Unravelling the influence of human behaviour on reducing casualties during flood evacuation

References

• Abebe, Y.A., et al., 2019. A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 111, 483–492. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, A., et al., 2013. Analysis of national travel statistics in Europe OPTIMISM WP2: harmonisation of national travel statistics in Europe. Joint Research Centre Technical Reports. Available from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83304/tch-d2.1_final.pdf [Accessed 19 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J., et al., 2012. Internet-based stated response survey for no-notice emergency evacuations. Transportation Letters - the International Journal of Transportation Research, 4 (1), 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banos, A., et al., 2017. Multiscale modeling: application to traffic flow. In: Agent-based spatial simulation with NetLogo. Vol. 2, Advanced Concepts, London, UK: Elsevier, 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J.S., et al., 2015. A review of people’s behaviour in and around floodwater. Weather, Climate and Society, 7 (4), 321–332. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00030.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., et al., 2017. Flooding risk in existing urban environment: from human behavioral patterns to a microscopic simulation model. Energy Procedia, 134, 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.549
   Google Scholar
• Bhamidipati, S., Van der Lei, T.E., and Herder, P.M., 2016. A layered approach to model interconnected infrastructure and its significance for asset management. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 16 (1), 254–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G., et al. 2019. Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (10), 1141–1158. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E., 2002. Agent-based modelling methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 (3), 7280–7287. doi:10.1073/pnas.082080899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2008. Assimilation of observed soil moisture data in storm rainfall-runoff data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14 (2), 153–165. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:2(153)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2009. Antecedent wetness conditions estimation based on ERS scatterometer data. Journal of Hydrology, 364 (1–2), 73–87. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, G., and Kosztra, B. CLC2018 Technical Guidelines. Based on CLC2006 Technical guidelines (EEA Technical report No 17/2007) and CLC2012 Addendum to the CLC2006 Technical Guidelines (ETC/SIA report). Wien, Austria: Environment Agency, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Camici, S., et al., 2011. Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm‐based rainfall‐runoff modeling. Water Resources Research, 47 (5), W05527. doi:10.1029/2010WR009298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters and United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015. The human cost of weather related disasters 1995–2015. Brussels, CRED. Available from: https://www.unisdr.org/2015/docs/climatechange/COP21_WeatherDisastersReport_2015_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 01 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Meaker, J.W., and Zhan, F.B., 2006. Agent-based modeling and analysis of hurricane evacuation procedures for the Florida keys. Natural Hazards, 38 (3), 321–338. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-0263-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. and Zheng, X., 2018. Can cooperative behaviors promote evacuation efficiency?. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 2069–2078.doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.124
   Google Scholar
• Cowpertwait, P.S.P., et al., 1996. Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. I. Single-site fitting and validation. Journal of Hydrology, 175 (1–4), 17–46. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, R., Peppe, R., and Wang, M., 2011. An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management. Natural Hazards, 59 (1), 167–189. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E.W., 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematlk, l, 269–271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390
   Google Scholar
• Doocy, S., et al., 2013. The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents Disasters. 2013 Apr 16. Edition 1. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a
   Google Scholar
• Du, E., et al., 2017. Exploring the role of social media and individual behaviours in flood evacuation processes: an agent‐based modelling approach. Water Resources Research, 53 (11), 9164–9180. doi:10.1002/2017WR021192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. and Fearnley, C.J., 2012. Evaluating critical links in early warning systems for natural hazards. Environmental Hazards, 11 (2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/17477891.2011.609877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. and Wunderlich, K., 2007. Evacuation Management Operations (EMO) modeling assessment: transportation modeling inventory [online]. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Transportation. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Available from: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstractanddid=11255 [Accessed 20 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Hitomi, N., Black, J., and Suenaga, Y., 2019. Investigating the flood evacuation behaviour of older people: A case study of a rural town in Japan. Research in Transportation, Business and Management, 30, 100376. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofinger, G., Zinke, R., and Künzer, L., 2014. Human factors in evacuation simulation, planning, and guidance. Transportation Research Procedia, 2, 603–611. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.101
   Google Scholar
• Iman, R.L. and Conover, W.J., 1982. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 11 (3), 311–334. doi:10.1080/03610918208812265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaïl, S., et al., 2018. Investigating scalability in population synthesis: a comparative approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 41 (7), 724–735. doi:10.1080/03081060.2018.1504182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J., 1994. Survival psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• League, C.E., 2009. What were they thinking? Using YouTube to observe driver behaviour while crossing flooded roads. M.A. thesis, Department of Applied Geography, University of Colorado, 76 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. and Lim, S., 2016. Integration of spatial analysis and an agent-based model into evacuation management for shelter assignment and routing. Journal of Spatial Science, 61 (2), 283–298. doi:10.1080/14498596.2016.1147393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. and Lim, S., 2018. An agent-based evacuation model for the 2011 Brisbane City-scale riverine flood. Natural Hazards, 94 (1), 53–70. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3373-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2010. Agent-based flood evacuation simulation of life-threatening conditions using vitae system model. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 31 (2), 69–77. doi:10.2328/jnds.31.69
   Google Scholar
• Mard, J., Di Baldassarre, G., and Mazzoleni, M., 2018. Nightlight data unravel how flood protection shapes human proximity to rivers. Science Advances, 4 (8), eaar5779. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar5779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas, E., et al., 2015. Recent advances in agent-based tsunami evacuation simulations: case studies in Indonesia, Thailand, Japan and Peru. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172 (12), 3409–3424. doi:10.1007/s00024-015-1105-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, M., et al., 2017. Effects of levee cover strength on flood mapping in the case of levee breach due to overtopping. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (6), 892–910. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1246800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, N., Sanchez, A., and Vojinovic, Z., 2016. The potential of agent based models for testing city evacuation strategies under a flood event. Procedia Engineering, 154, 765–772. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.581
   Google Scholar
• Menoni, S., et al., 2016. Flood damage: A model for consistent, complete and multipurpose scenarios. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16 (12), 2783–2797. doi:10.5194/nhess-16-2783-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, T., Brandimarte, L., and Mazzoleni, M., 2020. Capturing flood risk dynamics with a coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework. Hydrological Science Journal, 65, 1458–1473. accepted. doi:10.1080/02626667.2020.1750617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, D., et al., 2014. Ex post damage assessment: an Italian experience. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14 (4), 901–916. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-901-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordvintsev, A.S., et al., 2014. Simulation of city evacuation coupled to flood dynamics. Proccedings of the 6th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, PED2012. Springer, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, C., Yang, C., and Jin., S., 2009. Agent-based modeling and simulation on emergency evacuation. In: J. Zhou, ed.. Complex sciences. Complex 2009. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering. Vol. 5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1451–1461.
   Google Scholar
• Ridolfi, E., Albrecht, F., and Di Baldassarre, G., 2019. Exploring the role of risk perception in influencing flood losses over time. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65 (1), 12–20. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1677907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. and Tsirkunov, V., 2010. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: costs and benefits of early warning systems [online]. Washington, DC, World Bank. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/609951468330279598/Global-assessment-report-on-disaster-risk-reduction-costs-and-benefits-of-early-warning-systems [Accessed 11 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Scolobig, A., et al., 2017. Warning system options for landslide risk: a case study in upper Austria. Resources, 6 (3), 37. doi:10.3390/resources6030037
   Google Scholar
• Solís, I. and Gazmuri, P., 2017. Evaluation of the risk and the evacuation policy in the case of a tsunami in the city of Iquique, Chile. Natural Hazards, 88 (1), 503–532. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2876-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillandier, P., et al., 2018. Building, composing and experimenting complex spatial models with the GAMA platform. GeoInformatica, 23, 229–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarpanelli, A., et al., 2012. A simple approach for stochastic generation of spatial rainfall patterns. Journal of Hydrology, 472-473, 63–76. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, F. and Knüppe, K., 2016. From flood protection to flood risk management: insights from the Rhine River in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Water Resources Management, 30 (8), 2785–2800. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1323-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, T., et al., 2018. Analysis of evacuation behavior in a wildfire event. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 1366–1373. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno, K. and Kashiyama, K., 2008. Development of simulation system for the disaster evacuation based on multi-agent model using GIS. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13 (1), 348–353. doi:10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70173-1
   Google Scholar
• Vorst, H.C., 2010. Evacuation models and disaster psychology. Procedia Engineering, 3, 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2016. An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: decision-making and life safety. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 64, 86–100. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., et al., 2019. Simulation of pedestrians’ evacuation dynamics with underground flood spreading based on cellular automaton. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 94, 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., et al., 2018. Hurricane evacuation modeling using behavior models and scenario-driven agent-based simulations. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 836–843. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.074
   Google Scholar