Suitability of satellite-based hydro-climate variables and machine learning for streamflow modeling at various scale watersheds

References

• Adler, R.F., et al. 2001. Intercomparison of global precipitation products: the third Precipitation Intercomparison Project (PIP-3). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82 (7), 1377–1396. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<1377:IOGPPT>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., Kalra, A., and Stephen, H., 2010. Estimating soil moisture using remote sensing data: A machine learning approach. Advances in Water Resources, 33 (1), 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., et al. 2000. Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin. Journal of Hydrology, 227 (1–4), 21–40. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00139-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa, S. and Vibhava, V., 2009. A distributed artificial neural network model for watershed-scale rainfall-runoff modeling. Transactions of the ASABE, 52 (3), 813–823. doi:10.13031/2013.27402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, H.E., et al. 2017. Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21 (12), 6201–6217. doi:10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2011. Rainfall-runoff modeling: the primer. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G., 2005. Rainfall‐runoff modeling of ungauged catchments. In: M.G. Anderson, ed. Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. New York: John Wiley, Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Boegh, E., et al. 2009. Remote sensing based evapotranspiration and runoff modeling of agricultural, forest and urban flux sites in Denmark: from field to macro-scale. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (3), 300–316. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, D.R., Fleming, S.W., and Stull, R.B., 2012. Streamflow modeling: a primer on applications, approaches and challenges. Atmosphere-Ocean, 50 (4), 507–536. doi:10.1080/07055900.2012.734276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakenridge, G.R., et al., 2005. Space‐based measurement of river runoff. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86 (19), 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., et al., 1984. Classification and regression trees. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. and Chen, X., 2018. Monthly rainfall-runoff modeling at watershed scale: A comparative study of data-driven and theory-driven approaches. Water, 10 (9), 1116. doi:10.3390/w10091116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.M., et al., 2005. Distributed hydrological model for mapping evapotranspiration using remote sensing inputs. Journal of Hydrology, 305 (1), 15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X.-Y., Chau, K.-W., and Wang, W.-C., 2015. A novel hybrid neural network based on continuity equation and fuzzy pattern-recognition for downstream daily river discharge forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 17 (5), 733–744. doi:10.2166/hydro.2015.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, F., Stewardson, M., and McMahon, T., 1993. Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modeling approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 147 (1–4), 1–36. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90073-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros, J., 2014. Freshwater resources. In: C.B. Field, et al., eds.. Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C.W. and Wilby, R., 1998. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43 (1), 47–66. doi:10.1080/02626669809492102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demissie, M., et al. 2006. Evaluating the effectiveness of the Illinois River conservation reserve enhancement program in reducing sediment delivery. IAHS Publication, 306, 295.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, R.C. and Şahin, M., 2016. An extreme learning machine model for the simulation of monthly mean streamflow water level in eastern Queensland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188 (2), 90. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5094-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhi, D., 2003. Mike-11: a modeling system for rivers and channels, reference manual. Horsholm, Denmark: DHI–Water and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Didan, K., 2015. MOD13A3: MODIS/terra vegetation indices monthly L3 global 1km SIN grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 10. https://ind01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5067%2FMODIS%2FMOD13A3.006&data=02%7C01%7Csathyan.dhanasekaran%40integra.co.in%7C1a7ea24f2b7b4345260808d82e593d25%7C70e2bc386b4b43a19821a49c0a744f3d%7C0%7C0%7C637310308167990088&sdata=imXUUikZ5AV%2B8QOy6x%2FeMaVgTwD7NOhmoViY3v0YZ4A%3D&reserved=0 [Accessed 15 Sept 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R., and Hastie, T., 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77 (4), 802–813. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R., 2001. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer series in statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Gassman, P.W., et al., 2006. Upper Mississippi River Basin modeling system part 1: SWAT input data requirements and issues. In: V.P. Singh and Y.J. Xu, eds. Coastal Hydrology and Processes. Highlands Ranch, USA: Water Resources Publications, LLC, 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Herschy, R.W., 2009. Streamflow measurement. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., et al., 2007. A first approach to global runoff simulation using satellite rainfall estimation. Water Resources Research, 43 (8). doi:10.1029/2006WR005739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, K.L., Gupta, H.V., and Sorooshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall‐runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31 (10), 2517–2530. doi:10.1029/95WR01955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulley, G.C. and Hook, S.J., 2009. Intercomparison of versions 4, 4.1 and 5 of the MODIS land surface temperature and emissivity products and validation with laboratory measurements of sand samples from the Namib desert, Namibia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113 (6), 1313–1318. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illinois Climate Network, 2015. Water and atmospheric resources monitoring program. Champaign, IL: Illinois State Water Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, M., et al., 2004. Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: A regional climate model perspective. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109 (D9). doi:10.1029/2003JD003686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, M., et al. 2006. Climate change sensitivity assessment on Upper Mississippi River Basin streamflows using SWAT 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42 (4), 997–1015. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, M.K., Gassman, P.W., and Arnold, J.G., 2007. Water quality modeling for the Raccoon River watershed using SWAT. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (2), 479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, K., Mirzai, H., and Saleh, I., 2013. Assessment of empirical methods of runoff estimation by statistical test (Case study: Banadaksadat Watershed, Yazd Province). International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research 1 (3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzert, F., et al., 2018. Rainfall-runoff modeling using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6005–6022. https://ind01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5194%2Fhess-22-6005-2018&data=02%7C01%7Csathyan.dhanasekaran%40integra.co.in%7C1a7ea24f2b7b4345260808d82e593d25%7C70e2bc386b4b43a19821a49c0a744f3d%7C0%7C0%7C637310308167990088&sdata=uNw5vmd7GjgJc%2FXlOiSBDHNnaTwyyXrtitj2voTFnIw%3D&reserved=0
   Google Scholar
• Kummerow, C., et al. 1998. The tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) sensor package. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15 (3), 809–817. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0809:TTRMMT>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landerer, F.W. and Swenson, S.C., 2012. Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates. Water Resources Research, 48 (4). doi:10.1029/2011WR011453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston, G., Sud, Y., and Wood, E., 1994. Evaluating GCM land surface hydrology parameterizations by computing river discharges using a runoff routing model: application to the Mississippi basin. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33 (3), 394–405. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0394:EGLSHP>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T., et al., 2012. On the usefulness of remote sensing input data for spatially distributed hydrological modeling: case of the Tarim River basin in China. Hydrological Processes, 26 (3), 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, S.H., 2014. Investigation of rainfall–runoff modeling for Egypt by using remote sensing and GIS integration. Catena, 120, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markstrom, S.L., et al., 2015. PRMS-IV, the precipitation-runoff modeling system, version 4. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. (6-B7).
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, E.P. and Lettenmaier, D.P., 2003. Predictability of seasonal runoff in the Mississippi River basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108, D16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melesse, A.M. and Graham, W.D., 2004. Storm runoff prediction based on a spatially distributed travel time method utilizing remote sensing and GIS. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40 (4), 863–879. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, A., et al. 2019a. Multi-scale hydrologic sensitivity to climatic and anthropogenic changes in Northern Morocco. Geosciences, 10 (1), 13. doi:10.3390/geosciences10010013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, A., Elkadiri, R., and Durham, M., 2015. Assessment and intercomparison of TMPA satellite precipitation products in varying climatic and topographic regimes. Remote Sensing, 7 (5), 5697–5717. doi:10.3390/rs70505697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, M.A., et al., 2019b. Spatial downscaling of GRACE TWSA data to identify spatiotemporal groundwater level trends in the Upper Floridan Aquifer, Georgia, USA. Remote Sensing, 11 (23), 2756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milly, P.C., Dunne, K.A., and Vecchia, A.V., 2005. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438 (7066), 347–350. doi:10.1038/nature04312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minns, A. and Hall, M., 1996. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41 (3), 399–417. doi:10.1080/02626669609491511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, E., et al. 2008. Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural watershed. Hydrological Processes, 22 (26), 5097–5106. doi:10.1002/hyp.7136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S.L., et al., 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University, Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406.
   Google Scholar
• NRCS, 2010. Assessment of the effects of conservation practices on cultivated cropland in the upper Mississippi River basin. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, C., et al. 2007. Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall—runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (1), 131–151. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.1.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajurkar, M., Kothyari, U., and Chaube, U., 2002. Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall—runoff modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47 (6), 865–877. doi:10.1080/02626660209492996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, S., et al. 2004. Rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network approach. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 40 (7–8), 839–846. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.012
   Google Scholar
• Schapire, R.E., 2003. The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: D.D Denison, M.H. Hansen, C.C. Holmes, B. Mallick, and B. Yu., eds. Nonlinear estimation and classification. Lecture notes in statistics, vol 171. New York, NY: Springer, 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, K.E., et al., 2008. Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: historical effects and future directions. Water Resources Research, 44 (7). doi:10.1029/2007WR006644
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, K.E., et al. 2010. Quantifying the effect of land use land cover change on increasing discharge in the Upper Mississippi River. Journal of Hydrology, 387 (3–4), 343–345. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., Kim, S., and Singh, V., 2018. Machine learning models coupled with variational mode decomposition: A new approach for modeling daily rainfall-runoff. Atmosphere, 9 (7), 251. doi:10.3390/atmos9070251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, M.W., Kwon, D., and Milewski, M.A., 2019. Downscaling GRACE TWSA data into high-resolution groundwater level anomaly using machine learning-based models in a glacial aquifer system. Remote Sensing, 11 (7), 824. doi:10.3390/rs11070824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, W.M., 2018. Characterizing water storage trends and regional climate influence using GRACE observation and satellite altimetry data in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 566, 274–284. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, W.M. and Milewski, A.M., 2016. Monitoring and comparison of terrestrial water storage changes in the northern high plains using GRACE and in-situ based integrated hydrologic model estimates. Advances in Water Resources, 94, 31–44. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, W.M. and Milewski, A.M., 2017. Improved methods for estimating local terrestrial water dynamics from GRACE in the Northern High Plains. Advances in Water Resources, 110, 279–290. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, W.M., Milewski, A.M., and Durham, M.C., 2015. Understanding the relative impacts of natural processes and human activities on the hydrology of the Central Rift Valley lakes, East Africa. Hydrological Processes, 29 (19), 4312–4324. doi:10.1002/hyp.10490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, Q., et al. 2019. Downscaling of GRACE datasets based on relevance vector machine using InSAR time series to generate maps of groundwater storage changes at local scale. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 13 (4), 048503. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.13.048503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., Zhang, X., and Arnold, J., 2010. SWAT ungauged: hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Transactions of the ASABE, 53 (5), 1533–1546. doi:10.13031/2013.34903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steitz, D., et al., 2002. GRACE launch. Press Kit. Pasadena, CA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory/NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Tanty, R. and Desmukh, T.S., 2015. Application of artificial neural network in hydrology—A review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 4, 184–188.
   Google Scholar
• Taormina, R., Chau, K.-W., and Sivakumar, B., 2015. Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1788–1797. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K.J. and Bennett, M.E., 2010. Adjusting satellite precipitation data to facilitate hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11 (4), 966–978. doi:10.1175/2010JHM1206.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokar, A.S. and Johnson, P.A., 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (3), 232–239. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USACE, 2006. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Illinois River Basin restoration comprehensive plan with integrated environmental assessment, public review draft, February 2006, Rock Island District. Rock Island, IL: USACE.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., 2008. New refinements and validation of the MODIS land-surface temperature/emissivity products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (1), 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., Hook, S., and Hulley, G., 2015. MOD11C3 MODIS/terra land surface temperature/emissivity monthly L3 global 0.05 deg CMG V006 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://ind01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5067%2FMODIS%2FMOD11C3.006&data=02%7C01%7Csathyan.dhanasekaran%40integra.co.in%7C1a7ea24f2b7b4345260808d82e593d25%7C70e2bc386b4b43a19821a49c0a744f3d%7C0%7C0%7C637310308167990088&sdata=it8TzklPDF9phTnW4r4LdNVmILiVdfwz9dlCqjwd8jE%3D&reserved=0 [Accessed 01 Sept 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Yaseen, Z.M., et al., 2017. Novel approach for streamflow forecasting using a hybrid ANFIS-FFA model. Journal of Hydrology, 554, 263–276. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, H., et al. 2016. Application of large-scale, multi-resolution watershed modeling framework using the Hydrologic and Water Quality System (HAWQS). Water, 8 (4), 164. doi:10.3390/w8040164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2011. Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change, 2 (6), 851–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., et al. 2015. Evaluating the suitability of TRMM satellite rainfall data for hydrological simulation using a distributed hydrological model in the Weihe River catchment in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25 (2), 177–195. doi:10.1007/s11442-015-1161-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar