Hydrological model calibration with uncertain discharge data

References

• Bergström, S., 1976. Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. Norrköping, Sweden: SMHI.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Westerberg, I.K., 2011. On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference. Hydrological Processes, 25 (10), 1676–1680. doi:10.1002/hyp.v25.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.J., 2009. A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic. Water Resources Research, 45, W00B16. doi:10.1029/2007WR006726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bultot, F., et al., 1994. Effects of climate-change on snow accumulation and melting in the Broye catchment (Switzerland). Climatic Change, 28 (4), 339–363. doi:10.1007/BF01104078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, G., et al., 2013. Diagnostic evaluation of multiple hypotheses of hydrological behaviour in a limits-of-acceptability framework for 24 UK catchments. Hydrological Processes, 28 (25), 6135–6150. doi:10.1002/hyp.10096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, G., et al., 2015. A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations. Water Resources Research, 51 (7), 1944–7973. doi:10.1002/wrcr.v51.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, C.W., Abrahart, R.J., and See, L.M, 2007. Hydrotest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22 (7), 1034–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G., Laio, F., and Montanari, A., 2012. Effect of observation errors on the uncertainty of design floods. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 42–44, 85–90. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euser, T., et al., 2013. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1893–1912. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., et al., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1–2), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustard, A., Bullock, A., and Dixon, J.M., 1992. Low flow estimation in the United Kingdom. Wallingford, UK: Institute of Hydrology, 108.
   Google Scholar
• Herschy, R.W., 1970. The evaluation of errors at flow-measurement stations. In: ed. Paper presented at International Symposium on Hydrometry, Koblenz, 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Jalbert, J., Mathevet, T., and Favre, A.C., 2011. Temporal uncertainty estimation of discharges from rating curves using a variographic analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 397 (1–2), 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, I.G. and Duncan, M.J., 1990. Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in‐stream habitat and biota. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24 (3), 305–317. doi:10.1080/00288330.1990.9516427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juston, J., Jansson, P.-E., and Gustafsson, D., 2014. Rating curve uncertainty and change detection in discharge time series: case study with 44-year historic data from the Nyangores River, Kenya. Hydrological Processes, 28, 2509–2523. doi:10.1002/hyp.9786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang, J.E., et al., 2018. A comparison of methods for streamflow uncertainty estimation. Water Resources Research, 54 (10), 7149–7176. doi:10.1029/2018WR022708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., et al., 2010. Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses. Water Resources Research, 46, W07516. doi:10.1029/2009WR007845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coz, J., et al., 2014. Combining hydraulic knowledge and uncertain gaugings in the estimation of hydrometric rating curves: a Bayesian approach. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 573–587. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, G., et al., 1997. Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 201 (1–4), 272–288. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2009. Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error. Journal of Hydrology, 367, 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansanarez, V., et al., 2016. Bayesian analysis of stage-fall-discharge rating curves and their uncertainties. Water Resources Research, 52 (9), 7424–7443. doi:10.1002/2016WR018916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, H.K., et al., 2010. Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions. Hydrological Processes, 24 (10), 1270–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, H.K., et al., 2017a. How uncertainty analysis of streamflow data can reduce costs and promote robust decisions in water management applications. Water Resources Research, 53, 5220–5228. doi:10.1002/2016WR020328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, H.K., Krueger, T., and Freer, J., 2012. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes, 26 (26), 4078–4111. doi:10.1002/hyp.v26.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, H.K., Westerberg, I., and Branger, F., 2017b. Five guidelines for selecting hydrological signatures. Hydrological Processes, 31, 4757–4761. doi:10.1002/hyp.v31.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, H.K. and Westerberg, I.K., 2015. Rating curve estimation under epistemic uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, 29 (7), 1873–1882. doi:10.1002/hyp.v29.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlot, T., et al., 2014. Dynamic rating curve assessment for hydrometric stations and computation of the associated uncertainties: quality and station management indicators. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parriaux, A., 1981. Contribution à l’étude des ressources en eau du bassin de la Broye. Lausanne: EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, P., 1988. Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge: a literature review. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15 (5), 834–850. doi:10.1139/l88-109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen-Overleir, A., Soot, A., and Reitan, T., 2009. Bayesian rating curve inference as a streamflow data quality assessment tool. Water Resources Management, 23 (9), 1835–1842. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9354-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, B., et al., 2010. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: the challenge of identifying input and structural errors. Water Resources Research, 46, W05521. doi:10.1029/2009WR008328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefli, B., 2016. Snow hydrology signatures for model identification within a limits-of-acceptability approach. Hydrological Processes, 30 (22), 4019–4035. doi:10.1002/hyp.v30.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., 2000. Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4 (2), 215–224. doi:10.5194/hess-4-215-2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., 2003. Reliability of model predictions outside calibration conditions. Nordic Hydrology, 34 (5), 477–492.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., et al., 2018. Technical note: representing glacier geometry changes in a semi-distributed hydrological model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (4), 2211–2224. doi:10.5194/hess-22-2211-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., and Vis, M., 2012. Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 3315–3325. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska, A.E., et al., 2013. Considering rating curve uncertainty in water level predictions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (11), 4415–4427. doi:10.5194/hess-17-4415-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska, A.E. and Renard, B., 2017. Calibrating a hydrological model in stage space to account for rating curve uncertainties: general framework and key challenges. Advances in Water Resources, 105, 51–66. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska, A.E., Viviroli, D., and Seibert, J., 2018. Effective precipitation duration for runoff peaks based on catchment modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 510–522. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbakk, G.H., et al., 2016. Propagation of rating curve uncertainty in design flood estimation. Water Resources Research, 52 (9), 6897–6915. doi:10.1002/2015WR018516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, M., et al., 2009. Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis. Water Resources Research, 45, W00b14. doi:10.1029/2008WR006825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, K., 2012. Uncertainty in streamflow rating curves: methods, controls and consequences. Hydrological Processes. doi:10.1002/hyp.9567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigiak, O., et al., 2018. Uncertainty of modelled flow regime for flow-ecological assessment in Southern Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 1028–1047. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingartner, R. and Aschwanden, H., 1992. Discharge Regime – the basis for the estimation of average flows. Hydrological atlas of Switzerland. Bern: Swiss Federal Office for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Westerberg, I.K., et al., 2011a. Stage-discharge uncertainty derived with a non-stationary rating curve in the Choluteca River, Honduras. Hydrological Processes, 25 (4), 603–613. doi:10.1002/hyp.7848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg, I.K., et al., 2011b. Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (7), 2205–2227. doi:10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg, I.K., et al., 2016. Uncertainty in hydrological signatures for gauged and ungauged catchments. Water Resources Research, 52 (3), 1847–1865. doi:10.1002/2015WR017635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg, I.K. and Birkel, C., 2015. Observational uncertainties in hypothesis testing: investigating the hydrological functioning of a tropical catchment. Hydrological Processes, 29 (23), 4863–4879. doi:10.1002/hyp.v29.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg, I.K. and McMillan, H.K., 2015. Uncertainty in hydrological signatures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 12, 4233–4270. doi:10.5194/hessd-12-4233-2015
   Google Scholar
• Wilby, R.L., et al., 2017. The ‘dirty dozen’ of freshwater science: detecting then reconciling hydrological data biases and errors. WIREs Water, 4, e1209. doi:10.1002/wat2.1209
   Google Scholar
• Winsemius, H.C., et al., 2009. On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: A framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information. Water Resources Research, 45, W12422. doi:10.1029/2009WR007706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyder, D., 1998. Handbuch der Pegelmessung. Hydrologische Mitteilungen, 26. Bern: Swiss Federal Office for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H., 2007. Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources, 30 (8), 1756–1774. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar