Advanced search
Publication Cover
Hydrological Sciences Journal Latest Articles
Submit an article Journal homepage
0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The legacy of STAHY: Milestones, achievements, challenges, and open problems in statistical hydrology

Elena Volpi1 Department of Civil, Computer Science and Aeronautical Technologies Engineering, Roma Tre University, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-1496
ORCID Icon,
Salvatore Grimaldi2 DIBAF Department, Tuscia University, Italy
,
Amir Aghakouchak3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine, USA
,
Attilio Castellarin4 Department DICAM, University of Bologna, Italy
,
Fateh Chebana5 Eau Terre Environment Research Centre, National Institute for Scientific Research, Canada
,
Simon Michael Papalexiou6 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada
,
Hafzullah Aksoy7 Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-5660
ORCID Icon,
András Bárdossy8 Institute for Modelling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems, University of Stuttgart, Germany
,
Antonino Cancelliere9 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Italy
,
Yanfeng Chen10 College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, China
,
Roberto Deidda11 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Italy
,
Uwe Haberlandt12 Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Leibniz University of Hannover, Germany
,
Ebru Eris13 Department of Civil Engineering, Ege University, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-7666
ORCID Icon,
Svenja Fischer14 Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics, Wageningen University & Research, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-0223
ORCID Icon,
Félix Francés15 Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
,
Dmitri Kavetski16 School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Australia;17 Institute of Environmental Hydraulics IHCantabria, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
,
Thomas Rodding Kjeldsen18 Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, UK
,
Krzysztof Kochanek19 Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
,
Andreas Langousis20 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Greece
,
Luis Mediero Orduña21 Department of Civil Engineering: Hydraulic, Energy and Environment, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
,
Alberto Montanari4 Department DICAM, University of Bologna, Italy
,
Sofia D. Nerantzaki22 Department of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
,
Taha B.M.J. Ouarda5 Eau Terre Environment Research Centre, National Institute for Scientific Research, Canada
,
Ilaria Prosdocimi23 Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-094X
ORCID Icon,
Elesa Ragno24 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Chandra R. Rajulapati25 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Canada
,
Ana Isabel Requena26 Centre of Hydrographic Studies of the Centre for Studies and Experimentation of Public Works, Spain
,
Elena Ridolfi27 Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-2511
ORCID Icon,
Mojtaba Sadegh28 Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, USA
,
Andreas Schumann29 Faculty for Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
&
Ashish Sharma30 Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
 show all
Received 19 Sep 2023, Accepted 01 Jul 2024, Accepted author version posted online: 30 Jul 2024
Accepted author version

References

  • Adarsh, S. Nourani, V. Archana, D. S. & Dharan, D. S. (2020). Multifractal description of daily rainfall fields over India. Journal of Hydrology, 586, 124913.
  • Addor, N. Nearing, G. Prieto, C. Newman, A. J. Le Vine, N. & Clark, M. P. (2018). A ranking of hydrological signatures based on their predictability in space. Water Resources Research, 54(11), 8792-8812.
  • AghaKouchak, A. Bárdossy, A. & Habib, E. (2010). Copula‐based uncertainty modelling: application to multisensor precipitation estimates. Hydrological Processes, 24(15), 2111-2124.
  • AghaKouchak, A. Chiang, F. Huning, L. S. Love, C. A. Mallakpour, I. Mazdiyasni, O. … & Sadegh, M. (2020). Climate extremes and compound hazards in a warming world. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48, 519-548.
  • AghaKouchak, A. Huning, L. S. Chiang, F. Sadegh, M. Vahedifard, F. Mazdiyasni, O. … & Mallakpour, I. (2018). How do natural hazards cascade to cause disasters?. Nature 561, 458-460.
  • Aksoy, H. & Bayazit, M. (2000). A model for daily flows of intermittent streams. Hydrological Processes, 14(10), 1725-1744.
  • Alexander, L. V. Zhang, X. Peterson, T. C. Caesar, J. Gleason, B. Klein Tank, A. M. G. … & Vazquez‐Aguirre, J. L. (2006). Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 111(D5).
  • Alexandersson, H. (1986). A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. Journal of climatology, 6(6), 661-675.
  • Alila, Y. (1999). A hierarchical approach for the regionalization of precipitation annual maxima in Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D24), 31645-31655.
  • Allamano, P. Croci, A. & Laio, F. (2015). Toward the camera rain gauge. Water Resources Research, 51(3), 1744-1757.
  • Allamano, P. Laio, F. & Claps, P. (2011). Interactive comment on “Effects of seasonality on the distribution of hydrological extremes” by P. Allamano et al. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss, 8, C2841-C2851.
  • Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3), 175-185.
  • Archfield, S. A. & Vogel, R. M. (2010). Map correlation method: Selection of a reference streamgage to estimate daily streamflow at ungaged catchments. Water resources research, 46(10).
  • Ashkar, F. & Aucoin, F. (2011). A broader look at bivariate distributions applicable in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 405(3-4), 451-461. Ball, J. Babister, M. Retallick, M. Ling, F. & Thyer, M. A. (2019). Fundamental issues. Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia).
  • Banfi, F. Cazzaniga, G. & De Michele, C. (2022). Nonparametric extrapolation of extreme quantiles: a comparison study. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(6), 1579-1596.
  • Baratti, E. Montanari, A. Castellarin, A. Salinas, J. L. Viglione, A. & Bezzi, A. (2012). Estimating the flood frequency distribution at seasonal and annual time scales. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(12), 4651-4660.
  • Barber, C. Lamontagne, J. R. & Vogel, R. M. (2020). Improved estimators of correlation and R2 for skewed hydrologic data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(1), 87-101.
  • Bárdossy, A. & Li, J. (2008). Geostatistical interpolation using copulas. Water resources research, 44(7).
  • Bárdossy, A. & Pegram, G. (2013). Interpolation of precipitation under topographic influence at different time scales. Water Resources Research, 49(8), 4545-4565.
  • Bárdossy, A. & Plate, E. J. (1992). Space‐time model for daily rainfall using atmospheric circulation patterns. Water resources research, 28(5), 1247-1259.
  • Bárdossy, A. Seidel, J. & El Hachem, A. (2021). The use of personal weather station observations to improve precipitation estimation and interpolation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(2), 583-601.
  • Bárdossy, A. (2023). Changing correlations: a flexible definition of non-Gaussian multivariate dependence. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 1-11.
  • Basseville, M. & Nikiforov, I. V. (1993). Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application (Vol. 104). Englewood Cliffs: prentice Hall.
  • Bassiouni, M. Vogel, R. M. & Archfield, S. A. (2016). Panel regressions to estimate low‐flow response to rainfall variability in ungaged basins. Water Resources Research, 52(12), 9470-9494.
  • Bayazit, M. & Önöz, B. J. H. S. J. (2007). To prewhiten or not to prewhiten in trend analysis?. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52(4), 611-624.
  • Ben Aissia, M.A. Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T. B. (2017). Multivariate missing data in hydrology–Review and applications. Advances in Water Resources, 110, 299-309.
  • Benito, G. Lang, M. Barriendos, M. Llasat, M. C. Francés, F. Ouarda, T. … & Bobée, B. (2004). Use of systematic, palaeoflood and historical data for the improvement of flood risk estimation. Review of scientific methods. Natural hazards, 31, 623-643.
  • Benson, M.A. (1950). Use of Historical Data in Flood Frequency Analysis. Eos, Trans. AGU, v. 31(3), p. 419-424.
  • Benson, M. A. & Matalas, N. C. (1967). Synthetic hydrology based on regional statistical parameters. Water Resources Research, 3(4), 931-935.
  • Beran, J. (2017). Statistics for long-memory processes. Routledge.
  • Berezowski, T. Szcześniak, M. Kardel, I. Michałowski, R. Okruszko, T. Mezghani, A. & Piniewski, M. (2016). CPLFD-GDPT5: High-resolution gridded daily precipitation and temperature data set for two largest Polish river basins. Earth System Science Data, 8(1), 127-139.
  • Berg, D. (2009). Copula goodness-of-fit testing: an overview and power comparison. The European Journal of Finance, 15(7-8), 675-701.
  • Berndt, C. & Haberlandt, U. (2018). Spatial interpolation of climate variables in Northern Germany—Influence of temporal resolution and network density. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 15, 184-202.
  • Berndt, C. Rabiei, E. & Haberlandt, U. (2014). Geostatistical merging of rain gauge and radar data for high temporal resolutions and various station density scenarios. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 88-101.
  • Berne, A. & Krajewski, W. F. (2013). Radar for hydrology: Unfulfilled promise or unrecognized potential?. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 357-366.
  • Bertola, M. Viglione, A. & Blöschl, G. (2019). Informed attribution of flood changes to decadal variation of atmospheric, catchment and river drivers in Upper Austria. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 123919.
  • Bertola, M. Viglione, A. Lun, D. Hall, J. & Blöschl, G. (2020). Flood trends in Europe: are changes in small and big floods different?. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(4), 1805-1822.
  • Bertola, M. Viglione, A. Vorogushyn, S. Lun, D. Merz, B. & Blöschl, G. (2021). Do small and large floods have the same drivers of change? A regional attribution analysis in Europe. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(3), 1347-1364.
  • Blöschl, G. Bierkens, M. F. Chambel, A. Cudennec, C. Destouni, G. Fiori, A. … & Renner, M. (2019). Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(10), 1141-1158.
  • Blöschl, G. Hall, J. Parajka, J. Perdigão, R. A. Merz, B. Arheimer, B. … & Živković, N. (2017). Changing climate shifts timing of European floods. Science, 357(6351), 588-590.
  • Blöschl, G. Hall, J. Viglione, A. Perdigão, R. A. Parajka, J. Merz, B. … & Živković, N. (2019). Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature, 573(7772), 108-111.
  • Blöschl, G. Kiss, A. Viglione, A. Barriendos, M. Böhm, O. Brázdil, R. … & Wetter, O. (2020). Current European flood-rich period exceptional compared with past 500 years. Nature, 583(7817), 560-566.
  • Blöschl, G. Sivapalan, M. Wagener, T. Savenije, H. & Viglione, A. (Eds.) (2013). Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: synthesis across processes, places and scales. Cambridge University Press.
  • Blum, A. G. Ferraro, P. J. Archfield, S. A. & Ryberg, K. R. (2020). Causal effect of impervious cover on annual flood magnitude for the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(5), no-no.
  • Botero, B. & Francés, F. (2010). Estimation of high return period flood quantiles using additional non-systematic information with upper bounded statistical models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2617-2628.
  • Box, G. E. & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco. Calif: Holden-Day.
  • Box, G. E. Jenkins, G. M. Reinsel, G. C. & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Brahimi, B. & Necir, A. (2012). A semiparametric estimation of copula models based on the method of moments. Statistical Methodology, 9(4), 467-477.
  • Brahimi, B. Chebana, F. & Necir, A. (2015). Copula representation of bivariate L-moments: a new estimation method for multiparameter two-dimensional copula models. Statistics, 49(3), 497-521.
  • Brath, A. Castellarin, A. & Montanari, A. (2003). Assessing the reliability of regional depth‐duration‐frequency equations for gaged and ungaged sites. Water Resources Research, 39(12).
  • Brown, C. Meeks, R. Hunu, K. & Yu, W. (2011). Hydroclimate risk to economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Climatic Change, 106(4), 621-647.
  • Burn, D. H. (1990). An appraisal of the “region of influence” approach to flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 35(2), 149-165.
  • Burn, D. H. (2014). A framework for regional estimation of intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves. Hydrological Processes, 28(14), 4209-4218.
  • Burn, D. H. Hannaford, J. Hodgkins, G. A. Whitfield, P. H. Thorne, R. & Marsh, T. (2012). Reference hydrologic networks II. Using reference hydrologic networks to assess climate-driven changes in streamflow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57(8), 1580-1593.
  • Burton, A. Kilsby, C. G. Fowler, H. J. Cowpertwait, P. S. P. & O’connell, P. E. (2008). RainSim: A spatial–temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(12), 1356-1369.
  • Cabilio, P. Zhang, Y. & Chen, X. (2013). Bootstrap rank tests for trend in time series. Environmetrics, 24(8), 537-549.
  • Calenda, G. Mancini, C. P. & Volpi, E. (2009). Selection of the probabilistic model of extreme floods: The case of the River Tiber in Rome. Journal of Hydrology, 371(1-4), 1-11.
  • Cameron, D.S.; Beven, K.J.; Tawn, J.; Blazkova, S.; Naden, P. (1999). Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology, 219, 169–187,
  • Camuffo, D. della Valle, A. & Becherini, F. (2020). A critical analysis of the definitions of climate and hydrological extreme events. Quaternary International, 538, 5-13.
  • Cancelliere, A. Salas, J.D. (2010) Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflows series, Journal of Hydrology, 391 (1-2), pp. 77-89.
  • Capéraà, P. A.-L. Fougères, and C. Genest, A nonparametric estimation procedure for bivariate extreme value copulas. Biometrika, 1997. 84(3): p. 567-577.
  • Carsteanu, A.A, & Langousis, A. (2020). Break of temporal symmetry in a stationary Markovian setting: evidencing an arrow of time, and parameterizing linear dependencies using fractional low-order joint moments. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 34, 1–6.
  • Castellarin, A. (2007). Probabilistic envelope curves for design flood estimation at ungauged sites. Water Resources Research, 43(4).
  • Castellarin, A. (2014). Regional prediction of flow-duration curves using a three-dimensional kriging. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 179-191.
  • Castellarin, A. Burn, D. H. & Brath, A. (2008). Homogeneity testing: How homogeneous do heterogeneous cross-correlated regions seem?. Journal of Hydrology, 360(1-4), 67-76.
  • Castellarin, A. Persiano, S. Pugliese, A. Aloe, A. Skøien, J. O. & Pistocchi, A. (2018). Prediction of streamflow regimes over large geographical areas: interpolated flow–duration curves for the Danube region. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(6), 845-861.
  • Castiglioni, S. Castellarin, A. Montanari, A. Skøien, J. O. Laaha, G. & Blöschl, G. (2011). Smooth regional estimation of low-flow indices: physiographical space based interpolation and top-kriging. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(3), 715-727.
  • Ceola, S. Pugliese, A. Ventura, M. Galeati, G. Montanari, A. & Castellarin, A. (2018). Hydro-power production and fish habitat suitability: Assessing impact and effectiveness of ecological flows at regional scale. Advances in Water Resources, 116, 29-39.
  • Chandler, R. E. & Wheater, H. S. (2002). Analysis of rainfall variability using generalized linear models: a case study from the west of Ireland. Water Resources Research, 38(10), 10-1.
  • Charles, S. P. Bates, B. C. & Hughes, J. P. (1999). A spatiotemporal model for downscaling precipitation occurrence and amounts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D24), 31657-31669.
  • Chebana, F. (2022). Multivariate Frequency Analysis of Hydro-Meteorological Variables: A Copula-Based Approach. Elsevier.
  • Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T. B. (2021). Multivariate non-stationary hydrological frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 593, 125907.
  • Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T.B.M.J. (2011b). Multivariate quantiles in hydrological frequency analysis. Environmetrics, 22(1), 63-78.
  • Chebana, F. & T.B.M.J. Ouarda (2011a), Depth-based multivariate descriptive statistics with hydrological applications, Journal Geophysical Research, 116(D10), D10120.
  • Chebana, F. Ben Aissia, M.A. & Ouarda, T.B.M.J. (2017). Multivariate shift testing for hydrological variables, review, comparison and application. Journal of Hydrology, 548, 88-103
  • Chebana, F. T.B.M.J. Ouarda, and T.C. Duong, (2013) Testing for multivariate trends in hydrologic frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 486: p. 519-530.
  • Chen, J. Brissette, F. P. & Leconte, R. (2012). WeaGETS–a Matlab-based daily scale weather generator for generating precipitation and temperature. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 2222-2235.
  • Chen, L. Qiu, H. Zhang, J. Singh, V. P. Zhou, J. & Huang, K. (2019). Copula-based method for stochastic daily streamflow simulation considering lag-2 autocorrelation. Journal of Hydrology, 578, 123938.
  • Chiang, F. Mazdiyasni, O. & AghaKouchak, A. (2021). Evidence of anthropogenic impacts on global drought frequency, duration, and intensity. Nature communications, 12(1), 1-10.
  • Chiang, F. Greve, P. Mazdiyasni, O. et al. (2021). A multivariate conditional probability ratio framework for the detection and attribution of compound climate extremes. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(15), p.e2021GL094361.
  • Chiang, F. Greve, P. Mazdiyasni, O. et al. (2022). Intensified likelihood of concurrent warm and dry months attributed to anthropogenic climate change. Water Resources Research, 58(6), p.e2021WR030411.
  • Chow, V. T. Maidment, D. R. & Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
  • Cipollini, S. Fiori, A. & Volpi, E. (2021). Structure-based framework for the design and risk assessment of hydraulic structures, with application to offline flood detention basins. Journal of Hydrology, 600, 126527.
  • Claps, P. Giordano, A. & Laio, F. (2005). Advances in shot noise modeling of daily streamflows. Advances in water resources, 28(9), 992-1000.
  • Clark, M. Gangopadhyay, S. Hay, L. Rajagopalan, B. & Wilby, R. (2004). The Schaake shuffle: A method for reconstructing space–time variability in forecasted precipitation and temperature fields. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(1), 243-262.
  • Clark, M. P. Vogel, R. M. Lamontagne, J. R. Mizukami, N. Knoben, W. J. Tang, G. … & Papalexiou, S. M. (2021). The abuse of popular performance metrics in hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029001.
  • Cohn, T.A. J.R. Stedinger, (1987). Use of Historical Information in a Maximum Likelihood Framework. Journal of Hydrol. v. 96, p. 215-233.
  • Cohn, T. A. & Lins, H. F. (2005). Nature’s style: Naturally trendy. Geophysical research letters, 32(23).
  • Coles, S. (2001). Classical extreme value theory and models. In An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values (pp. 45-73). Springer, London.
  • Corbella, S. & Stretch, D. D. (2013). Simulating a multivariate sea storm using Archimedean copulas. Coastal Engineering, 76, 68-78.
  • Costa, J.E. (1978). Holocene Stratigraphy in Flood Frequency Analysis. Water Resour. Res. v. 14(4), p. 626-632.
  • Cover, T. & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory, 13(1), 21-27.
  • Cowpertwait, P. Isham, V. & Onof, C. (2007). Point process models of rainfall: developments for fine-scale structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2086), 2569-2587.
  • Cox, D. R. & Isham, V. (1980). Point processes (Vol. 12). CRC Press.
  • Croissant, Y. & Millo, G. (2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package. Journal of statistical software, 27(2), 1-43.
  • Cunderlik, J. M. & Burn, D. H. (2003). Non-stationary pooled flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 276(1-4), 210-223.
  • Dahlstedt, K. & Jensen, H. J. (2005). Fluctuation spectrum and size scaling of river flow and level. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 348, 596-610.
  • Dalrymple, T. (1960). Flood-frequency analyses (No. 1543). US Government Printing Office.
  • de Lavenne, A. Skøien, J. O. Cudennec, C. Curie, F. & Moatar, F. (2016). Transferring measured discharge time series: Large‐scale comparison of Top‐kriging to geomorphology‐based inverse modeling. Water Resources Research, 52(7), 5555-5576.
  • de Vos, L. W. Overeem, A. Leijnse, H. & Uijlenhoet, R. (2019). Rainfall estimation accuracy of a nationwide instantaneously sampling commercial microwave link network: Error dependency on known characteristics. Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 36(7), 1267-1283.
  • Debele, S. E. Strupczewski, W. G. & Bogdanowicz, E. (2017). A comparison of three approaches to non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Acta Geophysica, 65, 863-883.
  • DeGaetano, A. T. & Castellano, C. M. (2017). Future projections of extreme precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves for climate adaptation planning in New York State. Climate Services, 5, 23-35.
  • Dehling, H. Rooch, A. & Taqqu, M. S. (2013). Non‐parametric change‐point tests for long‐range dependent data. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 40(1), 153-173.
  • Dehling, H. Vogel, D. Wendler, M. & Wied, D. (2017). Testing for changes in Kendall’s tau. Econometric Theory, 33(6), 1352-1386.
  • Deidda, R. (2000). Rainfall downscaling in a space‐time multifractal framework. Water Resources Research, 36(7), 1779-1794.
  • Deidda, R. (2010). A multiple threshold method for fitting the generalized Pareto distribution to rainfall time series. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(12), 2559-2575.
  • Deidda, R. Hellies, M. & Langousis, A. (2021). A critical analysis of the shortcomings in spatial frequency analysis of rainfall extremes based on homogeneous regions and a comparison with a hierarchical boundaryless approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(12), 2605-2628.
  • Desai, S. & Ouarda, T. B. (2021). Regional hydrological frequency analysis at ungauged sites with random forest regression. Journal of Hydrology, 594, 125861.
  • Di Baldassarre, G. Castellarin, A. & Brath, A. (2006). Relationships between statistics of rainfall extremes and mean annual precipitation: an application for design-storm estimation in northern central Italy. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(4), 589-601.
  • Di Baldassarre, G. Laio, F. & Montanari, A. (2009). Design flood estimation using model selection criteria. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34(10-12), 606-611.
  • Douglas, E. M. Vogel, R. M. & Kroll, C. N. (2000). Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. Journal of hydrology, 240(1-2), 90-105.
  • Dung, N. V. Merz, B. Bárdossy, A. & Apel, H. (2015). Handling uncertainty in bivariate quantile estimation–An application to flood hazard analysis in the Mekong Delta. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 704-717.
  • Durocher, M. Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T. B. (2016). On the prediction of extreme flood quantiles at ungauged locations with spatial copula. Journal of Hydrology, 533, 523-532.
  • Eagleson, P.S. (1972). Dynamics Flood Frequency. Water Resources Research, 8, 878–898.
  • Easterling, D.R. Kunkel, K.E. Wehner, M.F. and Sun, L. (2016). Detection and attribution of climate extremes in the observed record. Weather and Climate Extremes, 11, pp.17-27.
  • Ekström, M. Fowler, H. J. Kilsby, C. G. & Jones, P. D. (2005). New estimates of future changes in extreme rainfall across the UK using regional climate model integrations. 2. Future estimates and use in impact studies. Journal of Hydrology, 300(1-4), 234-251.
  • El Adlouni, S. & Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2010). Frequency analysis of extreme rainfall events. Rainfall: State of the science, 191, 171-188.
  • El Adlouni, S. Ouarda, T. B. Zhang, X. Roy, R. & Bobée, B. (2007). Generalized maximum likelihood estimators for the nonstationary generalized extreme value model. Water Resources Research, 43(3).
  • El Adlouni, S. Bobée, B. & Ouarda, T. B. (2008). On the tails of extreme event distributions in hydrology. Journal of hydrology, 355(1-4), 16-33.
  • Emmanouil, S. Langousis, A. Nikolopoulos, E. I. & Anagnostou, E. N. (2020). Quantitative assessment of annual maxima, peaks-over-threshold and multifractal parametric approaches in estimating intensity-duration-frequency curves from short rainfall records. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125151.
  • Emmanouil, S. Langousis, A. Nikolopoulos, E.I. & Anagnostou, E.N. (2022). The spatiotemporal evolution of rainfall extremes in a changing climate: A CONUS-wide assessment based on multifractal scaling arguments. Earth’s Future, 10, e2021EF002539.
  • Emmanouil, S. Langousis, A. Nikolopoulos, E.I. & Anagnostou, E.N. (2023). Exploring the future of rainfall extremes over CONUS: The effects of high emission climate change trajectories on the intensity and frequency of rare precipitation events. Earth’s Future, 11, e2022EF003039.
  • Farmer, W. H. (2016). Ordinary kriging as a tool to estimate historical daily streamflow records. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(7), 2721-2735.
  • Farmer, W. H. Over, T. M. & Vogel, R. M. (2015). Multiple regression and inverse moments improve the characterization of the spatial scaling behavior of daily streamflows in the Southeast United States. Water Resources Research, 51(3), 1775-1796.
  • Farmer, W. H. & Vogel, R. M. (2016). On the deterministic and stochastic use of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 52(7), 5619-5633.
  • Farris, S. Deidda, R. Viola, F. & Mascaro, G. (2021). On the role ofserial correlation and field significance in detecting changes in extreme precipitation frequency. Water Resources Research, 57, e2021WR030172.
  • Faulkner, D. Warren, S. Spencer, P. & Sharkey, P. (2020). Can we still predict the future from the past? Implementing non‐stationary flood frequency analysis in the UK. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(1), e12582.
  • Favre, A. C. El Adlouni, S. Perreault, L. Thiémonge, N. & Bobée, B. (2004). Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water resources research, 40(1).
  • Feng, Y. Shi, P. Qu, S. Mou, S. Chen, C. & Dong, F. (2020). Nonstationary flood coincidence risk analysis using time-varying copula functions. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-12.
  • Fernandez, B. & Salas, J. D. (1986). Periodic gamma autoregressive processes for operational hydrology. Water Resources Research, 22(10), 1385-1396.
  • Fernández, B. & Salas, J. D. (1999). Return period and risk of hydrologic events. I: Mathematical formulation. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 4(4), 297-307.
  • Fernandez, W. Vogel, R. M. & Sankarasubramanian, A. (2000). Regional calibration of a watershed model. Hydrological sciences journal, 45(5), 689-707.
  • Fischer, E.M. & Knutti, R. (2016). Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models. Nature Climate Change, 6(11), 986-991.
  • Fischer, S. (2018). A seasonal mixed-POT model to estimate high flood quantiles from different event types and seasons. Journal of Applied Statistics, 45(15), 2831-2847.
  • Fischer, S. Lun, D. Schumann, A. H. & Blöschl, G. (2023). Detecting flood-type-specific flood-rich and flood-poor periods in peaks-over-threshold series with application to Bavaria (Germany). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 1395–1413.
  • Fischer, S. & Schumann, A. H. (2021). Regionalisation of flood frequencies based on flood type-specific mixture distributions. Journal of Hydrology X, 13, 100107.
  • Fischer, S. Schumann, A. & Bühler, P. (2019). Timescale-based flood typing to estimate temporal changes in flood frequencies. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(15), 1867-1892.
  • Fitzner, D. & Sester, M. (2015). Estimation of precipitation fields from 1-minute rain gauge time series–comparison of spatial and spatio-temporal interpolation methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(9), 1668-1693.
  • Flores, C. (2004, June). Multiplicative cascade models for rain in hydro-meteorological disasters risk management. In ASTIN-Kolloquium, Bergen, Norway (pp. 6-9).
  • Frahm, G. (2006). On the extremal dependence coefficient of multivariate distributions. Statistics & Probability Letters, 76(14): p. 1470-1481.
  • Francés, F. Salas, J. D. & Boes, D. (1994). Flood Frequency Analysis with Systematic and Historical or Paleoflood Data based on the Two-Parameter GEV Models. Water Resources Research, 30(6), 1653-1664.
  • Fu, G. Chiew, F. H. & Shi, X. (2018). Generation of multi-site stochastic daily rainfall with four weather generators: a case study of Gloucester catchment in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 134(3-4), 1027-1046.
  • Gaume, E. Mouhous, N. & Andrieu, H. (2007). Rainfall stochastic disaggregation models: Calibration and validation of a multiplicative cascade model. Advances in Water Resources, 30(5), 1301-1319.
  • Gedikli, A. Aksoy, H. & Unal, N. E. (2010). AUG-Segmenter: a user-friendly tool for segmentation of long time series. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 12(3), 318-328.
  • Genest, C. & Nešlehová J. (2012b). Copulas and Copula Models. In: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, 2nd Edition, Wiley, Chichester, 2, pp. 541-553.
  • Genest, C. & Nešlehová, J. (2012a). Copula modeling for extremes. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, 2nd Edition, Wiley, Chichester, 2012, 2, p. 530-541.
  • Genest, C. & Chebana, F. (2017). Copula modeling in hydrologic frequency analysis. Chapter 30. Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 30-1.
  • Genest, C. & Favre, A. C. (2007). Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(4), 347-368.
  • Genest, C. & Rémillard, B. (2008). Validity of the parametric bootstrap for goodness-of-fit testing in semiparametric models. In Annales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques (Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 1096-1127).
  • Genest, C. Favre, A. C. Béliveau, J. & Jacques, C. (2007). Metaelliptical copulas and their use in frequency analysis of multivariate hydrological data. Water Resources Research, 43(9).
  • Genest, C. Rémillard, B. & Beaudoin, D. (2009). Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and economics, 44(2), 199-213.
  • Gerstenberger, C. Vogel, D. & Wendler, M. (2020). Tests for scale changes based on pairwise differences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1336-1348.
  • Gilleland, E. & Katz, R.W. (2016). extRemes 2.0: An Extreme Value Analysis Package in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 72(8), 1-39
  • Goovaerts, P. (2000). Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. Journal of hydrology, 228(1-2), 113-129.
  • Goudenhoofdt, E. & Delobbe, L. (2009). Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(2), 195-203.
  • Gräler, B. Van Den Berg, M. J. Vandenberghe, S. Petroselli, A. Grimaldi, S. De Baets, B. & Verhoest, N. E. C. (2013). Multivariate return periods in hydrology: a critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(4), 1281-1296.
  • Grassberger, P. (1983). On the critical behavior of the general epidemic process and dynamical percolation. Mathematical Biosciences, 63(2), 157-172.
  • Graves, T. Gramacy, R. Watkins, N. & Franzke, C. (2017). A brief history of long memory: Hurst, Mandelbrot and the road to ARFIMA, 1951–1980. Entropy, 19(9), 437.
  • Griffis, V. W. & Stedinger, J. R. (2007). Log-Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in flood frequency analysis. I: Distribution characteristics. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(5), 482-491.
  • Grimaldi, S. & Serinaldi, F. (2006a). Design hyetograph analysis with 3-copula function. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51(2), 223-238.
  • Grimaldi, S. & Serinaldi, F. (2006b). Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 29(8), 1155-1167.
  • Grimaldi, S. Volpi, E. Langousis, A. Papalexiou, S.M. De Luca, D.L. Piscopia, R. Nerantzaki, S.D. Papacharalampous, G. & Petroselli, A. (2022) Continuous hydrologic modelling for small and ungauged basins: A comparison of eight rainfall models for sub-daily runoff simulations. J. Hydrol. 610.
  • Grønneberg, S. & Hjort, N. L. (2014). The copula information criteria. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 41(2), 436-459.
  • Gruber, A. M. & Stedinger, J. R. (2008). Models of LP3 regional skew, data selection, and Bayesian GLS regression. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008: Ahupua’A (pp. 1-10).
  • Grundmann, J. Hörning, S. & Bárdossy, A. (2019). Stochastic reconstruction of spatio-temporal rainfall patterns by inverse hydrologic modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(1), 225-237.
  • Gumbel, E.J. (1958). Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Guo, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. & Wang, Z. (2021). Regionalization of hydrological modeling for predicting streamflow in ungauged catchments: A comprehensive review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(1), e1487.
  • Haan, C. T. Allen, D. M. & Street, J. O. (1976). A Markov chain model of daily rainfall. Water Resources Research, 12(3), 443-449.
  • Haberlandt, U. (2007). Geostatistical interpolation of hourly precipitation from rain gauges and radar for a large-scale extreme rainfall event. Journal of Hydrology, 332(1-2), 144-157.
  • Haberlandt, U. & Sester, M. (2010). Areal rainfall estimation using moving cars as rain gauges–a modelling study. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(7), 1139-1151.
  • Haese, B. Hörning, S. Chwala, C. Bárdossy, A. Schalge, B. & Kunstmann, H. (2017). Stochastic reconstruction and interpolation of precipitation fields using combined information of commercial microwave links and rain gauges. Water Resources Research, 53(12), 10740-10756.
  • Hald, A. (2005). A history of probability and statistics and their applications before 1750. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Han, J. C. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Wu, X. Liu, Z. & Wang, Y. (2020). Risk assessment through multivariate analysis on the magnitude and occurrence date of daily storm events in the Shenzhen bay area. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34(5), 669-689.
  • Hao, Z. & AghaKouchak, A. (2014). A nonparametric multivariate multi-index drought monitoring framework. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15(1), 89-101.
  • Hao, Z. & Singh, V. P. (2013). Modeling multisite streamflow dependence with maximum entropy copula. Water Resources Research, 49(10), 7139-7143.
  • Hao, Z. & Singh, V. P. (2016). Review of dependence modeling in hydrology and water resources. Progress in Physical Geography, 40(4), 549-578.
  • Hayhoe, H. N. (2000). Improvements of stochastic weather data generators for diverse climates. Climate Research, 14(2), 75-87.
  • Hecht, J. S. & Vogel, R. M. (2020). Updating urban design floods for changes in central tendency and variability using regression. Advances in Water Resources, 136, 103484.
  • Helsel, D. R. & Hirsch, R. M. (1992). Statistical methods in water resources. Elsevier.
  • Helsel, D. R. Hirsch, R. M. Ryberg, K. R. Archfield, S. A. & Gilroy, E. J. (2020). Statistical methods in water resources: US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. book, 4, 458.
  • Hirsch, R. M. (1979). Synthetic hydrology and water supply reliability. Water Resources Research, 15(6), 1603-1615.
  • Hirsch, R. M. (1982). A comparison of four streamflow record extension techniques. Water Resources Research, 18(4), 1081-1088.
  • Hirschboeck, K. K. (1987). Hydroclimatically-defined mixed distributions in partial duration flood series. In Hydrologic frequency modeling (pp. 199-212). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Hodgkins, G. A. Whitfield, P. H. Burn, D. H. Hannaford, J. Renard, B. Stahl, K. … & Wilson, D. (2017). Climate-driven variability in the occurrence of major floods across North America and Europe. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 704-717.
  • Hofert, M. Mächler, M. & Mcneil, A. J. (2012). Likelihood inference for Archimedean copulas in high dimensions under known margins. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 110, 133-150.
  • Hörning, S. & Bárdossy, A. (2018). Phase annealing for the conditional simulation of spatial random fields. Computers & Geosciences, 112, 101-111.
  • Hosking, J. R. (1990). L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 52(1), 105-124.
  • Hosking, J. R. & Wallis, J. R. (1987). Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 29(3), 339-349.
  • Hosking, J. R. M. & Wallis, J. R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis (p. 240).
  • Hrachowitz, M. Savenije, H. H. G. Blöschl, G. McDonnell, J. J. Sivapalan, M. Pomeroy, J. W. … & Cudennec, C. (2013). A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review. Hydrological sciences journal, 58(6), 1198-1255.
  • Huang, Y. Schmitt, F. G. Lu, Z. & Liu, Y. (2009). Analysis of daily river flow fluctuations using empirical mode decomposition and arbitrary order Hilbert spectral analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 373(1-2), 103-111.
  • Hubert, P. (2000). The segmentation procedure as a tool for discrete modeling of hydrometeorological regimes. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 14, 297-304.
  • Hughes, J. P. & Guttorp, P. (1994). Incorporating spatial dependence and atmospheric data in a model of precipitation. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 33(12), 1503-1515.
  • Hurst, H. E. (1951). Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American society of civil engineers, 116(1), 770-799.
  • Hutchinson, M. F. (1998). Interpolation of rainfall data with thin plate smoothing splines. Part I: Two dimensional smoothing of data with short range correlation. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 2(2), 139-151.
  • Hutchinson, M. F. (1998). Interpolation of rainfall data with thin plate smoothing splines: II. Analysis of topographic dependence. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 2(2), 168-185.
  • Iliopoulou, T. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2020). Projecting the future of rainfall extremes: Better classic than trendy. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125005.
  • Inclan, C. & Tiao, G. C. (1994). Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427), 913-923.
  • Izady, A. Davary, K. Alizadeh, A. Ghahraman, B. Sadeghi, M. & Moghaddamnia, A. (2012). Application of” panel-data” modeling to predict groundwater levels in the Neishaboor plain, Iran. Hydrogeology Journal, 20(3), 435.
  • Jiang, C. Xiong, L. Xu, C. Y. & Guo, S. (2015). Bivariate frequency analysis of nonstationary low‐flow series based on the time‐varying copula. Hydrological Processes, 29(6), 1521-1534.
  • Joe, H. (2014). Dependence modeling with copulas. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Jothityangkoon, C. Sivapalan, M. & Viney, N. R. (2000). Tests of a space‐time model of daily rainfall in southwestern Australia based on nonhomogeneous random cascades. Water resources research, 36(1), 267-284.
  • Kalai, C. Mondal, A. Griffin, A. & Stewart, E. (2020). Comparison of nonstationary regional flood frequency analysis techniques based on the index-flood approach. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 25(7), 06020003.
  • Kantelhardt, J. W. Rybski, D. Zschiegner, S. A. Braun, P. Koscielny-Bunde, E. Livina, V. … & Bunde, A. (2003). Multifractality of river runoff and precipitation: comparison of fluctuation analysis and wavelet methods. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 330(1-2), 240-245.
  • Kao, S. C. & Govindaraju, R. S. (2007). A bivariate frequency analysis of extreme rainfall with implications for design. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112(D13).
  • Kao, S. C. and R. S. Govindaraju (2008), Trivariate statistical analysis of extreme rainfall events via the Plackett family of copulas, Water Resources Research, 44(2).
  • Karahacane, H. Meddi, M. Chebana, F. & Saaed, H. A. (2020). Complete multivariate flood frequency analysis, applied to northern Algeria. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(4), e12619.
  • Katz, R. W. (2013). Statistical methods for nonstationary extremes. In Extremes in a changing climate (pp. 15-37). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Katz, R. W. Parlange, M. B. & Naveau, P. (2002). Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Advances in Water Resources, 25(8-12), 1287-1304.
  • Kauffeldt, A. Halldin, S. Rodhe, A. Xu, C. Y. & Westerberg, I. K. (2013). Disinformative data in large-scale hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(7), 2845-2857.
  • Kehagias, A. (2004). A hidden Markov model segmentation procedure for hydrological and environmental time series. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 18, 117-130.
  • Kehagias, A. Nidelkou, E. & Petridis, V. (2006). A dynamic programming segmentation procedure for hydrological and environmental time series. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 20, 77-94.
  • Kelley, D. (1994). Introduction to probability. Macmillan Publishing Company, London.
  • Keylock, C. J. (2012). A resampling method for generating synthetic hydrological time series with preservation of cross‐correlative structure and higher‐order properties. Water Resources Research, 48(12).
  • Kilsby, C. G. Jones, P. D. Burton, A. Ford, A. C. Fowler, H. J. Harpham, C. … & Wilby, R. L. (2007). A daily weather generator for use in climate change studies. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(12), 1705-1719.
  • Kim, D. & Onof, C. (2020). A stochastic rainfall model that can reproduce important rainfall properties across the timescales from several minutes to a decade. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125150.
  • Kim, D. Lee, J. Kim, H. & Choi, M. (2016). Spatial composition of AMSR2 soil moisture products by conditional merging technique with ground soil moisture data. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 30, 2109-2126.
  • Kim, G. Silvapulle, M. J. & Silvapulle, P. (2007). Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulas. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(6), 2836-2850.
  • Kjeldsen, T. R. Ahn, H. & Prosdocimi, I. (2017). On the use of a four-parameter kappa distribution in regional frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62(9), 1354-1363.
  • Kjeldsen, T. R. & Prosdocimi, I. (2021). Assessment of trends in hydrological extremes using regional magnification factors. Advances in Water Resources, 149, 103852.
  • Klemeš, V. (1974). The Hurst phenomenon: A puzzle?. Water Resources Research, 10(4), 675-688.
  • Klemeš, V. (2000a). Tall tales about tails of hydrological distributions. I. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(3), 227-231.
  • Klemeš, V. (2000b). Tall tales about tails of hydrological distributions. II. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(3), 232-239.
  • Kochanek, K. Strupczewski, W. G. & Bogdanowicz, E. (2012). On seasonal approach to flood frequency modelling. Part II: flood frequency analysis of Polish rivers. Hydrological Processes, 26(5), 717-730.
  • Kochanek, K. Strupczewski, W. G. Bogdanowicz, E. & Markiewicz, I. (2020). The bias of the maximum likelihood estimates of flood quantiles based solely on the largest historical records. Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124740.
  • Kochel, R.C. V.R. Baker (1982). Paleoflood Hydrology. Science, v. 215(4531), p. 353-361.
  • Kojadinovic, I. & J. Yan (2010). Comparison of three semiparametric methods for estimating dependence parameters in copula models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47(1), 52-63.
  • Kojadinovic, I. Yan, J. & Holmes, M. (2011). Fast large-sample goodness-of-fit tests for copulas. Statistica Sinica, 841-871.
  • Kossieris, P. Makropoulos, C. Onof, C. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2018). A rainfall disaggregation scheme for sub-hourly time scales: Coupling a Bartlett-Lewis based model with adjusting procedures. Journal of hydrology, 556, 980-992.
  • Kotz, S. and S. Nadarajah (2000). Extreme Value Distributions. Imperial College Press, London.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. (2003). Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological statistics. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(1), 3-24.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. (2020). Revisiting the global hydrological cycle: is it intensifying?. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(8), 3899-3932.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. (2021). Stochastics of Hydroclimatic Extremes - A Cool Look at Risk, 333 pages, Kallipos Open Academic Editions, Athens, 2021.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. (2016). Generic and parsimonious stochastic modelling for hydrology and beyond. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61(2), 225– 244.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. & Montanari, A. (2015). Negligent killing of scientific concepts: the stationarity case. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60(7-8), 1174-1183.
  • Koutsoyiannis, D. & Langousis, A. (2011). Precipitation, In: Treaties on Water Sciences: Hydrology, Vol. 2, Edts: P. Wilderer (in chief) and S. Uhlenbrook, Academic Press, Oxford, pp. 27–78.
  • Krajewski, W. F. & Smith, J. A. (2002). Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation. Advances in water resources, 25(8-12), 1387-1394.
  • Kumar, D. N. Lall, U. & Petersen, M. R. (2000). Multisite disaggregation of monthly to daily streamflow. Water Resources Research, 36(7), 1823-1833.
  • Kundzewicz, Z. W. & Robson, A. J. (2004). Change detection in hydrological records—a review of the methodology/revue méthodologique de la détection de changements dans les chroniques hydrologiques. Hydrological sciences journal, 49(1), 7-19.
  • Kundzewicz, Z. W. Graczyk, D. Maurer, T. Pińskwar, I. Radziejewski, M. Svensson, C. & Szwed, M. (2005). Trend detection in river flow series: 1. Annual maximum flow/Détection de tendance dans des séries de débit fluvial: 1. Débit maximum annuel. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50(5).
  • Kwon, H.-H. & Lall, U. (2016). A copula-based nonstationary frequency analysis for the 2012–2015 drought in California, Water Resources Research, 52, 5662–5675.
  • Laaha, G. Skøien, J. O. & Blöschl, G. (2014). Spatial prediction on river networks: comparison of top‐kriging with regional regression. Hydrological Processes, 28(2), 315-324.
  • Laaha, G. Skøien, J. O. Nobilis, F. & Blöschl, G. (2013). Spatial prediction of stream temperatures using top-kriging with an external drift. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 18, 671-683.
  • Laio, F. (2004). Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling goodness of fit tests for extreme value distributions with unknown parameters, Water Resources Research, 40, W09308, 2004.
  • Laio, F. Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A. (2009). Model selection techniques for the frequency analysis of hydrological extremes, Water Resources Research, 45, W07416, 2009.
  • Laio, F. Ganora, D. Claps, P. & Galeati, G. (2011). Spatially smooth regional estimation of the flood frequency curve (with uncertainty). Journal of hydrology, 408(1-2), 67-77.
  • Lall, U. (1995). Recent advances in nonparametric function estimation: Hydrologic applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 33(S2), 1093-1102.
  • Lall, U. & Sharma, A. (1996). A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series. Water resources research, 32(3), 679-693.
  • Lamontagne, J. R. Stedinger, J. R. Yu, X. Whealton, C. A. & Xu, Z. (2016). Robust flood frequency analysis: Performance of EMA with multiple Grubbs‐Beck outlier tests. Water Resources Research, 52(4), 3068-3084.
  • Lamontagne, J. R. Barber, C. A. & Vogel, R. M. (2020). Improved estimators of model performance efficiency for skewed hydrologic data. Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2020WR027101.
  • Langousis, A. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2006). A Stochastic Methodology for Generation of Seasonal Time Series Reproducing Over-year Scaling Behavior. J. Hydrol. 322 (1-4), 138-154
  • Langousis, A. Carsteanu, A. A. & Deidda, R. (2013). A simple approximation to multifractal rainfall maxima using a generalized extreme value distribution model. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 27(6), 1525-1531.
  • Langousis, A. & Kaleris, V. (2014). Statistical framework to simulate daily rainfall series conditional on upper-air predictor variables. Water Resour. Res. 50(5), 3907-3932.
  • Langousis, A. Mamalakis, A. Puliga, M. & Deidda, R. (2016a). Threshold detection for the generalized Pareto distribution: Review of representative methods and application to the NOAA NCDC daily rainfall database. Water Resources Research, 52(4), 2659-2681.
  • Langousis, A. Mamalakis, A. Deidda, R. & Marrocu, M. (2016b). Assessing the relative effectiveness of statistical downscaling and distribution mapping in reproducing rainfall statistics based on climate model results. Water Resour. Res. 52.
  • Langousis, A. & Veneziano, D. (2007). Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves from Scaling Representations of Rainfall. Water Resour. Res. 43.
  • Langousis, A. Veneziano, D. Furcolo, P. & Lepore, C. (2009). Multifractal Rainfall Extremes: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Estimation. Chaos Solitons and Fractals, 39, 1182-1194.
  • Latif, S. Souaissi, Z. Ouarda, T. B.M.J. & St-Hilaire, A. (2023). Copula-based joint modelling of extreme river temperature and low flow characteristics in the risk assessment of aquatic life, Weather and Climate Extremes, 41: 100586.
  • Latif, S. Ouarda, T. B. St-Hilaire, A. Souaissi, Z. & Rehana, S. (2024). A new nonparametric copula framework for the joint analysis of river water temperature and low flow characteristics for aquatic habitat risk assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 634, 131079.
  • Lawrance, A. J. & Kottegoda, N. T. (1977). Stochastic modelling of riverflow time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 140(1), 1-31.
  • Lebrenz, H. & Bárdossy, A. (2019). Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(3), 1633-1648.
  • Leclerc, M. & Ouarda, T. B. (2007). Non-stationary regional flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites. Journal of hydrology, 343(3-4), 254-265.
  • Lee, T. Modarres, R. & Ouarda, T.B.M.J. (2013). Data-based analysis of bivariate copula tail dependence for drought duration and severity. Hydrological Processes, 27(10), 1454-1463,
  • Lee, T. & Ouarda, T. B. (2012). Stochastic simulation of nonstationary oscillation hydroclimatic processes using empirical mode decomposition. Water Resources Research, 48(2).
  • Lee, T. Salas, J. D. & Prairie, J. (2010). An enhanced nonparametric streamflow disaggregation model with genetic algorithm. Water Resources Research, 46(8).
  • Leese, M.N. (1973). Use of Censored Data in the Estimation of Gumbel Distribution Parameters for Annual Maximum Flood Series. Water Res. Res. v. 9, p. 1534-1542
  • Lekina, A. Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T. B. (2015). On the tail dependence in bivariate hydrological frequency analysis. Dependence Modeling, 3(1).
  • Li, J. Evans, J. Johnson, F. & Sharma, A. (2017). A comparison of methods for estimating climate change impact on design rainfall using a high-resolution RCM. Journal of Hydrology, 547, 413-427.
  • Libertino, A. Allamano, P. Laio, F. & Claps, P. (2018). Regional-scale analysis of extreme precipitation from short and fragmented records. Advances in Water Resources, 112, 147-159.
  • Libiseller, C. & Grimvall, A. (2002). Performance of partial Mann–Kendall tests for trend detection in the presence of covariates. Environmetrics: The official journal of the International Environmetrics Society, 13(1), 71-84.
  • Liguori, S. & Rico-Ramirez, M. A. (2014). A review of current approaches to radar-based quantitative precipitation forecasts. International Journal of River Basin Management, 12(4), 391-402.
  • Lilienthal, J. Fried, R. & Schumann, A. (2018). Homogeneity testing for skewed and cross-correlated data in regional flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 557-571.
  • Lins, H. F. & Cohn, T. A. (2011). Stationarity: wanted dead or alive? 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47(3), 475-480.
  • Liu Y.R. Li Y.P. Ma Y. Jia Q.M. and Su Y.Y. (2020). Development of a Bayesian-copula-based frequency analysis method for hydrological risk assessment–The Naryn River in Central Asia, Journal of Hydrology 580, 124349.
  • López, J. & Francés, F. (2013). Non-stationary flood frequency analysis in continental Spanish rivers, using climate and reservoir indices as external covariates. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3189-3203.
  • Luke, A. Vrugt, J. A. AghaKouchak, A. Matthew, R. & Sanders, B. F. (2017). Predicting nonstationary flood frequencies: Evidence supports an updated stationarity thesis in the United States. Water Resources Research, 53, 5469– 5494.
  • Lun, D. Fischer, S. Viglione, A. & Blöschl, G. (2020). Detecting flood‐rich and flood‐poor periods in annual peak discharges across Europe. Water Resources Research, 56(7), e2019WR026575.
  • Lun, D. Viglione, A. Bertola, M. Komma, J. Parajka, J. Valent, P. & Blöschl, G. (2021). Characteristics and process controls of statistical flood moments in Europe–a data-based analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(10), 5535-5560.
  • Ma, M. Song, S. Ren, L. Jiang, S. & Song, J. (2013). Multivariate drought characteristics using trivariate Gaussian and Student t copulas. Hydrological processes, 27(8), 1175-1190.
  • Machado, M. J. Botero, B. A. López, J. Francés, F. Díez-Herrero, A. & Benito, G. (2015). Flood frequency analysis of historical flood data under stationary and non-stationary modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(6), 2561-2576.
  • Madsen, H. P. F. Rasmussen, and D. Rosbjerg (1997), Comparison of annual maximum series and partial duration series methods for modeling extreme hydrologic events: 1. At-site modeling, Water Resources Research, 33(4), 747–757.
  • Madsen, H. Lawrence, D. Lang, M. Martinkova, M. & Kjeldsen, T. R. (2014). Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in Europe. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 3634-3650.
  • Mallakpour, I. & Villarini, G. (2017). Analysis of changes in the magnitude, frequency, and seasonality of heavy precipitation over the contiguous USA. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 130(1), 345-363.
  • Mandelbrot, B. B. & Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature (Vol. 1). New York: WH freeman.
  • Mandelbrot, B. B. & Wallis, J. R. (1968). Noah, Joseph, and operational hydrology. Water Resources Research, 4(5), 909-918.
  • Mangini, W. Viglione, A. Hall, J. Hundecha, Y. Ceola, S. Montanari, A. … & Parajka, J. (2018). Detection of trends in magnitude and frequency of flood peaks across Europe. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(4), 493-512.
  • Marani, M. & Ignaccolo, M. (2015). A metastatistical approach to rainfall extremes. Advances in Water Resources, 79, 121-126.
  • Maraun, D. (2013). Bias correction, quantile mapping, and downscaling: Revisiting the inflation issue. Journal of Climate, 26(6), 2137-2143.
  • Markonis, Y. Moustakis, Y. Nasika, C. Sychova, P. Dimitriadis, P. Hanel, M. … & Papalexiou, S. M. (2018). Global estimation of long-term persistence in annual river runoff. Advances in Water Resources, 113, 1-12.
  • Marra, F. Amponsah, W. & Papalexiou, S. M. (2023). Non-asymptotic Weibull tails explain the statistics of extreme daily precipitation. Advances in Water Resources, 173, 104388.
  • Martins, E. S. & Stedinger, J. R. (2000). Generalized maximum‐likelihood generalized extreme‐value quantile estimators for hydrologic data. Water Resources Research, 36(3), 737-744.
  • Mascaro, G. (2018). On the distributions of annual and seasonal daily rainfall extremes in central Arizona and their spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 266-281.
  • Matalas, N. C. (1967). Mathematical assessment of synthetic hydrology. Water Resources Research, 3(4), 937-945.
  • Matalas, N. C. (2012). Comment on the announced death of stationarity. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(4), 311-312.
  • Mazdiyasni, O. Sadegh, M. Chiang, F. & AghaKouchak, A. (2019). Heat wave intensity duration frequency curve: A multivariate approach for hazard and attribution analysis. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-8.
  • McNeil, A. J. Frey, R. & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Medda, S. & Bhar, K. K. (2019). Comparison of single-site and multi-site stochastic models for Streamflow generation. Applied Water Science, 9, 1-14.
  • Mehrotra, R. & Sharma, A. (2007). A semi-parametric model for stochastic generation of multi-site daily rainfall exhibiting low-frequency variability. Journal of Hydrology, 335(1-2), 180-193.
  • Mejia, J. M. Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. & Dawdy, D. R. (1972). Streamflow simulation: 2. The broken line process as a potential model for hydrologic simulation. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 931-941.
  • Menabde, M. Harris, D. Seed, A. Austin, G. & Stow, D. (1997). Multiscaling properties of rainfall and bounded random cascades. Water Resources Research, 33(12), 2823-2830.
  • Merz, R. & Blöschl, G. (2004). Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. Journal of hydrology, 287(1-4), 95-123.
  • Merz, R. & Blöschl, G. (2005). Flood frequency regionalisation—spatial proximity vs. catchment attributes. Journal of hydrology, 302(1-4), 283-306.
  • Merz, R. Blöschl, G. & Humer, G. (2008). National flood discharge mapping in Austria. Natural Hazards, 46, 53-72.
  • Merz, B. Basso, S. Fischer, S. Lun, D. Blöschl, G. Merz, R. … & Schumann, A. (2022). Understanding heavy tails of flood peak distributions. Water Resources Research, 58(6), e2021WR030506.
  • Michiels, F. & De Schepper, A. (2008). A copula test space model how to avoid the wrong copula choice. Kybernetika, 44(6), 864-878.
  • Milly, P. C. Betancourt, J. Falkenmark, M. Hirsch, R. M. Kundzewicz, Z. W. Lettenmaier, D. P. & Stouffer, R. J. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?. Science, 319(5863), 573-574.
  • Milly, P. C. Betancourt, J. Falkenmark, M. Hirsch, R. M. Kundzewicz, Z. W. Lettenmaier, D. P. … & Krysanova, V. (2015). On critiques of “Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?”. Water Resources Research, 51(9), 7785-7789.
  • Montanari, A. Rosso, R. Taqqu, M.S. (1997). Fractionally differenced ARIMA models applied to hydrologic time series: Identification, estimation, and simulation. Water Resources Research, 33 (5), pp. 1035-1044.
  • Naghettini, M. (Ed.). (2017). Fundamentals of statistical hydrology. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Naulet, R. Lang, M. Ouarda, T. B. Coeur, D. Bobée, B. Recking, A. & Moussay, D. (2005). Flood frequency analysis on the Ardèche river using French documentary sources from the last two centuries. Journal of Hydrology, 313(1-2), 58-78.
  • Nelsen, R. B. (2007). An introduction to copulas. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Nerantzaki, S. D. & Papalexiou, S. M. (2022). Assessing extremes in hydroclimatology: A review on probabilistic methods. Journal of Hydrology, 605, 127302.
  • Nowak, K. Prairie, J. Rajagopalan, B. & Lall, U. (2010). A nonparametric stochastic approach for multisite disaggregation of annual to daily streamflow. Water Resources Research, 46(8).
  • O’Brien, N. L. & Burn, D. H. (2014). A nonstationary index-flood technique for estimating extreme quantiles for annual maximum streamflow. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2040-2048.
  • O’Brien, N. L. Burn, D. H. Annable, W. K. & Thompson P. J. (2020). Trend detection in the presence of positive and negative serial correlation: a comparison of block maxima and peaks-over-threshold data. Water Resources Research, 57, e2020WR028886.
  • O’Shea, Nathan, R. Sharma, A. Wasko, C. (2023). Improved Extreme Rainfall Frequency Analysis Using a Rwo-Step Kappa Approach. Water Resources Research,59(4), e2021WR031854.
  • Ochoa‐Rodriguez, S. Wang, L. P. Willems, P. & Onof, C. (2019). A review of radar‐rain gauge data merging methods and their potential for urban hydrological applications. Water Resources Research, 55(8), 6356-6391.
  • Oliveira, B. & Maia, R. (2018). Stochastic generation of streamflow time series. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 23(10), 04018043.
  • Oriani, F. Mehrotra, R. Mariethoz, G. Straubhaar, J. Sharma, A. & Renard, P. (2018). Simulating rainfall time-series: how to account for statistical variability at multiple scales?. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 32(2), 321-340.
  • Ostrowski, P. Falkowski, T. & Kochanek, K. (2023). Reconstructing parameters of the Holocene paleofloods in alluvial lowland river valleys–An example from the Bug valley (East Poland). Journal of Hydrology, 624, 129930.
  • Ouali, D. Chebana, F. & Ouarda, T. B. (2017). Fully nonlinear statistical and machine‐learning approaches for hydrological frequency estimation at ungauged sites. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9(2), 1292-1306.
  • Ouarda, T. B. & Charron, C. (2019). Changes in the distribution of hydro-climatic extremes in a non-stationary framework. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-8.
  • Ouarda, T. B. Charron, C. & St‐Hilaire, A. (2020). Uncertainty of stationary and nonstationary models for rainfall frequency analysis. International Journal of Climatology, 40(4), 2373-2392.
  • Ouarda, T. B. Girard, C. Cavadias, G. S. & Bobée, B. (2001). Regional flood frequency estimation with canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 254(1-4), 157-173.
  • Ouarda, T. B. Yousef, L. A. & Charron, C. (2019). Non‐stationary intensity‐duration‐frequency curves integrating information concerning teleconnections and climate change. International Journal of Climatology, 39(4), 2306-2323.
  • Pan, X. Rahman, A. Haddad, K. & Ouarda, T.B.M.J. (2022). Peaks-over-threshold model in flood frequency analysis: a scoping review. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(9): 2419-2435.
  • Papaioannou, G. Kohnová, S. Bacigál, T. Szolgay, J. Hlavčová, K. & Loukas, A. (2016). Joint modelling of flood peaks and volumes: A copula application for the Danube River. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 64(4), 382-392.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. (2018). Unified theory for stochastic modelling of hydroclimatic processes: Preserving marginal distributions, correlation structures, and intermittency. Advances in water resources, 115, 234-252.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. & Montanari, A. (2019). Global and regional increase of precipitation extremes under global warming. Water Resources Research, 55(6), 4901-4914.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. & Serinaldi, F. (2020). Random fields simplified: Preserving marginal distributions, correlations, and intermittency, with applications from rainfall to humidity. Water Resources Research, 56(2), e2019WR026331.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. Koutsoyiannis, D. & Makropoulos, C. (2013). How extreme is extreme? An assessment of daily rainfall distribution tails. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(2), 851-862.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. Serinaldi, F. & Porcu, E. (2021). Advancing Space‐Time Simulation of Random Fields: From Storms to Cyclones and Beyond. Water Resources Research, 57(8), e2020WR029466.
  • Papalexiou, S. M. Serinaldi, F. & Clark, M. P. (2023). Large‐Domain Multisite Precipitation Generation: Operational Blueprint and Demonstration for 1,000 Sites. Water Resources Research, 59(3), e2022WR034094.
  • Parajka, J. Merz, R. Skøien, J. O. & Viglione, A. (2015). The role of station density for predicting daily runoff by top-kriging interpolation in Austria. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 63(3), 228-234.
  • Parzen, E. (1962). On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The annals of mathematical statistics, 33(3), 1065-1076.
  • Persiano, S. Ferri, E. Antolini, G. Domeneghetti, A. Pavan, V. & Castellarin, A. (2020). Changes in seasonality and magnitude of sub-daily rainfall extremes in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) and potential influence on regional rainfall frequency estimation. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 32, 100751.
  • Persiano, S. Salinas, J. L. Stedinger, J. R. Farmer, W. H. Lun, D. Viglione, A. … & Castellarin, A. (2021). A comparison between generalized least squares regression and top-kriging for homogeneous cross-correlated flood regions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(4), 565-579.
  • Pettitt, A. N. (1979). A non‐parametric approach to the change‐point problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(2), 126-135.
  • Piantadosi, J. Howlett, P. Borwein, J. & Henstridge, J. (2012). Maximum entropy methods for generating simulated rainfall. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2(2), 233.
  • Poulin, A. Huard, D. Favre, A. C. & Pugin, S. (2007). Importance of tail dependence in bivariate frequency analysis. Journal of hydrologic engineering, 12(4), 394-403.
  • Price, K. Purucker, S. T. Kraemer, S. R. Babendreier, J. E. & Knightes, C. D. (2014). Comparison of radar and gauge precipitation data in watershed models across varying spatial and temporal scales. Hydrological Processes, 28(9), 3505-3520.
  • Prieto, C. Le Vine, N. Kavetski, D. García, E. & Medina, R. (2019). Flow prediction in ungauged catchments using probabilistic random forests regionalization and new statistical adequacy tests. Water Resources Research, 55(5), 4364-4392.
  • Prieto, C. Le Vine, N. Kavetski, D. Fenicia, F. Scheidegger, A. & Vitolo, C. (2022). An exploration of Bayesian identification of dominant hydrological mechanisms in ungauged catchments. Water Resources Research, 58(3), e2021WR030705.
  • Prosdocimi, I. Kjeldsen, T. R. & Svensson, C. (2014). Non-stationarity in annual and seasonal series of peak flow and precipitation in the UK. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(5), 1125-1144.
  • Prosdocimi, I. Kjeldsen, T. R. & Miller, J. D. (2015). Detection and attribution of urbanization effect on flood extremes using nonstationary flood‐frequency models. Water resources research, 51(6), 4244-4262.
  • Prosdocimi, I. & Kjeldsen, T. (2021). Parametrisation of change-permitting extreme value models and its impact on the description of change. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(2), 307-324.
  • Pugliese, A. Castellarin, A. & Brath, A. (2014). Geostatistical prediction of flow–duration curves in an index-flow framework. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(9), 3801-3816.
  • Pugliese, A. Farmer, W. H. Castellarin, A. Archfield, S. A. & Vogel, R. M. (2016). Regional flow duration curves: Geostatistical techniques versus multivariate regression. Advances in water resources, 96, 11-22.
  • R Core Team, (2020). R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rabiei, E. & Haberlandt, U. (2015). Applying bias correction for merging rain gauge and radar data. Journal of Hydrology, 522, 544-557.
  • Ragno, E. AghaKouchak, A. Cheng, L. & Sadegh, M. (2019). A generalized framework for process-informed nonstationary extreme value analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 130, 270-282.
  • Ragno, E. AghaKouchak, A. Love, C. A. Cheng, L. Vahedifard, F. & Lima, C. H. (2018). Quantifying changes in future intensity‐duration‐frequency curves using multimodel ensemble simulations. Water Resources Research, 54(3), 1751-1764.
  • Ragno, E. Hrachowitz, M. & Morales-Nápoles, O. (2022). Applying non-parametric Bayesian networks to estimate maximum daily river discharge: potential and challenges. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26(6), 1695-1711.
  • Rajagopalan, B. & Lall, U. (1995). A kernel estimator for discrete distributions. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 4(4), 409-426.
  • Rajagopalan, B. Lall, U. & Tarboton, D. G. (1997). Evaluation of kernel density estimation methods for daily precipitation resampling. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 11, 523-547.
  • Rao, A. R. & Hamed, K. H. (2019). Flood frequency analysis. CRC press.
  • Reed, D. W. (2002). Reinforcing flood–risk estimation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360(1796), 1373-1387.
  • Reis Jr, D. S. & Stedinger, J. R. (2005). Bayesian MCMC flood frequency analysis with historical information. Journal of hydrology, 313(1-2), 97-116.
  • Renard, B. Lang, M. Bois, P. Dupeyrat, A. Mestre, O. Niel, H. … & Gailhard, J. (2008). Regional methods for trend detection: Assessing field significance and regional consistency. Water Resources Research, 44(8).
  • Requena, A. I. Burn, D. H. & Coulibaly, P. (2019). Estimates of gridded relative changes in 24-h extreme rainfall intensities based on pooled frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 123940.
  • Requena, A. I. Burn, D. H. & Coulibaly, P. (2021). Technical guidelines for future intensity–duration–frequency curve estimation in Canada. Canadian Water Resources Journal/revue Canadienne Des Ressources Hydriques, 46(1-2), 87-104.
  • Requena, A. I. Mediero, L. & Garrote, L. (2013). A bivariate return period based on copulas for hydrologic dam design: accounting for reservoir routing in risk estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(8), 3023-3038.
  • Requena, A.I. F. Chebana, and L. Mediero (2016), A complete procedure for multivariate index-flood model application. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 559-580.
  • Richardson, C. W. (1981). Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water resources research, 17(1), 182-190.
  • Rigby, R. A. & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005). Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 54(3), 507-554.
  • Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. De Power, B. F. & Valdes, J. B. (1987). Rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall: analysis of empirical data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 92(D8), 9645-9656.
  • Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. Mejia, J. M. & Dawdy, D. R. (1972). Streamflow simulation: 1. A new look at Markovian models, fractional Gaussian noise, and crossing theory. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 921-930.
  • Rutkowska, A. (2013). Statistical methods for trend investigation in hydrological non-seasonal series. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Formatio Circumiectus, 12(4), 85-94.
  • Sadegh, M. Moftakhari, H. Gupta, H. V. Ragno, E. Mazdiyasni, O. Sanders, B. … & AghaKouchak, A. (2018). Multihazard scenarios for analysis of compound extreme events. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(11), 5470-5480.
  • Saint Criq, L. Gaume, E. Hamdi, Y. & Ouarda, T.B.M.J. (2022). Extreme Sea Level Estimation Combining Systematic Observed Skew Surges and Historical Record Sea Levels. Water Resources Research, 58(3): e2021WR030873.
  • Salas, J. D. (1980). Applied modeling of hydrologic time series. Water Resources Publication.
  • Salas, J. D. & Fernandez, B. (1993). Models for data generation in hydrology: univariate techniques. Stochastic hydrology and its use in water resources systems simulation and optimization, 47-73.
  • Salas, J. D. & Obeysekera, J. (2014). Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(3), 554-568.
  • Salas, J. D. & Obeysekera, J. T. B. (1992). Conceptual basis of seasonal streamflow time series models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118(8), 1186-1194.
  • Salas, J. D. Obeysekera, J. & Vogel, R. M. (2018). Techniques for assessing water infrastructure for nonstationary extreme events: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(3), 325-352.
  • Salas, J. D. Anderson, M. L. Papalexiou, S.M. & Francés, F. (2020). PMP and Climate Variability and Change. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 25(12): 03120002.
  • Salinas, J. L. Laaha, G. Rogger, M. Parajka, J. Viglione, A. Sivapalan, M. & Blöschl, G. (2013). Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins–Part 2: Flood and low flow studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(7), 2637-2652.
  • Salvadori, G. & C. De Michele, (2011). Estimating strategies for multiparameter multivariate extreme value copulas. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 15(1): p. 141-150.
  • Salvadori, G. & De Michele, C. (2004). Frequency analysis via copulas: Theoretical aspects and applications to hydrological events. Water resources research, 40(12).
  • Salvadori, G. & De Michele, C. (2010). Multivariate multiparameter extreme value models and return periods: A copula approach. Water resources research, 46(10).
  • Salvadori, G. De Michele, C. Kottegoda, N. T. & Rosso, R. (2007). Extremes in nature: an approach using copulas (Vol. 56). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Salvadori, G. Durante, F. De Michele, C. & Bernardi, M. (2018). Hazard Assessment under Multivariate Distributional Change-Points: Guidelines and a Flood Case Study. Water, 10(6), 751.
  • Salvadori, G. Durante, F. De Michele, C. Bernardi, M. & Petrella, L. (2016). A multivariate copula‐based framework for dealing with hazard scenarios and failure probabilities. Water Resources Research, 52(5), 3701-3721.
  • Samaniego, L. Bárdossy, A. & Kumar, R. (2010). Streamflow prediction in ungauged catchments using copula‐based dissimilarity measures. Water Resources Research, 46(2).
  • Schertzer, D. & Lovejoy, S. (1987). Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 92(D8), 9693-9714.
  • Seibert, J. & McDonnell, J. J. (2010). Land-cover impacts on streamflow: a change-detection modelling approach that incorporates parameter uncertainty. Hydrological Sciences Journal–Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques, 55(3), 316-332.
  • Seidou, O. Asselin, J.J. & T.B.M.J. Ouarda (2007). Bayesian multivariate linear regression with application to changepoint models in hydrometeorological variables, Water Resources Research. 43, W08401.
  • Seo, D. J. Krajewski, W. F. & Bowles, D. S. (1990). Stochastic interpolation of rainfall data from rain gages and radar using cokriging: 1. Design of experiments. Water Resources Research, 26(3), 469-477.
  • Seo, D. J. Krajewski, W. F. Azimi‐Zonooz, A. & Bowles, D. S. (1990). Stochastic interpolation of rainfall data from rain gages and radar using cokriging: 2. Results. Water Resources Research, 26(5), 915-924.
  • Seo, D. J. Siddique, R. Zhang, Y. & Kim, D. (2014). Improving real-time estimation of heavy-to-extreme precipitation using rain gauge data via conditional bias-penalized optimal estimation. Journal of hydrology, 519, 1824-1835.
  • Serago, J. M. & Vogel, R. M. (2018). Parsimonious nonstationary flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 112, 1-16.
  • Serinaldi, F. (2009). A multisite daily rainfall generator driven by bivariate copula‐based mixed distributions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D10).
  • Serinaldi, F. Bonaccorso, B. Cancelliere, A. Grimaldi, S. (2009) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 34 (10-12), pp. 596-605.
  • Serinaldi, F. (2013). An uncertain journey around the tails of multivariate hydrological distributions, Water Resources Research, 49, 6527–6547.
  • Serinaldi, F. (2015). Dismissing return periods!. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 29(4), 1179-1189.
  • Serinaldi, F. & Kilsby, C. G. (2015). Stationarity is undead: Uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes. Advances in Water Resources, 77, 17-36.
  • Serinaldi, F. & Kilsby, C. G. (2016). The importance of prewhitening in change point analysis under persistence. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 30(2), 763-777.
  • Serinaldi, F. & Kilsby, C. G. (2018). Unsurprising surprises: The frequency of record‐breaking and overthreshold hydrological extremes under spatial and temporal dependence. Water Resources Research, 54(9), 6460-6487.
  • Serinaldi, F. & Lombardo, F. (2020). Probability distribution of waiting time of the kth extreme event under serial dependence. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering.
  • Serinaldi, F. & Kilsby, C. (2015). Stationarity is undead: Uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes. Advances in Water Resources, 77, 17– 36.
  • Serinaldi, F. Kilsby, C. G. & Lombardo, F. (2018). Untenable nonstationarity: An assessment of the fitness for purpose of trend tests in hydrology. Advances in Water Resources, 111, 132-155.
  • Sharma, A. & Mehrotra, R. (2010). Rainfall generation. Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 191, 215-246.
  • Sharma, A. Wasko, C. & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2018). If precipitation extremes are increasing, why aren’t floods?. Water resources research, 54(11), 8545-8551.
  • Sharma, S. & Mujumdar, P. P. (2019). On the relationship of daily rainfall extremes and local mean temperature. Journal of Hydrology, 572, 179-191.
  • Shu, C. & Ouarda, T. B. (2007). Flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks in canonical correlation analysis physiographic space. Water Resources Research, 43(7).
  • Sinclair, S. & Pegram, G. (2005). Combining radar and rain gauge rainfall estimates using conditional merging. Atmospheric Science Letters, 6(1), 19-22.
  • Singh, V. P. & Strupczewski, W. G. (2002). On the status of flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Processes, 16(18), 3737-3740.
  • Sklar, M. (1959), Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de statistique de l’Université de Paris. 8: p. 229-231.
  • Skøien, J. O. & Blöschl, G. (2007). Spatiotemporal topological kriging of runoff time series. Water Resources Research, 43(9).
  • Skøien, J. O. Merz, R. & Blöschl, G. (2006). Top-kriging-geostatistics on stream networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(2), 277-287.
  • Slater, L. Villarini, G. Archfield, S. Faulkner, D. Lamb, R. Khouakhi, A. & Yin, J. (2021a). Global changes in 20-year, 50-year, and 100-year river floods. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2020GL091824.
  • Slater, L. J. Anderson, B. Buechel, M. Dadson, S. Han, S. Harrigan, S. … & Wilby, R. L. (2021b). Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(7), 3897-3935.
  • Snelder, T. H. Datry, T. Lamouroux, N. Larned, S. T. Sauquet, E. Pella, H. & Catalogne, C. (2013). Regionalization of patterns of flow intermittence from gauging station records. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(7), 2685-2699.
  • Srikanthan, R. & McMahon, T. A. (2001). Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and daily climate data: A review. Hydrology and earth system sciences, 5(4), 653-670.
  • Srinivas, V. V. & Srinivasan, K. (2005). Hybrid moving block bootstrap for stochastic simulation of multi-site multi-season streamflows. Journal of Hydrology, 302(1-4), 307-330.
  • Srivastav, R. K. & Simonovic, S. P. (2014). An analytical procedure for multi-site, multi-season streamflow generation using maximum entropy bootstrapping. Environmental Modelling & Software, 59, 59-75.
  • Stedinger, J.R. R.M. Vogel and E. Foufoula-Georgiou, (1993) Frequency Analysis of Extreme Events, Chapter 18, Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, David R. Maidment, Editor-inChief. Stedinger, J. R. & Cohn, T. A. (1986). Flood frequency analysis with historical and paleoflood information. Water resources research, 22(5), 785-793.
  • Steinschneider, S. Yang, Y. C. E. & Brown, C. (2013). Panel regression techniques for identifying impacts of anthropogenic landscape change on hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 49(12), 7874-7886.
  • Steinschneider, S. Ray, P. Rahat, S. H. & Kucharski, J. (2019). A weather‐regime‐based stochastic weather generator for climate vulnerability assessments of water systems in the western United States. Water Resources Research, 55(8), 6923-6945.
  • Stern, R. D. & Coe, R. (1984). A model fitting analysis of daily rainfall data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 147(1), 1-18.
  • Strupczewski, W. G. Kochanek, K. Bogdanowicz, E. & Markiewicz, I. (2012). On seasonal approach to flood frequency modelling. Part I: Two‐component distribution revisited. Hydrological processes, 26(5), 705-716.
  • Strupczewski, W. G. Kochanek, K. Bogdanowicz, E. Markiewicz, I. & Feluch, W. (2016). Comparison of two nonstationary flood frequency analysis methods within the context of the variable regime in the representative polish rivers. Acta Geophysica, 64, 206-236.
  • Svensson, C. & Jones, D. A. (2010). Review of rainfall frequency estimation methods. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3(4), 296-313.
  • Szilagyi, J. Balint, G. & Csik, A. (2006). Hybrid, Markov chain-based model for daily streamflow generation at multiple catchment sites. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(3), 245-256.
  • Szolgayova, E. Laaha, G. Blöschl, G. & Bucher, C. (2014). Factors influencing long range dependence in streamflow of European rivers. Hydrological Processes, 28(4), 1573-1586.
  • Tessier, Y. Lovejoy, S. Hubert, P. Schertzer, D. & Pecknold, S. (1996). Multifractal analysis and modeling of rainfall and river flows and scaling, causal transfer functions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 101(D21), 26427-26440.
  • Thiemig, V. Rojas, R. Zambrano-Bigiarini, M. & De Roo, A. (2013). Hydrological evaluation of satellite-based rainfall estimates over the Volta and Baro-Akobo Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 499, 324-338.
  • Thomas, J. & Fiering, M. (1962). Mathematical Synthesis of Streamflow Sequences for the Analysis of River Basins by Simulation. In Design of Water-Resource Systems: New Techniques for Relating Economic Objectives, Engineering Analysis, and Governmental Planning (pp. 459-493). Harvard University Press.
  • Thorndahl, S. Nielsen, J. E. & Rasmussen, M. R. (2014). Bias adjustment and advection interpolation of long-term high resolution radar rainfall series. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 214-226.
  • Todini, E. (2001). A Bayesian technique for conditioning radar precipitation estimates to rain-gauge measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5(2), 187-199.
  • Tootoonchi, F. Haerter, J. O. Räty, O. Grabs, T. Sadegh, M. & Teutschbein, C. (2020). Copulas for hydroclimatic applications–a practical note on common misconceptions and pitfalls. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1-31.
  • Tosunoglu, F. & Singh, V. P. (2018). Multivariate modeling of annual instantaneous maximum flows using copulas. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 23(3), 04018003.
  • Treiber, B. & Plate, E. J. (1977). A stochastic model for the simulation of daily flows/Modèle stochastique pour la simulation des débits journaliers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 22(1), 175-192.
  • Tyralis, H. Papacharalampous, G. & Tantanee, S. (2019). How to explain and predict the shape parameter of the generalized extreme value distribution of streamflow extremes using a big dataset. Journal of Hydrology, 574, 628-645.
  • Vazifehkhah, S. Tosunoglu, F. & Kahya, E. (2019). Bivariate risk analysis of droughts using a nonparametric multivariate standardized drought index and copulas. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24(5), 05019006.
  • Veilleux, A.G. Cohn, T.A. Flynn, K.M. Mason, R.R. Jr. and Hummel, P.R. (2014). Estimating magnitude and frequency of floods using the PeakFQ 7.0 program: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2013-3108, 2 p.
  • Velghe, T. Troch, P. A. De Troch, F. P. & Van de Velde, J. (1994). Evaluation of cluster‐based rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall. Water Resources Research, 30(10), 2847-2857.
  • Veneziano, D. & Langousis, A. (2005a). The maximum of multifractal cascades: exact distribution and approximations. Fractals, 13(04), 311-324.
  • Veneziano, D. & Langousis, A. (2005b). The Areal Reduction Factor a Multifractal Analysis. Water Resour. Res. 41.
  • Veneziano, D. & Langousis, A. (2010) Scaling and Fractals in Hydrology, In: Advances in Data-based Approaches for Hydrologic Modeling and Forecasting, Edited by: B. Sivakumar and R. Berndtsson, World Scientific, 145p.
  • Veneziano, D. Langousis, A. & Furcolo, P. (2006). Multifractality and rainfall extremes: A review. Water resources research, 42(6).
  • Veneziano, D. Langousis, A. & Lepore, C. (2009). New Asymptotic and Pre-Asymptotic Results on Rainfall Maxima from Multifractal Theory. Water Resour. Res. 45.
  • Veneziano, D. Lepore, C. Langousis, A. & Furcolo, P. (2007). Marginal Methods of Intensity-duration-frequency Estimation in Scaling and Nonscaling Rainfall. Water Resour. Res. 43.
  • Veneziano, D. & Yoon, S. (2013). Rainfall extremes, excesses, and intensity–duration–frequency curves: a unified asymptotic framework and new non-asymptotic results based on multifractal measures. Water Resour. Res. 49 (7), 4320–4334.
  • Vermeer, M. & Rahmstorf, S. (2009). Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106(51), 21527-21532.
  • Villarini, G. Smith, J. A. Baeck, M. L. Vitolo, R. Stephenson, D. B. & Krajewski, W. F. (2011). On the frequency of heavy rainfall for the Midwest of the United States. Journal of Hydrology, 400(1-2), 103-120.
  • Visessri, S. & McIntyre, N. (2016). Regionalisation of hydrological responses under land-use change and variable data quality. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61(2), 302-320.
  • Vogel, R. M. (2010). Regional calibration of watershed models. In Watershed models (pp. 71-96). CRC Press.
  • Vogel, R. M. (2017). Stochastic watershed models for hydrologic risk management. Water Security, 1, 28-35.
  • Vogel, R. M. & Fennessey, N. M. (1993). L moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water resources research, 29(6), 1745-1752.
  • Vogel, R.M. A. Rosner, and P.H. Kirshen, (2013) Likelihood of Societal Preparedness for Global Change –Trend Detection, Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, Brief Communication. 13. 1-6.
  • Vogel, R. M. & Castellarin, A. (2017). Risk, reliability, and return periods and hydrologic design. Handbook of Applied Hydrology; Singh, VP, Ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA.
  • Volpi, E. (2019). On return period and probability of failure in hydrology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(3), e1340.
  • Volpi, E. & Fiori, A. (2012). Design event selection in bivariate hydrological frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57(8), 1506-1515.
  • Volpi, E. & Fiori, A. (2014). Hydraulic structures subject to bivariate hydrological loads: Return period, design, and risk assessment. Water Resources Research, 50(2), 885-897.
  • Volpi, E. Fiori, A. Grimaldi, S. Lombardo, F. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2015). One hundred years of return period: Strengths and limitations. Water Resources Research, 51(10), 8570-8585.
  • Volpi, E. Fiori, A. Grimaldi, S. Lombardo, F. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2019). Save hydrological observations! Return period estimation without data decimation. Journal of Hydrology, 571, 782-792.
  • Vormoor, K. Skaugen, T. Langsholt, E. Diekkrüger, B. & Skøien, J. O. (2011). Geostatistical regionalization of daily runoff forecasts in Norway. Intl. J. River Basin Management, 9(1), 3-15.
  • Vorogushyn, S. & Merz, B. (2012). What drives flood trends along the Rhine River: climate or river training?. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions, 9(12).
  • Wahl, T. Jain, S. Bender, J. Meyers, S. D. & Luther, M. E. (2015). Increasing risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities. Nature Climate Change, 5(12), 1093-1097.
  • Wang, W. & Ding, J. (2007). A multivariate non‐parametric model for synthetic generation of daily streamflow. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 21(13), 1764-1771.
  • Wang, W.P. Chen, Y.F. Becker, S. & Liu, B. (2015). Variance correction prewhitening method for trend detection in autocorrelated data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(12), 04015033.
  • Westra, S. Fowler, H. J. Evans, J. P. Alexander, L. V. Berg, P. Johnson, F. … & Roberts, N. (2014). Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short‐duration extreme rainfall. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(3), 522-555.
  • Whitfield, P. H. Burn, D. H. Hannaford, J. Higgins, H. Hodgkins, G. A. Marsh, T. & Looser, U. (2012). Reference hydrologic networks I. The status and potential future directions of national reference hydrologic networks for detecting trends. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57(8), 1562-1579.
  • Wilks, D. S. (1998). Multisite generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model. journal of Hydrology, 210(1-4), 178-191.
  • Wilks, D. S. (1999). Interannual variability and extreme-value characteristics of several stochastic daily precipitation models. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 93(3), 153-169.
  • Wilks, D. S. & Wilby, R. L. (1999). The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models. Progress in physical geography, 23(3), 329-357.
  • Wilson, L. L. Lettenmaier, D. P. & Skyllingstad, E. (1992). A hierarchical stochastic model of large‐scale atmospheric circulation patterns and multiple station daily precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 97(D3), 2791-2809.
  • Worthington, A. C. Higgs, H. & Hoffmann, M. (2009). Residential water demand modeling in Queensland, Australia: a comparative panel data approach. Water Policy, 11(4), 427-441.
  • Xu, P. Wang, D. Singh, V. P. Lu, H. Wang, Y. Wu, J. … & Zhang, J. (2020). Copula-based seasonal rainfall simulation considering nonstationarity. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125439.
  • Xu, Z. Schumann, A. & Li, J. (2003). Markov cross-correlation pulse model for daily streamflow generation at multiple sites. Advances in Water Resources, 26(3), 325-335.
  • Yadav, M. Wagener, T. & Gupta, H. (2007). Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Advances in water resources, 30(8), 1756-1774.
  • Yaglom, A. M. (1966). The influence of fluctuations in energy dissipation on the shape of turbulence characteristics in the inertial interval. In Sov. Phys. Dokl. (Vol. 11, pp. 26-29).
  • Yevjevich, V. (1984). Extremes in hydrology. Statistical Extremes and Applications, 197-220.
  • Yilmaz, M. & Tosunoglu, F. (2019). Trend assessment of annual instantaneous maximum flows in Turkey. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(7), 820-834.
  • Yue, S. Ouarda, T. B. Bobée, B. Legendre, P. & Bruneau, P. (1999). The Gumbel mixed model for flood frequency analysis. Journal of hydrology, 226(1-2), 88-100.
  • Yue, S. Pilon, P. & Phinney, B. O. B. (2003). Canadian streamflow trend detection: impacts of serial and cross-correlation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(1), 51-63.
  • Zaghloul, M. Papalexiou, S. M. Elshorbagy, A. & Coulibaly, P. (2020). Revisiting flood peak distributions: A pan-Canadian investigation. Advances in Water Resources, 145, 103720.
  • Zhang, L. S. V. P. & Singh, V. P. (2006). Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. Journal of hydrologic engineering, 11(2), 150-164.
  • Zhang, L. & Singh, V. P. (2019). Copulas and their applications in water resources engineering. Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhang, L. & Singh, V.P. (2007a), Gumbel-Hougaard copula for trivariate rainfall frequency analysis, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(4), 409-419.
  • Zhang, L. & Singh, V.P. (2007b), Trivariate flood frequency analysis using the Gumbel-Hougaard copula, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(4), 431-439
  • Zhang, Q. Gu, X. Singh, V. P. & Xiao, M. (2014). Flood frequency analysis with consideration of hydrological alterations: Changing properties, causes and implications. Journal of hydrology, 519, 803-813.
  • Zhu, D. Xuan, Y. & Cluckie, I. (2014). Hydrological appraisal of operational weather radar rainfall estimates in the context of different modelling structures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(1), 257-272.
  • Zorzetto, E. Botter, G. & Marani, M. (2016). On the emergence of rainfall extremes from ordinary events. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(15), 8076-8082.
  • Zscheischler, J. Westra, S. Van Den Hurk, B. J. Seneviratne, S. I. Ward, P. J. Pitman, A. … & Zhang, X. (2018). Future climate risk from compound events. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 469-477.
  • Zucchini, W. & Guttorp, P. (1991). A hidden Markov model for space‐time precipitation. Water Resources Research, 27(8), 1917-1923.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.