Propagation of uncertainties in interpolated rainfields to runoff errors

References

• Berndt, C., Rabiei, E., and Haberlandt, U., 2014. Geostatistical merging of rain gauge and radar data for high temporal resolutions and various station density scenarios. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 88–101. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand, B., 2017. rgrass7: interface between grass 7 geographical information system and R. R package version 0.1-10. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgrass7 [Accessed 10 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Buishand, T.A., 1978. Some remarks on the use of daily rainfall models. Journal of Hydrology, 36, 295–308. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(78)90150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buytaert, W., et al., 2006. Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in mountainous areas: a case study from the South ecuadorian andes. Journal of Hydrology, 329 (3–4), 413–421. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, D.A., 2013. Water-resources engineering: international edition. 3rd. Harlow, England: Pearson Intl.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S.J. and Moore, R.J., 2009. Distributed hydrological modelling using weather radar in gauged and ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources, 32 (7), 1107–1120. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowpertwait, P.S.P., et al., 1996. Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. Single-site fitting and validation. Journal of Hydrology, 175, 17–46. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., 1993. Statistics for spatial data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, P., et al., 2016. Comparative evaluation of 1D and quasi-2D hydraulic models based on benchmark and real-world applications for uncertainty assessment in flood mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 534, 478–492. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Mora, R., et al., 2014. Time and spatial synthetic hourly rainfall generation in the Basin of Mexico. International Journal of River Basin Management, 12 (4), 367–375. doi:10.1080/15715124.2013.842574
   Google Scholar
• Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.K., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall–runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28 (4), 1015–1031. doi:10.1029/91WR02985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmanuel, I., et al., 2015. Influence of rainfall spatial variability on rainfall–runoff modelling: benefit of a simulation approach? Journal of Hydrology, 531, 337–348. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, P., et al., 2002. Spatial disaggregation of mean areal rainfall using gibbs sampling. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 324–337. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-034.1
   Google Scholar
• Glasbey, C.A., Cooper, G., and McGechan, M.B., 1995. Disaggregation of daily rainfall by conditional simulation from a point-process model. Journal of Hydrology, 165, 1–9. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)02598-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Hernández, J.J. and Journel, A.G., 1993. Joint sequential simulation of multi-Gaussian fields. In: A. Soares, ed. Geostatistics Troía ’92. Switzerland: Springer Nature, Vol. 1, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Groisman, P.Y., et al., 1999. Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Climate Change, 42, 243–283. doi:10.1023/A:1005432803188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2005. Stochastic disaggregation of daily rainfall into one-hour time scale. Journal of Hydrology, 309, 178–190. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2011. Copula-based daily rainfall disaggregation model. Water Resources Research, 47, 7. doi:10.1029/2011WR010519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2012. Use of observed scaled daily storm profiles in a copula based rainfall disaggregation model. Advances in Water Resources, 45, 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2013. Evaluation of the effects of temperature changes on fine timescale rainfall. Water Resources Research, 49 (7), 4379–4398. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2016. Assessment of radar based locally varying anisotropy on daily rainfall interpolation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (10), 1890–1902. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1083652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y., 2018. Realistic sampling of anisotropic correlogram parameters for daily rainfall interpolation. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 1064–1077. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyei, Y. and Pegram, G., 2014. Interpolation of daily rainfall networks using simulated radar fields for realistic hydrological modelling of spatial rain field ensembles. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 777–791. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, U. and Kite, G.W., 1998. Estimation of daily space-time precipitation series for macroscale hydrological modelling. Hydrological Processes, 12 (9), 1419–1432. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, L.S. and Vogel, R. 2008. The probability distribution of daily rainfall in the United States. In: R.W. Babcock and R.W. Walton, eds., Proceedings of the world environment and water resources congress, 12–16 May. Honolulu, Hawaii, USAReston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., Onof, C., and Wheater, H.S., 2003. Multivariate rainfall disaggregation at a fine timescale. Water Resources Research, 39 (7), 1173. doi:10.1029/2002WR001600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., Paschalis, A., and Theodoratos, N., 2011. Two-dimensional Hurst-Kolmogorov process and its application to rainfall fields. Journal of Hydrology, 398 (1–2), 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., et al., 2018. Three resampling approaches based on method of fragments for daily-to-subdaily precipitation disaggregation. International Journal of Climatology, 38 (Suppl.1), e1119–e1138. doi:10.1002/joc.5438
   Google Scholar
• Mandapaka, P.V., et al., 2009. Dissecting the effect of rainfall variability on the statistical structure of peak flows. Advances in Water Resources, 32, 1508–1525. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R. and Blöschl, G., 2003. A process typology of regional floods. Water Resources Research, 39 (12), 1340. doi:10.1029/2002WR001952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa, R., 1996. Analytical Hayami solution for the diffusive wave flood routing problem with lateral inflow. Hydrological Processes, 10, 1209–1227. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Thomy, H., Wallner, M., and Förster, K., 2018. Rainfall disaggregation for hydrological modeling: is there a need for spatial consistence? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 5259–5280. doi:10.5194/hess-22-5259-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandakumar, N. and Mein, R.G., 1997. Uncertainty in rainfall–runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land use change. Journal of Hydrology, 192 (1–4), 211–232. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03106-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., 2006. Spatio-temporal precipitation error propagation in runoff modelling: a case study in central Sweden. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6, 597–609. doi:10.5194/nhess-6-597-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E.J., 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences, 30, 683–691. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L., and McMahon, T.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11 (5), 1633–1644. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, J.R., 1957. The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations. Soil Science, 84, 257–264. doi:10.1097/00010694-195709000-00010
   Google Scholar
• Pui, A., et al., 2012. A comparison of alternatives for daily to sub-daily rainfall disaggregation. Journal of Hydrology, 470, 138–157. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, B., et al., 2010. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: the challenge of identifying input and structural errors. Water Resources Research, 46, W05521. doi:10.1029/2009WR008328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, R.A. and Stasinopoulos, D.M., 2004. Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Statistics in Medicine, 23 (19), 3053–3076. doi:10.1002/sim.1861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slope in badlands at perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 67, 597–646. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segond, M.L., Wheater, H.S., and Onof, C., 2007. The significance of spatial rainfall representation for flood runoff estimation: a numerical evaluation based on the Lee catchment, UK. Journal of Hydrology, 347 (1–2), 116–131. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S.M.S., O’Connell, P.E., and Hosking, J.R.M., 1996. Modelling the effects of spatial variability in rainfall on catchment response. 2. Experiments with distributed and lumped models. Journal of Hydrology, 175 (1–4), 89–111. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif, H.O., et al., 2002. Numerical simulations of radar rainfall error propagation. Water Resources Research, 38, 8. doi:10.1029/2001WR000525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoji, T. and Kitaura, H., 2006. Statistical and geostatistical analysis of rainfall in central Japan. Computers & Geosciences, 32, 1007–1024. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska, A.E., Viviroli, D., and Seibert, J., 2018. Effective precipitation duration for runoff peaks based on catchment modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 510–522. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skøien, J.O., et al., 2014. Rtop: an R package for interpolation of data with a variable spatial support, with an example from river networks. Computers & Geosciences, 67, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos, D.M. and Rigby, R.A., 2007. Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 23 (7). doi:10.18637/jss.v023.i07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarolli, M., et al., 2013. Rainfall space–time organization and orographic control on flash flood response: the Weisseritz event of August 13, 2002. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18 (2), 183–193. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco-Forero, C.A., et al., 2009. A non-parametric automatic blending methodology to estimate rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data. Advances in Water Resources, 32, 986–1002. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, A., et al., 2010. Generalised synthesis of space-time variability in flood response: 1. Analytical framework. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (1–2), 198–212. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra, S., et al., 2012. Continuous rainfall simulation: 1. A regionalized subdaily disaggregation approach. Water Resources Research, 48 (1), W01535. doi:10.29/2011WR010489
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, D.S., 1998. Multi-site generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation model. Journal of Hydrology, 210, 178–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00186-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, R. and Sivapalan, M., 1999. A synthesis of space-time variability in storm response: rainfall, runoff generation, and routing. Water Resources Research, 35 (8), 2469–2485. doi:10.1029/1999WR900014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, T. and Journel, A.G., 1998. Automatic modeling of (cross) covariance tables using fast Fourier transform. Mathematical Geology, 30 (6), 589–615. doi:10.1023/A:1022335100486
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, F., et al., 2010. Hydrological analysis of a flash flood across a climatic and geologic gradient the September 18, 2007 event in Western Slovenia. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (1–2), 182–197. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoccatelli, D., et al., 2015. The relative role of hillslope and river network routing in the hydrologic response to spatially variable rainfall fields. Journal of Hydrology, 531, 349–359. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoccatelli, D., et al., 2010. Which rainfall spatial information for flash flood response modelling? A numerical investigation based on data from the Carphatian range, Romania. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (1–2), 148–161. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar