Simultaneous hydrological prediction at multiple gauging stations using the NARX network for Kemaman catchment, Terengganu, Malaysia

References

• Abrahart, R.J., et al., 2012. Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting. Progress in Physical Geography, 36 (4), 480–513. doi:10.1177/0309133312444943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahart, R.J. and See, L.M., 2007. Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1563–1579. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1563-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A., 2009. Nonlinear multivariate rainfall–stage model for large wetland systems. Journal of Hydrology, 374, 338–350. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, M.R.C.O., Gonzalez, R.M., and Castro, P.P.M., 2014. Multiple data fusion for rainfall estimation using a NARX- based recurrent neural network the development of the REIINN model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 17, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Arbain, S.H. and Wibowo, A., 2012. Neural networks based nonlinear time series regression for water level forecasting of Dungun River. Journal of Computer Science, 8 (9), 506–1513.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE, 2000a. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (2), 115–123. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(115)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE, 2000b. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (2), 124–137. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolo, M., Soldati, A., and Andreussi, P., 2003. Artificial neural network approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48 (3), 381–398. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.381.45286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F.-J., et al., 2015. Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors - data driven approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y.-M., Chang, L.-C., and Chang, F.-J., 2004. Comparison of static-feed-forward and dynamic-feedback neural networks for rainfall–runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 290 (3–4), 297–311. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigizoglu, H.K., 2005. Application of generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10 (4), 336–341. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(336)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deka, P. and Chandramouli, V., 2005. Fuzzy neural network model for hydrologic flow routing. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10 (4), 302–314. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(302)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel, M.C., Booij, M.J., and Kahya, E., 2012. Validation of an ANN flow prediction model using a multistation cluster analysis. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (2), 262–271. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaconescu, E., 2008. The use of NARX neural networks to predict chaotic time series. Wseas Transactions on Computer Research, 3 (3), 182–191.
   Google Scholar
• DID (Department of Irrigation and Drainage), 2000. Manual Saliran Mesra Alam. Kuala Lumpur: DID.
   Google Scholar
• Gasim, M.B.G., et al., 2007. Coastal flood phenomenon in Terengganu, Malaysia: special reference to Dungun. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1 (3), 102–109. doi:10.3923/rjes.2007.102.109
   Google Scholar
• Horne, B.G. and Giles, C.L., 1995. An experimental comparison of recurrent neural network. In: G. Tesauro, D.S. Touretzky, and T.K. Leen (eds), Advances in neural information processing systems. 7th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 697–704.
   Google Scholar
• Kalteh, A.M., 2008. Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural networks (ANNs): modeling and understanding. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6 (1), 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.K., 2007. Long term tidal forecasting and hindcasting using QuickTIDE tidal simulation package. J. Inst. Eng. Malaysia, 68 (2), 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.K. and Tuan Resdi, T.A., 2013. Neural network approach to coastal high and low water level prediction. Proceedings of the international civil and infrastructure engineering conference (InCIEC 2013), 22–24 September, Kuching, Malaysia, 275–279.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, G.-F. and Chen, L.-H., 2004. A Non-linear rainfall–runoff model using radial basis function network. Journal of Hydrology, 289, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T., et al., 1996. Learning long-term dependencies in NARX recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 7 (6), 1424–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrvand, M. and Nourani, V., 2012. An ANN-based data driven approach for multi-station rainfall–runoff modeling. International Journal of Computer Science and Management Research, 1 (4), 771–780.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes Jr., J.M.P. and Barreto, G.A., 2008. Long-term time series prediction with the NARX network: an empirical evaluation. Neurocomputing, 71 (16–18), 3335–3343. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2008.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, E., et al., 2008. Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural watershed. Hydrological Processes, 22, 5097–5106. doi:10.1002/hyp.7136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V. and Komasi, M., 2013. A geomorphology-based ANFIS model for multi-station modeling of rainfall–runoff process. Journal of Hydrology, 490, 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okkan, U., 2011. Application of Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm based multilayer neural networks for hydrological time series modeling. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 1 (1), 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, P., Choudhury, P.S., and Saharia, M., 2010. Dynamic artificial neural network modeling for flood forecasting in a river network. In: S. Paruya, S. Kar, and S. Roy (eds.). International conference on modeling, optimization, and computing (ICMOC), AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1298(1), 219–225. doi:10.1063/1.3516305
   Google Scholar
• Senthil Kumar, A.R., et al., 2005. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types. Hydrological Processes, 19, 1277–1291. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H.-Y. and Chang, L.-C., 2013. Online multistep-ahead inundation depth forecasts by recurrent NARX networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 935–945. doi:10.5194/hess-17-935-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P. and Woolhiser, D.A., 2002. Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7 (4), 270–292. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza Júnior, A.H., Barreto, G.A., and Corona, F., 2015. Regional models: a new approach for nonlinear system identification via clustering of the self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 147, 31–46. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.11.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudheer, K.P., 2005. Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10 (4), 264–269. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(264)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulong, I., et al., 2002. Mangrove mapping using landsat imagery and aerial photographs: Kemaman District, Terengganu, Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 4 (2), 135–152. doi:10.1023/A:1020844620215
   Google Scholar
• The Malaysian Insider, 2012. Terengganu, Pahang facing second wave of flood. The Malaysian Insider, 31 Dec. Available from: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/terengganu-pahang-facing-second-wave-of-flood/
   Google Scholar
• The Star, 2013. Floods in Terengganu worsen, number of victims triple to over 22,000. The Star, 7 Dec. Available from: http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2013/12/07/flood-tganu-worsen/
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M.K. and Chatterjee, C., 2010. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). Journal of Hydrology, 382, 20–33. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., Lu, M.-C., and Wei, C.-C., 2012. Decision tree-based classifier combined with neural-based predictor for water-stage forecasts in a river basin during typhoons: A case study in Taiwan. Environmental Engineering Science, 29 (2), 108–116. doi:10.1089/ees.2011.0210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan Resdi, T.A. and Lee, W.K., 2014. Neural network hydrological modeling for Kemaman Catchment. IEEE symposium on business, engineering & industrial applications (ISBEIA 2014), Sep 28–Oct 1, Kota Kinabalu.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L., Chau, K.W., and Li, Y.S., 2009. Predicting monthly stream flow using data driven models coupled with data preprocessing techniques. Water Resources Research, 45, W08432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.S., et al., 2005. Artificial neural networks for forecasting watershed runoff and stream flows. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10, 216–222. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:3(216)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Tang, H., and Liao, Y.H., 2009. Time series prediction based on NARX neural networks: an advanced approach. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, 12–15 July. Baoding: IEEE Xplore Press, 1275–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., 2002. Hydrology: modeling and prediction. Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, 3 (980–986). doi:10.1006/rwas.2002.0172
   Google Scholar