Investigation of the groundwater modelling component of the Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM)

References

• Allen, R.G., et al., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, 300 p.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P.F., 1993. A manual for Instructional Problems for the USGS MODFLOW Model. Publication No. EPA/600/R-93/010. Available from: http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000BHNI.txt [ Accessed June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• BCDWRC (Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation). 2004. Butte Basin groundwater model update: Phase I Report, 57 p. Available from: http://www.buttecounty.net/Portals/26/Modeling/DWRC-Strategic-Plan-2011-2015.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• BCDWRC (Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation). 2008a. Butte Basin groundwater model update: Phase II Report, 155 p. Available from: http://www.buttecounty.net/Portals/26/Modeling/CDM%20Butte%20Basin%20Model%20TM2%20FINAL.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• BCDWRC (Butte County Dept. Water and Resource Conservation). 2008b. Butte Basin groundwater model update: Base case and water management scenario simulations, 25 p. Available from: http://www.buttecounty.net/Portals/26/Modeling/TM3BaseCaseScenario20080424.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bedient, P.B. and Huber, W.C., 1992. Hydrology and flood plain analysis. 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley publishing company, p. 692. ISBN: 9780201517118.
   Google Scholar
• Bellin, A., et al., 2016. A continuous coupled hydrological and water resources management model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 176–192. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, C.F. and Dogrul, E.C., 2013. User manual for the California Central Valley groundwater-surface water simulation model (C2VSim), version 3.02-CG. Available from: http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/C2VSim/download/C2VSim_Users_Manual_Final.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Brush, C.F., Dogrul, E.C., and Kadir, T.N., 2013. DWR technical memorandum: development and calibration of the California Central Valley groundwater-surface water simulation model (C2VSim), version 3.02-CG. Available from: http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/C2VSim/download/C2VSim_Model_Report_Final.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• CADWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2015a. Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM-2015): Theoretical Documentation. Central Valley Modeling Unit, Modeling Support Branch, Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento. Available from: http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/IWFM/IWFM-2015/v2015_0_260/downloadables/IWFM-2015.0.260_TheoreticalDocumentation.pdf [ Accessed May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• CADWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2015b. IWFM Demand Calculator (IDC-2015): Theoretical Documentation and User’s Manual, Central Valley Modeling Unit, Modeling Support Branch, Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento. Accessed from: http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/IDC/IDC-2015/v2015_0_36/downloadables/IDC-2015.0.36_Documentation.pdf [ Accessed May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, G.S., 1974. A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science, 117 (6), 311–314. doi:10.1097/00010694-197406000-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, L.L., et al., 2013. Simulating the impact of drought on California’s Central Valley hydrology, groundwater and cropping. British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 3 (3), 271–291. doi:10.9734/BJECC/2013/2680
   Google Scholar
• Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), 1999. Mike She pre- and post-processing user manual. Hørsholm, Denmark: DHI Software.
   Google Scholar
• Dogrul, E.C., et al., 2016. Linking groundwater simulation and reservoir system analysis models: the case for California’s Central Valley. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogrul, E.C., Kadir, T.N., and Chung, F.I., 2011. Root zone moisture routing and water demand calculations in the context of integrated hydrology. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137 (6), 359–366. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, A.J., et al., 2004. CalSim: Generalized model for reservoir system analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130 (6), 480–489. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(480)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuit, J., 1863. Etudes Théoriques et Pratiques sur le Mouvement des Eau x dans les Canau x Découverts et a Travers les Terrains Perméables. 2nd edn. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Efstratiadis, A., et al., 2008. Hydrogeios: a semi-distributed GIS-based hydrological model for modified river basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12, 989–1006. doi:10.5194/hess-12-989-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, A., 2006. Verification problems for IWFM. Department of Water Resources, Bay-Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch, 42 p. Available from: http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/IWFM/Publications/downloadables/Reports/IWFM_Verification.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hantush, M.S. and Jacob, C.E., 1955. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 36, 95–100. doi:10.1029/TR036i001p00095
   Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, A.W. and McDonald, M.G., 1996a. User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96- An update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model, USGS Open-File Report 96-485. Available from: http://water.usgs.gov/software/code/ground_water/modflow/doc/ofr96485.pdf [Accessed July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, A.W. and McDonald, M.G., 1996b. Programmer’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model, USGS Open-File Report 96-486. Available from: http://water.usgs.gov/software/code/ground_water/modflow/doc/ofr96486.pdf [Accessed July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Harter, T. and Morel-Seytou X, H., 2013. Peer review of the IWFM, MODFLOW and HGS model codes: potential for water management applications in California’s central valley and other irrigated groundwater basins. Final Report, California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum, August 2013, Sacramento. Available from: http://www.cwemf.org/Pubs/GWModelsPeerReviewFinal.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hatchett, S., Mann, R., and Zhang, B., 1997. Analysis of agricultural economics for the central valley project improvement act programmatic environmental impact statement. Presented at Western Agricultural Economics Association 1997, annual meeting, 13–16 July Reno/Sparks, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Haushild, W. and Kruse, G., 1962. Unsteady Flow of Ground Water into a Surface Reservoir. Transactions, ASCE, 127, Part I, 408–415.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, R.E., et al., 2014. Economic analysis of the 2014 drought for California agriculture. Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, California. 20p. Available from: https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/files/biblio/DroughtReport_23July2014_0.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Idaho Water Resources Board (IWRB), 2010. Treasure Valley future water demand, 74 p. Available from: http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/WaterBoard/WaterPlanning/CAMP/TV_CAMP/PDF/2010/09-29-2010_Water_Demand.pdf [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Kavvas, M.L., et al., 2004. Watershed environmental hydrology (WEHY) model, based on upscaled conservation equations: hydrologic module. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 9 (6), 450–464. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:6(450)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavvas, M.L., et al., 2006. Watershed environmental hydrology model: environmental module and its application to a California watershed. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 11 (3), 261–272. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:3(261)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. and Robinson, A.R., 1959. Model study of interceptor drains. Proceedings. ASCE, September, 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Leavesley, G.H., et al., 1983. Precipitation-runoff modeling system: user’s manual. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey. 207 p. Water Resources Investigations Report 83-4238.
   Google Scholar
• Markstrom, S.L., et al., 2008. GSFLOW–coupled groundwater and surface water FLOW model based on the integration of the precipitation-runoff modeling system (PRMS) and the modular groundwater flow model (MODFLOW-2005). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. 240 p. Techniques and Methods 6-D1.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, R.M., et al., 2014. Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: a first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks. Water Resources Research, 50, 1531–1549. doi:10.1002/2013WR013725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N.L., et al., 2009. Drought resilience of the California central valley surface-ground-water-conveyance system. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45 (4), 857–866. doi:10.1111/jawr.2009.45.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, S., 2000. On the performance of high aspect ratio elements for incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 188 (1–3). 21 July 2000, pp. 269–287. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00152-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalbantis, I., et al., 2011. Holistic versus monomeric strategies for hydrological modelling of human-modified hydrosystems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (3), 743–758. doi:10.5194/hess-15-743-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.C. and Henriksen, H.J., 2004. Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27 (1), 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherberg, J., et al., 2014. Design of managed aquifer recharge for agricultural and ecological water supply assessed through numerical modeling. Water Resources Management, 28, 4971–4984. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0780-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, W., et al., 2006. User guide for the farm process (FMP1) for the US Geological Survey’s modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model, MODFLOW-2000. (Book 6). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. 127 p. Techniques and Methods 6-A17. Available from: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/tm6A17/ [ Accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P.R., et al., 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for Version 3, EPA/600/R-94/168b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sophocleous, M.A., et al., 1999. Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. . Journal of Hydrology, 214 (1–4), 179–196. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00289-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), 2014. Cal. Assembly B. 1379,C.S.B., and Cal. Senate B. 1319 [online]. Available from: https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/2014_Sustainable_Groundwater_Management_Legislation_092914.pdf [Accessed 4 January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. . Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 16, 519–524. doi:10.1029/TR016i002p00519
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, R., et al., 2010. HydroGeoSphere—a three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport (Draft), October 2010. Available from: http://www.ggl.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/ggl/documents/rtherrien/hydrogeosphere.pdf [Accessed July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed-form solution for predicting the conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.F. and Anderson, M.P., 1982. Introduction to groundwater modeling: finite difference and finite element methods. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar