Effect of input data in hydraulic modeling for flood warning systems

References

• Alho, P. and Aaltonen, J., 2008. Comparing a 1D hydraulic model with a 2D hydraulic model for the simulation of extreme glacial outburst floods. Hydrological Processes, 22 (10), 1537–1547. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allouis, T., Bailly, J., and Feurer, D., 2007. Assessing water surface effects on LiDAR bathymetry measurements in very shallow rivers: a theoretical study. In: Second ESA space for hydrology workshop [online], Geneva, CHE, 12–14. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Denis_Feurer/publication/268260522_Assessing_water_surface_effects_on_LiDAR_bathymetry_measurements_in_very_shallow_rivers_a_theoretical_study/links/54bcd6f30cf29e0cb04c390b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arcement, G.J. and Verne, R.S., 1989. Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains [online]. Available from: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/lacfcd/wdr/files/WG/041615/Guide%20for%20Selecting%20n-Value.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ASCE Task Committee, 1993. The ASCE task committee on definition of criteria for evaluation of watershed models of the watershed management committee Irrigation and Drainage Division, Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 119 (3), 429–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, J.D. and Wagner, C.R., 2009. Sources of uncertainty in flood inundation maps. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2.2, 139–147. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes Jr., H.H., 1849. Roughness characteristics of natural streams [online]. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/wsp_1849/pdf/wsp_1849.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Basha, E. and Daniela, R., 2007. Design of early warning flood detection systems for developing countries. In: Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 2007. ICTD 2007. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 15–16 December, Bangalore, India, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, P.D., et al., 2004. Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data. Hydrological Processes, 18 (17), 3347–3370. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, P.D. and De Roo, A.P.J., 2000. A simple raster-based model for floodplain inundation. Journal of Hydrology, 236, 54–77. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, G.W., 1995. HEC-RAS River Analysis System [online]. Hydraulic Reference Manual. Version 1.0. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. Available from: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a311952.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, G.W., 2002. HEC-RAS river analysis system: user’s manual. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Castellarin, A., et al., 2009. Optimal cross-sectional spacing in Preissmann scheme 1D hydrodynamic models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135 (2), 96–105. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:2(96)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. and Merwade, V., 2009. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1), 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A.C., 2008. Comparison of one-dimensional HEC-RAS with two-dimensional FESWMS model in flood inundation mapping. Dissertation. Purdue University West Lafayette.
   Google Scholar
• Costabile, P., et al., 2015. Flood mapping using LIDAR DEM. Limitations of the 1D modeling highlighted by the 2-D approach. Natural Hazards, 77 (1), 181–204. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1606-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto, M. and Tarantola, S., 2001. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (5), 415–437. doi:10.1080/13658810110053125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G., 2012. Flood trends and population dynamics. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 22–27 April, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A., 2009. Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (6), 913. doi:10.5194/hess-13-913-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domeneghetti, A., et al., 2013. Probabilistic flood hazard mapping: effects of uncertain boundary conditions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (8), 3127–3140. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3127-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dottori, F., Baldassarre, G.D., and Todini, E., 2013. Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling. Water Resources Research, 49 (9), 6079–6085. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, A.D., et al., 2006. Flood of July 27–31, 2006, on the Grand River near Painesville, Ohio. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007–1164.
   Google Scholar
• Fread, D.L., 1974. Numerical properties of implicit four-point finite difference equations of unsteady flow [online]. Washington, DC: Office of Hydrology. Available from: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/hsmb/docs/hydraulics/papers_before_2009/hl_51.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, O.P., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (2), 135–143. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.D., et al., 2008. Stewart.StreamStats: a water resources web application. Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, F.E. and Peacock, T., 2005. Suitability of HEC-RAS for flood forecasting. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 30 (2), 159–174. doi:10.4296/cwrj3002159
   Google Scholar
• Holtzclaw, E., Leite, B., and Myrick, R., 2005. Floodplain modeling applications for emergency management and stakeholder involvement a case study. New Braunfels, TX: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Horritt, M.S. and Bates, P.D., 2001. Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. Journal of Hydrology, 253 (1), 239–249. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00490-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horritt, M.S. and Bates, P.D., 2002. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology, 268 (1–4), 87–99. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, H.C., et al., 2011. Analysis of the relationship between flooding area and water height in the Logone floodplain. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36 (7–8), 232–240. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanapu, A.J., Burian, S.J., and McPherson, T.N., 2009. Effect of land use-based surface roughness on hydrologic model output. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 9 (2), 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• King, R.O., 2009. National flood insurance program: background, challenges, and financial status. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Koltun, G.F. and Roberts, J.W., 1990. Techniques for estimating flood-peak discharges of rural, unregulated streams in Ohio. Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 89, 4126.
   Google Scholar
• Krimm, R.W., 1996. Reducing flood losses in the United States. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Floodplain Risk Management, 11–13 November, Hiroshima.
   Google Scholar
• Krzysztofowicz, R., Karen, S.K., and Dou, L., 1994. Reliability of flood warning systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120 (6), 906–926. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:6(906)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedal, D., et al., 2010. Visualization approaches for communicating real‐time flood forecasting level and inundation information. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3 (2), 140–150. doi:10.1111/jfrm.2010.3.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggett, J.A. and Jean, A.C., 1975. Numerical methods of solution of the unsteady flow equations. Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, 1 (89), 182.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, A.S., 2003. The federal emergency management agency’s multi-hazard flood map modernization and the national map. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69 (10), 1133–1135. doi:10.14358/PERS.69.10.1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, K. and Bates, P., 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes, 14 (11–12), 2109–2122. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merwade, V., et al., 2008. Uncertainty in flood inundation mapping: current issues and future directions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13 (7), 608–620. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:7(608)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merwade, V., Cook, A., and Coonrod, J., 2008. GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23 (10–11), 1300–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B.A., Thieken, H., and Gocht, M., 2007. Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In: Flood risk management in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer, 231–251.
   Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Oegema, B.W. and McBean, E., 1987. A. Uncertainties in flood plain mapping. In: Application of frequency and risk in water resources. Dordrecht: Springer, 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Department of Administrative Services, 2007. Ohio Statewide Imagery Program [online]. Available from: http://ogrip.oit.ohio.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Ostheimer, C.J., 2012. Development of a flood-warning system and flood-inundation mapping in Licking county, Ohio. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, No. FHWA/OH-2012/4.
   Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., et al., 2005. Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. Journal of Hydrology, 302 (1–4), 46–69. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., et al., 2006. Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. Advances in Water Resources, 29 (10), 1430–1449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhi, P.K., Sankhua, R.N., and Roy, G.P., 2012. Calibration of channel roughness for Mahanadi River, (India) using HEC-RAS model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4 (10), 847. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2012.410098
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C.A., 2000. Significant floods in the United States during the 20th century-USGS measures a century of floods. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, No. 024-00.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D.H., 1976. Travel times and nonlinearity of flood runoff from tracer measurements on a small watershed. Water Resources Research, 12 (3), 487–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Re, M., 2011. Great natural catastrophes worldwide 1950–2010. Munich, Germany: Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, P.G., 1990. Cross-section location in 1D models. In: W.R. White, ed. Proceedings of International Conference on River Flood Hydraulics. Chichester: John Wiley, 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, B.F., 2007. Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Advances in Water Resources, 30 (8), 1831–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smemoe, C., Nelson, J., and Zundel, A., 2012. Developing a probabilistic flood plain boundary using HEC-1 and HEC-RAS. In: World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, 23–26 June 2003, Philadelphia, PA. doi:10.1061/40685(2003)286
   Google Scholar
• Tayefi, V., et al., 2007. A comparison of one‐and two‐dimensional approaches to modelling flood inundation over complex upland floodplains. Hydrological Processes, 21 (23), 3190–3202. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbadiya, P.V., Patel, P.L., and Porey, P.D., 2011. Calibration of HEC-RAS model on prediction of flood for lower Tapi River, India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 3 (11), 805. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2011.311090
   Google Scholar
• USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers), 2000. Revised report on Great Lakes open-coast flood levels [online]. Detroit, MI: USACE. Available from: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/wrd-nfip-great-lakes-flood-levels-part1_564793_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M.T. and Ostheimer, C.J., 2009. Development of a flood-warning system and flood-inundation mapping for the Blanchard river in Findlay, Ohio. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, No. 2008-5234.
   Google Scholar