A novel hybrid approach to flood susceptibility assessment based on machine learning and land use change. Case study: a river watershed in Vietnam

References

• Anguita, D., et al., 2010. Model selection for support vector machines: advantages and disadvantages of the machine learning theory. In: The 2010 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), Barcelona, Spain, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, A., et al., 2020. Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain, India. Science of the Total Environment, 750, 141565. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., et al., 2021. Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain, India. Science of the Total Environment, 750, 141565. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141565123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azareh, A., et al., 2019. Incorporating multi-criteria decision-making and fuzzy-value functions for flood susceptibility assessment. Geocarto International, 36, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Band, S.S., et al. 2020. Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 12 (21), 3568. doi:10.3390/rs12213568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D., et al. 2018. A novel integrated approach of relevance vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm for spatial modeling of shallow landslides. Remote Sensing, 10, 1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2019a. A novel hybrid approach based on a swarm intelligence optimized extreme learning machine for flash flood susceptibility mapping. Catena, 179, 184–196. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, Q.-T., 2019b. Metaheuristic algorithms in optimizing neural network: a comparative study for forest fire susceptibility mapping in Dak Nong, Vietnam. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10 (1), 136–150. doi:10.1080/19475705.2018.1509902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, Q.-T., et al., 2020. Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124379. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al., 2019a. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 864–873. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al., 2019b. Groundwater spring potential mapping using population-based evolutionary algorithms and data mining methods. Science of the Total Environment, 684, 31–49. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, V.J. and Salam, Z., 2019. Coyote optimization algorithm for the parameter extraction of photovoltaic cells. Solar Energy, 194, 656–670. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin, B., et al., 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerc, M., 2010. Particle swarm optimization. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, M.M., Ebinger, M.R., and Knowlton, F.F., 2008. Evaluating coyote management strategies using a spatially explicit, individual-based, socially structured population model. Ecological Modelling, 219 (1–2), 234–247. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al. 2020a. Flash-flood susceptibility assessment using multi-criteria decision making and machine learning supported by remote sensing and GIS techniques. Remote Sensing, 12 (1), 106. doi:10.3390/rs12010106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al. 2020b. New neural fuzzy-based machine learning ensemble for enhancing the prediction accuracy of flood susceptibility mapping. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65 (16), 2816–2837. doi:10.1080/02626667.2020.1842412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R. and Bui, D.T., 2020. Identification of areas prone to flash-flood phenomena using multiple-criteria decision-making, bivariate statistics, machine learning and their ensembles. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136492. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi, H., et al., 2019. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 569, 142–154. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawod, G.M., Mirza, M.N., and Al-ghamdi, K.A., 2012. GIS-based estimation of flood hazard impacts on road network in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67 (8), 2205–2215. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1660-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza, R. C. T., et al., 2020. Binary coyote optimization algorithm for feature selection. Pattern Recognition, 107, 107470. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, B. and Erturk, S., 2007. Hyperspectral image classification using relevance vector machines. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4 (4), 586–590. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2007.903069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, B., et al. 2019. Assessing susceptibility of debris flow in southwest China using gradient boosting machine. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48986-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A.A.Z., et al., 2020. Coyote optimization algorithm for parameters estimation of various models of solar cells and PV modules. IEEE Access, 8, 111102–111140. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodangeh, E., et al., 2020. Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Science of the Total Environment, 705, 135983. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, D. and Herath, S., 2004. Trend of floods in Asia and flood risk management with integrated river basin approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of Asia-Pacific hydrology and water resources Association, Suntec City, Singapore, 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• El-haddad, B.A., et al. 2021. Flood susceptibility prediction using four machine learning techniques and comparison of their performance at Wadi Qena Basin, Egypt. Natural Hazards, 105 (1), 83–114. doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04296-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falah, F., et al., 2019. Artificial neural networks for flood susceptibility mapping in data-scarce urban areas. In: Spatial modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Elsevier, 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh, B., et al. 2017. Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10 (5), 1–13. doi:10.1007/s12517-017-2918-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenicia, F., et al., 2008. Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement. Water Resources Research, 44 (1). doi:10.1029/2006WR005563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, R., Romão, X., and Paupério, E., 2020. Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: framework and application to mainland Portugal. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 43, 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesch-huidobro, M., et al., 2017. Governance challenges of flood-prone delta cities: integrating flood risk management and climate change in spatial planning. Progress in Planning, 114, 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E., 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55 (1), 119–139. doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29 (5), 1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayathri, B. and Sumathi, C., 2016. Comparative study of relevance vector machine with various machine learning techniques used for detecting breast cancer. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), United States, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Handayani, W., et al. 2020. Urbanization and increasing flood risk in the Northern Coast of Central Java—Indonesia: an assessment towards better land use policy and flood management. Land, 9 (10), 343. doi:10.3390/land9100343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddam, S., Ptak, M., and Zhu, S., 2020. Modelling of daily lake surface water temperature from air temperature: Extremely Randomized Trees (ERT) versus Air2Water, Mars, M5Tree, RF and MLPNN. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125130. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H. et al., 2018. Applying genetic algorithms to set the optimal combination of forest fire related variables and model forest fire susceptibility based on data mining models. The case of Dayu County, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 630, 1044–1056. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, F.S., et al., 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 135161. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, X.-P., Park, S.-M., and Kim, Y.-G., 2016. Detection of driver drowsiness using 3D deep neural network and semi-supervised gradient boosting machine. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, 134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, X.K., et al. 2020. Hydrodynamic modeling for flood hazard assessment in a data scarce region: a case study of Bharathapuzha River Basin. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 25 (1), 97–114. doi:10.1007/s10666-019-09664-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janizadeh, S., et al. 2019. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh watershed, Iran. Sustainability, 11 (19), 5426. doi:10.3390/su11195426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhong, B.-C., et al. 2020. A generalized framework for assessing flood risk and suitable strategies under various vulnerability and adaptation scenarios: a case study for residents of Kyoto city in Japan. Water, 12 (9), 2508. doi:10.3390/w12092508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, V., et al., 2018. Free space, visible and missing lane marker estimation using the PsiNet and extra trees regression. In: 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijing, China, 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kadavi, P.R., LEE, C.-W., and LEE, S., 2018. Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sensing, 10 (8), 1252. doi:10.3390/rs10081252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantari, Z., et al., 2014. A method for mapping flood hazard along roads. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, 69–77. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, K., et al., 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311–323. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntla, S.K., Sree, M., and Viswanadham, M., 2019. Sentinel-1 SAR data preparation for extraction of flood footprints- a case study. Disaster Advances, 12, 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K., et al. 2012. Flood loss analysis and quantitative risk assessment in China. Natural Hazards, 63 (2), 737–760. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0180-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-W. and Zhou, D.-L., 2012. Review of AdaBoost and its improvement. Jisuanji Xitong Yingyong- Computer Systems and Applications, 21 (5), 240–244.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., 2014. Random forest algorithm in big data environment. Computer Modelling & New Technologies, 18 (12A), 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• Luu, C., et al., 2015. A proposed flood risk assessment method for Central Vietnam. In: 5th International Conference on Building Resilience, Newcastle City Hall, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Luu, C., et al., 2021. GIS-based ensemble computational models for flood susceptibility prediction in the Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 599, 126500. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, C. and Von Meding, J., 2018. A flood risk assessment of Quang Nam, Vietnam using spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Water, 10 (4), 461. doi:10.3390/w10040461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekinezhad, H., et al., 2021. Application of entropy weighting method for urban flood hazard mapping. Acta Geophysica, 69, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick, J., et al. 2021. Risk assessment of resources exposed to rainfall induced landslide with the development of GIS and RS based ensemble metaheuristic machine learning algorithms. Sustainability, 13 (2), 457. doi:10.3390/su13020457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, M., et al. 2009. Damage and casualties modelling as part of a vulnerability assessment for tsunami hazards: a case study from Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2 (2), 120–131. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, M. and Hori, J., 2014. Classification of silent speech using support vector machine and relevance vector machine. Applied Soft Computing, 20, 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, M., et al. 2020. Optimizing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using four state-of-the-art metaheuristic techniques. Sensors, 20 (6), 1723. doi:10.3390/s20061723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metin, A.D., et al. 2020. The role of spatial dependence for large-scale flood risk estimation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20 (4), 967–979. doi:10.5194/nhess-20-967-2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mianji, F.A. and Zhang, Y., 2011. Robust hyperspectral classification using relevance vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49 (6), 2100–2112. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2103381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mind’je, R., et al., 2019. Flood susceptibility modeling and hazard perception in Rwanda. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38, 101211. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming, X., et al. 2020. Real‐time flood forecasting based on a high‐performance 2‐D hydrodynamic model and numerical weather predictions. Water Resources Research, 56. doi:10.1029/2019WR025583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., and Lewis, A., 2014. Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi, H., et al. 2019. Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10 (1), 1879–1911. doi:10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D., Grayson, R., and Ladson, A., 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 3–30. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., et al., 2020. Ensemble models of GLM, FDA, Mars, and RF for flood and erosion susceptibility mapping: a priority assessment of sub-basins. Geocarto International, 1–20. doi:10.1080/10106049.2020.1829101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachappa, T.G., et al., 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125275. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi, S.A., Ahmadi, K., and Daneshi, A., 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resources Management, 31 (9), 2761–2775. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1660-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.-D., et al. 2020a. An optimal search for neural network parameters using the Salp swarm optimization algorithm: a landslide application. Remote Sensing Letters, 11 (4), 353–362. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2020.1716409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P.T., et al. 2020b. Groundwater potential mapping combining artificial neural network and real AdaBoost ensemble technique: the DakNong province case-study, Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (7), 2473. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.D., et al. 2020c. Biases in national and continental flood risk assessments by ignoring spatial dependence. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76523-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.D., et al. 2021a. Predicting future urban flood risk using land change and hydraulic modeling in a river watershed in the central Province of Vietnam. Remote Sensing, 13 (2), 262. doi:10.3390/rs13020262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.G., et al., 2021b. Salinity intrusion prediction using remote sensing and machine learning in data-limited regions: a case study in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta. Geoderma Regional, 27, e00424. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., Ardillier-carras, F., and Touchart, L., 2018. Les paysages de rizières et leur évolution récente dans le delta du fleuve Gianh. Cybergeo. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.29826
   Google Scholar
• Nirupama, N. and Simonovic, S.P., 2007. Increase of flood risk due to urbanisation: a Canadian example. Natural Hazards, 40 (1), 25. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, E.C. and Thorne, C.R., 2020. Drivers of future urban flood risk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378 (2168), 20190216. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinsky, A., Kennedy, K., and Brayton Kennedy, B., 2014. Assessing gradient boosting in the reduction of misclassification error in the prediction of success for actuarial majors. Case Studies In Business, Industry And Government Statistics, 5 (1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Petrişor, A.-I., et al. 2020. Degradation of coastlines under the pressure of urbanization and tourism: evidence on the change of land systems from Europe, Asia and Africa. Land, 9 (8), 275. doi:10.3390/land9080275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrişor, A.-I., Ianoş, I., and Tălângă, C., 2010. Land cover and use changes focused on the urbanization processes in Romania. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 9 (6), 765–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2019. Hybrid computational intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping. Catena, 182, 104101. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2020a. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 592, 125815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al. 2020b. A comparative study of Kernel logistic regression, radial basis function classifier, multinomial Naïve Bayes, and logistic model tree for flash flood susceptibility mapping. Water, 12 (1), 239. doi:10.3390/w12010239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2021. Can deep learning algorithms outperform benchmark machine learning algorithms in flood susceptibility modeling? Journal of Hydrology, 592, 125615. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierezan, J. and Coelho, L.D.S., 2018. Coyote optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic for global optimization problems. In: 2018 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B. and Youssef, D.A., 2011. A 100‐year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4, 189–202. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01103.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psomiadis, E., et al. 2021. Potential dam breach analysis and flood wave risk assessment using HEC-RAS and remote sensing data: a multicriteria approach. Water, 13 (3), 364. doi:10.3390/w13030364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi-termeh, S.V., et al. 2020. Improving groundwater potential mapping using metaheuristic approaches. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65 (16), 2729–2749. doi:10.1080/02626667.2020.1828589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robi, M.A., Abebe, A., and Pingale, S.M., 2019. Flood hazard mapping under a climate change scenario in a Ribb catchment of Blue Nile River basin, Ethiopia. Applied Geomatics, 11 (2), 147–160. doi:10.1007/s12518-018-0249-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajedi Hosseini, F., et al., 2021. Towards a flood vulnerability assessment of watershed using integration of decision making trial and evaluation laboratory, analytical network process, and fuzzy theories. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 62487–62498. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11319-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, N., et al. 2011. Flood susceptibility assessment in a highly urbanized alluvial fan: the case study of Sala Consilina (Southern Italy). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11 (10), 2765–2780. doi:10.5194/nhess-11-2765-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, P.P., Tavares, A., and Andrade, A., 2011. Comparing historical-hydrogeomorphological reconstitution and hydrological-hydraulic modelling in the estimation of flood-prone areas–a case study in Central Portugal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11 (6), 1669–1681. doi:10.5194/nhess-11-1669-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, N., et al. 2012. Air quality modelling using the Met Office Unified Model (AQUM OS24-26): model description and initial evaluation. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 3131–3182.
   Google Scholar
• Sayed, G.I., Khoriba, G., and Haggag, M.H., 2020. The novel multi-swarm coyote optimization algorithm for automatic skin lesion segmentation. Evolutionary Intelligence, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann, G., et al. 2008. Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 63 (3), 283–296. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi, H., et al. 2020. Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using sentinel-1 remote sensing data and a machine learning approach: hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on k-nearest neighbor classifier. Remote Sensing, 12 (2), 266. doi:10.3390/rs12020266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, Z., et al. 2018. Assessment of business interruption of flood-affected companies using random forests. Water, 10 (8), 1049. doi:10.3390/w10081049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S. and Lal, S., 2020. A metaheuristic framework based automated Spatial-Spectral graph for land cover classification from multispectral and hyperspectral satellite images. Infrared Physics & Technology, 105, 103172. doi:10.1016/j.infrared.2019.103172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., et al., 2020a. Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naïve Bayes method: a comparison between different factor discretization methods. Catena, 190, 104536. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., et al., 2020b. A novel optimized repeatedly random undersampling for selecting negative samples: a case study in an SVM-based forest fire susceptibility assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111014. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S. and Kumar, L., 2018. The application of a Dempster–Shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77 (13), 490. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7667-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S., Pradhan, B., and Jebur, M.N., 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. and Fong, S., 2016. Survey of meta-heuristic algorithms for deep learning training. In: O. Baskan, ed. Optimization Algorithms—methods and Applications. London, England: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui, D., et al., 2016. Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 317–330. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipping, M.E., 2000. The relevance vector machine. In: S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, and K.-R. M¨uller eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 652–658.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V., 2013. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtek, M., et al. 2021. Comparison of multi-criteria-analytical hierarchy process and machine learning-boosted tree models for regional flood susceptibility mapping: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12 (1), 1153–1180. doi:10.1080/19475705.2021.1912835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojtek, M. and Vojteková, J., 2018. Flood maps and their potential role in local spatial planning: a case study from Slovakia. Water Policy, 20 (5), 1042–1058. doi:10.2166/wp.2018.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghwala, R.K. and Agnihotri, P., 2019. Flood risk assessment and resilience strategies for flood risk management: a case study of Surat City. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40, 101155. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, B., et al., 2015. PETs: a stable and accurate redictor of protein-protein interacting sites based on xtremely-randomized ree. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 14, 1-1. doi:10.1109/TNB.2015.2491303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, D.N., Warner, T.T., and Leavesley, G.H., 2000. Prediction of a flash flood in complex terrain. Part II: a comparison of flood discharge simulations using rainfall input from radar, a dynamic model, and an automated algorithmic system. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39 (6), 815–825. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0815:POAFFI>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., et al., 2020. Developed coyote optimization algorithm and its application to optimal parameters estimation of PEMFC model. Energy Reports, 6, 1106–1117. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaninetti, J.-M., Ngo, A.-T., and Grivel, S., 2015. La construction sociale de la vulnérabilité face au risque d’inondation au Viêt Nam. Mappemonde, 114, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., et al. 2020. Assessment of flood inundation by coupled 1D/2D hydrodynamic modeling: a case study in mountainous watersheds along the coast of Southeast China. Water, 12 (3), 822. doi:10.3390/w12030822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar