3,270
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Advancing socio-hydrology

Exploring changes in hydrogeological risk awareness and preparedness over time: a case study in northeastern Italy

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1049-1059 | Received 20 Jun 2019, Accepted 11 Dec 2019, Published online: 26 Feb 2020

References

  • Aerts, J.C.J.H., et al., 2018. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change, 8 (3), 193–199. Springer US. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
  • Armaş, I., 2008. Social vulnerability and seismic risk perception. Case study: the historic center of the Bucharest Municipality/Romania. Natural Hazards, 47 (3), 397–410. doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9229-3
  • Asgary, A. and Willis, K.G., 1997. Household behaviour in response to earthquake risk: an assessment of alternative theories. Disasters, 21 (4), 354–365. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00067
  • Atreya, A., Ferreira, S., and Kriesel, W., 2013. Forgetting the flood? An analysis of the flood risk discount over time. Land Economics, 89 (4), 577–596. doi:10.3368/le.89.4.577
  • Babcicky, P. and Seebauer, S., 2017. The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy and coping capacity. Journal of Risk Research, 20 (8), 1017–1037. Routledge. doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1147489
  • Becker, G., Aerts, J.C.J.H., and Huitema, D., 2014. Influence of flood risk perception and other factors on risk-reducing behaviour: a survey of municipalities along the Rhine. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 7 (1), 16–30. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12025
  • Blair, P. and Buytaert, W., 2016. Socio-hydrological modelling: a review asking “why, what and how?”. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (1), 443–478. doi:10.5194/hess-20-443-2016
  • Bloschl, G., Viglione, A., and Montanari, A., 2013. Emerging approaches to hydrological risk management in a changing world. In: Climate vulnerability: understanding and addressing threats to essential resources. 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2009.07.001
  • Bodoque, J.M., et al., 2019. Enhancing flash flood risk perception and awareness of mitigation actions through risk communication: a pre-post survey design. Journal of Hydrology, 568, 769–779. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.007
  • Botzen, W.J.W., Aerts, J.C.J.H., and Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2009. Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors. Water Resources Research, 45 (10), 1–15. doi:10.1029/2009WR007743
  • Bubeck, P., Botzen, W.J.W., and Aerts, J.C.J.H., 2012. A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32 (9), 1481–1495. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
  • Burningham, K., Fielding, J., and Thrush, D., 2008. “It'll never happen to me”: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters, 32 (2), 216–238. doi:10.1111/disa.2008.32.issue-2
  • Campedel, P., 2007. Analisi del dissesto da frana nella Provincia di Trento. In: Rapporto sulle frane in Italia. Rome: ISPRA, 203–226.
  • Coali, R., 2002. Interventi urgenti di sistemazione idraulico-forestale sulle frande del Rio Prà dell’Acqua e Val Limonara a Romagnano (Comune di Trento). Trento: Provincia Autonoma di Trento.
  • De Marchi, B., et al., 2007. Risk construction and social vulnerability in an Italian Alpine Region. Report T11-07-12 of FLOODsite Integrated Project. Available from: http://www.floodsite.net/html/publications2.asp?ALLdocs=on&Submit=View.
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2015. Debates—perspectives on socio-hydrology: capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes Giuliano. Water Resources Research, 51, 4770–4781. doi:10.1002/2014WR016416
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2017. Drought and flood in the Anthropocene: feedback mechanisms in reservoir operation. Earth System Dynamics, 8 (1), 225–233. doi:10.5194/esd-8-225-2017
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2018a. Hess opinions: an interdisciplinary research agenda to explore the unintended consequences of structural flood protection. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (11), 5629–5637. doi:10.5194/hess-22-5629-2018
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2018b. An integrative research framework to unravel the interplay of natural hazards and vulnerabilities. Earth’s Future, 6 (February), 305–310. doi:10.1002/2017EF000764
  • Di Baldassarre, G.,et al., 2013. Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (8), 3295–3303. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013
  • Fielding, J.L., 2012. Inequalities in exposure and awareness of flood risk in England and Wales. Disasters, 36 (3), 477–494. doi:10.1111/disa.2012.36.issue-3
  • Fuchs, S., et al., 2017. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21 (6), 3183–3198. doi:10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
  • Garcia, M., Portney, K., and Islam, S., 2016. A question driven socio-hydrological modeling process. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (1), 73–92. doi:10.5194/hess-20-73-2016
  • Gonzales, P. and Ajami, N., 2017. Social and structural patterns of drought-related water conservation and rebound. Water Resources Research, 53 (12), 10619–10634. doi:10.1002/2017WR021852
  • Grothmann, T. and Patt, A., 2005. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3), 199–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
  • Grothmann, T. and Reusswig, F., 2006. People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38 (1–2), 101–120. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
  • Hudson, P., Thieken, A.H., and Bubeck, P., 2019. The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain. Journal of Risk Research, 1–22. Routledge. doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1617339
  • Jongman, B., et al., 2015. Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (18), 2271–2280. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414439112
  • Kerstholt, J., Duijnhoven, H., and Paton, D., 2017. Flooding in The Netherlands: how people’s interpretation of personal, social and institutional resources influence flooding preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24 (August 2016), 52–57. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.013
  • Kienzler, S., et al., 2015. After the extreme flood in 2002: changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15 (3), 505–526. doi:10.5194/nhess-15-505-2015
  • Kreibich, H., et al., 2011. Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 11 (1), 59–71. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0119-3
  • Kreibich, H., et al., 2017. Adaptation to flood risk: results of international paired flood event studies. Earth’s Future, 5, 953–965. doi:10.1002/2017EF000606
  • Kuhlicke, C., et al., 2011. Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe. Natural Hazards, 58 (2), 789–810. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9751-6
  • Kuil, L., et al., 2016. Conceptualizing socio-hydrological drought processes: the case of the Maya collapse. Water Resources Research, 52, 6222–6242. doi:10.1002/2015WR018298
  • Lindell, M.K. and Perry, R.W., 2000. Household adjustment to earthquake hazard - a review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32 (4), 461–501. doi:10.1177/00139160021972621
  • Logan, C., 2017. Quantifying changes in risk perception through house price differentials following the catastrophic canterbury earthquake event. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 23 (1), 51–74. Routledge. doi:10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262
  • Ludy, J. and Kondolf, G.M., 2012. Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees. Natural Hazards, 61 (2), 829–842. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
  • Mård, J., Di Baldassarre, G., and Mazzoleni, M., 2018. Nighttime light data reveal how flood protection shapes human proximity to rivers. Science Advances, 4 (8), eaar5779. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar5779
  • Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., and Settanni, M., 2008. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (2), 164–173. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006
  • Pande, S. and Sivapalan, M., 2017. Progress in socio-hydrology: a meta-analysis of challenges and opportunities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4 (4), 1–18. doi:10.1002/wat2.1193
  • Panizza, L., 2005. Vermiglio Ieri e Oggi. Trento: Nuove Arti Grafiche.
  • Scolobig, A., De Marchi, B., and Borga, M., 2012. The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: findings from case studies in an Alpine Region. Natural Hazards, 63 (2), 499–520. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0161-1
  • Siegrist, M., 2013. The necessity for longitudinal studies in risk perception research. Risk Analysis, 33 (1), 50–51. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01941.x
  • Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H.G., and Blöschl, G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: a new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26 (8), 1270–1276. doi:10.1002/hyp.8426
  • Slovic, P., 1987. Perception of risk. Advancement of Science, 236 (4799), 280–285.
  • Spence, A., et al., 2011. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1 (1), 46–49. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/nclimate1059
  • Su, Y., Zhao, F., and Tan, L., 2015. Whether a large disaster could change public concern and risk perception: a case study of the 7/21 extraordinary rainstorm disaster in Beijing in 2012. Natural Hazards, 78 (1), 555–567. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1730-x
  • Terpstra, T., 2011. Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31 (10), 1658–1675. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
  • Thieken, A.H., et al., 2007. Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (5), 1016–1037. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.5.1016
  • Trumbo, C., et al., 2014. An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among gulf coast residents. Risk Analysis, 34 (6), 1013–1024. doi:10.1111/risa.12149
  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1973. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  • UNISDR, 2018. Economic losses, poverty & disasters. Brussels: UNISDR.
  • van Duinen, R., et al., 2015. Empirical analysis of farmers’ drought risk perception: objective factors, personal circumstances, and social influence. Risk Analysis, 35 (4), 741–755. doi:10.1111/risa.12299
  • Viglione, A., et al., 2014. Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk - roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust. Journal of Hydrology, 518 (PA), 71–82. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.018
  • Wachinger, G., et al., 2013. The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33 (6), 1049–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
  • White, G.F., 1945. Human adjustiment to flooding: a geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352
  • Yu, D.J., et al., 2017. Incorporating institutions and collective action into a sociohydrological model of flood resilience. Water Resources Research, 53, 1336–1353. doi:10.1002/2016WR019746
  • Zhang, L., 2016. Flood hazards impact on neighborhood house prices: a spatial quantile regression analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 60, 12–19. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.06.005