Comparison of SMOS, modelled and in situ long-term soil moisture series in the northwest of Spain

References

• Al Bitar, A., et al. 2011. Validation of SMOS soil moisture over SCAN/SNOTEL network. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 13, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Albergel, C., et al., 2012. Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 215–226. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Yaari, A., et al., 2014. Global-scale evaluation of two satellite-based passive microwave soil moisture datasets (SMOS and AMSR-E) with respect to land data assimilation system estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 149, 181–195. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bircher, S., Skou, N., and Kerr, Y.H., 2013. Validation of SMOS L1C and L2 products and important parameters of the retrieval algorithm in the skjern river catchment, Western Denmark. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (5), 2969–2985. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2215041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2010. ASCAT soil wetness index validation through in situ and modelled soil moisture data in central Italy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 2745–2755. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2011. Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: an intercomparison and validation study across Europe. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 3390–3408. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2013a. Developing and testing a long-term soil moisture dataset at the catchment scale. Journal of Hydrology, 490, 144–151. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2013b. Scaling and filtering approaches for the use of satellite soil moisture observations. In: G.P. Petropoulos, ed. Remote sensing of energy fluxes and soil moisture content. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 2013, Taylor & Francis Group, Chapter 17, 411–426. ISBN: 978-1-4665-0578-0. doi:10.1201/b15610-21
   Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2014. Improving the representation of soil moisture by using a semi-analytical infiltration model. Hydrological Processes, 28 (4), 2103–2115. doi:10.1002/hyp.9766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T., 2008. On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrological Processes, 22 (5), 629–642. doi:10.1002/hyp.6629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos, A., et al., 2002. Soil water behaviour of sandy soils under semi-arid conditions in the Duero Basin (Spain). Journal of Arid Environments, 51 (4), 501–519. doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(02)90973-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos, A., et al., 2005a. Variabilidad espacio-temporal de la humedad del suelo en el sector semiárido de la cuenca del Duero (España). Revista Cuaternario Y Geomorfología, 19 (3–4), 63-77. ISSN:0214-1744.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos, A., et al., 2005b. Validation of ERS scatterometer-derived soil moisture data in the central part of the Duero Basin, Spain. Hydrological Processes, 19 (8), 1549–1566. doi:10.1002/hyp.5585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Willgoose, G.R., and Saco, P.M., 2014. Spatial prediction of temporal soil moisture dynamics using HYDRUS-1D. Hydrological Processes, 28, 171–185. doi:10.1002/hyp.9518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collow, T.W., et al., 2012. Evaluation of SMOS retrievals of soil moisture over the central United States with currently available in situ observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117 (D09113). doi:10.1029/2011JD017095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W., et al., 2012. Upscaling sparse ground-based soil moisture observations for the validation of coarse-resolution satellite soil moisture products. Reviews of Geophysics, 50 (2), RG2001/2012. doi:10.1029/2011RG000372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W.T., Miralles, D.G., and Cosh, M.H., 2010. A quasi-global evaluation system for satellite-based surface soil moisture retrievals. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48 (6), 2516–2527. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2040481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W.T. and Zhan, X., 2007. Continental-scale evaluation of remotely sensed soil moisture products. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4, 451–455. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2007.896533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’amico, J.T., et al., 2012. First results of SMOS soil moisture validation in the upper danube catchment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (5), 1507–1516. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2171496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lannoy, G.J.M., et al., 2006. Assessment of model uncertainty for soil moisture through ensemble verification. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D10101. doi:10.1029/2005JD006367
   Google Scholar
• De Rosnay, P., et al., 2006. SMOSREX: A long term field campaign experiment for soil moisture and land surface processes remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102 (3–4), 377–389. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dente, L., Su, Z., and Wen, J., 2012. Validation of SMOS soil moisture products over the Maqu and Twente regions. Sensors, 12, 9965–9986. doi:10.3390/s120809965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W.O., 1977. Background and development of methods to predict reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo). FAO-ID-24, Appendix II, 108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo, W.A., et al., 2010. Error characterization of global active and passive microwave soil moisture datasets. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14 (12), 2605–2616. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2605-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorigo, W.A., et al., 2011. The international soil moisture network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1675–1698. doi:10.5194/hessd-8-1609-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drusch, M., Wood, E.F., and Gao, H., 2005. Observation operators for the direct assimilation of TRMM microwave imager retrieved soil moisture. Geophysical Research Letters, 32 (15), L15403. doi:10.1029/2005GL023623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Famiglietti, J.S. and Wood, E.F., 1994. Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes. Water Resources Research, 30 (11), 3061–3078. doi:10.1029/94WR01498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, P.A., Wösten, J.H.M., and Jansen, M.J.W., 1996. Effects of uncertainty in major input variables on simulated functional soil behaviour. Hydrological Processes, 10 (5), 661–669. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199605)10:5<661::AID-HYP346>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, T.W., Harris, E., and Quiring, S.M., 2014. Estimating root zone soil moisture using near-surface observations from SMOS. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 139–154. doi:10.5194/hess-18-139-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Zamora, A., et al., 2015. Long-term SMOS soil moisture products: A comprehensive evaluation across scales and methods in the Duero Basin (Spain), Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. [cited 4 June 2015], ISSN 1474-7065. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706515000686
   Google Scholar
• Green, W.H. and Ampt, G., 1911. Studies of soil physics. Part I. The flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 1–24. doi:10.1017/S0021859600001441
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, A., et al., 2013. Characterizing coarse-scale representativeness of in situ soil moisture measurements from the international soil moisture network. Vadose Zone Journal, 12 (2), 16. doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T.J., et al., 2010. Validation of advanced microwave scanning radiometer soil moisture products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48 (12), 4256–4272. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2051035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T.J., et al., 2012. Validation of soil moisture and ocean salinity (SMOS) soil moisture over watershed networks in the U.S. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (5), 1530–1543. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2168533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juglea, S., et al., 2010. Modelling soil moisture at SMOS scale by use of a SVAT model over the valencia anchor station. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1509–1525. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1509-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Y., 2007. Soil moisture from space: where are we? Hydrogeology Journal, 15 (1), 117–120. doi:10.1007/10040-006-0095-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Y., et al., 2010. The SMOS mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 98 (5), 666–687. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Y., et al., 2011. SMOS level 2 processor soil moisture algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD), CBSA, UoR, TV and INRA, Toulouse, Tech. Rep. SO-TN-ARR-L2PP-0037, V3.4, 24/01/2011 2011. Available from: http://www.cesbio.ups-tlse.fr/fr/indexsmos.html
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Y., et al., 2012. The SMOS soil moisture retrieval algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 1384–1403. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacava, T., et al., 2012a. A first assessment of the SMOS soil moisture product with in-situ and modelled data in Italy and Luxembourg. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (5), 1612–1622. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2186819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacava, T., et al., 2012b. A multisensor (SMOS, AMSR-E and ASCAT) satellite-based soil moisture products inter-comparison. In: Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International, 1135–1138. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351348.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, D.J., et al., 2013. Comparison between SMOS, VUA, ASCAT, and ECMWF soil moisture products over four watersheds in U.S. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52 (3), 1562–1571. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2252468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loew, A., 2008. Impact of surface heterogeneity on surface soil moisture retrievals from passive microwave data at the regional scale: the upper Danube case. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (1), 231–248. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loew, A. and Schlenz, F., 2011. A dynamic approach for evaluating coarse scale satellite soil moisture products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (1), 75–90. doi:0.5194/hess-15-75-2011. doi:10.5194/hess-15-75-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Fernández, J. et al., 2007. Evolución de la humedad del suelo bajo diferentes tipos de cubierta vegetal de la cuenca del Duero. In: J.V. Giráldez Cervera and F.J. Jiménez Hornero, et al., eds. Estudios de la Zona No-Saturada del Suelo Vol. VIII. Córdoba (España): Universidad de Córdoba, 275–280.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Fernández, J. and Ceballos, A., 2003. Temporal stability of soil moisture in a large-field experiment in Spain. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 1647–1656. doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.1647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Fernández, J. and Ceballos, A., 2005. Mean soil moisture estimation using temporal stability analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 312, 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, V., et al., 2003. A global data base of land surface parameters at 1 km resolution in meteorological and climate models. Journal of Climate, 16 (9), 1261–1282. doi:10.1175/1520-0442-16.9.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mironov, V.L., Kosolapova, L.G., and Fomin, S.V., 2009. Physically and mineralogically based spectroscopic dielectric model for moist soils. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47 (7), 2085–2085. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.2011631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, M.S., et al., 2004. Estimating soil moisture at the watershed scale with satellite-based radar and land surface models. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30 (5), 805–826. doi:10.5589/m04-043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsner, T., et al., 2013. The state of the art in large-scale soil moisture monitoring. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77 (6), 1888–1919. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.03.0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piles, M., et al., 2011. Downscaling SMOS-derived soil moisture using MODIS visible/infrared data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49 (9), 3156–3166. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L. and Saxton, K.E., 1982. Estimation of soil water properties. Transaction of the ASAE, 25(5), 1316–1320.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, R., et al., 2004. Global soil moisture from satellite observations, land surface models and ground data: Implications for data assimilation. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5, 430–442. doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0430:GSMFSO>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, R.H. and Koster, R.D., 2004. Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture. Geophysical Research Letters, 31 (L19501), 1–4. doi:10.1029/2004GL020938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Release note of the SMOS level 2 v. 5.51 Soil Moisture data products, 2013. Available from: https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/118493/L2SMv551_release_note_2013-08-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D.A., et al., 2008. Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed-scale observatories: A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 7, 358–389. doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rötzer, K., et al., 2012. Time series analysis of SMOS and ASCAT: soil moisture product validation in the Rur and Erft catchments. In: Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International, 3716–3719. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350510.
   Google Scholar
• Rötzer, K., et al., 2014. Catchment scale validation of SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture products using hydrological modelling and temporal stability analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 934–946. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüdiger, C., et al., 2009. An intercomparison of ERS-SCAT and AMSR-E soil moisture observations with model simulations over France. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10 (2), 431–447. doi:10.1175/2008JHM997.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, N., et al., 2010. Combining remote sensing and in situ soil moisture data for the application and validation of a distributed water balance model (HIDROMORE). Agricultural Water Management, 98, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, N., et al., 2012a. Validation of the SMOS L2 soil moisture data in the REMEDHUS network (Spain). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (5), 1602–1611. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2186971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, N., et al., 2012b. Spatial patters of SMOS downscaled soil moisture maps over the REMEDHUS network (Spain). In: Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International, 714–717. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351465.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ruiz, S., et al., 2014. Combining SMOS with visible and near/shortwave/thermal infrared satellite data for high resolution soil moisture estimates. Journal of Hydrology, 516, 273–283. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenz, F., et al., 2012. Uncertainty assessment of the SMOS validation in the Upper Danube catchment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 1517–1529. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2171694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmugge, T.J., et al., 2002. Remote sensing in hydrology. Advances in Water Resources, 25 (8–12), 1367–1385. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00065-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scipal, K., Drusch, M., and Wagner, W., 2008. Assimilation of a ERS scatterometer derived soil moisture index in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system. Advances in Water Resources, 31 (8), 1101–1112. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, M. and De Smedt, F., 2013. Validation of soil moisture simulation with a distributed hydrologic model (WetSpa). Environmental Earth Sciences, 69, 739–747. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1957-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, 1997. World Atlas of Desertification. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi. 182 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Vereecken, H., et al., 2013. On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale. Journal of Hydrology, 516, 76–96. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnikov, K.Y., et al., 1996. Scales of temporal and spatial variability of midlatitude soil moisture. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101 (D3), 7163–7174. doi:10.1029/95JD02753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., et al., 2007. Operational readiness of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for hydrologic applications. Nordic Hydrology, 38 (1), 1–20. doi:10.2166/nh.2007.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanders, N., et al., 2012. Observations uncertainty of satellite soil moisture products determined with physically-based modelling. Remote Sensing Environment, 127, 341–356. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanders, N., et al., 2014. The benefits of using remotely sensed soil moisture in parameter identification of large-scale hydrological models. Water Resource Research, 50 (8), 6874–6891. doi:10.1002/2013WR014639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigneron, J.P., et al., 2004. Soil moisture retrievals from biangular L-band passive microwave observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1 (4), 277–281. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2004.834594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigneron, J.P., et al., 2007. L-band microwave emission of the biosphere (L-MEB) model: description and calibration against experimental data sets over crop fields. Remote Sensing of Environment, 107 (4), 639–655. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, C.J., 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63, 1309–1313. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar