Hybrid model for daily runoff interval predictions based on Bayesian inference

References

• Alizadeh, M.J., et al., 2017. A new approach for simulating and forecasting the rainfall-runoff process within the next two months. Journal of Hydrology, 548, 588–597. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, X., et al., 2020. Daily runoff forecasting based on data-augmented neural network model. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22 (4), 900–915. doi:10.2166/hydro.2020.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, G., et al., 2019. Influent forecasting for wastewater treatment plants in North America, sustainability, 11 (6), 1764. doi:10.3390/su11061764
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K.H., et al., 2011. Prediction of contamination potential of groundwater arsenic in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand using artificial neural network. Water Research, 45 (17), 5535–5544. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, A., et al., 2017. Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets. Energy and Buildings, 154, 343–355. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V., 1995. Support-Vector networks. Machine Learning, 20 (3), 273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, P. and Chanda, K., 2020. Bayesian network based modeling of regional rainfall from multiple local meteorological drivers. Journal of Hydrology, 591, 125563. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, R., Sa, P., and Majhi, B., 2012. Particle swarm optimization based support vector regression for blind image restoration. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 27 (5), 989–995. doi:10.1007/s11390-012-1279-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duane, S., et al., 1987. Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics Letters B, 195 (2), 216–222. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, M. and O’Connor, K.M., 2007. Real-time flow forecasting in the absence of quantitative precipitation forecasts: a multi-model approach. Journal of Hydrology, 334 (1–2), 125–140. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhill, S., et al., 2020. Bayesian optimisation for adaptive experimental design: a review. IEEE Access, 99, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hakan, T. and Booij, M.J., 2018. Simulation and forecasting of streamflows using machine learning models coupled with base flow separation. Journal of Hydrology, 564, S0022169418305092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M.D. and Gelman, A., 2011. The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15 (1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu, K.L., Gupta, H.V., and , and Sorooshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31 (10), 2517–2530. doi:10.1029/95WR01955
   Google Scholar
• Hua, X.G., et al., 2007. Modeling of temperature–frequency correlation using combined principal component analysis and support vector regression technique. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 21 (2), 122–135. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:2(122)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiming, Z., Yuqi, H., and Jincheng, Z., 2005. Bayesian AR(p) prediction model based on normal-Gamma conjugate prior distribution. Statistics and Decision, 2, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A. and Indurthy, S., 2003. Comparative analysis of event-based rainfall-runoff modeling techniques—deterministic, statistical, and artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8 (2), 93–98. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(93)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteh, A.M., 2013. Monthly river flow forecasting using artificial neural network and support vector regression models coupled with wavelet transform. Computers & Geosciences, 54 (apr.), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, T.Y., 2000. The evidence framework applied to support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 11 (5), 1162–1173. doi:10.1109/72.870047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laloy, E., Fasbender, D., and Bielders, C.L., 2010. Parameter optimization and uncertainty analysis for plot-scale continuous modeling of runoff using a formal Bayesian approach. Journal of Hydrology, 380 (1–2), 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legates, D.R. and Mccabe, G.J., 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35 (1), 233–241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., et al., 2021. Bayesian LSTM with stochastic variational inference for estimating model uncertainty in process-based hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 57 (9), e2021WR029772. doi:10.1029/2021WR029772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., et al., 2018. A data-driven SVR model for long-term runoff prediction and uncertainty analysis based on the Bayesian framework. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 133 (1–2), 137–149. doi:10.1007/s00704-017-2186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al. 2016. A Bayesian analysis of generalized pareto distribution of runoff minima. Hydrological Processes, 30 (3), 424–432. doi:10.1002/hyp.10606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., et al., 2020. Variational inference in Bayesian computation. International Core Journal of Engineering, 6 (12), 326–332.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. and Gupta, H.V., 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resources Research, 43 (7), W07401. doi:10.1029/2006WR005756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lmlh, A. and Zlh, B., 2008. Water quality prediction of marine recreational beaches receiving watershed baseflow and stormwater runoff in southern California, USA. Water Research, 42 (10–11), 2563–2573. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshram, S.G., et al., 2020. Application of artificial neural networks, support vector machine and multiple model-ann to sediment yield prediction. Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 34 (15), 4561–4575. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02672-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, A., et al., 2018. A simplified approach to produce probabilistic hydrological model predictions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 109, 306–314. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, F., et al., 2018. Prediction of landslide displacement with step-like behavior based on multialgorithm optimization and a support vector regression model. Landslides, 15, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s10346-017-0883-y
   Google Scholar
• Niu, D.X., Shi, H.F., and Wu, D.D., 2012. Short-term load forecasting using Bayesian neural networks learned by Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 12 (6), 1822–1827. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourali, M., et al., 2016. Effect of formal and informal likelihood functions on uncertainty assessment in a single event rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 549–564. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharalampous, G.A., et al., 2020. Quantification of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modelling by harnessing the wisdom of the crowd: a large-sample experiment at monthly timescale. Advances in Water Resources, 103470.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, K.E., 1998. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 211 (1), 69–85. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, R.J., 1999. Time series data mining: identifying temporal patterns for characterization and prediction of time series events [M]. Marquette University.
   Google Scholar
• Schoppa, L., Disse, M., and Bachmair, S., 2020. Evaluating the performance of random forest for large-scale flood discharge simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125531. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, P., et al., 2020. Annual runoff forecasting based on multi-model information fusion and residual error correction in the Ganjiang River Basin. Water, 12 (8), 2086. doi:10.3390/w12082086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., et al., 2021. An improved grid search algorithm to optimize SVR for prediction. Soft Computing, 25 (10), 5633–5644. doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05560-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, M.E., et al., 2011. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 4144–4147. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265
   Google Scholar
• Valipour, M., 2015. Long-term runoff study using SARIMA and ARIMA models in the United States. Meteorological Applications, 22 (3), 592–598. doi:10.1002/met.1491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2017. Bayesian forecasting and uncertainty quantifying of stream flows using metropolis–hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 549, 476–483. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Qiu, J., and , and Li, F., 2018. Hybrid models combining emd/eemd and arima for long-term streamflow forecasting. Water, 10 (7), 853. doi:10.3390/w10070853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Zhang, Y., and Tang, Q., 2020. Impact assessment of climate change and human activities on streamflow signatures in the Yellow River Basin using the Budyko hypothesis and derived differential equation. Journal of Hydrology, 591 (7401), 125460. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welling, M. and Teh, Y.W., 2011. Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dynamics. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning. Omnipress, Bellevue, Washington, USA, pp. 681–688.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., et al., 2019. Two-phase extreme learning machines integrated with the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise algorithm for multi-scale runoff prediction problems. Journal of Hydrology, 570, 167–184. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Broda, S., 2021. Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 25 (3), 1671–1687. doi:10.5194/hess-25-1671-2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L.H., et al., 2009. Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Bulletin, 54 (5), 852–871. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.852
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2009. Estimating uncertainty of streamflow simulation using Bayesian neural networks. Water Resources Research, 45 (2). doi:10.1029/2008WR007030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., et al., 2022. Evaluation of the impacts of human activities on propagation from meteorological drought to hydrological drought in the Weihe River Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 819, 153030. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.H. and Chen, X., 2015. Auto regressive and ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybrid model for annual runoff forecasting. Water Resources Management, 29 (8), 2913–2926. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-0977-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar