1,922
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Predicting return periods of hydrological droughts using the Pearson 3 distribution: a case from rivers in the Canadian prairies

Prédéterminer les périodes de retour des sécheresses hydrologiques en utilisant la distribution Pearson 3 : cas de rivières des Prairies canadiennes

&
Pages 1783-1796 | Received 14 Jan 2014, Accepted 30 Apr 2014, Published online: 23 Sep 2015

REFERENCES

  • Adamowski, K., 1985. Nonparametric kernal estimation of flood frequencies. Water Resources Research, 21 (11), 1585–1590. doi:10.1029/WR021i011p01585
  • Bayazit, M. and Önöz, B., 2005. Probabilities and return periods of multisite droughts. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (4), 605–615. doi:10.1623/hysj.2005.50.4.605
  • Bobee, B. and Robitaille, R., 1977. The use of the Pearson type 3 and log Pearson type 3 distributions revisited. Water Resources Research, 13 (2), 427–443. doi:10.1029/WR013i002p00427
  • Bonaccorso, B., Cancelliere, A., and Rossi, G., 2003. An analytical formulation of return period of drought severity. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA), 17 (3), 157–174. doi:10.1007/s00477-003-0127-7
  • Bonaccorso, B., et al., 2012. Large-scale probabilistic drought characterization over Europe. Water Resources Management. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0177-z
  • Cancelliere, A. and Salas, J.D., 2004. Drought length properties for periodic hydrologic data. Water Resources Research, 10 (2), 1–13.
  • Cancelliere, A. and Salas, J.D., 2010. Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflows series. Journal of Hydrology, 391, 77–89. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.008
  • Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Environment Canada., 2011. HYDAT CD-ROM Version 96-1.04 and HYDAT CD-ROM User’s Manual. Surface Water and Sediment Data. Water Survey of Canada.
  • Fernández, B. and Salas, J.D., 1999a. Return period and risk of hydrologic events. I: mathematical formulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (4), 297–307. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:4(297)
  • Fernández, B. and Salas, J.D., 1999b. Return period and risk of hydrologic events. II: applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (4), 308–316. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:4(308)
  • González, J. and Valdés, J.B., 2003. Bivariate drought recurrence analysis using tree ring reconstructions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8 (5), 247–258. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:5(247)
  • Gringorten, I.I., 1963. A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68 (3), 813–814. doi:10.1029/JZ068i003p00813
  • Haan, C.T., 1977. Statistical Hydrology. Ames: Iowa state University Press.
  • Hazen, A., 1930. Flood flows, A study of frequency and magnitudes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–209.
  • Kendall, D.R. and Dracup, J.A., 1992. On the generation of drought events using an alternating renewal-reward model. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 6 (1), 55–68. doi:10.1007/BF01581675
  • Kim, T.-W., Valdés, J.B., and Yoo, C., 2003. Nonparametric approach for estimating return periods of droughts in arid regions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8 (5), 237–246. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:5(237)
  • Kite, G.W., 1988. Frequency and risk analysis in hydrology (revised). Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
  • Koutrouvelis, I.A. and Canavos, G.C., 1999. Estimation in the Pearson type 3 distribution. Water Resources Research, 35 (9), 2693–2704. doi:10.1029/1999WR900174
  • Lana, X., et al., 2006. Statistical distributions and sampling strategies for the analysis of extreme dry spells in Catalonia (NE Spain). Journal of Hydrology, 324, 94–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.013
  • Lana, X., et al., 2008. Return period maps of dry spells for Catalonia (northeastern Spain) based on the Weibull distribution. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (1), 48–64. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.1.48
  • Matalas, N.C. and Wallis, J.R., 1973. Eureka! It fits a Pearson type: 3 distribution. Water Resources Research, 9 (2), 281–289. doi:10.1029/WR009i002p00281
  • Mathier, L., et al., 1992. The use of geometric and gamma-related distributions for frequency analysis of water deficit. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 6, 239–254. doi:10.1007/BF01581619
  • Millan, J. and Yevjevich, V., 1971. Probabilities of observed droughts. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Hydrology Paper 50.
  • Moon, Y. and Lall, U., 1994. Kernel quantite function estimator for flood frequency analysis. Water Resources Research, 30 (11), 3095–3103. doi:10.1029/94WR01217
  • Salas, J.D., et al., 1997. Applied modelling of hydrologic time series. Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
  • Salazar, P.G. and Yevjevich, V., 1975. Analysis of drought characteristics by the theory of runs. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Hydrology Paper 80.
  • Şen, Z., 1980. Statistical analysis of hydrological critical droughts. Journal of Hydraulics ASCE, 1064 (HY1), 99–115.
  • Şen, Z., 1989. The theory of runs with applications to drought prediction- comment. Journal of Hydrology, 110, 383–391.
  • Şen, Z., 1990. Critical drought analysis by second order Markov chain. Journal of Hydrology, 120, 183–202. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(90)90149-R
  • Şen, Z., 1999. Simple risk calculations in dependent hydrological series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44 (6), 871–878. doi:10.1080/02626669909492286
  • Sharma, T.C. and Panu, U.S., 2008. Drought analysis of monthly hydrological sequences: a case study of Canadian rivers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (3), 503–518. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.3.503
  • Sharma, T.C. and Panu, U.S., 2010. Analytical procedures for weekly hydrological droughts: a case of Canadian rivers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (1), 79–92. doi:10.1080/02626660903526318
  • Sharma, T.C. and Panu, U.S., 2012. Prediction of hydrological drought durations based on Markov chains: case of the Canadian prairies. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (4), 705–722. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.672741
  • Shiau, J.T., 2006. Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resources Management, 20, 795–815. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-9008-9
  • Shiau, J.T. and Shen, W.S., 2001. Recurrence analysis of hydrological droughts of different severity. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE, 127 (1), 30–40.
  • Vogel, R.M. and Fennessey, N.M., 1993. L-moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water Resources Research, 29 (6), 1745–1752. doi:10.1029/93WR00341
  • Yevjevich, V., 1967. An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Hydrology Paper 23.
  • Yevjevich, V., 1972. Stochastic processes in hydrology. Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
  • Zelenhasić, E. and Salvai, A., 1987. A method of streamflow drought analysis. Water Resources Research, 23 (1), 156–168. doi:10.1029/WR023i001p00156

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.