A novel smoothing-based long short-term memory framework for short-to medium-range flood forecasting

References

• Adikari, K.E., et al., 2021. Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for flood and drought forecasting in arid and tropical regions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 144, 105136. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adikari, Y. and Yoshitani, J., 2009. Global trends in water-related disasters: an insight for policymakers. World Water Assessment Programme Side Publication Series, Insights. The United Nations, UNESCO. International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management (ICHARM).
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M.K., et al., 2009. River flow forecasting with artificial neural networks using satellite observed precipitation pre-processed with flow length and travel time information: case study of the Ganges River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (9), 1607–1618. doi:10.5194/hess-13-1607-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Y., et al., 2018. Discrete space reinforcement learning algorithm based on support vector machine classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 111, 30–35. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division, 1993. Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119 (3), 429–442. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:3(429).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assem, H., et al., 2017. Urban water flow and water level prediction based on deep learning. In: Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases, Cham: Springer, 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh, A., Asadzadeh, S.M., and Ghanbari, A., 2010. An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system for short-term natural gas demand estimation: uncertain and complex environments. Energy Policy, 38 (3), 1529–1536. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., et al., 2019. Short-term streamflow forecasting using the feature-enhanced regression model. Water Resources Management, 33 (14), 4783–4797. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02399-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmik, S.R. and Durai, V.R., 2012. Development of multimodel ensemble based district level medium range rainfall forecast system for Indian region. Journal of Earth System Science, 121 (2), 273–285. doi:10.1007/s12040-012-0158-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht, D.S., et al., 2020. Impact of climate change on streamflow regime of a large Indian river basin using a novel monthly hybrid bias correction technique and a conceptual modeling framework. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125448. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakenridge, G.R., 2018. Global active archive of large flood events [online]. Dartmouth Flood Observatory, University of Colorado. Available from: https://floodobservatory.colorado.edu/Archives/index.html [ Accessed 2 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Central Water Commission, 2014. Mahanadi Basin. CWC and NRSC, p. 110.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., 2019. State wise flood damage statistics. Government of India, Central Water Commission, Technical Report Number, 3/38/2012-FFM/1067-1164.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., et al., 2020. The importance of short lag-time in the runoff forecasting model based on long short-term memory. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125359. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costabile, P. and Macchione, F., 2015. Enhancing river model set-up for 2-D dynamic flood modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 67, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., et al., 2022. Effective improvement of multi-step-ahead flood forecasting accuracy through encoder-decoder with an exogenous input structure. Journal of Hydrology, 609, 127764. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damavandi, H.G., et al., 2019. Accurate prediction of streamflow using long short-term memory network: a case study in the Brazos River Basin in Texas. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 10 (10), 294–300. doi:10.18178/ijesd.2019.10.10.1190.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A.K. and Kaur, S., 2013. Performance of IMD multi-model ensemble and WRF (ARW) based sub-basin wise rainfall forecast for Mahanadi basin during flood season 2009 and 2010. Mausam, 64 (4), 625–644. doi:10.54302/mausam.v64i4.745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A.K. and Kaur, S., 2016. Performance of IMD multi-model ensemble and WRF (ARW) model for sub-basin wise rainfall forecast during monsoon 2012. Mausam, 67 (2), 323–332. doi:10.54302/mausam.v67i2.1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Fuente, A., Meruane, V., and Meruane, C., 2019. Hydrological early warning system based on a deep learning runoff model coupled with a meteorological forecast. Water, 11 (9), 1808. doi:10.3390/w11091808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, H., Chen, W., and Huang, G., 2022. Deep insight into daily runoff forecasting based on a CNN-LSTM model. Natural Hazards, 113 (3), 1675–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., et al., 2020. Interpretable spatio-temporal attention LSTM model for flood forecasting. Neurocomputing, 403, 348–359. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durai, V.R. and Bhardwaj, R., 2014. Forecasting quantitative rainfall over India using multi-model ensemble technique. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 126 (1), 31–48. doi:10.1007/s00703-014-0334-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, H., et al., 2020. Comparison of long short term memory networks and the hydrological model in runoff simulation. Water, 12 (1), 175. doi:10.3390/w12010175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K., et al., 2017. Prolongation of SMAP to spatiotemporally seamless coverage of continental US using a deep learning neural network. Geophysical Research Letters, 44 (21), 11030–11039. doi:10.1002/2017GL075619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farfán, J.F., et al., 2020. A hybrid neural network-based technique to improve the flow forecasting of physical and data-driven models: methodology and case studies in Andean watersheds. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27, 100652.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z.K., et al., 2020. Monthly runoff time series prediction by variational mode decomposition and support vector machine based on quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124627. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, R., et al., 2021. Enhanced long short-term memory model for runoff prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 26 (2), 04020063. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca Alves, L.G., et al., 2022. Modelling and assessment of sustainable urban drainage systems in dense precarious settlements subject to flash floods. LHB, 108 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/27678490.2021.2016024.
   Google Scholar
• Frame, J., et al., 2021. Post-processing the national water model with long short-term memory networks for streamflow predictions and model diagnostics. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57 (5), 1–48. doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., et al., 2020. Short-term runoff prediction with GRU and LSTM networks without requiring time step optimization during sample generation. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125188. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaeini, R., et al., 2018. DR-BiLSTM: dependent reading bidirectional LSTM for natural language inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05577.
   Google Scholar
• Ghimire, S., et al., 2021. Streamflow prediction using an integrated methodology based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory networks. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 1–26. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96751-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., et al., 2013. Estimating epistemic and aleatory uncertainties during hydrologic modeling: an information theoretic approach. Water Resources Research, 49 (4), 2253–2273. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., et al., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1–2), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgamuge, M.N. and Nirmalathas, A., 2017. Analysis of large flood events: based on flood data during 1985-2016 in Australia and India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, G.L., Hargreaves, G.H., and Riley, J.P., 1985. Irrigation water requirements for Senegal River basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111 (3), 265–275. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:3(265).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., et al., 2019. Daily runoff forecasting using a hybrid model based on variational mode decomposition and deep neural networks. Water Resources Management, 33 (4), 1571–1590. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-2183-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J., 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9 (8), 1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., et al., 2018. Deep learning with a long short-term memory networks approach for rainfall-runoff simulation. Water, 10 (11), 1543. doi:10.3390/w10111543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, R., et al., 2019. Rapid spatio-temporal flood prediction and uncertainty quantification using a deep learning method. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 911–920. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., et al., 2020. Stream-flow forecasting of small rivers based on LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05681.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., et al., 2019. Combination of multiple data-driven models for long-term monthly runoff predictions based on Bayesian model averaging. Water Resources Management, 33 (9), 3321–3338. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02305-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena, P.P., et al., 2014. Are recent frequent high floods in Mahanadi basin in eastern India due to increase in extreme rainfalls? Journal of Hydrology, 517, 847–862. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, Y., et al., 2021. Application of the decomposition-prediction-reconstruction framework to medium-and long-term runoff forecasting. Water Supply, 21 (2), 696–709. doi:10.2166/ws.2020.337.
   Google Scholar
• Jimeno-Sáez, P., et al., 2018. A comparison of SWAT and ANN models for daily runoff simulation in different climatic zones of peninsular Spain. Water, 10 (2), 192. doi:10.3390/w10020192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, I. and Castelli, M., 2020. The effect of batch size on the generalizability of the convolutional neural networks on a histopathology dataset. ICT express, 6 (4), 312–315. doi:10.1016/j.icte.2020.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, I.F., et al., 2020. Exploring a long short-term memory based encoder-decoder framework for multi-step-ahead flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124631. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, H.S., et al., 2019. Comparison of learning-based wastewater flow prediction methodologies for smart sewer management. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 123977. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun, A., et al., 2022a. Understanding the impacts of predecessor rain events on flood hazard in a changing climate. Hydrological Processes, 36 (2), e14500. doi:10.1002/hyp.14500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun, A., Sahoo, B., and Chatterjee, C., 2022b. Assessment of enhanced Kohonen self-organizing map, quantile mapping and copula-based bias-correction approaches for constructing basin-scale rainfall forecasts. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 67 (12), 1860–1875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J., 2014. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
   Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., 2005. Quantile regression Cambridge University Press, USA ISBN-13: 978-0521608275.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzert, F., et al., 2018. Rainfall-runoff modelling using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (11), 6005–6022. doi:10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzert, F., et al., 2019. Benchmarking a catchment-aware long short-term memory network (LSTM) for large-scale hydrological modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Le, X.H., et al., 2019. Application of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for flood forecasting. Water, 11 (7), 1387. doi:10.3390/w11071387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechowska, E., 2018. What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Natural Hazards, 94 (3), 1341–1366. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian, Y., et al., 2021. Climate-driven model based on long short-term memory and Bayesian optimization for multi-day-ahead daily streamflow forecasting. Water Resources Management, 36 (1), 21–37. doi:10.1007/s11269-021-03002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., et al., 2018. Dongting lake water level forecast and its relationship with the Three Gorges dam based on a long short-term memory network. Water, 10 (10), 1389. doi:10.3390/w10101389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livieris, I.E., et al., 2020. An advanced deep learning model for short-term forecasting US natural gas price and movement. In: IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Cham: Springer, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Livieris, I.E., et al., 2021. Smoothing and stationarity enforcement framework for deep learning time-series forecasting. Neural Computing & Applications, 33 (20), 14021–14035. doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06043-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology, 235 (3–4), 276–288. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., Wilson, G., and Ammentorp, H.C., 2002. Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 261 (1–4), 48–59. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00619-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam, S.V., et al., 2021. An efficient strategy for predicting river dissolved oxygen concentration: application of deep recurrent neural network model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193 (12), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10661-021-09586-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K.W., 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water, 10 (11), 1536. doi:10.3390/w10111536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najibi, N. and Devineni, N., 2018. Recent trends in the frequency and duration of global floods. Earth System Dynamics, 9 (2), 757–783. doi:10.5194/esd-9-757-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, T., et al., 2016. A wavelet-based non-linear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (WNARX) dynamic neural network model for real-time flood forecasting using satellite-based rainfall products. Journal of Hydrology, 539, 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, T., Sahoo, B., and Chatterjee, C., 2019. Enhancing real-time streamflow forecasts with wavelet-neural network based error-updating schemes and ECMWF meteorological predictions in variable infiltration capacity model. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 890–910. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NERC, 1975. Flood studies report. Hydrological studies. Vol. 1. London: Natural Environment Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, L., et al., 2020. Streamflow and rainfall forecasting by two long short-term memory-based models. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124296. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., et al., 2014. Applications of hybrid wavelet-artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 358–377. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., 2017. An emotional ANN (EANN) approach to modeling rainfall-runoff process. Journal of Hydrology, 544, 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., et al., 2019. Emotional artificial neural networks (EANNs) for multi-step ahead prediction of monthly precipitation; case study: northern Cyprus. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 138 (3), 1419–1434. doi:10.1007/s00704-019-02904-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., et al., 2022. Multi-step-ahead solar irradiance modeling employing multi-frequency deep learning models and climatic data. Applied Energy, 315, 119069. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Elkiran, G., and Abdullahi, J., 2020. Multi-step ahead modeling of reference evapotranspiration using a multi-model approach. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124434. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall, A., 1981. Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 29 (1), 84–91. doi:10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163506.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A.V. and Schafer, R.W., 1999. Discrete-time signal processing. Pearson: Prentice-Hall, 494–495.
   Google Scholar
• Pai, D.S., et al., 2014. Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25°×0.25°) Long period (1901-2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam, 65 (1), 1–18. doi:10.54302/mausam.v65i1.851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisouj, P., Mohebzadeh, H., and Lee, T., 2020. Employing machine learning algorithms for streamflow prediction: a case study of four river basins with different climatic zones in the United States. Water Resources Management, 34 (13), 4113–4131. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02659-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, A., et al., 2022. Effects of training data on the learning performance of LSTM network for runoff simulation. Water Resources Management, 36, 2381–2394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., et al., 2019. Simulating and predicting of hydrological time series based on TensorFlow deep learning. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 28, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimzad, M., et al., 2021. Performance comparison of an LSTM-based deep learning model versus conventional machine learning algorithms for streamflow forecasting. Water Resources Management, 35 (12), 4167–4187. doi:10.1007/s11269-021-02937-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., et al., 2022. Mid-to long-term runoff prediction based on deep learning at different time scales in the upper Yangtze river basin. Water, 14 (11), 1692. doi:10.3390/w14111692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, B.B., et al., 2019. Long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network for low-flow hydrological time series forecasting. Acta Geophysica, 67 (5), 1471–1481. doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00330-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saon, G. and Picheny, M., 2017. Recent advances in conversational speech recognition using convolutional and recurrent neural networks. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 61 (4/5), 1–10. doi:10.1147/JRD.2017.2701178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal, V., Sahay, R.R., and Chatterjee, C., 2014. Effect of utilization of discrete wavelet components on flood forecasting performance of wavelet based ANFIS models. Water Resources Management, 28 (6), 1733–1749. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0584-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafaei, M., et al., 2016. A wavelet-SARIMA-ANN hybrid model for precipitation forecasting. Journal of Water and Land Development, 28 (1), 27–36. doi:10.1515/jwld-2016-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. and Mujumdar, P., 2017. Increasing frequency and spatial extent of concurrent meteorological droughts and heatwaves in India. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15896-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., et al., 2017. 14.2 DNPU: an 8.1 TOPS/W reconfigurable CNN-RNN processor for general-purpose deep neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), IEEE, 240–241.
   Google Scholar
• Shoaib, M., et al., 2018. A comparative study of various hybrid wavelet feedforward neural network models for runoff forecasting. Water Resources Management, 32 (1), 83–103. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1796-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortridge, J.E., Guikema, S.D., and Zaitchik, B.F., 2016. Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (7), 2611–2628. doi:10.5194/hess-20-2611-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., et al., 2004. Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41 (2), 343–360. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A.K., Rajeevan, M., and Kshirsagar, S.R., 2009. Development of a high resolution daily gridded temperature data set (1969-2005) for the Indian region. Atmospheric Science Letters, 10 (4), 249–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudheer, K.P., Gosain, A.K., and Ramasastri, K.S., 2002. A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Processes, 16 (6), 1325–1330. doi:10.1002/hyp.554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Q.F., et al., 2018. An adaptive middle and long-term runoff forecast model using EEMD-ANN hybrid approach. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 767–780. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., et al., 2016. A deep neural network modeling framework to reduce bias in satellite precipitation products. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17 (3), 931–945. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-15-0075.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taormina, R. and Chau, K.W., 2015. Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machines. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1617–1632. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, C., et al., 2020. The utility of information flow in formulating discharge forecast models: a case study from an arid snow-dominated catchment. Water Resources Research, 56 (8), e2019WR024908. doi:10.1029/2019WR024908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., et al., 2018. LSTM-based traffic flow prediction with missing data. Neurocomputing, 318, 297–305. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M.K. and Chatterjee, C., 2010a. Development of an accurate and reliable hourly flood forecasting model using wavelet-bootstrap-ANN (WBANN) hybrid approach. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (3–4), 458–470. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M.K. and Chatterjee, C., 2010b. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). Journal of Hydrology, 382 (1–4), 20–33. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M.K. and Chatterjee, C., 2011. A new wavelet-bootstrap-ANN hybrid model for daily discharge forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13 (3), 500–519. doi:10.2166/hydro.2010.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troin, M., et al., 2021. Generating ensemble streamflow forecasts: a review of methods and approaches over the past 40 years. Water Resources Research, 57 (7), e2020WR028392. doi:10.1029/2020WR028392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, S.P., et al., 2020. Deep learning convolutional neural network in rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22 (3), 541–561. doi:10.2166/hydro.2020.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, D., Teräsvirta, T., and Franses, P.H., 2002. Smooth transition autoregressive models-a survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 21 (1), 1–47. doi:10.1081/ETC-120008723.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V., Golowich, S., and Smola, A., 1996. Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9, 281–287.
   Google Scholar
• Weerts, A.H., Winsemius, H.C., and Verkade, J.S., 2011. Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: examples from the National Flood Forecasting System (England and Wales). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (1), 255. doi:10.5194/hess-15-255-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegayehu, E.B. and Muluneh, F.B., 2022. Short-term daily univariate streamflow forecasting using deep learning models. Advances in Meteorology, 2022, 1–22. doi:10.1155/2022/1860460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al., 2020. A spatiotemporal deep fusion model for merging satellite and gauge precipitation in China. Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124664. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, Z., Yan, J., and Demir, I., 2020. A rainfall-runoff model with LSTM-based sequence-to-sequence learning. Water Resources Research, 56 (1), e2019WR025326. doi:10.1029/2019WR025326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., et al., 2019. Speech emotion classification using attention-based LSTM. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 27 (11), 1675–1685. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2019.2925934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., et al., 2021. Physics-guided deep learning for rainfall-runoff modeling by considering extreme events and monotonic relationships. Journal of Hydrology, 603, 127043. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W., et al., 2020. Using long short-term memory networks for river flow prediction. Hydrology Research, 51 (6), 1358–1376. doi:10.2166/nh.2020.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., et al., 2022. Research on particle swarm optimization in LSTM neural networks for rainfall-runoff simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 608, 127553. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, H., et al., 2022. Rainfall-runoff modeling using long short-term memory based step-sequence framework. Journal of Hydrology, 610, 127901. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C.C., Liu, W.C., and Wu, M.C., 2017. A physically based and machine learning hybrid approach for accurate rainfall-runoff modeling during extreme typhoon events. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 205–216. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., et al., 2020. Mid-to long-term runoff prediction by combining the deep belief network and partial least-squares regression. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22 (5), 1283–1305. doi:10.2166/hydro.2020.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunpeng, L., et al., 2017. Multi-step ahead time series forecasting for different data patterns based on LSTM recurrent neural network. In: 2017 14th Web Information Systems And Applications Conference (WISA), IEEE, 305–310.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Lindholm, G., and Ratnaweera, H., 2018. Use long short-term memory to enhance Internet of things for combined sewer overflow monitoring. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 409–418. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., 2020. Real-time probabilistic forecasting of river water quality under data missing situation: deep learning plus post-processing techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125164. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Guo, S., and Chang, F.J., 2019. Explore an evolutionary recurrent ANFIS for modelling multi-step-ahead flood forecasts. Journal of Hydrology, 570, 343–355. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar