Drainage network characterization based on confluence organization and tortuosity

References

• Abrahams, A.D., 1984. Channels networks: a geomorphological perspective. Water Resources Research, 20 (2), 161–168. doi:10.1029/WR020i002p00161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Ain, W., et al., 2013. Skeletonization algorithm for binary images. Procedia Technology, 11, 704–709. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.248
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A.N., McBratney, A.B., and FitzPatrick, E.A., 1996. Soil mass, surface, and spectral dimensions estimates from thin section photograph. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60 (4), 962–969. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040002x
   Google Scholar
• Arge, L., et al. 2003. Efficient flow computation on massive grid terrain datasets. Geoinformatica, 7 (4), 283–313. doi:10.1023/A:1025526421410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astras, T. and Soulankellis, N. 1992. Contribution of digital image analysis techniques on Landsat-5 TM imageries for drainage delineation. A case study from the Olympus Mountain, west Macedonia, Greece. In: Proceedings 18th Annual Conference of Remote Sensing Society, Dundee, Scotland, University of Dundee, 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Balister, P., et al. 2018. River landscapes and optimal channel networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (26), 6548–6553. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804484115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behera, M.D., et al. 2012. Modelling and analyzing the watershed dynamics using Cellular Automata (CA) -Markov model - A geo-information based approach. Journal of Earth System Science, 121 (4), 1011–1024. doi:10.1007/s12040-012-0207-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl, P.J. and Jain, R.C., 1986. Invariant surface characteristics for 3-D object recognition in range images. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 33 (1), 33–80. doi:10.1016/0734-189X(86)90220-3
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, R., 2008. Fundamentals of fluvial geomorphology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chorowicz, J., et al. 1992. A combined algorithm for automated drainage network extraction. Water Resources Research, 28 (5), 1293–1302. doi:10.1029/91WR03098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, E., et al. 2007. Cellular automata algorithms for drainage network extraction and rainfall data assimilation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (3), 579–592. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.3.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyphers, A., et al., 2013. Retos y riesgos en la vida olmeca. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Deimel, L.E., et al., 1982. Techniques for computerized lake and river fills in digital terrain models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 48 (9), 1431–1436.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, K., 2003. Mathematical foundations and applications. England: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Feder, J., 1988. The fractal dimension. In: Fractals. Physics of solids and liquids. New York: Springer, 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, J. and Xie, J., 2009. Extraction of drainage networks from large terrain datasets using high throughput computing. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (2), 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyr, A., 2010. The meander paradox-a topological view. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 63 (2), 020801. doi:10.1115/1.4000725
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, R.F. and Schumm, S.A. 1961. Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin. Washington DC, Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, 1531-B, 198.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56 (3), 275–370. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A.D., 1967. Drainage analysis in geologic interpretation: a summation. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, 51, 2246–2259.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, H.E., 1951. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 116 (1), 770–799. doi:10.1061/TACEAT.0006518
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) 2010. Data from: vectorial drainage network (Hydrographic data), scale 1: 50,000, second edition [dataset] Avalable from: http://antares.inegi.org.mx/analisis/red_hidro/SIATL/ [ Accessed 18 july 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, S.K., 1991. Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 31–44. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050104
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O., 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54 (11), 1593–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J.M., Chen, S., and Crownover, R.M., 1989. Texture description and segmentation through fractal geometry. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 45 (2), 150–166. doi:10.1016/0734-189X(89)90130-8
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, N., 1922. Eine Karte der Reliefenergie Süddeutschlands. Petermanns Geographical Mitteilungen, 68, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• La Barbera, P. and Rosso, R., 1987. The fractal geometry of river networks. Water Resources Research, 24 (8), 1317–1322.
   Google Scholar
• La Barbera, P. and Rosso, R., 1989. On the fractal dimension of stream networks. Water Resources Research, 25 (4), 735–741. doi:10.1029/WR025i004p00735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L.B. and Miller, J.P. (1956). Ephimeral streams: hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage net. (Report) Washington D.C, U.S. Government Printing Office, Professional Paper, 282–A.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B.B., 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, M. 1957. An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology. Technical Report 11, Project NR 389-042, New York, Department of Geology, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Morisawa, M.E. 1959. Relation of quantitative geomorphology to stream flow in representative watersheds of the appalachian plateau province. Technical Report 20, Project NR 389-042, New York, Department of Geology, ONR, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, L., 1990. k × k Thinning. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 51 (2), 195–215. doi:10.1016/0734-189X(90)90030-Y
   Google Scholar
• Padilla Y Sánchez, R.J., 2007. Evolución geológica del sureste de mexicano desde el Mesozoico al presente en el contexto regional del Golfo de México. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 59 (1), 19–42. doi:10.18268/BSGM2007v59n1a3
   Google Scholar
• Parrot, J.-F., 2012. Aplicación del software FROG_V2 en el estudio fractal del espacio geográfico. In: J. A. Quintero-Pérez, ed. Temas Selectos de Geomática: métodos y Aplicaciones. Mexico: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, 151–181.
   Google Scholar
• Parrot, J.-F. and Ramírez-Núñez, C., 2016. LiDAR DTM: artifacts, and correction for river altitudes. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, 90, 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, F.G. and Sahota, T.S., 1985. Surface curvature as a measure of image texture. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-7 (6), 734–738. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1985.4767733
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, S., et al. 1984. Multiple resolution texture analysis and classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6 (4), 518–523. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, A.P., 1984. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6 (6), 661–674. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, R.J. and Wilson, S.E., 1971. Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82 (4), 1079–1084. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82[1079:ERHIAG]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Núñez, C., et al. 2019. Multidirectional interpolation of lidar data from southern Veracruz, Mexico: implications for early Olmec subsistence. Ancient Mesoamerica, 30 (3), 385–398. doi:10.1017/S0956536118000263
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A., et al. 1992. Minimum energy and fractal structures of drainage networks. Water Resources Research, 28 (9), 2183–2195. doi:10.1029/92WR00801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A., et al. 1993. Self-organized fractal river networks. Physical Review Letters, 70 (6), 822. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rinaldo, A., et al. 2014. Evolution and selection of river networks: statics, dynamics, and complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (7), 2417–2424. doi:10.1073/pnas.1322700111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saha, P.K. and Borgefors, G., 2016. Skeletonization and its application. Pattern Recognition Letters, 76 (1), 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2016.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Saha, P.K., Borgefors, G., and Sanniti Di Baja, G., 2016. A survey on skeletonization algorithms and their applications. Pattern Recognition Letters, 76 (1), 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2015.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., 1956. The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67 (5), 597–646. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., 1963. Sinuosity of alluvial rivers in the great plains. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74 (9), 1089–1100. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[1089:SOAROT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servicio Geológico Mexicano (SGM), 2004. Carta geológico-minera Coatzacoalcos, E15-1-4. Veracruz: Oaxaca y Tabasco. México.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.G., 1950. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. American Journal of Science, 248 (9), 655–668. doi:10.2475/ajs.248.9.655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A.N., 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63 (11), 1117–1142. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 38 (6), 913–920. doi:10.1029/TR038i006p00913
   Google Scholar
• Strahler, A.N., 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: V.T., Chow, ed. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 4–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., et al. 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 81–100. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twidale, C.R., 2004. River patterns and their meaning. Earth-Science Reviews, 67 (3–4), 159–218. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, R.F., 1985. Random fractal forgeries. In: R.A. Earnshaw, ed. Fundamental algorithms for computer graphics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 802–835.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C., 2000. Terrain analysis: principles and applications. New York: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., et al., 2015. A robust channel network extraction combining discrete curve evolution and skeleton construction technique. Advances in Water Resources, 83, 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar