Laboratory observations for examining estimates of soil dry surface layer thickness with parsimonious models

References

• Budyko, M., 1963. Evaporation under natural conditions. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 63 (11061), 1–130.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R.E., 1971. Evaporation from bare soil as affected by texture and temperature. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, E.J., et al., 2010. Estimation of NH3 bi-directional flux from managed agricultural soils. Atmospheric Environment, 44 (17), 2107–2115. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuntz, M., et al., 2016. The impact of standard and hard-coded parameters on the hydrologic fluxes in the Noah-MP land surface model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121 (18), 10,676–10,700. doi:10.1002/2016JD025097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatichi, S. and Leuzinger, S., 2013. Reconciling observations with modeling: the fate of water and carbon allocation in a mature deciduous forest exposed to elevated CO2. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 174–175, 144–157. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillel, D., 1998. Environmental soil physics: fundamentals, applications, and environmental considerations. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Idso, S.B., et al., 1974. The three stages of drying of a field soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 38 (5), 831–837. doi:10.2136/sssaj1974.03615995003800050037x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, M., Reichstein, M., and Bondeau, A., 2009. Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model. Biogeosciences, 6 (10), 2001–2013. doi:10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury, W.A. and Horton, R., 2004. Soil physics. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, J., Saigusa, N., and Sato, T., 1990. A parameterization of evaporation from bare soil surfaces. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 29 (5), 385–389. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0385:APOEFB>2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D.M., et al., 2019. The community land model version 5: description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11 (12), 4245–4287. doi:10.1029/2018MS001583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichiheb, N., et al., 2019. Implementation of the effect of urease inhibitor on ammonia emissions following urea-based fertilizer application at a Zea mays field in central Illinois: a study with SURFATM-NH3 model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 269–270, 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamadou, O., et al., 2014. Energy fluxes and surface characteristics over a cultivated area in Benin: daily and seasonal dynamics. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (3), 893–914. doi:10.5194/hess-18-893-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlin, O., et al., 2016. Modeling soil evaporation efficiency in a range of soil and atmospheric conditions using a meta-analysis approach. Water Resources Research, 52 (5), 3663–3684. doi:10.1002/2015WR018233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguez-Macho, G. and Fan, Y., 2012. The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 2. Influence on seasonal soil moisture and evapotranspiration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117 (D15). doi:10.1029/2012JD017540.
   Google Scholar
• Monteith, J. L., 1981. Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 107 (451), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleson, K.W., et al., 2008. Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 113 (G1). doi:10.1029/2007JG000563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Or, D., et al., 2013. Advances in soil evaporation physics – a review. Vadose Zone Journal, 12 (4), 1–16. doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, H.L. and Mahrt, L., 1987. Interaction between soil hydrology and boundary-layer development. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 38, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Pleim, J.E., et al., 2013. Development and evaluation of an ammonia bidirectional flux parameterization for air quality models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118 (9), 3794–3806. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resurreccion, A.C., et al., 2011. Relationship between specific surface area and the dry end of the water retention curve for soils with varying clay and organic carbon contents. Water Resources Research, 47 (6), W06522. doi:10.1029/2010WR010229.
   Google Scholar
• Sabau, A.S., et al., 2020. Evaporation due to infrared heating and natural convection. Heat and Mass Transfer, 56, 2585–2593. doi:10.1007/s00231-020-02875-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi, K. and Zeng, X., 2009. Effects of soil wetness, plant litter, and under-canopy atmospheric stability on ground evaporation in the Community Land Model (CLM3.5). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114 (D1). doi:10.1029/2008JD010834.
   Google Scholar
• Salvucci, G.D., 1997. Soil and moisture independent estimation of stage-two evaporation from potential evaporation and albedo or surface temperature. Water Resources Research, 33 (1), 111–122. doi:10.1029/96WR02858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, B.R., et al., 2019. Tracking seasonal fluctuations in land water storage using global models and GRACE satellites. Geophysical Research Letters, 46 (10), 5254–5264. doi:10.1029/2018GL081836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokri, N. and Salvucci, G.D., 2011. Evaporation from Porous media in the presence of a water table. Vadose Zone Journal, 10 (4), 1309–1318. doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B., et al., 2017. Area-wide evapotranspiration monitoring at the crown level of a tropical mountain rain forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 219–229. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, K.M., et al., 2011. Evaporation from soils under thermal boundary conditions: experimental and modeling investigation to compare equilibrium- and nonequilibrium-based approaches. Water Resources Research, 47 (5), W05540. doi:10.1029/2010WR009533.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, S.C. and Lawrence, D.M., 2014. Assessing a dry surface layer-based soil resistance parameterization for the Community Land Model using GRACE and FLUXNET-MTE data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119 (17), 10299–10312. doi:10.1002/2014JD022314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapley, B.D., et al., 2004. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophysical Research Letters, 31 (9). doi:10.1029/2004GL019920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuller, M. and Or, D., 2005. Water films and scaling of soil characteristic curves at low water contents. Water Resources Research, 41 (9), W09403. doi:10.1029/2005WR004142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Griend, A.A. and Owe, M., 1994. Bare soil surface resistance to evaporation by vapor diffusion under semiarid conditions. Water Resources Research, 30 (2), 181–188. doi:10.1029/93WR02747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2011. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151 (4), 437–448. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar