MF9941353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux, N. and Capra, H., 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for target fish populations. Freshwater Biology, 47 (8), 1543–1556. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00879.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux, N. and Cattanéo, F., 2006. Fish assemblages and stream hydraulics: consistent relations across spatial scales and regions. River Research and Applications, 22, 727–737. doi:10.1002/rra.931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux, N. and Jowett, I.G., 2005. Generalized instream habitat models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62 (1), 7–14. doi:10.1139/f04-163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux, N. and Souchon, Y., 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams. Freshwater Biology, 47 (8), 1531–1542. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00880.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LREFTP, 2002. Environmental flow determination of the Loddon River catchment. Final Report. Unpublished Report prepared by the Loddon River Environmental Flows scientific panel to the North Central Catchment Management Authority and Department of Natural Resources and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Maddock, I., et al., 2004. Identifying the influence of channel morphology on physical habitat availability for native fish: application to the two-spined blackfish (Gadopsis bispinosus) in the Cotter River, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 55, 173–184. doi:10.1071/MF03114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olden, J.D. and Poff, N.L., 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications, 19 (2), 101–121. doi:10.1002/rra.700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L., and McMahon, T., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633–1644. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, L.N. and Zimmerman, J.K.H., 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55, 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N.L., et al., 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55, 147–170. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.M. and Hickey, C.W., 1994. Hydraulic parameters and benthic invertebrate distributions in two gravel-bed New Zealand rivers. Freshwater Biology, 32, 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A.J., Growns, J.E., and Cook, R.A., 2004. Distribution and life history of caridean shrimps in regulated lowland rivers in Southern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 55, 295–308. doi:10.1071/MF03126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B.D., et al., 1998. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 14, 329–340. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199807/08)14:4<329::AID-RRR505>3.0.CO;2-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B.D., et al., 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications, 13 (1), 206–224. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, C.B., Bovee, K.D., and Waddle, T.J., 1996. Importance of the temporal aspects of habitat hydraulics to fish population studies. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 12, 145–153. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199603)12:2/3<145::AID-RRR386>3.0.CO;2-H.
   Google Scholar
• Statzner, B., Gore, J.A., and Resh, V.H., 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7 (4), 307–360. doi:10.2307/1467296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewardson, M.J., 2005. Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches. Journal of Hydrology, 306 (1–4), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharme, R.E., 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19, 397–441. doi:10.1002/rra.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoms, M.C., Beyer, P.J., and Rogers, K.H., 2006. Variability, complexity and diversity: the geomorphology of river ecosystems in dryland regions. In: R.T. Kingsford, eds. The ecology of desert rivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Thoms, M.C., Ogden, R.W., and Reid, M.A., 1999. Establishing the condition of lowland floodplain rivers: a palaeo-ecological approach. Freshwater Biology, 41, 407–423. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00439.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoms, M.C. and Sheldon, F., 2000. Lowland rivers: an Australian introduction. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 16, 375–383. doi:10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<375::AID-RRR591>3.0.CO;2-#.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J.R., Taylor, M.P., and Brierley, G.J., 2004. Are river styles ecologically meaningful? A test of the ecological significance of a geomorphic river characterization scheme. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14, 25–48. doi:10.1002/aqc.585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M., 2009. Natural spatial and temporal hydraulic habtiat variability; Implications for regional environmental flow planning. Thesis (PhD). Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., et al., 2005. Using reach-scale hydraulic parameters to assess in-stream heterogeneity for environmental flow needs. 29th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 20–23 February, Canberra, Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vietz, G.J., Sammonds, M.J., and Stewardson, M.J., 2013. Impacts of flow regulation on slackwaters in river channels. Water Resources Research, 49, 1797–1811. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vietz, G.J., Stewardson, M.J., and Finlayson, B.L., 2006. Flows that form: the hydromorphology of concave-bank bench formation in the Ovens River, Australia. In: J.S. Rowan, et al., eds. Sediment dynamics and the hydromorphology of fluvial systems. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Press, IAHS Publ. 306, 267–276.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S., 1994. Life in moving fluids: The physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wadeson, R.A., 1994. A geomorphological approach to the identification and classification of instream flow environments. Southern African Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 20 (1–2), 38–61. doi:10.1080/10183469.1994.9631349.
   Google Scholar
• Wadeson, R.A. and Rowntree, K.M., 2002. Mapping hydraulic biotopes for ecological flow assessments. ENVIRO FLOWS. 2002. In: Proceedings of the international conference on environmental flows for river systems (incorporating the 4th international ecohydraulics symposium), 3–8 March. Cape Town: Unpublished Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Woodyer, K.D., 1968. Bankfull frequency in rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 6, 114–142. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(68)90155-8.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadil, E., et al., 2012. An evaluation of surface flow types as a rapid measure of channel morphology for the geomorphic component of river condition assessments. Geomorphology, 139–140, 303–312. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar