Assessing machine learning models for streamflow estimation: a case study in Oued Sebaou watershed (Northern Algeria)

References

• Abda, Z. and Chettih, M., 2018. Forecasting daily flow rate-based intelligent hybrid models combining wavelet and Hilbert–Huang transforms in the Mediterranean basin in northern Algeria. Acta Geophysica, 66 (5), 1131–1150. doi:10.1007/s11600-018-0188-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abda, Z., et al., 2019. Efficiency of a Neuro-Fuzzy model based on the Hilbert-Huang transform for flood prediction. In: H.I. Chaminé, ed. Advances in sustainable and environmental hydrology, hydrogeology, hydrochemistry and water resources. advances in science. Cham: Technology & Innovation, Springer, 401–404 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01572-5_94
   Google Scholar
• Abda, Z., Chettih, M., and Zerouali, B., 2021a. Assessment of neuro-fuzzy approach based different wavelet families for daily flow rates forecasting. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7, 1523–1538. doi:10.1007/s40808-020-00855-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abda, Z., et al., 2021b. Suspended sediment load simulation during flood events using intelligent systems: a case study on semiarid regions of Mediterranean basin. Water, 13 (24), 3539. doi:10.3390/w13243539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid, S., Mouelhi, A., and Fnaiech, F., 2006. Accelerating the multilayer perceptron learning with the Davidon Fletcher Powell algorithm. In: The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3389–3394. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2006.247340
   Google Scholar
• Adamowski, J. and Karapataki, C., 2010. Comparison of multivariate regression and artificial neural networks for peak urban water-demand forecasting: evaluation of different ANN learning algorithms. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (10), 729–743. d oi:1 0.1061/ %28ASCE% 29HE.1943-5584.000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, R.M., et al., 2020. Short term rainfall-runoff modelling using several machine learning methods and a conceptual event-based model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35, 597–616. doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01910-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, R.M., et al., 2021a. Novel ensemble forecasting of streamflow using locally weighted learning algorithm. Sustainability, 13, 5877. doi:10.3390/su13115877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, R.M., et al., 2021b. Comparison of different methodologies for rainfall-runoff modeling: machine learning vs conceptual approach. Natural Hazards, 105, 2987–3011. doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04438-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadianfar, I., Jamei, M., and Chu, X., 2020. A novel hybrid wavelet-locally weighted linear regression (W-LWLR) model for electrical conductivity (EC) prediction in surface water. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 232, 103641. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S. and Shahbaz, M., 2020. Streamflow forecasting by modeling the rainfall–streamflow relationship using artificial neural networks. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 6 (3), 1645–1656. doi:10.1007/s40808-020-00780-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajirao, T.S., et al., 2021. Superiority of hybrid soft computing models in daily suspended sediment estimation in highly dynamic rivers. Sustainability, 13 (2), 542. doi:10.3390/su13020542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekas, G.K., Alexakis, D.E., and Gamvroula, D.E., 2021. Forecasting discharge rate and chloride content of karstic spring water by applying the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80 (11), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s12665-021-09685-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouguerra, H., et al., 2019. Suspended sediment discharge modeling during flood events using two different artificial neural network algorithms. Acta Geophysica, 67 (6), 1649–1660. doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00373-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustami, R.A., Bessaih, N., and Muhammad, M.S., 2006. Artificial neural network for daily water level estimation. Engineering e-Transaction, 1 (1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chaipimonplin, T., 2016. Investigation internal parameters of neural network model for flood forecasting at upper river ping, Chiang Mai. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (1), 478–484. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-1282-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaipimonplin, T., 2017. Comparison learning algorithms for artificial neural network model for flood forecasting, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2017), 472–479.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.K., et al., 2017. Choice of rainfall inputs for event-based rainfall-runoff modeling in a catchment with multiple rainfall stations using data-driven techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 545, 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, S. and Chattopadhyay, G., 2018. Conjugate gradient descent learned ANN for Indian summer monsoon rainfall and efficiency assessment through Shannon-Fano coding. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 179, 202–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M.P., et al., 2021. The abuse of popular performance metrics in hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 57. doi:10.1029/2020wr029001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D.T., et al., 1993. Retrieval of snow parameters by iterative inversion of a neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31 (4), 842–852. doi:10.1109/36.239907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Farias, C.A.S. and Santos, C.A.G., 2014. The use of Kohonen neural networks for runoff–erosion modeling. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14 (7), 1242–1250. doi:10.1007/s11368-013-0841-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djemai, M., 2008. Bilan physico-chimique des eaux de la vallée de l’ouest Sébaou et son environnement immédiat: impact de l’urbanisation, l’agriculture et l’industrie sur la qualité des eaux en Grande Kabylie. Thèse de doctorat Géologie Appliquée, Université Mouloud Maameri de Tizi Ouzo.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi, A., et al., 2021a. Applications of Gaussian process regression for predicting blue water footprint: case study in Ad Daqahliyah, Egypt. Agricultural Water Management, 255, 107052. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi, A., et al., 2021b. Prediction of combined terrestrial evapotranspiration index (CTEI) over large river basin based on machine learning approaches. Water, 13 (4), 547. doi:10.3390/w13040547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanos, A.M. and Pradhan, B., 2019. A spatial ensemble model for rockfall source identification from high resolution LiDAR data and GIS. IEEE Access, 7, 74570–74585. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R.G., et al., 2021. Machine learning models for streamflow regionalization in a tropical watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111713. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P.K.M.M., Santos, C.A.G., and Da Silva, G.B.L., 2019. Analysis of the use of discrete wavelet transforms coupled with ANN for short-term streamflow forecasting. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 80, 494–505. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P.K.M.M. and Santos, C.A.G., 2020. Optimal level of wavelet decomposition for daily inflow forecasting. Earth Science Informatics, 13, 1163–1173. doi:10.1007/s12145-020-00496-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayathri, K.D., Ganasri, B.P., and Dwarakish, G.S., 2015. A review on hydrological models. Aquatic Procedia, 4 (Icwrcoe), 1001–1007. doi:10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.126
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, H., et al., 2019. Predicting liquid flow-rate performance through wellhead chokes with genetic and solver optimizers: an oil field case study. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 9 (2), 1355–1373. doi:10.1007/s13202-018-0532-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, S.M., Paz, J.O., and Tagert, M.L.M., 2017. The use of NARX neural networks to forecast daily groundwater levels. Water Resources Management, 31 (5), 1591–1603. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1598-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J.H., 2017. The elements of statistical learning (Second). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hauduc, H., et al., 2015. Efficiency criteria for environmental model quality assessment: a review and its application to wastewater treatment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68, 196–204. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honorato, A.G.D.S.M., Silva, G.B.L.D., and Guimaraes Santos, C.A., 2019. Monthly streamflow forecasting using neuro-wavelet techniques and input analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63, 1–16. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1552788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., et al., 2018. Deep learning with a long short-term memory networks approach for rainfall-runoff simulation. Water, 10 (11), 1543. doi:10.3390/w10111543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z.Y., et al., 2020. Predicting the morbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on multiple locally weighted linear regression model with K-means clustering. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139, 104141. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, D. and Khan, A.A., 2020. Machine learning techniques for monthly river flow forecasting of Hunza River, Pakistan. Earth Science Informatics, 13 (3), 939–949. doi:10.1007/s12145-020-00450-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamei, M., et al., 2021. Estimation of triangular side orifice discharge coefficient under a free flow condition using data-driven models. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 77, 101878. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerin, J.N., et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal trends in reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in Bangladesh. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 144, 793–808. doi:10.1007/s00704-021-03566-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani, M.H., et al., 2016. Integration of Volterra model with artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff simulation in forested catchment of northern Iran. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 340–354. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., Latifoğlu, L., and Latifoğlu, F., 2014. Investigation of empirical mode decomposition in forecasting of hydrological time series. Water Resources Management, 28 (12), 4045–4057. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0726-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O. and Ozkan, C., 2017. A new approach for modeling sediment-discharge relationship: local weighted linear regression. Water Resources Management, 31 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1481-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kişi, Ö., 2007. Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12 (5), 532–539. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., et al., 2021. The superiority of data-driven techniques for estimation of daily pan evaporation. Atmosphere, 12, 701. doi:10.3390/atmos12060701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Sha, J., and Wang, Z.L., 2019. Comparison of daily streamflow forecasts using extreme learning machines and the random forest method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (15), 1857–1866. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1680846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., et al., 2020. Estimating annual runoff in response to forest change: a statistical method based on random forest. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125168. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Q., et al., 2020. Prediction of maximum flood inundation extents with resilient backpropagation neural network: case study of Kulmbach. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 332. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks, D.P. and Beek, E. 2017. Water resource systems planning and management. Water Resource Systems Planning and Management. eBook: Deltares and UNESCO-IHE. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44234-7
   Google Scholar
• Meshram, S.G., et al., 2021. Stream flow prediction based on artificial intelligence techniques. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Civil Engineering, 45, 2021. doi:10.1007/s40996-021-00696-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K.W., 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water, 10 (11), 1–40. doi:10.3390/w10111536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., et al., 2020. Susceptibility mapping of soil water erosion using machine learning models. Water, 12 (7), 1995. doi:10.3390/w12071995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, P., et al., 2018. Flash-flood forecasting in an andean mountain catchment-development of a step-wise methodology based on the random forest algorithm. Water, 10 (11), 1519. doi:10.3390/w10111519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacar, S., Hinis, M.A., and Kankal, M., 2018. Forecasting daily streamflow discharges using various neural network models and training algorithms. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22 (9), 3676–3685. doi:10.1007/s12205-017-1933-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi, S.A., Ahmadi, K., and Daneshi, A., 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resources Management, 31 (9), 2761–2775. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1660-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, S.P. and Hashemi, M.R., 2018. Ocean modelling for resource characterization. Fundamentals of Ocean Renewable Energy, 193–235. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-810448-4.00008-2
   Google Scholar
• Nettleton, D., 2014. Selection of variables and factor derivation. Commercial Data Mining, 79–104. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-416602-8.00006-6
   Google Scholar
• Papacharalampous, G.A. and Tyralis, H., 2018. Evaluation of random forests and Prophet for daily streamflow forecasting. Advances in Geosciences, 45, 201–208. doi:10.5194/adgeo-45-201-2018
   Google Scholar
• Peng, F., et al., 2020. Monthly streamflow prediction based on random forest algorithm and phase space reconstruction theory. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1637 1, 012091. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1637/1/012091
   Google Scholar
• Perera, A. and Rathnayake, U., 2019. Rainfall and atmospheric temperature against the other climatic factors: a case study from Colombo, Sri Lanka. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1–15. doi:10.1155/2019/5692753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L.T., Luo, L., and Finley, A., 2021. Evaluation of random forests for short-term daily streamflow forecasting in rainfall-and snowmelt-driven watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25 (6), 2997–3015. doi:10.5194/hess-25-2997-2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, A.P. and Napiorkowski, J.J., 2011. Optimizing neural networks for river flow forecasting–evolutionary computation methods versus the Levenberg–Marquardt approach. Journal of Hydrology, 407 (1–4), 12–27. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonia, V. and Tiwari, H.L., 2020. Rainfall-runoff modeling for the Hoshangabad Basin of Narmada River using artificial neural network. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13 (18), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s12517-020-05930-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeian-Zadeh, M., Tabari, H., and Abghari, H., 2013. Prediction of monthly discharge volume by different artificial neural network algorithms in semi-arid regions. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6 (7), 2529–2537. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0517-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaie-Balf, M., et al., 2019. Enhancing streamflow forecasting using the augmenting ensemble procedure coupled machine learning models: case study of Aswan High Dam. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (13), 1629–1646. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1661417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, S., et al., 2004. Rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40 (7–8), 839–846. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.012
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., and Guns, R., 2018. Becoming metric-wise: a bibliometric guide for researchers. Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sameen, M.I., Pradhan, B., and Lee, S., 2019. Self-learning random forests model for mapping groundwater yield in data-scarce areas. Natural Resources Research, 28 (3), 757–775. doi:10.1007/s11053-018-9416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C.A.G., et al., 2003. Application of an optimization technique to a physically based erosion model. Hydrological Processes, 17 (5), 989–1003. doi:10.1002/hyp.1176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C.A.G. and Silva, G.B.L., 2014. Daily streamflow forecasting using a wavelet transform and artificial neural network hybrid models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59, 312–324. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.800944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C.A.G., et al., 2019. Hybrid wavelet neural network approach for daily inflow forecasting using tropical rainfall measuring mission data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24, 04018062. doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraiva, S.V., et al., 2021. Daily streamflow forecasting in Sobradinho Reservoir using machine learning models coupled with wavelet transform and bootstrapping. Applied Soft Computing, 102, 107081. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoppa, L., Disse, M., and Bachmair, S., 2020. Evaluating the performance of random forest for large-scale flood discharge simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125531. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev-Shwartz, S. and Ben-David, S., 2014. Understanding machine learning: from theory to algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 9781107057. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107298019
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., et al., 2022. Random forests based error correction of streamflow from a large-scale hydrological model: using model state variables to estimate error terms. Computers and Geosciences, 159, 105019. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoaib, M., Shamseldin, A.Y., and Melville, B.W., 2014. Comparative study of different wavelet based neural network models for rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 515, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solgi, A., et al., 2014. Evaluation of artificial intelligence systems performance in precipitation forecasting. TI Journals Agriculture Science Developments, 3 (7), 256–264.
   Google Scholar
• Talaee, P.H., 2014. Multilayer perceptron with different training algorithms for streamflow forecasting. Neural Computing and Applications, 24 (3), 695–703. doi:10.1007/s00521-012-1287-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Booij, M.J., 2018. Simulation and forecasting of streamflows using machine learning models coupled with base flow separation. Journal of Hydrology, 564, 266–282. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyralis, H., Papacharalampous, G., and Langousis, A., 2019. A brief review of random forests for water scientists and practitioners and their recent history in water resources. Water, 11, 910. doi:10.3390/w11050910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisesty, U.N., 2017. Comparative study of conjugate gradient to optimize learning process of neural network for Intrusion Detection System (IDS). In 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), Bandung, Indonesia, 459–464.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L., Chau, K.W., and Fan, C., 2010. Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data-preprocessing techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 389 (1–2), 146–167. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P.S., et al., 2017. Comparison of random forests and support vector machine for real-time radar-derived rainfall forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhrouf, M., Chettih, M., and Mesbah, M., 2014. Adaptive neural fuzzy inference systems for the daily flow forecast in Algerian coastal basins. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52 (10–12), 2131–2138. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.873740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerouali, B., et al., 2018. Contribution of cross time-frequency analysis in assessment of possible relationships between large-scale climatic fluctuations and rainfall of northern central Algeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11 (14), 392. doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3728-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerouali, B., et al., 2020. The use of hybrid methods for change points and trends detection in rainfall series of northern Algeria. Acta Geophysica, 68, 1443–1460. doi:10.1007/s11600-020-00466-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerouali, B., et al., 2021a. Spatiotemporal meteorological drought assessment in a humid Mediterranean region: case study of the Oued Sebaou basin (northern central Algeria). Natural Hazards, 108 (1), 689–709. doi:10.1007/s11069-021-04701-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerouali, B., et al., 2021b. Evaluation of karst spring discharge response using time-scale-based methods for a Mediterranean Basin of Northern Algeria. Water, 13 (21), 2946. doi:10.3390/w13212946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerouali, B., et al., 2022. A new regionalization of rainfall patterns based on wavelet transform information and hierarchical cluster analysis in northeastern Algeria. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 147, 1489–1510. doi:10.1007/s00704-021-03883-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar