Automated watershed subdivision for simulations using multi-objective optimization

References

• Arabi, M., et al., 2006. Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42, 513–528. doi:10.1111/jawr.2006.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baginska, B., Milne-Home, W., and Cornish, P.S., 2003. Modeling nutrient transport in currency Creek, NSW with AnnAGNPS and PEST. Environment Model Softw, 18 (8), 801–808. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00079-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingner, R.L., 1998. Systems analysis of runoff and sediment yield from a watershed using a simulation model. Thesis (PhD). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, 305.
   Google Scholar
• Bingner, R.L., et al., 1996. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield. Transactions of the ASAE, 40 (5), 1329–1335. doi:10.13031/2013.21391
   Google Scholar
• Bingner, R.L. and Theurer, F.D., 2001. AGNPS 98: a suite of water quality models for watershed use. In: Proceedings of the Sedimentation: Monitoring, Modeling, and Managing, 7th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Reno, NV, 25–29 Mar. 2001 Washington, DC: United States Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, p. VII-1–VII-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bingner, R.L., Theurer, F.D., and Yuan, Y., 2015. AnnAGNPS Technical Processes, Unpublished Report, USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory: Oxford, MS. Available from: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/wntsc/H&H/AGNPS/downloads/AnnAGNPS_Technical_Documentation.pdf [ Accessed March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, L.C. and Yuan, Y., 2015. The NHDPlus dataset, watershed subdivision and SWAT model performance. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (10), 1690–1708. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.916408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronshey, R.G. and Theurer, F.D., 1998. AnnAGNPS: non-point pollutant loading model. In: 1st Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference. Las Vegas, NV: U.S. Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1, 1-9–1-16.
   Google Scholar
• FitzHugh, T.W. and Mackay, D.S., 2000. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology, 236, 35–53. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00276-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzHugh, T.W. and Mackay, D.S., 2001. Impact of subwatershed partitioning on modeled source- and transport-limited agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 56 (2), 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel, D.B., 2000. Evolutionary computation: toward a new philosophy of machine learning. New York, NY: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garbrecht, J. and Martz, L., 1996. Digital landscape parameterization for hydrological applications. In: HydroGIS 96: application of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrology and Water Resources Management (Proceedings of the Vienna Conference, April). IAHS Publ. no. 235, 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Garbrecht, J.D., Campbell, J., and Martz, L.W., 2004. TOPAZ user manual-updated manual. El Reno, OK: Grazinglands Research Laboratory Miscellaneous Publication No. GRL 04-3. 169.
   Google Scholar
• Jenness, J. and Wynne, J.J., 2004. Cohen’s kappa and classification table derived metrics: an ArcView 3x extension for the accuracy assessment of spatial-explicit models. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/kappa_stats.htm [ Accessed April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Jha, M., et al., 2004. Effect of watershed subdivisions on SWAT flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. Journal of the American Water Association, 40 (3), 811–825. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb04460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalin, L., Govindaraju, R.S., and Hantush, M.M., 2003. Effect of geomorphological resolution on modeling of Runoff Hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 276, 89–111. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00072-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koza, J.R., 1992. Genetic Programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, R.A., et al., 2008. Conservation practice effects on sediment load in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63, 496–503. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, R.A., et al., 1996. Effect of land use changes on sediment transport in Goodwin Creek. Water Resources Research, 32 (10), 3189–3196. doi:10.1029/96WR02104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, R.A., et al., 1998. Chapter 13 - Land use changes and sediment transport on Goodwin Creek. In: P.C. Klingeman, et al., eds. Gravel-Bed rivers in the environment. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications, LLC, 279–292.
   Google Scholar
• Licciardello, F., et al., 2007. Runoff and soil erosion evaluation by the AnnAGNPS model in a small Mediterranean watershed. Transactions of ASABE, 50 (5), 1585–1593. doi:10.13031/2013.23972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B.A. and Schetzl, R.J., 2015. Digital classification of Hillslope Position. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79, 132–145. doi:10.2136/sssaj2014.07.0287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momm, H.G., et al., 2011b. AGNPS GIS-based tool for watershed-scale identification and mapping of cropland potential ephemeral gullies. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momm, H.G., et al., 2016. Characterization and placement of wetlands for integrated conservation practice planning. Transactions of the ASABE, 59 (5), 1345–1357. doi:10.13031/trans.59.11635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momm, H.G., et al., 2014. Spatial characterization of riparian buffer effects on sediment loads from watershed systems. Journal of Environmental Quality, 43 (5), 1736–1753. doi:10.2134/jeq2013.10.0413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momm, H.G. and Easson, G.L., 2010. Population restarting: a study case of feature extraction from remotely sensed imagery using textural information. In: The 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, July 7–11, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Momm, H.G., Easson, G.L., and Bingner, R.L., 2011. Evaluation of the use of remotely sensed evapotranspiration estimates into AnnAGNPS pollution model. Ecohydrology, 4, 650–660. doi:10.1002/eco.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nour, M.H., et al., 2007. Effect of watershed subdivision on water-phase phosphorus modeling: an artificial neural network modeling application. Journal of Environmental Engineering Science, 7, S95–S108. doi:10.1139/S08-043
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., 2009. Uncertainty metrics for coupled watershed models. Thesis (PhD). Ottawa, Canada: Department of Civil Engineering at University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G.T., Rennie, C.D., and Droste, R.L., 2011. Model structure and uncertainty for stochastic non-point source modeling applications. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (5), 870–882. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.586350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhanang, S.M. and Briggs, R.D., 2013. Effects of critical source area on sediment yield and streamflow. Water and Environmental Journal, 28, 222–232. doi:10.1111/wej.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, K.G., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook Number 703. USDA: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhani, R., Feyen, J., and Willems, P., 2006. Impact of watershed delineation on the SWAT runoff prediction: a case study in the Grote Nete catchment, Flanders, Belgium. In:Proceedings of the 2006 IASME/WSEAS int. Conf. on Water Resources, Hydraulics and Hydrology, Chalkida, May 11–13, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Suttles, J.B., et al., 2003. Watershed-scale simulation of sediment and nutrient loads in Georgia Coastal Plain streams using the Annualized AGNPS model. Transactions of ASAE, 46 (5), 1325–1335. doi:10.13031/2013.15443
   Google Scholar
• Theurer, F.D. and Clarke, C.D., 1991. Wash load component for sediment yield modeling. In: 5th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Washington, DC: Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Subcommittee on Sedimentation, Vol. 1: 7–1 –7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, M.P., Raghuwanshi, N.S., and Rao, G.P., 2006. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation of water balance components. Hydrological Processes, 20, 1137–1156. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA-SCS, 1972. National engineering handbook. Section 4: hydrology. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, P.M., 2005. Quantitative Analysis of Land Loss in Coastal Louisiana Using Remote Sensing. Thesis (Master). University, MS: University of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. and Lin, Q., 2011. Impact of critical source area on AnnAGNPS simulation. Water Science and Technology, 64 (9), 1767–1773. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki, D.A., Schoeneberger, P.J., and LaGarry, H.E., 2000. Geomorphology of soil landscapes. In: M.E. Sumner, editor. Handbook of soil science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, E5–E40.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Bingner, R.L., and Rebich, R.A., 2001. Evaluation of AnnAGNPS on Mississippi delta MSEA watersheds. Transactions of ASAE, 45 (5), 1183–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Locke, M.A., and Bingner, R.L., 2008. Annualized agricultural non-point source model application for Mississippi delta Beasley Lake watershed conservation practices assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63 (6), 542–551. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zema, D.A., et al., 2012. Evaluation of runoff, peak flow and sediment yield for events simulated by the AnnAGNPS model in a Belgian agricultural watershed. Land Degradation and Development, 23, 205–215. doi:10.1002/ldr.1068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar