Formative and summative assessment of science in English primary schools: evidence from the Primary Science Quality Mark

References

• Alexander, R. 2006. Towards Dialogic Teaching – Rethinking Classroom Talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, J. Hodgen, B. Marshall, and N. Serret. 2011. “Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning?” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18 (4): 451–469.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. 2012. “Formative Assessment and Learning.” In ASE Guide to Research in Science Education, edited by J. Oversby, 126–132. ASE: Hatfield.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and C. Harrison. 2004. Science inside the Black Box. London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the Black Box. London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: putting it into practice. Matidenhead: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, F., and L. Twist. 2013. Where Have All the Levels Gone? The Importance of a Shared Understanding of Assessment at a Time of Major Policy Change (NFER Thinks: What the Evidence Tells Us). Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., C. Collier, and A. Howe. 2012. “Assessing Scientific and Technological Enquiry Skills at Age 11 Using the E-scape System.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 22: 247–263.10.1007/s10798-011-9191-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCSF. 2010. Assessing Pupils’ Progress: A teachers’ handbook. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children and Families DCSF. 2008. The Assessment for Learning Strategy. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013a. Science–Programmes of Study for Key Stages 1–2. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2011. http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/toolsandinitiatives/cuttingburdens/b0075738/reducing-bureaucracy/progress.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2013b. Accessed June 14. http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/nationalcurriculum2014/a00225864/assessing-without-levels.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, S., and N. Serret. 2012. “Children Communicating Science.” In Primary Science: A Guide to Teaching Practice, edited by M. Dunne and A. Peacock, 11–124. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Frances. 2013. “Quality Assessment by Science Teachers: Five Focus Areas.” Science Education International 24 (2): 212–226.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., W. Harlen, L. Hayward, G. Stobart, with M. Montgomery. 2010. Developing Teacher Assessment. Maidenhead: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C., and P. Murphy. 1994. A Fair Test? Assessment, Achievement and Equity. Buckingham: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2007. Assessment of Learning. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2012. “What Research Tells us about Summative Assessment.” In ASE Guide to Research in Science Education, edited by J. Oversby, 133–141. Hatfield: ASE.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2013. Assessment and Inquiry-Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice. Trieste, Italy: Global Network of Science Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and R. Osborne. 1985. “A Model for Learning and Teaching Applied to Primary Science.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 17 (2): 133–146.10.1080/0022027850170203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., and S. Howard. 2009. Inside the Primary Black Box. London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, C., and K. Pyle. 2010. A Literature Review of Assessment for Learning in Science. Slough: Nfer.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, A., D. Davies, K. McMahon, L. Towler, C. Collier, and T. Scott. 2009. Science 5–11: A Guide for Teachers. 2nd ed. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., and D. Stead, eds. 2013. Enhancing Primary Science. Maidenhead: OUP, McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, W., and M. James. 2009. Assessment in schools: fit for purpose? London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Mawby, T., and M. Dunne. 2012. “Planning for Assessment for Learning.” In (2012) Primary Science: A Guide to Teaching Practice, edited by M. Dunne and A. Peacock, 137–151. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, S., and B. Keogh. 2000. Concept Cartoons in Science Educatio. Sandbach: Millgate House.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. 2009. “The Reliability of Results from National Curriculum Testing in England.” Educational Research 51 (2): 181–212.10.1080/00131880902891404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffield Foundation. 2012. Developing Policy, Principles and Practice in Primary School Science Assessment. London: Nuffield.
   Google Scholar
• Ollerenshaw, C., and R. Ritchie. 1997. Primary Science: Making It Work. 2nd ed. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., and W. Harlen. 1990. Assessing Science in the Primary Classroom: Practical Tasks. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. 2011. “Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18 (4): 433–449.10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., with S. Marshall, A. Farley and L. Harriss. 2013. Primary Science Quality Mark: Learning from Good Practice in Primary Science. London: Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2003. “National Curriculum Assessment: How to Make It Better.” Research Papers in Education 18 (2): 129–136.10.1080/0267152032000081896
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. Embedded Formative Assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., and P. Black. 1996. “Meaning and Consequences: A Basis for Distinguishing Formative and Summative Functions of Assessment?” British Educational Research Journal 22 (5): 537; 12.10.1080/0141192960220502
   Google Scholar