On the role of floodplain storage and hydrodynamic interactions in flood risk estimation

References

• Alfieri, L., et al., 2014. Advances in pan-European flood hazard mapping. Hydrological Processes, 28 (13), 4067–4077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L. et al., 2016. Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci, 16 (6), 1401–1411. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1401-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, H., et al., 2004. Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 81 (2), 343–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, H., Merz, B., and Thieken, A.H., 2009. Influence of dike breaches on flood frequency estimation. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (5), 907–923. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, P.D., Horritt, M.S., and Fewtrell, T.J., 2010. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 387, 33–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancamaria, S. et al. 2009. Large-Scale coupled hydrologic and hydraulic modelling of the Ob river in Siberia. J. Hydrol Vol. 379(1–2), pp. 136–150. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2009.09.054
   Google Scholar
• Blazkova, S. and Beven, K. 2004. Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation of subcatchment rainfalls and discharges with the aim of improving dam safety assessment in a large basin in the Czech Republic. J. Hydrol Vol. 292(1–4), pp. 153–172. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2003.12.025
   Google Scholar
• Bradbrook, K., Waller, S., and Morris, D., 2005. National floodplain mapping: datasets and methods – 160,000 km in 12 months. Natural Hazards, 36 (1–2), 103–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-4544-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciullo, A. et al., 2019. Accounting for the uncertain effects of hydraulic interactions in optimising embankments heights: Proof of principle for the IJssel River. J. Flood Risk Manag, 12 (January), 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunge, J.A., 1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7 (2), 205–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686909500264
   Google Scholar
• Curran, A., et al., 2019. Large scale flood hazard analysis by including defence failures on the Dutch River System. Water, 11 (8), 1732. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, A. et al. 2020. Large-Scale stochastic flood hazard analysis applied to the Po River. Nat. Hazards Vol. 104 (3), pp. 2027–2049. Springer Netherlands. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04260-w
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, K.M., Diermanse, F.L.M., and Beckers, J.V.L., 2014. An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risk in the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14 (10), 2767–2781. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2767-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moel, H., et al., 2015. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20 (6), 865–890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paiva, R.C.D., et al., 2013. Large-scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling of the Amazon River basin. Water Resources Research, 49 (3), 1226–1243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.K., 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimisation method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 158 (3–4), 265–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuits, E., et al., 2019. Impact of including interdependencies between multiple riverine flood defences on the economically optimal flood safety levels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 191, 106475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2019.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, H., 1997. The flood events of 1993/1994 and 1995 in the Rhine River basin. IAHS-AISH Publication, 239, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Falter, D., et al., 2015. Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 182–193. Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falter, D., et al., 2016. Continuous, large-scale simulation model for flood risk assessments: proof-of-concept. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 9 (1), 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falter, D. et al., 2013. Hydraulic model evaluation for large-scale flood risk assessments. Hydrological Processes, 27 (9), 1331–1340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, A., et al., 2019. Modeling the role of reservoirs versus floodplains on large scale river hydrodynamics. Natural Hazards, 99 (2), 1075–1104. Springer Netherlands. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03797-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fread, D.L., 1976. Theoretical development of an implicit dynamic routing model. In: Presented at dynamic routing seminar, Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center, Slidell, LA, 13–17 December 1976. Silver Spring, MD: Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Office of Hydrology, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, NWS.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. et al., 2013. Flood mapping in ungauged basins using fully continuous hydrologic–hydraulic modeling. J. Hydrol. Elsevier, Vol. 487, pp. 39–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2013.02.023
   Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, U. and Radtke, I., 2014. Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 353–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-353-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haylock, M.R., et al., 2008. A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (20). doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegnauer, M., et al., 2014. Generator of Rainfall and Discharge Extremes (GRADE) for the Rhine and Meuse basins. Delft: Deltares, Final report of GRADE 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y., Pahlow, M., and Schumann, A., 2009. Modeling of daily precipitation at multiple locations using a mixture of distributions to characterise the extremes. Water Resources Research, 45 (12). doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICPR: Action Plan on Floods. Kurzfassung Bericht Nr. 156. Koblenz, Germany, 2005
   Google Scholar
• International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), 2013. The Rhine and its catchment: an overview 35. Available from: https://www.iksr.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente_de/Symposien_u._Workshops/IKSR_BRO_210x297_ENG_26.09.13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, B., et al., 2012. Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 3733–3752. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, B., et al., 2014. Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nature Climate Change, 4, 264–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keef, C., Svensson, C., and Tawn, J.A., 2009. Spatial dependence in extreme river flows and precipitation for Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology, 378 (3–4), 240–252. Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaus, S., et al., 2016. Large-scale, seasonal flood risk analysis for agricultural crops in Germany. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75 (18). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6096-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, L., et al., 2006. Estimation of the regional stock of residential buildings as a basis for a comparative risk assessment in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6 (4), 541–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-541-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, H., et al., 2010. Développement de FLEMOcs - un nouveau modèle pour l’estimation des dommages dus aux inondations dans le secteur commercial. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (8), 1302–1314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.529815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysanova, V., Müller-Wohlfeil, D.I., and Becker, A., 1998. Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds. Ecological Modelling, 106 (2–3), 261–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00204-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B., 2010. Schäden in der Landwirtschaft. In: A.H. Thieken, I. Seifert, and B. Merz, eds. Hochwasserschäden – Erfassung, Abschätzung und Vermeidung. Munich, Germany: Oekom, 223–234. ( in German).
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., et al., 2010. A new method to assess the risk of local and widespread flooding on rivers and coasts. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3 (4), 323–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L.B.M.T., 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. Urban Ecology, 1–23. ( Alberti 2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00028-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R., Blöschl, G., and Humer, G., 2008. National flood discharge mapping in Austria. Natural Hazards, 46 (1), 53–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9181-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., Elmer, F., and Thieken, A.H., 2009. Significance of ‘high probability/low damage’ versus ‘low probability/high damage’ flood events. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9 (3), 1033–1046. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1033-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metin, A.D., et al., 2020. The role of spatial dependence for large-scale flood risk estimation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20 (4), 967–979. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-967-2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 2006. Hydraulische Randvoorwaarden primaire waterkeringen voor de derde toetsronde 2006–2011 2011 (HR 2006), 295. 978-90-369-5761-8.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J., Schumann, G., and Bates, P., 2012. A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas. Water Resources Research, 48 (11), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., et al., 2020. Biases in national and continental flood risk assessments by ignoring spatial dependence. Scientific Reports, 10, 19387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76523-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.D., et al., 2021. Comprehensive evaluation of a large-scale multisite weather generator. International Journal of Climatology, 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österle, H., Gerstengarbe, F.W., and Werner, P., 2016. Die Elbe im globalen Wandel. H. F. W. V. H. S. K. M. V. B. H. P. Gräfe, ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbart Science Publishers. Available from: http://www.schweizerbart.de//publications/detail/isbn/9783510653065/Die_Elbe_im_globalen_Wandel_Eine_integr
   Google Scholar
• Paprotny, D., et al., 2020a. Exposure and vulnerability estimation for modelling flood losses to commercial assets in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 140011. Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paprotny, D., et al., 2020b. Estimating exposure of residential assets to natural hazards in Europe using open data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20 (1), 323–343. Copernicus GmbH. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-323-2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinter, N., et al., 2006. Flood magnification on the River Rhine. Hydrological Processes, 20 (1), 147–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, N., et al., 2019. The spatial dependence of flood hazard and risk in the United States. Water Resources Research, 55 (3), 1890–1911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlins, C.L., 1994. A view of the river by Luna B. Leopold. Western Literature Association, 29 (4), 386–386. Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.1995.0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, I., et al., 2010. Estimation of industrial and commercial asset values for hazard risk assessment. Natural Hazards, 52 (2), 453–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9389-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R.H., 1978. Development of a flood routing model for small meandering rivers. Ph.D. Diss. Missouri Roll, MO: Department of Civil Engineering University.
   Google Scholar
• Te Linde, A.H., et al., 2011. Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11 (2), 459–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-459-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieken, A.H., et al., 2008. Development and evaluation of FLEMOps - A new flood loss estimation model for the private sector. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 118, 315–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.2495/FRIAR080301
   Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, M.C.L.M., et al., 2007. Assessment of floods risk accounting for river system behaviour. International Journal of River Basin Management, 5, 93–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2007.9635309
   Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn, S., et al., 2010. A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. Water Resources Research, 46, 8541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn, S., et al., 2012. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the River Elbe, Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 436–437, 120–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn, S., et al., 2018. Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water, e1266. November. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P.J., et al., 2013. Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 044019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsemius, H.C., et al., 2013. A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (5), 1871–1892. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1871-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B., et al., 2019. A continuous modelling approach for design flood estimation on sub-daily time scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (5), Taylor & Francis, 539–554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1593419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., et al., 2016. Calibration of channel depth and friction parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model using medium-resolution SAR data and identifiability techniques. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (12), 4983–4997. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4983-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wünsch, A., et al., 2009. The role of disaggregation of asset values in flood loss estimation: a comparison of different modeling approaches at the mulde river, Germany. Environmental Management, 44 (3), 524–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9335-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyncoll, D. and Gouldby, B., 2015. Integrating a multivariate extreme value method within a system flood risk analysis model. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 8 (2), 145–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, D., et al., 2011. A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. Water Resources Research, 47 (4), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, D., et al., 2012. Adjustment of a spaceborne DEM for use in floodplain hydrodynamic modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 436–437, 81–91. Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar