A continuous modelling approach for design flood estimation on sub-daily time scale

References

• Achleitner, S., et al., 2012. Analysing the operational performance of the hydrological models in an alpine flood forecasting system. Journal of Hydrology, 412-413, 90–100. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achleitner, S., Rinderer, M., and Kirnbauer, R., 2009. Hydrological modeling in alpine catchments. Sensing the critical parameters towards an efficient model calibration. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 60 (6), 1507–1514. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrieu, C., et al., 2003. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Machine Learning, 50 (1/2), 5–43. doi:10.1023/A:1020281327116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud, P., et al., 2011. Sensitivity of hydrological models to uncertainty in rainfall input. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (3), 397–410. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.563742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud, P., Cantet, P., and Odry, J., 2017. Uncertainties of flood frequency estimation approaches based on continuous simulation using data resampling. Journal of Hydrology, 554, 360–369. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavay, M. and Egger, T., 2014. MeteoIO 2.4.2: a preprocessing library for meteorological data. Geoscientific Model Development, 7 (6), 3135–3151. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-3135-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazkova, S. and Beven, K., 1997. Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL. Journal of Hydrology, 195 (1–4), 256–278. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazkova, S. and Beven, K., 2004. Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation of subcatchment rainfalls and discharges with the aim of improving dam safety assessment in a large basin in the Czech Republic. Journal of Hydrology, 292 (1–4), 153–172. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G., ed., 2009. Hochwässer - Bemessung, Risikoanalyse und Vorhersage. ÖWAV- Seminar, Bundesamtsgebäude Wien, 26. Mai 2009. Wien: Techn. Univ. Wien, Inst. f. Wasserbau und Ingenieurhydrologie.
   Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G., et al., eds. 2013. Runoff prediction in ungauged basins. Synthesis across processes, places and scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BMLFUW, 2007. Hydrologischer Atlas Österreich. 3rd ed. Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (BMLFUW).
   Google Scholar
• BMLFUW, ed., 2011. Verfahren zur Abschätzung von Hochwasserkennwerten. Leitfaden. Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (BMLFUW).
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, W. and Droop, O., 2003. Continuous simulation for design flood estimation? A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18 (4), 309–318. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breinl, K., 2016. Driving a lumped hydrological model with precipitation output from weather generators of different complexity. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (8), 1395–1414. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1036755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breinl, K., et al., 2017. A joint modelling framework for daily extremes of river discharge and precipitation in urban areas. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10 (1), 97–114. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, M.I., et al., 2017. Flood type specific construction of synthetic design hydrographs. Water Resources Research, 53 (2), 1390–1406. doi:10.1002/2016WR019535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buishand, T.A. and Brandsma, T., 2001. Multisite simulation of daily precipitation and temperature in the Rhine Basin by nearest-neighbor resampling. Water Resources Research, 11 (37), 2761–2776. doi:10.1029/2001WR000291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, D.H., 2003. The use of resampling for estimating confidence intervals for single site and pooled frequency analysis/Utilisation d’un rééchantillonnage pour l’estimation des intervalles de confiance lors d’analyses fréquentielles mono et multi-site. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48 (1), 25–38. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.1.25.43485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, S., 2001. An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. 4th. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dastorani, M., et al., 2013. River instantaneous peak flow estimation using daily flow data and machine-learning-based models. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15, 1089–1098. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A., 2009. Uncertainty in river discharge observations. A quantitative analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (6), 913–921. doi:10.5194/hess-13-913-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobler, C. and Pappenberger, F., 2013. Global sensitivity analyses for a complex hydrological model applied in an Alpine watershed. Hydrological Processes, 27 (26), 3922–3940. doi:10.1002/hyp.9520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dung, N.V., et al., 2015. Handling uncertainty in bivariate quantile estimation – an application to flood hazard analysis in the Mekong Delta. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 704–717. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DVWK, ed., 1984. DVWK 113/1984. Arbeitsanleitung zur Anwendung von Niederschlag-Abfluß-Modellen in kleinen Einzugsgebieten. Hamburg: Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau (DVWK).
   Google Scholar
• DWA, ed., 2012. Ermittlung von Hochwasserwahrscheinlichkeiten. Merkblatt DWA-M 552. Hennef: Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall (DWA).
   Google Scholar
• Elshafei, Y., et al., 2014. A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology. Identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (6), 2141–2166. doi:10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU), 2007. European Union on the assessment and management of flood risks. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L288/27. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Falter, D., et al., 2015. Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 182–193. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, K., et al., 2016. An open-source MEteoroLOgical observation time series DISaggregation Tool (MELODIST v0.1.1). Geoscientific Model Development, 9 (7), 2315–2333. doi:10.5194/gmd-9-2315-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaál, L., et al., 2015. Dependence between flood peaks and volumes. A case study on climate and hydrological controls. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (6), 968–984. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.951361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts, P., 2000. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 228 (1–2), 113–129. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2012a. Time of concentration. A paradox in modern hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (2), 217–228. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.644244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2013. Flood mapping in ungauged basins using fully continuous hydrologic–hydraulic modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 487, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. and Petroselli, A., 2015. Do we still need the rational formula? An alternative empirical procedure for peak discharge estimation in small and ungauged basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (1), 67–77. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.880546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Serinaldi, F., 2012b. Design hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds. Continuous simulation method versus event-based approach. Hydrological Processes, 26 (20), 3124–3134. doi:10.1002/hyp.8384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güntner, A., et al., 2001. Cascade-based disaggregation of continuous rainfall time series: the influence of climate. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (2), 145–164. doi:10.5194/hess-5-145-2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S.C., et al., 2015. Climate and agricultural land use change impacts on streamflow in the upper midwestern United States. Water Resources Research, 51 (7), 5301–5317. doi:10.1002/2015WR017323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutknecht, D., et al., 2006. Ein “Mehr-Standbeine”-Ansatz zur Ermittlung von Bemessungshochwässern kleiner Auftretenswahrscheinlichkeit. Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 58 (3–4), 44–50. doi:10.1007/BF03165683
   Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, U., et al. 2011. Rainfall generators for application in flood studies. In: A.H. Schumann, ed. Flood risk assessment and management. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 117–147. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_7
   Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, U. and Radtke, I., 2014. Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (1), 353–365. doi:10.5194/hess-18-353-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmann, H., et al., 2010. Auswirkungen möglicher Klimaänderungen auf Hochwasser und Wasserhaushaltskomponenten ausgewählter Einzugsgebiete in Österreich. Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 62 (1–2), 7–14. doi:10.1007/s00506-009-0154-9
   Google Scholar
• Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional frequency analysis. An approach based on L-moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y. and Merz, B., 2012. Exploring the relationship between changes in climate and floods using a model-based analysis. Water Resources Research, 48 (4). doi:10.1029/2011WR010527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y., Pahlow, M., and Schumann, A., 2009. Modeling of daily precipitation at multiple locations using a mixture of distributions to characterize the extremes. Water Resources Research, (45. doi:10.1029/2008WR007453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keef, C., Tawn, J., and Svensson, C., 2009. Spatial risk assessment for extreme river flows. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 58 (5), 601–618. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindienst, H., 1996. Erweiterung und Erprobung eines anwendungsorientierten hydrologischen Modells zur Gangliniensimulation in kleinen Wildbacheinzugsgebie. Diplomarbeit.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, H., Fuchs, M., and Paulin, M., 2012. Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios. Journal of Hydrology, 424-425, 264–277. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossieris, P., et al. 2016. A rainfall disaggregation scheme for sub-hourly time scales. Coupling a bartlett-lewis based model with adjusting procedures. Journal of Hydrology. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., Onof, C., and Wheater, H.S., 2003. Multivariate rainfall disaggregation at a fine timescale. Water Resources Research, 39, 7. doi:10.1029/2002WR001600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyselý, J., 2008. A cautionary note on the use of nonparametric bootstrap for estimating uncertainties in extreme-value models. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47 (12), 3236–3251. doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1763.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, U. and Sharma, A., 1996. A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series. Water Resources Research, 32 (3), 679–693. doi:10.1029/95WR02966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., et al., 2016. Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process-based flood frequency analysis? Hydrological Processes, 30 (14), 2463–2481. doi:10.1002/hyp.10882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, R. and Buishand, T.A., 2009. A daily weather generator based on a two-stage resampling algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 374 (3–4), 185–195. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., et al., 2014. Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in Europe. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 3634–3650. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniak, U., 2010. Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft. Eine Einführung für Ingenieure. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mediero, L., Jiménez-Álvarez, A., and Garrote, L., 2010. Design flood hydrographs from the relationship between flood peak and volume. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14 (12), 2495–2505. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2495-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mélèse, V., Blanchet, J., and Molinié, G., 2018. Uncertainty estimation of Intensity–Duration–Frequency relationships. A regional analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 558, 579–591. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R., Blöschl, G., and Humer, G., 2008. National flood discharge mapping in Austria. Natural Hazards, 46 (1), 53–72. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9181-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milly, P.C.D., et al., 2008. Climate change. Stationarity is dead. Whither water management? Science (New York, N.Y.), 319 (5863), 573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1151915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanari, A., 2011. Uncertainty of hydrological predictions. In: P. Wilderer, ed. Treatise on water science. Oxford: Academic Press, 459–478.
   Google Scholar
• Moussa, R. and Chahinian, N., 2009. Comparison of different multi-objective calibration criteria using a conceptual rainfall–runoff model of flood events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (4), 519–535. doi:10.5194/hess-13-519-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. and Haberlandt, U., 2018. Temporal rainfall disaggregation using a multiplicative cascade model for spatial application in urban hydrology. Journal of Hydrology. 556, 847–864. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K., et al., 2010. A nonparametric stochastic approach for multisite disaggregation of annual to daily streamflow. Water Resources Research, 46 (8). doi:10.1029/2009WR008530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., 1998. Evaluation of a scaling cascade model for temporal rainfall disaggregation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, (2), 19–30. doi:10.5194/hess-2-19-1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plouffe, C.C.F., Robertson, C., and Chandrapala, L., 2015. Comparing interpolation techniques for monthly rainfall mapping using multiple evaluation criteria and auxiliary data sources: A case study of Sri Lanka. Environmental Modelling & Software, 67, 57–71. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pui, A., et al., 2012. A comparison of alternatives for daily to sub-daily rainfall disaggregation. Journal of Hydrology, 470-471, 138–157. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff, D.A., Pruitt, T., and Brekke, L.D., 2009. A framework for assessing flood frequency based on climate projection information. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 6 (2), 2005–2040. doi:10.5194/hessd-6-2005-2009
   Google Scholar
• Rickenmann, D., 1996. Fliessgeschwindigkeit in Wildbächen und Gebirgsflüssen. Wasser Energie Luft, 88 (11/12), 298–304.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, A. and Reed, D., 1999. Statistical procedures for flood frequency estimation. Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Rogger, M., et al., 2012a. Runoff models and flood frequency statistics for design flood estimation in Austria? Do they tell a consistent story? Journal of Hydrology, 456-457, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogger, M., et al., 2012b. Step changes in the flood frequency curve. Process controls. Water Resources Research, 48 (5), 147. doi:10.1029/2011WR011187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogger, M., et al., 2017. Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale. Challenges and opportunities for future research. Water Resources Research, 53 (7), 5209–5219. doi:10.1002/2017WR020723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeberger, K., et al. 2017. A probabilistic framework for risk analysis of widespread flood events. A proof-of-concept study. Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.12863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeberger, K., Rössler, O., and Weingartner, R., 2018. Spatial patterns of frequent floods in Switzerland. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (6), 895–908. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1450505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeberger, K. and Steinberger, T., 2018. Generation of spatially heterogeneous flood events in an alpine region—Adaptation and application of a multivariate modelling procedure. Hydrology, 5 (1), 5. doi:10.3390/hydrology5010005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senfter, S., et al. 2009. Flood Forecasting for the River Inn. In: E. Veulliet, S. Johann, and H. Weck-Hannemann, eds. Sustainable natural hazard management in alpine environments. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 35–67. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03229-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Serinaldi, F. and Grimaldi, S., 2011. Synthetic design hydrographs based on distribution functions with finite support. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (5), 434–446. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serinaldi, F. and Kilsby, C.G., 2017. A blueprint for full collective flood risk estimation. Demonstration for European river flooding. Risk Analysis: an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 37 (10), 1958–1976. doi:10.1111/risa.12747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. and Srikanthan, S., 2006. Continuous rainfall simulation: a nonparametric alternative. In: Hydrology & water resources symposium: past, present and future 2006. Sandy Bay: Conference Design, 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sivapalan, M., et al., 2005. Linking flood frequency to long-term water balance. Incorporating effects of seasonality. Water Resources Research, 41 (6), 1065. doi:10.1029/2004WR003439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolgay, J., et al., 2016. A regional comparative analysis of empirical and theoretical flood peak-volume relationships. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 64 (4), 367–381. doi:10.1515/johh-2016-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, A. and Blöschl, G., 2009. On the role of storm duration in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (2), 205–216. doi:10.5194/hess-13-205-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, A., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G., 2009. On the role of the runoff coefficient in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 6 (1), 627–665. doi:10.5194/hessd-6-627-2009
   Google Scholar
• Viviroli, D., et al., 2009. Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland – part II. Parameter regionalisation and flood estimation results. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1–2), 208–225. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrac, M. and Naveau, P., 2007. Stochastic downscaling of precipitation: from dry events to heavy rainfalls. Water Resources Research, 43, 7. doi:10.1029/2006WR005308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, P.D., et al., 2012. Comparison and evaluation of spatial interpolation schemes for daily rainfall in data scarce regions. Journal of Hydrology, 464-465, 388–400. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weilguni, V., 2009. Bemessungsniederschläge in Österreich. In: G. Blöschl, ed. Hochwässer - Bemessung, Risikoanalyse und Vorhersage. ÖWAV- Seminar, Bundesamtsgebäude Wien, 26. Mai 2009. Wien: Techn. Univ. Wien, Inst. f. Wasserbau und Ingenieurhydrologie, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Westra, S., et al., 2013. A conditional disaggregation algorithm for generating fine time-scale rainfall data in a warmer climate. Journal of Hydrology, 479, 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar