Comparison of two rainfall–runoff models: effects of conceptualization on water budget components

References

• Ambroise, B., Perin, J.L., and Reutenauer, D., 1995. Multicriterion validation of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France). Water Resources Research, 31 (6), 1467–1481. doi:10.1029/94WR03293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasiadou, E., 2011. Application of the MIKE SHE model in Glafkos catchment. MSc Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2012. Rainfall–runoff modeling, the primer. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and German, P., 1982. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research, 18 (5), 1311–1325. doi:10.1029/WR018i005p01311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J., 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24 (1), 43–69. doi:10.1080/02626667909491834
   Google Scholar
• Brutsaert, W., 1984. Evaporation into the Atmosphere. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Burnash, R.J.C., Ferral, K.L., and McGuire, R.A., 1973. A generalized streamflow system: conceptual modeling for digital computers. Sacramento, USA: Joint Federal State River Forecast Center, U.S. National Weather Service and California Department of Water Resources, Report.
   Google Scholar
• Chiew, F.H.S., Stewardson, M.J., and MacMahon, T.A., 1993. Comparison of six rainfall–runoff modelling approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 147, 1–36. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90073-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1964. Runoff. In: V.T. Chow, ed. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw – Hill, Section 14, 14-1–14-54.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarapica, L. and Todini, E., 2002. TOPKAPI: a model for the representation of the rainfall–runoff process at different scales. Hydrological Processes, 16, 207–229. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M.P., Kavetski, D., and Fenicia, F., 2011. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research, 47, W09301. doi:10.1029/2010WR009827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R.T., 2008. A critique of present procedure used to compare performance of rainfall–runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 352, 379–387. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, P., 2005. The influence of soils and species on tree root depth. UK: Forestry Commission Information Note. Available from: www.forestry.gov.uk [ Accessed 1 October 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Das, T., et al., 2008. Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology, 356, 106–118. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingman, S.L., 2002. Physical hydrology. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall–runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28 (4), 1015–1031. doi:10.1029/91WR02985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, G., 2002. Water balance modelling in Alpine catchments at different spatial and temporal scales. Dissertationsarbeit zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Universitaet fuer Bodenkultur Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Helton, J.C., 1993. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 42, 327–367. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(93)90097-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J.C. and Davis, F.J., 2003. Latin Hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 81, 23–69. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaleris, V. and Langousis, A., 2012. Hydrological modelling in Glafkos catchment, Western Greece: a data analysis, calibration and comparison of hydrological models ENNS and MIKE SHE. Greece: Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, University of Patras. Report for the contract UFZ-02/2099 (RA-3205/09).
   Google Scholar
• Kaleris, V. and Ziogas, A., 2011. Evaluation of available data for water budget calculations in the Glafkos catchment, Western Greece. Greece: Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, University of Patras, Report for the contract UFZ-02/2099 (RA-3205/09).
   Google Scholar
• Karpouzos, D.K., et al., 2011. A hydrological investigation using a lumped water balance model: the Aison River Basin case (Greece). Water & Environment Journal, 25 (3), 297–307. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00222.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottegoda, N.T. and Rosso, R., 1997. Statistics, probability and reliability for civil and environmental engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsougera, A.K., 2010. An investigation of parameter regionalization for rainfall–runoff models. M.Sc. Thesis. Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., 1999. Engineering hydrology. 3rd ed. Greece: National Technical University of Athens. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Langousis, A. and Kaleris, V., 2013. Theoretical framework to estimate spatial rainfall averages conditional on river discharges and point rainfall measurements from a single location: an application to western Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1241–1263. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1241-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology, 235, 276–288. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., Wilson, G., and Ammentorp, H.C., 2002. Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall–runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 261, 48–59. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00619-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehleri, V., 2008. Hydrological modelling of catchments with incomplete data. M.Sc. Thesis, Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• MIKE SHE User Manual, 2009. Volume 2, user guide, MIKE by DHI. Denmark: DHI.
   Google Scholar
• MIKE SHE User Manual, 2014. Volume 2, user guide, MIKE by DHI. Denmark: DHI.
   Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50 (3), 885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtnebel, H.P., Lettl, W., and Baumung, S., 1993. Abfluβprognosemodell fuer das Einzugsgebiet der Enns und der Steyr (Handbuch). Wien, Austria: Institut fuer Wasserwirtschaft, Hydrologie und Wasserbau, BOKU.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Oudin, L., et al., 2006. Dynamic averaging of rainfall–runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations. Water Resources Research, 42 (7), W07410. doi:10.1029/2005WR004636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J. and Vis, M.J.P., 2012. Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 9, 5905–5930. doi:10.5194/hessd-9-5905-2012
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E.M., 1983. Hydrology in practice. Berkshire: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Siambi, K., 2012. Calibration of the rainfall–runoff model MIKE SHE for the mountainous part of Glafkos catchment and comparison with the model ENNS. MSc Thesis. Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P. and Frevert, D.K., 2006. Introduction. In: V.P. Singh and D.K. Frevert, eds. Watershed models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sittner, W.T., 1976. WMO project on intercomparison of conceptual models used in hydrological forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 21 (1), 203–213. doi:10.1080/02626667609491617
   Google Scholar
• Staudinger, M., et al., 2011. Comparison of hydrological model structures based on recession and low flow simulations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 3447–3459. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3447-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todini, E., 1996. The ARNO rainfall–runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, 175, 339–382. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80016-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turc, L., 1954. Calcul du bilan de l’eau evaluation en fonction des precipitations et des temperatures, IASH Rome Symp. 111, Pub. No. 38, Rome: IASH. 188–202.
   Google Scholar
• Turc, L., 1955. Le bilan d’eau des soles. Relation entre les precipitation, l’evaporation et l’ecoulement. Annals of Agronomy, 6, 5–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, T., Wheater, H.S., and Gupta, H.V., 2004. Rainfall–runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments. London, UK: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• WMO, 1975. Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting. Geneva, Switzerland: Secretariat of the WMO, Operational Hydrology Report No. 7, WMO-No. 429.
   Google Scholar
• WMO, 1983.Guide to hydrological practices, No. 168, Vol. II. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO.
   Google Scholar
• Ziogas, A., 2006. Water budget of Glafkos aquifer and estimation of the capture zone of pumping wells. MSc Thesis. Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece (in Greek).
   Google Scholar