Artificial intelligence applications in the field of streamflow: a bibliometric analysis of recent trends

References

• Adamowski, J.F., 2008. Development of a short-term river flood forecasting method for snowmelt driven floods based on wavelet and cross-wavelet analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 353 (3–4), 247–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adisa, O.M., et al., 2020. Bibliometric analysis of methods and tools for drought monitoring and prediction in Africa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (16), 6516. doi:10.3390/su12166516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, R.M., et al., 2017. Streamflow forecasting using artificial neural network and support vector machine models. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 29 (1), 286–294.
   Google Scholar
• Afan, H.A., et al., 2016. Past, present and prospect of an artificial intelligence (AI) based model for sediment transport prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 902–913. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anctil, F. and Tape, D.G., 2004. An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 3, 121–128. doi:10.1139/s03-071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apaydin, H., et al., 2021. Artificial intelligence modelling integrated with singular spectral analysis and seasonal-trend decomposition using loess approaches for streamflow predictions. Journal of Hydrology, 600, 126506. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri, A., et al., 2020. Novel ensemble of MCDM-artificial intelligence techniques for groundwater-potential mapping in arid and semi-arid regions (Iran). Remote Sensing, 12 (3), 490. doi:10.3390/rs12030490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ara Rahman, S. and Chakrabarty, D., 2020. Sediment transport modelling in an alluvial river with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125056. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C., 2017. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 959–975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffaut, C. and Delleur, J.W., 1989. Calibrating SWMM runoff quality model with an expert system. In: Sixth Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering. Atlanta, GA, USA: ASCE, 124–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bibliometrix, Biblioshiny [online]. K-Synth Srl, Academic Spin-Off of the University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. Available from: https://www.bibliometrix.org/home/ [ Accessed 5 May 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Buyukyildiz, M., Tezel, G., and Yilmaz, V., 2014. Estimation of the change in lake water level by artificial intelligence methods. Water Resources Management, 28 (13), 4747–4763. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0773-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K.W., 2006. Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River. Journal of Hydrology, 329 (3–4), 363–367. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., 2006. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (3), 359–377. doi:10.1002/asi.20317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al., 2020. Groundwater spring potential mapping using artificial intelligence approach based on kernel logistic regression, random forest, and alternating decision tree models. Applied Sciences, 10 (2), 425. doi:10.3390/app10020425.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. and Guan, J., 2011. A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (2), 233–247. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, M.J., et al., 2012. SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (8), 1609–1630. doi:10.1002/asi.22688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T.M., 1991. Neural networks-applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. In: Proceeding International Hydrology and Water Resources. Perth, Australia: Institution of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C.W., et al., 2006. Symbiotic adaptive neuro-evolution applied to rainfall-runoff modelling in northern England. Neural Networks, 19 (2), 236–247. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, C.W. and Wilby, R., 2009. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43 (1), 47–66. doi:10.1080/02626669809492102.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C.W. and Wilby, R.L., 2016. Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 25 (1), 80–108. doi:10.1177/030913330102500104.
   Google Scholar
• Delleur, J.W. and Baffaut, C., 1988. Front end expert system for the calibration of SWMM runoff block. In: Critical Water Issues and Computer Applications: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Water Resources Conference. Norfolk, VA, USA: ASCE, 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., et al., 2021a. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., et al., 2021b. Forty years of the international journal of information management: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102307. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engman, E.T., 1988. Diagnostic strategies of an expert system for simulating snowmelt runoff. In: Planning Now for Irrigation and Drainage in the 21st Century. Lincoln, NE, USA: ASCE, 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Engman, E.T., Rango, A., and Martinec, J., 1986. Expert system for snowmelt runoff modeling and forecasting. In: Water Forum ‘86: World Water Issues in Evolution, Proceedings of the Conference. Long Beach, CA, USA: ASCE, 174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Frame, J.D., 1977. Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean. Interciencia, 2 (2), 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gorzeń-Mitka, I. and Wieczorek-Kosmala, M., 2023. Mapping the energy sector from a risk management research perspective: a bibliometric and scientific approach. Energies, 16 (4), 2024. doi:10.3390/en16042024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, R.S., 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (2), 124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Q., et al., 2022. Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of air pollution: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 933665. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.933665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., et al., 2014. A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 379–386. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Franco, G., et al., 2021. Worldwide research on socio-hydrology: a bibliometric analysis. Water, 13 (9), 1283. doi:10.3390/w13091283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmoud Al-Adhaileh, M. and Waselallah Alsaade, F., 2021. Modelling and prediction of water quality by using artificial intelligence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13 (8), 4259. doi:10.3390/su13084259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J., 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9 (8), 1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, K.L., Gupta, H.V., and Sorooshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall‐runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31 (10), 2517–2530. doi:10.1029/95WR01955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Rousseau, R., 2009. A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries. Scientometrics, 81 (2), 475–491. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2202-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, K.S.M.H., et al., 2022. A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61 (1), 279–303. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A. and Kumar, A.M., 2007. Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 7 (2), 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothiprakash, V. and Magar, R.B., 2012. Multi-time-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir inflow prediction by artificial intelligent techniques using lumped and distributed data. Journal of Hydrology, 450-451, 293–307. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katy, B., Chaomei, C., and Kevin, W.B., 2005. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 37 (2003), 179–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kent Baker, H., et al., 2020. A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: current status, development, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 108, 232–246. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia, M.B., et al., 2011. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67 (1), 251–264. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., et al., 2021. Can artificial intelligence and data-driven machine learning models match or even replace process-driven hydrologic models for streamflow simulation?: a case study of four watersheds with different hydro-climatic regions across the CONUS. Journal of Hydrology, 598, 126423. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kişi, Ö., 2007. Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12 (5), 532–539. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(532).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzert, F., et al., 2018. Rainfall–runoff modelling using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (11), 6005–6022. doi:10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Shivarama, J., and Choukimath, P.A., 2015. Popular scientometric analysis, mapping and visualisation softwares: an overview. In: 10th International CABLIBER-2015 HP Univ., India, IIAS, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
   Google Scholar
• Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521 (7553), 436–444. doi:10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-Y., Cheng, C.-T., and Chau, K.-W., 2010. Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (4), 599–612. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.4.599.
   Google Scholar
• Luk, K.C., Ball, J.E., and Sharma, A., 2000. A study of optimal model lag and spatial inputs to artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 227, 56–57. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00165-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, H.R., 2013. Commentary: what constitutes a good literature review and why does its quality matter? Environmental Modelling and Software, 43, 3–4. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maksimovic, C. and Radojkovic, M. 1989. Computational modelling and experimental methods in hydraulics. In: Hydrocomp ’89. Dubrovnik
   Google Scholar
• Maroufpoor, S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., and Maroufpoor, E., 2020. Reference evapotranspiration estimating based on optimal input combination and hybrid artificial intelligent model: hybridization of artificial neural network with grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125060. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, S., 2018. Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) using artificial intelligence methods: offering a new approach for lagged ETo data-based modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 794–812. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshram, S.G., et al., 2021. Streamflow prediction based on artificial intelligence techniques. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 46 (3), 2393–2403. doi:10.1007/s40996-021-00696-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minns, A.W. and Hall, M.J., 2009. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41 (3), 399–417. doi:10.1080/02626669609491511.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, B., et al., 2021. Improving streamflow simulation by combining hydrological process-driven and artificial intelligence-based models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (46), 65752–65768. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15563-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moleod, A.I., 1977. Improved Box–Jenkins estimators. Biometrika, 64 (3), 531–534. doi:10.1093/biomet/64.3.531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S.A. and Martens, B.V.D.V., 2009. Mapping research specialties. Annual Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42 (2008), 213–295.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, J., et al., 2016. Global research on artificial intelligence from 1990–2014: spatially-explicit bibliometric analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5 (5), 66. doi:10.3390/ijgi5050066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., et al., 2014. Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 358–377. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Komasi, M., and Mano, A., 2009. a multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall–runoff modeling. Water Resources Management, 23 (14), 2877–2894. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9414-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdoğan-Sarikoç, G., et al., 2023. Reservoir volume forecasting using artificial intelligence-based models: artificial neural networks, support vector regression, and long short-term memory. Journal of Hydrology, 616, 128766. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A., et al., 2023. Review of artificial intelligence and internet of things technologies in land and water management research during 1991–2021: a bibliometric analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, 106335. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, O., Danell, R., and Schneider, J.W., 2009. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, 5, 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Phong, T.V., et al., 2021. Groundwater potential mapping using GIS -based hybrid artificial intelligence methods. Groundwater, 59 (5), 745–760. doi:10.1111/gwat.13094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J. and Van Asselt, M., 1996. Integrated assessment: a growing child on its way to maturity. Climatic Change, 34, 327–336. doi:10.1007/BF00139296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, Y.-F., 2013. Improved wavelet modeling framework for hydrologic time series forecasting. Water Resources Management, 27 (8), 2807–2821. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0316-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, A. and Braun, T., 1986. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment ofpublicationoutput and citationimpact. Scientometrics, 9 (5/6), 281–291. doi:10.1007/BF02017249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCI2TEAM, 2009. Science of science (Sci2) tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Available from: https://sci2.cns.iu.edu [ online].
   Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., et al., 2015. Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 520, 224–243. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamim, M.A., et al., 2015. A comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN) and local linear regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (2), 971–977. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0298-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseldin, A.Y., 1997. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 199, 272–294. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03330-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, A.K., et al., 2019. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: a bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 517–532. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D.P. and Dulal, K.N., 2003. Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall—runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48 (3), 399–411. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudheer, K.P., Gosain, A.K., and Ramasastri, K.S., 2002. A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Processes, 16 (6), 1325–1330. doi:10.1002/hyp.554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague-Sutcliffe, J., 1992. An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing & Management, 28, 1–3. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90087-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, H., et al., 2024. Hybridized artificial intelligence models with nature-inspired algorithms for river flow modeling: a comprehensive review, assessment, and possible future research directions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 129, 107559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.G., 1996. Neural networks and their applications. United Kingdom: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tiyasha, T.M. and Yaseen, Z.M., 2020. A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. Journal of Hydrology, 585, 124670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todini, E., 1992. From Real-Time Flood Forecasting to Comprehensive Flood Risk Management Decision Support Systems. In: A.J. Saul, ed. Floods and Flood Management. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht: Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Tokar, A.S. and Johnson, P.A., 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (3), 232–239. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, E., Brath, A., and Montanari, A., 2000. Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 239, 132–147. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00344-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde Ramírez, M.C., De Campos Velho, H.F., and Ferreira, N.J., 2005. Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to the São Paulo region. Journal of Hydrology, 301 (1–4), 146–162. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L., 2014. CitNetExplorer: a new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (4), 802–823. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantagepoint, [online]. Available from: https://www.thevantagepoint.com/ [ Accessed 22 May 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Vinio, F., Simons, D.B., and Simons, R.K. 1989. Knowledge-based expert system for the real-time operation of reservoir systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower. Niagara Falls, NY, USA, 1770–1780.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-C., et al., 2009. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 374 (3–4), 294–306. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-H., Li, J., and Ho, Y.-S., 2011. Research articles published in water resources journals: a bibliometric analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 28, 353–365. doi:10.5004/dwt.2011.2412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William, J. and Alan, D., 1986. Integrated conceptual expert system for flood and water pollution management. In: Water Forum ‘86: World Water Issues in Evolution, Proceedings of the Conference. Long Beach, CA, USA: ASCE, 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L. and Chau, K.W., 2011. Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 399 (3–4), 394–409. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L., Chau, K.W., and LI, Y.S., 2009. Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques. Water Resources Research, 45 (8). doi:10.1029/2007WR006737.
   Google Scholar
• Yaseen, Z.M., et al., 2015. Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 829–844. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yifru, B.A., Lim, K.J., and Lee, S., 2024. Enhancing streamflow prediction physically consistently using process-based modeling and domain knowledge: a review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16 (4), 1376. doi:10.3390/su16041376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare, F., et al., 2017. Integrated water assessment and modelling: a bibliometric analysis of trends in the water resource sector. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 765–778. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zealand, C.M., Burn, D.H., and Simonovic, S.P., 1999. Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 214, 32–48. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00242-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., et al., 2018. Modeling and simulating of reservoir operation using the artificial neural network, support vector regression, deep learning algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 565, 720–736. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar