Improved runoff curve numbers for a large number of watersheds of the USA

References

• Ahmadisharaf, E., et al., 2019. Calibration and validation of watershed models and advances in uncertainty analysis in TMDL Studies. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24 (7), 3119001. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajmal, M., et al., 2015. Evolution of a parsimonious rainfall–runoff model using soil moisture proxies. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 623–633. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banasik, K., et al., 2014. Curve number estimation for small urban catchment from recorded rainfall-runoff events. Archives of Environmental Protection, 40 (4), 75–86. doi:10.2478/aep-2014-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caletka, M., et al., 2020. Improvement of SCS-CN initial abstraction coefficient in the Czech Republic: a study of five catchments. Water, 12 (7), 1964. doi:10.3390/w12071964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donigian, A., 2002. Watershed model calibration and validation: the HSPF experience. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 8 (8), 44–73. doi:10.2175/193864702785071796
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 119 (2), 334–345. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 2002. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference. ASCE, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M., et al., 2006. A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess plateau of China. Hydrological Processes, 20 (3), 579–589. doi:10.1002/hyp.5925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-Y., et al., 2019. Feasible ranges of runoff curve numbers for Korean watersheds based on the interior point optimization algorithm. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23 (12), 5257–5265. doi:10.1007/s12205-019-0901-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, S.C., 2006. Rainfall-runoff relationships for selected eastern U.S. forested mountain watersheds: testing of the curve number method for flood analysis. Technical Report, West Virginia Division of Forestry, Charleston, WV.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Vazken, A., and Charles, P., 2005. Soil conservation service curve number method: how to mend among soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resources Research, 41 (2), 1–6. doi:10.1029/2004WR003191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2006. An improved Ia-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resources Management, 20 (5), 643–660. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-9000-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2002. SCS-CN method: part I: derivation of SCS-CN based models. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 50 (3), 457–477.
   Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50, 885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2012. Hydrologic and water quality models: use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 55 (4), 1241–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2015. Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 58 (6), 1763–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I- A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Pandit, A. and Gopalakrishnan, G., 1996. Estimation of annual storm runoff coefficients by continuous simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 122 (4), 211–220. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1996)122:4(211)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M. and Hawkins, R.H., 1996. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1 (1), 11–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallison, R.E. and Miller, N., 1982. Past, present and future SCS runoff procedure. Proceedings of international symposium on rainfall-runoff modeling. Littleton, Colordo: Water Resources Publications, 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. and Mu~noz-Carpena, R., 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowska, A., et al., 2015. Probabilistic properties of a curve number: A case study for small Polish and Slovak Carpathian Basins. Journal of Mountain Science, 12 (3), 533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., et al., 2007. An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method. Hydrological Processes, 21 (21), 2827–2881. doi:10.1002/hyp.6503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhi, C., et al., 2001. Validation of the swat model on a large RWER basin with point and nonpoint sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37 (5), 1169–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L.E. and McCuen, R.H., 2005. Statistical guideline for curve number generation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 131 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:3(282)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1972. National engineering handbook. Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1975. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release 55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., 2001. On the need for benchmarks in hydrological modelling. Hydrological Processes, 15 (6), 1063–1064. doi:10.1002/hyp.446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2010. An updated hydrological review on recent advancements in soil conservation service curve-number technique. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1 (2), 118–134. doi:10.2166/wcc.2010.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2015. Development of a modified SMA based MSCS-CN model for runoff estimation. Water Resources Management, 29 (11), 4111–4127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X., 2018. Estimation of SCS curve number variation following forest fires. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (9), 1332–1346. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1501482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedela, N.H., et al., 2012. Runoff curve numbers for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the Eastern United States. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (11), 1188–1198. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S., et al., 2017a. An enhanced SMA based SCS-CN inspired model for watershed runoff prediction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76 (21), 736. doi:10.1007/s12665-017-7062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S., et al., 2017b. A revisit of NRCS-CN methodology and application of RS and GIS for surface runoff estimation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (12), 1891–1930. doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1334166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S., et al., 2018. Simplified SMA-inspired 1-parameter SCS-CN model for runoff estimation. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11 (15), 420. doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3736-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S., et al., 2020. Activation Soil Moisture Accounting (ASMA) for runoff estimation using Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Liu, T., and Yang, W., 2012. Development of a robust runoff-prediction model by fusing the Rational Equation and a modified SCS-CN method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (6), 1118–1140. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.701305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar