Data rescue in manuscripts: a hydrological modelling study example

References

• Bhatt, G., Kumar, M., and Duffy, C.J., 2014. A tightly coupled GIS and distributed hydrologic modeling framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 62, 70–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, T., van Meerveld, I., and Weiler, M., 2017. The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (3), 334–337. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1230675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, K., et al., 2014. Managing scientific data as public assets: data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 251–262. doi:10.1002/asi.2014.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerr, R.E., et al., 2011. On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data: an assessment and recommendations. Earth Science Informatics, 4, 139–160. doi:10.1007/s12145-011-0083-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durack, P.J., et al., 2018. Toward standardized datasets for climate model experimentation [Online]. Eos. URL https://eos.org/project-updates/toward-standardized-data-sets-for-climate-model-experimentation (Accessed 7 Mar 2018). doi:10.1029/2018EO101751
   Google Scholar
• Essawy, B.T., et al., 2018. Integrating scientific cyberinfrastructures to improve reproducibility in computational hydrology: example for HydroShare and GeoTrust. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105, 217–229. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A.R., et al., 2014. Big data from small data: data-sharing in the’long tail’of neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 1442–1447. doi:10.1038/nn.3838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, D. and Jannaschk, K., 2011. A path to filled archives. Nature Geoscience, 4, 575–576. doi:10.1038/ngeo1248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, Y., et al., 2014. EarthCube: past, present, and future. EarthCube Project Report EC-2014-3. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, Y., et al., 2016. Towards the geoscience paper of the future: best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance. Earth and Space Science, 3 (10), 388–415. 2015EA000136. doi:10.1002/2015EA000136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, B. and Hilst, R., 2014. AGU’s data policy: history and context. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 95, 337. doi:10.1002/eost.v95.37
   Google Scholar
• Heidorn, P.B., 2008. Shedding light on the dark data in the long tail of science. Library Trends, 57, 280–299. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, J.S., et al., 2016. Hydroshare: sharing diverse environmental data types and models as social objects with application to the hydrology domain. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 52, 873–889. doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. and Lauriault, T.P., 2015. Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80, 463–475. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D., et al., 2016. Joint editorial – fostering innovation and improving impact assessment for journal publications in hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (7), 1170–1173. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1162953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, M. and Reuben, E., 2012. (Un) Available upon request: field experiment on researchers’ willingness to share supplementary materials. Accountability in Research, 19, 175–186. doi:10.1080/08989621.2012.678688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, M., et al., 2018. Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (11), 2557–2560. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715374115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsy, M.M., et al., 2017. Design of a metadata framework for environmental models with an example hydrologic application in HydroShare. Environmental Modelling & Software, 93, 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSF, 2015. Public Access Plan: Today’s Data, Tomorrow’s Discoveries.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B., 2013. Executive order – making open and machine readable the new default for government information. Washington DC: The White House.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, S.K., et al., 2018. Strategies for effective collaborative manuscript development in interdisciplinary science. Ecosphere, 9, e02206. doi:10.1002/ecs2.2206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckham, S.D., 2014. The CSDMS standard names: cross-domain naming conventions for describing process models, datasets and their associated variables. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), San Diego, California, USA, 1, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Penn State, 2015. Lion-X Clusters User Guide, University Park, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, N., et al., 2018. Invigorating hydrological research through journal publications. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (8), 1113–1117. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1496632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS (US Geological Survey), 2016. Public Access to Results of Federally Funded Research at the U.S. Geological Survey: Scholarly Publications and Digital Data.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X., et al., 2015. Modeling the long term water yield effects of forest management in a Norway spruce forest. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (2), 174–191. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.897406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., et al., 2016. Open science in practice: learning integrated modeling of coupled surface-subsurface flow processes from scratch. Earth and Space Science, 3, 190–206. doi:10.1002/2015EA000155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar