Improving rainfall–runoff modelling through the control of uncertainties under increasing climate variability in the Ouémé River basin (Benin, West Africa)

References

• Afouda, A. and Alamou, E., 2010, Modèle hydrologique basé sur le principe de moindre action (MODHYPMA). Annales des Sciences Agronomiques du Bénin, 13 (1), 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Afouda, A., Lawin, E., and Lebel, T., 2004. A stochastic streamflow model based on a minimum energy expenditure concept. In contemporary problems in mathematical physics: Proceeding 3rd Intern Workshop. Word Scientific Publishing, 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Afouda, A., et al., 2007. Impact of climate change and variability on water resources in West African watersheds: what are the prospects? In: Synthesis Report - WRITESHOP, 21–24 February 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Alamou, E., 2011. Application du principe de moindre action a la modélisation pluie – débit. Thèse de Doctorat. CIPMA - chaire UNESCO, Université d’ Abomey Calavi.
   Google Scholar
• Andréassian, V., et al., 2010. Editorial – The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: can failure stories contribute to hydrological science? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (6), 849–856. doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.506050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annunziato, M. and Borzì, A., 2010, Optimal control of probability density functions of stochastic Processes. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 15 (4), 393–407. doi:10.3846/1392-6292.2010.15.393-407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biao, I.E., et al., 2015, Influence of the uncertainties related to the random component of rainfall inflow in the Oueme river basin (Benin, West Africa). International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5 (3), 1618–1629.
   Google Scholar
• Bodo, B.A., Thompson, M.E., and Unny, T.E., 1987. A review on stochastic differential equations for applications in hydrology. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 1, 81–100. doi:10.1007/BF01543805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantarangsi, W., et al., 2014. Normal probability plots with confidence. Biometrical Journal, 1–12. doi:10.1002/bimj.201300244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, J.H., 1987, Development of stochastic partial differential equations for subsurface hydrology. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 1 (4), 241–262. doi:10.1007/BF01543097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denisov, S.I., Horsthemke, W., and Hänggi, P., 2009. Generalized Fokker – Planck equation: derivation and exact solutions. The European Physical Journal B, 68, 567–575. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2009-00126-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekkrüger, B., et al., 2010. Hydrology. In: P. Speth, M. Christoph, and B. Diekkrüger, eds. Impacts of global change on the hydrological cycle in West and Northwest Africa. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Efstratiadis, A., Nalbantis, I., and Koutsoyiannis, D., 2014. Hydrological modelling of temporally varying catchments: Facets of change and the value of information. Hydrological Sciences Journal. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.982123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanggi, P. and Ljung, P., 1995. Colored noise in dynamical systems. Advances in Chemical Physics, 89, 239–326.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014a. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. In: C.B. Field, et al. eds. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014b. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. In: V.R. Barros, et al. eds. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khatri, K. B., 2013. Risk and Uncertainty analysis for sustainable urban water systems (PhD thesis). UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands, 253 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Konecny, F. and Nachtnebel, H.P., 1995. A daily stream flow model based on a jump – diffusion process. In: Z. Kundzewicz, ed. New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., 2013. Hydrology and Change. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (6), 1177–1197. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.804626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczera, G., et al., 2010. There are no hydrological monsters, just models and observations with large uncertainties! Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (6), 980–991. doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.504677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z.W., et al., 2014. Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (1), 1–28. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.857411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, P.J., 1982. Persistence of Sub-Saharan drought. Nature, 299, 46–48. doi:10.1038/299046a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., 2008, Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 2 (1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, G., 1970, La théorie des variables régionalisées et ses applications. Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathématique de Fontaine Bleau Fascicule, 5, 212p.
   Google Scholar
• Mtundu, N.D. and Koch, R.W., 1987. A stochastic differential equation approach to soil moisture. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 1, 101–116. doi:10.1007/BF01543806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujumdar, P.P. and Nagesh Kumar, D., 1990, Stochastic models of streamflow: some case studies. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 35 (4), 395–410. doi:10.1080/02626669009492442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Risken, H., 1989. The Fokker – Planck Equation. Methods of solution and applications. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer – Verlag, 472 p.
   Google Scholar
• Saporta, G., 1974. Probabilités, Analyse des données et statistique. Moscow: Mir.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, S.E. and Unny, T.E., 1987. Semigroup solutions to stochastic unsteady groundwater flow subject to random parameters. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 1, 281–296. doi:10.1007/BF01543100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soro, G.E., 2011. Modélisation statistique des pluies extrêmes en Cote d’ Ivoire. Thèse de Doctorat. Université d’ Abobo – Adjamé, 193 p.
   Google Scholar
• Strupczewski, W.G. and Mitosek, H.T., 1995. Some aspects of hydrological design under non – stationarity. In: Z. Kundzewicz, ed. New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam, J.C., 1999. Impacts of climate change and climatic variability on hydrological regimes. International Hydrology Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2011. Inondations au Benin: Rapport d’Evaluation des Besoins Post Catastrophe. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/04/1635839-inondations-au-benin-rapport-d’evaluation-des-besoins-post-catastrophes
   Google Scholar
• Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G.E., 2002. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24 (2), 619–644. doi:10.1137/S1064827501387826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar