Mahallah and kinship relations. A study on residential communal commitment structures in Central Asia of the 19th century

References

• Krader , L. 1966 . Peopes cf Central Asia 219 Bloomington
   Google Scholar
• Radioff , W. 1884 . Aus Sibirien. Lose Blätter aus dem Tagebuch eines reisenden Linguisten 2 vols , Leipzig II, pp431-433; Krader, op cit, note 4, pp 164-165
   Google Scholar
• Maev , N.A. 1876 . “ 'Aziatskiî Tashkent' ” . In Materialy dlia statistiki Turkestanskogo kraia Edited by: Maev , N.A. 260 – 313 . 262 – 265 . St. Petersburg vyp. IV
   Google Scholar
• Geiss , Cf. P.O. 1999 . 'Turkman tribalism' . CentralAsian Survey , 18 ( 3 ) : 347 – 57 . see pp 347-349 and 354 (n 5);
   Google Scholar
• Geiss , P.C. 1998 . Tribal commitment and political order in Central Asia. A reconsideration' . Proceedings of ESCAS Sixth Conference . October 8-10 1998 . Edited by: Bellingeri , Giampiero . (forthcoming 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Geiss , P.C. 2001 . “ 'The problem of political order in contemporary Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan' ” . In Post Soviet Central Asia , Edited by: Gammer , Moshe . Ilford , Essex : Frank Cass . forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Poliakov , S.P. 1980 . Istoricheskaia etnografiia SredneI Azii i Kazakhstana. KhoziaSstvo-sotsial'naia organizatsiia-etnicheskaia istoriia 120 – 122 . Moscow
   Google Scholar
• Sukhareva , O. A. 1976 . Kvartal'naia obshchinapozdnefeodal 'nogo goroda Bukhary (v sviazi s istorietkvartalov) 13 – 17 . Moscow
   Google Scholar
• Rempel , L.I. 1982 . Dalekoe i blizkoe 115 – 121 . Tashkent
   Google Scholar
• Abramov , M. 1989 . Guzary Samarkanda 3 – 5 . Tashkent Zapiski P.I. Demezona, Zapiski o Bukharskom khanstve (Otchety P. I. Demezona i I. V. Vitkevicha) (Moskow, 1983 {1834}), p 57; Sukhareva, op cit, note 10, p 35;
   Google Scholar
• Mustafina , R.M. 1992 . Predstavleniia, kul'ty, obriady u Kazakhov (v kontekste bytovogo islama v iuzhnom Kazakhstane v kontse XIX-XX vv.) 29 – 30 . Almaty
   Google Scholar
• Rakhimov , R.R. 1990 . 'Muzhskie' doma v traditsionnot kul'ture Tadzhikov 27 – 37 . 100 – 101 . 108 – 111 . Leningrad
   Google Scholar
• Khanykov , N.V. 1844 . “ 'Gorodskoe upravlenie v SredneI Azii' ” . In Zhumal Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Vol. 5 , 346 – 348 . St. Petersburg
   Google Scholar
• Skrine , F.H. and Ross , E.D. 1899 . The Heart of Asia. A History of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the Earliest Times 381 London
   Google Scholar
• 1973 . The Middle East Collection New York
   Google Scholar
• Pahlen , K.K. 1910 . Sel'skoe upravlenie, russkoe i tuzemnoe (Otchet po revizii Turkestansogo kraia) 5 – 6 . St. Petersburg Sukhareva, op cit, note 10, pp 22-23; Maev, op cit, note 6, pp 276-277; Ostroumov, op cit, note 8, pp 38-39;
   Google Scholar
• Sukhareva , O. A. 1958 . Traditsionnoe sopernichestvo mezhdu chastiami gorodov v Uzbekistane (konets XIX-nachalo XX v.)' . Kratkie soobshcheniia instituta etnogrufii AN SSR (Moscow) , XXX : 121 – 129 . 128 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• Dilger , K. 1984 . “ Tendenzen der Rechtsentwicklung' ” . In Der Islam in der Gegenwart Edited by: Ende , W. and Steinbach , U. 170 – 197 . Munich Penal Islamic law includes five offences that leads to hadd-punishments : These were adultery (lino), defamation due to adultery (qadhf), consumption of alcohol (ahurb al-khamr), theft (sariqa) and highway robbery (oat'at-tariq). See
   Google Scholar
• Lomakin , A. 1897 . Obychnoe pravo Turkmen (adat) 88 Ashkhabad see pp 186-197. See also: M.B. Durdyev, 'K voprosu o sootnoshenii shariata i adata v Turkmenskom prave v kontse XIX-nachale XX v., in Turkmenistan SSR Ylymlar Akademiiasynyng khabarlary jemgyetchllik Ylymlaiyng Seriiasy-Izvestiia Akademii Nauk Turkmenskot SSR, Seriia obshchestvennykh nauk, 1969, l, pp 18-25, p20
   Google Scholar
• Khan , Cf. H.M. Fazil . 1981 . Tarikh-i-Manazili-Buhara 51 Srinagar 1813J)
   Google Scholar
• Logpfet , D.N. 1911 . Bukharskoe Khanstvo pad russkim protektoratom 2 vols , 318 – 319 . St. Petersburg I
   Google Scholar
• Logofet , D.I. 1909 . Strana bezprava. Bukharskoe khanstvo i ego sovremenhoe sostoianie 58 – 65 . St. Petersburg
   Google Scholar
• Kisliakov , N.A. 1977 . Nasledovanie i razdel imushchestva u narodov SrednetAii i Kazakhstana (XIX-nachalo XX v.) Leningrad One of the most systematic studies about hereditary law and the division of property is:
   Google Scholar
• Izraztsov , N. 1897 . Obychnoe pravo ("adat") Kirgizov semirechenskoi oblasti: semeînye soiuzy' . Etnograficheskoe obozrenie , 3 : 68 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• McChesney , R.D. 1996 . Central Asia: Foundations of Change 71 – 115 . Princeton , NJ About shrines in Central Asia and literature see:
   Google Scholar
• Eitzen , cf. H. 1998 . 'Refiguring ethnicity through Kazak genealogies' . Nationalities Papers , 26 ( 3 ) : 443 Today it is even possible to observe that descentants of khojas face difficulties of identifying with nationalities with a prevailing tribal background. For example, residents of Almaty who are descentants of khojas do not believe themselves to be Kazakhs, although they had received die status of a Kazakh nationality in Soviet times (
   Google Scholar
• Dzhabbarov , S. 1996 . Shariat, semetHoe i obychnoe pravo v Uzbekistane: istoriia i sovremennost' (opyt sotsial'no-pravovogo issledovaniia) 68 – 69 . Tashkent
   Google Scholar
• Markov , G.E. 1990 . 'Les Sociétés traditionnelles d'Asie centrale' . CdMRS , XXXI ( 2-3 ) : 397 – 402 . Soviet historians and ethnographers tend to describe the Uzbeks of the 19th century as a sedentary people (e.g. In this way they identify the Turkic speaking Sarts as Uzbeks. This identification conceals the fact that many rural Uzbeks were tribesmen rather than subjects of the emir or khan in the middle of the 19th century
   Google Scholar
• Abramzon , S.M. 1951, . 'Formy rodoplemenn oî organizatsii u kochevnikov Sredneî Azii' . Trudy Instiuta Etnografii , 14 : 132 – 156 . see p 141
   Google Scholar
• Krader , L. 1963 . Social Organization of the Mongol-Turkic Nomads 205 – 206 . 369 – 370 . The Hague He generalized from his research on the Monguors of Kansu. There he found territorially located sibs among recently settled tribesmen who had lost tribal affiliations and kept exogamy within groupings sharing common patronymics (Ibid, pp 289-293). He did not sufficiently take into consideration that it was the Chinese Empire whose basic groups of communal commitments were sibs and which acculturated tribesmen on its borderlands. (About Chinese sibs and villages see: M. Granet, Die chinesische Zivilisation. Familie-Gesellschaft-Herrschaft.
   Google Scholar
• 1988 . Von den Anfängen bis zur Kaiserzeit 19 – 40 . Frankfurt (1929J) As Kazakh and Kyrgyz tribesmen had to submit to Islamic states, commitment groups changed in a different way
   Google Scholar