Identifying potential systemic changes in a regulated river: a diagnostic methodology based on whiteness property of innovation sequences

References

• Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J.R.L., 1974. Reaction, relaxation and lag in natural sedimentary systems: general principles, examples and lessons. Earth-Science Reviews, 10 (4), 263–342. doi:10.1016/0012-8252(74)90109-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrigoni, A.S., Greenwood, M.C., and Moore, J.N., 2010. Relative impact of anthropogenic modifications versus climate change on the natural flow regimes of rivers in the Northern Rocky Mountains, United States. Water Resources Research, 46 (12). doi:10.1029/2010WR009162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellman, R., 1966. Dynamic programming. Science, 153 (3731), 34–37. doi:10.1126/science.153.3731.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N.D., et al., 2013. Characterising performance of environmental models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 40, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brierley, G.J. and Fryirs, K.A., 2013. Geomorphology and river management: applications of the river styles framework. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Buechel, M., Slater, L., and Dadson, S., 2022. Hydrological impact of widespread afforestation in Great Britain using a large ensemble of modelled scenarios. Communications Earth & Environment, 3 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00334-0
   Google Scholar
• Butts, M.B., et al., 2004. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 298 (1–4), 242–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciria, T.P., Labat, D., and Chiogna, G., 2019. Detection and interpretation of recent and historical streamflow alterations caused by river damming and hydropower production in the Adige and Inn River basins using continuous, discrete and multiresolution wavelet analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 578, 124021. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunge, J.A., 1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7 (2), 205–230. doi:10.1080/00221686909500264
   Google Scholar
• Feng, P., Wu, J., and Li, J., 2019. Changes in flood characteristics and the flood driving mechanism in the mountainous Haihe River Basin, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (16), 1997–2005. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1619931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K.A., 2017. River sensitivity: a lost foundation concept in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42 (1), 55–70. doi:10.1002/esp.3940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakos, A.P., Georgakakos, K.P., and Baltas, E.A., 1990. A state‐space model for hydrologic river routing. Water Resources Research, 26 (5), 827–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, W.L., 1977. The rate law in fluvial geomorphology. American Journal of Science, 277 (2), 178–191. doi:10.2475/ajs.277.2.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, W.L., 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology, 79 (3–4), 336–360. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, F., 2000. Adaptive filtering and change detection. Vol. 1, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., et al., 2014. Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (7), 2735–2772. doi:10.5194/hess-18-2735-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanvand, K., Hashemi, M.R., and Abedini, M.J., 2013. Development of an accurate time integration technique for the assessment of Q-based versus h-based formulations of the diffusion wave equation for flow routing. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (10), 1079–1088. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haykin, S., 2004. Kalman filtering and neural networks. Vol. 47. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks Franssen, H.J. and Kinzelbach, W., 2008. Real‐time groundwater flow modeling with the ensemble Kalman filter: joint estimation of states and parameters and the filter inbreeding problem. Water Resources Research, 44 (9). doi:10.1029/2007WR006505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman, R.E., 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82 (1), 35–45. doi:10.1115/1.3662552
   Google Scholar
• Killick, R., Fearnhead, P., and Eckley, I.A., 2012. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107 (500), 1590–1598. doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.737745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.H. and Georgakakos, A.P., 2014. Hydrologic routing using nonlinear cascaded reservoirs. Water Resources Research, 50 (8), 7000–7019. doi:10.1002/2014WR015662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavielle, M., 2005. Using penalized contrasts for the change-point problem. Signal Processing, 85 (8), 1501–1510. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisenring, M. and Moradkhani, H., 2012. Analyzing the uncertainty of suspended sediment load prediction using sequential data assimilation. Journal of Hydrology, 468, 268–282. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, R. and Richter, B.D., 2007. Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43 (6), 1400–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matteson, D.S. and James, N.A., 2014. A nonparametric approach for multiple change point analysis of multivariate data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109 (505), 334–345. doi:10.1080/01621459.2013.849605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, M., et al., 2018. Real-time assimilation of streamflow observations into a hydrological routing model: effects of model structures and updating methods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (3), 386–407. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1430898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G.T., 1938. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. In Proceedings of conference of North Atlantic Division, US Army Corps of Engineers. Concord, MA, 608–609.
   Google Scholar
• Meditch, J.S., 1969. Stochastic optimal linear estimation and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moradkhani, H., et al., 2005. Dual state–parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter. Advances in Water Resources, 28 (2), 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathiraja, S., et al., 2016. Hydrologic modeling in dynamic catchments: a data assimilation approach. Water Resources Research, 52 (5), 3350–3372. doi:10.1002/2015WR017192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, G.E., 1987. Time-scales for ecological change in regulated rivers. In: J.F. Craig and J.B. Kemper, eds. Regulated streams. Boston, MA: Springer, 257–266.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.D. and Van Dyke, C., 2016. Principles of geomorphic disturbance and recovery in response to storms. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41 (7), 971–979. doi:10.1002/esp.3912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppl, R.E., Keesstra, S.D., and Maroulis, J., 2017. A conceptual connectivity framework for understanding geomorphic change in human-impacted fluvial systems. Geomorphology, 277, 237–250. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N.L., et al., 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience, 47 (11), 769–784. doi:10.2307/1313099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polhill, J.G., et al., 2016. Modelling systemic change in coupled socio-environmental systems. Environmental Modelling and Software, 75, 318–332. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaram, H. and Georgakakos, K.P., 1989. Recursive parameter estimation of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 25 (2), 281–294. doi:10.1029/WR025i002p00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, R.H., Crow, W.T., and Keppenne, C.L., 2008. An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation. Water Resources Research, 44 (3). doi:10.1029/2007WR006357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G., 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Swayne, D.A., and Obimbo, C., 2016. Trend analysis and change point techniques: a survey. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 1 (3), 123–130. doi:10.1007/s40974-016-0011-1
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., 2006. Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P. and Scarlatos, P.D., 1987. Analysis of nonlinear Muskingum flood routing. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 113 (1), 61–79. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:1(61)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, L.J., et al., 2021. Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25 (7), 3897–3935. doi:10.5194/hess-25-3897-2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, L.J., Singer, M.B., and Kirchner, J.W., 2015. Hydrologic versus geomorphic drivers of trends in flood hazard. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (2), 370–376. doi:10.1002/2014GL062482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P.J., et al., 2013. Data assimilation for state and parameter estimation: application to morphodynamic modelling. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 139 (671), 314–327. doi:10.1002/qj.1944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todini, E., 1978. Mutually interactive state-parameter (MISP) estimation. In: Proceedings of AGU Chapman conference, 22–24 May 1978 Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, A.R., 2021. The lumped Muskingum flood routing model revisited: the storage relationship. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66 (11), 1625–1637. doi:10.1080/02626667.2021.1957475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstegen, J.A., et al., 2016. Detecting systemic change in a land use system by Bayesian data assimilation. Environmental Modelling and Software, 75, 424–438. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, J.A. and Sadegh, M., 2013. Toward diagnostic model calibration and evaluation: approximate Bayesian computation. Water Resources Research, 49 (7), 4335–4345. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G.P. and Wolman, M.G., 1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. Vol. 1286. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Zheng, S., and Thorne, C.R., 2012. A general framework for using the rate law to simulate morphological response to disturbance in the fluvial system. Progress in Physical Geography, 36 (5), 575–597. doi:10.1177/0309133312436569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., et al., 2019. Comparative analysis of nonparametric change-point detectors commonly used in hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (14), 1690–1710. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1669792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, Q., et al., 2019. Quantitative research on the water ecological environment of dam-controlled rivers: case study of the Shaying River, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (16), 2129–2140. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1669794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar