The lumped Muskingum flood routing model revisited: the storage relationship

References

• Akan, A.O., 2006. Open channel hydraulics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, G.H. and Barati, R., 2012. Comprehensive analysis of flooding in unmanaged catchments. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 165 (4), 229–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.10.00036
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, R., Hessami-Kermani, M.R., and Shojaee, S., 2020. Flood routing: improving outflow using a new non-linear Muskingum model with four variable parameters coupled with PSO-GA algorithm. Water Resources Management, 34 (10), 3291–3316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02613-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayvaz, M.T. and Gurarslan, G., 2017. A new partitioning approach for nonlinear Muskingum flood routing models with lateral flow contribution. Journal of Hydrology, 553, 142–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barat, R., Akbari, G.H., and Rahimi, S., 2013. Flood routing of an unmanaged River Basin using Muskingum-Cunge model; field application and numerical experiments. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2 (6), 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barati, R., 2013. Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (5), 1139–1148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barati, R., Rahimi, S., and Akbari, G.H., 2012. Analysis of dynamic wave model for flood routing in natural rivers. Water Science and Engineering, 5 (3), 243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Barati, R., et al., 2014. Discussion: new and improved four-parameter non-linear Muskingum model. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 167 (10), 612–615.
   Google Scholar
• Bazargan, J. and Norouzi, H., 2018. Investigation the effect of using variable values for the parameters of the linear Muskingum method using the Particle Swarm Algorithm (PSO). Water Resources Management, 32 (14), 4763–4777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2082-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2011. Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bozorg-Haddad, O., et al., 2019. Generalized storage equations for flood routing with nonlinear Muskingum models. Water Resources Management, 33 (8), 2677–2691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02247-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1959. Open channel hydraulics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, H.J. and Chang, L.C., 2009. Applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14 (9), 1024–1027. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easa, S.M., 2013. Improved nonlinear Muskingum model with variable exponent parameter. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18 (12), 1790–1794. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easa, S.M., 2014a. Closure to “improved nonlinear Muskingum model with variable exponent parameter” by Said M. Easa. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (10), 07014008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easa, S.M., 2014b. New and improved four-parameter nonlinear Muskingum model. Proceedings of the ICE–Water Management, 167 (5), 288–298.
   Google Scholar
• Easa, S.M., 2015a. Versatile Muskingum flood model with four variable parameters. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 168 (3), 139–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.14.00034
   Google Scholar
• Easa, S.M., 2015b. Evaluation of nonlinear Muskingum model with continuous and discontinuous exponent parameters. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19 (7), 2281–2290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0154-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavilan, G. and Houck, M.H., 1985. Optimal Muskingum river routing. In: Specialty Conference: Computer applications in water resources. Buffalo, NY: ASCE, 1294–1302.
   Google Scholar
• Geem, Z.W., 2006. Parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum model using the BFGS technique. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 474–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:5(474)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geem, Z.W., 2011. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using parameter-setting-free harmony search. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (8), 684–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M.A., 1978. Flood routing by the Muskingum method. Journal of Hydrology, 36 (3–4), 353–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90153-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahan, H., 2014. Discussion of “improved nonlinear Muskingum model with variable exponent parameter” by Said M Easa. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., and Geem, Z.W., 2013. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum flood-routing model using a hybrid harmony search algorithm. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18 (3), 352–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., and Geem, Z.W., 2015. A new nonlinear Muskingum flood routing model incorporating lateral flow. Engineering Optimization, 47 (6), 737–749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.918115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.H., Geem, Z.W., and Kim, E.S., 2001. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model using harmony search. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37 (5), 1131–1138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J. and Xie, J., 2010. Parameter estimation for nonlinear Muskingum model based on immune clonal selection algorithm. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (10), 844–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G.T., 1938. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. In: Proceeding of the Conference of North Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, S., 1997. Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using genetic algorithm. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123 (2), 137–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:2(137)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NERC (Natural Environment Research Council), 1975. Flood studies report, Vol. III. Wallingford, UK: Institute of Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Niazkar, M. and Afzali, S.H., 2017. New nonlinear variable-parameter Muskingum models. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21 (7), 2958–2967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0652-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, T., 1985. A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 30 (4), 479–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509491013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, F., et al., 2000. New proofs of weighted power mean inequalities and monotonicity for generalized weighted mean values. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, 3 (3), 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2010. Discussion of ‘applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model’ by H.-J. Chu and L.-C. Chang. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (11), 949–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2014a. Evaluation of explicit numerical solution methods of the Muskingum model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (8), 06014001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2014b. Discussion of “improved nonlinear Muskingum model with variable exponent parameter” by Said M. Easa. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (10), 07014004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2014c. Discussion of ‘parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum flood-routing model using a hybrid harmony search algorithm’ by Halil Karahan, Gurhan Gurarslan, and ZongWoo Geem. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (4), 839–842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2015a. Discussion of “application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models” by Reza Barati. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19 (1), 332–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-1422-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2015b. Discussion of “parameter estimation for the nonlinear forms of the Muskingum model” by Piyusha Hirpurkar and Aniruddha D. Ghare. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20 (11), 07015018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2017. Non-linear Muskingum model with inflow-based exponent. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 170 (2), 66–80. Thomas Telford Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2018. Discussion of “assessment of modified Honey Bee mating optimization for parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models” by Majid Niazkar and Seied Hosein Afzali. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 23 (4), 07018002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viessman, W. and Lewis, G.L., 2003. Introduction to hydrology. NJ, USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E.M., 1974. Engineering hydrology. Hampshire, UK: MacMillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D.M., Qiu, L., and Chen, S.Y., 2012. Estimation of nonlinear Muskingum model parameter using differential evolution. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (2), 348–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J.W. and Padmanabhan, G., 1993. Parameter-estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119 (5), 600–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:5(600)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar